1992 Ford Ranger problems
The Ford Ranger is a compact or mid-size pickup marketed globally by Ford over a series of generations, varying between both in-house or outside development and manufacturing — and with a hiatus in North America from 2011–2018.
Debuting as a compact pickup in North America in 1982 for the 1983 model year, the Ranger was later introduced in some South American countries. From 1998 to 2011, the Ranger nameplate was used for models developed by Mazda for sale outside the North American market. In 2011, Ford introduced the first Ranger based on the T6 platform. Considered a mid-size pickup truck, the model was developed in-house by Ford Australia. In that same year, the North American-market Ranger was discontinued, leaving the T6 platform-based Ranger as the sole Ranger model worldwide.
For the 2019 model year, the Ranger was reintroduced in North America using the globally-marketed T6 model. It is manufactured at the Michigan Assembly Plant at Wayne, Michigan. The Ranger is smaller than the F-150 and larger than the Maverick in the Ford North American pickup truck range, while for markets outside the Americas it is typically the only Ford pickup offered for sale.
The second generation of the T6-based Ranger was released in 2021 for worldwide markets, using a revised T6 platform.
Social links
Common 1992 Ford Ranger problems
The Ford Ranger, produced in 1992, has been reported to have several common problems based on complaints from owners. These issues include engine problems, electrical system drawbacks, transmission issues, brake failures, and other minor problems.
- Electric System Drawbacks: A malfunctioning electrical system is one of the car complaints raised by many Ford Ranger car buyers. Dimming light indicates low system voltage, lousy wiring harness, and malfunctioning alternator belts. Other electrical issues noted in the car research report are faulty spark plugs, blown out fuses, and short-circuiting.
- Transmission Issues: Transmission failure is another primary concern raised by Ford Ranger drivers. Transmission slipping is one of the common occurrences and can be realized when gears delay to engage or shift for no reason. Rough shifting, idling, or transmission warning lights are indicators that your car requires professional diagnoses. The cost to fix transmission problems is usually high. The best solution is to take your automotive to a Ford dealership during safety recalls to get the service at a lower repair.
- Brake Failures: The 1994 Ford Ranger buyers guide indicates emergency brake’s tendency to fail to work with the Range models.
- Minor Problems: Other minor problems include interior/exterior lights problems, body paint issues, and airbags, and seat belts problems. Though the minor problems raise no vehicle safety issues, having them fixed can boost your confidence and peace of mind.
These common problems with the Ford Ranger 1992 are based on complaints from owners of this car. Regular maintenance and servicing can help prevent or early identify these issues, ensuring the vehicle's longevity and safety.
What year did Ford Ranger have problems?
Ford Ranger recent recalls
| Affected model dates | Issue |
|---|---|
| 01/09/18 - 31/05/19 | Heavy loading could cause the rear differential to fail |
| 01/12/16 - 28/02/19 | Rear silencer may detach from the exhaust pipe creating an accident risk |
| 01/01/04-31/12/06 | Gas generator on front airbag may be defective which could cause uncontrolled inflation |
Are 90s Ford Rangers reliable?
The average rating is a 3.9 out of 5 stars. The 1990 Ford Ranger Reliability Rating is 3.5 out of 5. It ranks 21st out of 32 for all car brands.
What is the most common problem with the Ford Ranger?
Common engine problems on a Ford Ranger include a turbo failure and engine crank damage which causes excessive overheating, dark smoke from the exhaust, and a dip in fuel economy. Engine problems can land your car in serious trouble. Thus, it is always better to consult a mechanic right after you've spotted any faults.
What year Ranger is the most reliable?
Q: What are the most dependable model years for a used Ford Ranger? A: If you're in the market for a reliable pre-owned Ford Ranger, consider the following model years: 1998, 2007, 2009, 2010, 2020, 2021, and 2022. These years have proven sturdy and durable, and they are ready to hit the road with minimal issues.
What is the common problem of Ford Ranger?
Intermittent crankshaft sensor failure is a common problem with a Ford Ranger. A dip in fuel efficiency, engine misfires, and sluggish acceleration are some of the aftermaths of a faulty crankshaft sensor. There is also a possibility that your Ranger won't start due to a faulty crankshaft sensor.
What year did Ford Ranger have problems?
Ford Ranger recent recalls
| Affected model dates | Issue |
|---|---|
| 01/09/18 - 31/05/19 | Heavy loading could cause the rear differential to fail |
| 01/12/16 - 28/02/19 | Rear silencer may detach from the exhaust pipe creating an accident risk |
| 01/01/04-31/12/06 | Gas generator on front airbag may be defective which could cause uncontrolled inflation |
What is the best years for Ford Ranger to avoid?
A: Yes, some Ford Ranger model years have proven less reliable than others. It's best to avoid the following years: 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2008, 2011, and 2019. These years have been subject to numerous customer complaints and issues.
What year model Ford Ranger is best?
Before diving deep into configurations and trims, here are the overall 5 best used Ford Ranger model years to buy used.
- 2009 Ford Ranger. The 2009 Ford Ranger stands against the test of time even over a decade later. ...
- 2010 Ford Ranger. ...
- 2020 Ford Ranger. ...
- 2021 Ford Ranger. ...
- 2022 Ford Ranger.
1992 Ford Ranger car problems categorized by type of issue
After analyzing all complaints sent to the NHTSA and researching popular Ford Ranger problems, we found that the most common problems with these 2023 model year vehicles are:
- Electrical system problems
- Suspension problems
- Visibility problems
- Service brakes problems
- Hydraulic problems
The graph below shows statistics for all 1992 Ford Ranger vehicle components and the number of complaints received.
Latest 25 complaints 1992 Ford Ranger
The NHTSA has received 209 complaints about various vehicle components related to the 1992 Ford Ranger. Below are the 25 most recent complaints reported for 1992 Ford Ranger vehicles.
ENGINE PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2015-07-22
- VIN: 1FTCR10U3NT
- Components: ENGINE
- Summary: OIL PRESSURE SUDDENLY WENT TO ZERO.ENGINE BEGAN TO CLATTER.I RETURNED HOME.
ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING,VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2011-09-02
- VIN: 1FTCR15X0NT
- Components: ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING,VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL
- Summary: WHEN VEHICLE STARTED IN NEUTRAL, IT WAS PUT IN REVERSE AND THROTTLE WENT TO FLOOR WITHOUT ANYONE TOUCHING IT, VEHICLE TOOK OFF IN REVERSE , FRONT WHEEL HIT BUILDING BENDING AXLE AND OTHER COMPONENTS THIS HAPPENED ABOUT 30 DAYS PRIOR WITHOUT ANY DAMAGE. *TR
SUSPENSION PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2010-09-02
- Crash: 1
- Components: SUSPENSION
- Summary: I HAVE A 1992 FORD RANGER THE PASSENGER SIDE SPRING TOWER MOUNT IS COMPLETELY RUSTED AND THE FRONT SHOCK AND SPRING HAVE DROPPED MAKING THE TRUCK UNSAFE TO DRIVE THE BRAKE LINE WAS SMASHED WHEN IT GAVE WAY. MY BOYFRIEND ALSO HAD A 1992 FORD RANGER THAT THIS HAPPENED TO CAUSING HIM TO WRECK AND TOTAL THE TRUCK SO WE HAD TO JUNK IT. I WISH I WOULD HAVE KNOWN IT WAS A COMMON THING FOR THE 1992'S ONLY ON THE PASSENGER SIDE. IT MUST BE PRETTY COMMON AS FORD HAS MADE A REPLACEMENT PART!!!! *TR
VISIBILITY PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2009-01-12
- Components: VISIBILITY
- Summary: TRUCK WAS WARMING UP WITH ME IN IT AROUND JANUARY. I WENT TO OPEN THE DOOR FROM THE INSIDE, THEIR WAS NO RESPONSE AND WAS STUCK IN TRUCK. EVENTUALLY, I WAS ABLE TO GET OUT OF THE REAR SLIDING WINDOW. I WAS AND AM NEVER ABLE TO USE MY PASSENGER DOOR AGAIN, FROM THE INSIDE OR OUTSIDE. *TR
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2009-01-26
- Fire: 1
- VIN: 1FTCR14X6NT
- Components: ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
- Summary: WHILE DRIVING HOME FROM MY COAST GUARD DUTY MY TRUCK STARTED TO FILL WITH SMOKE. I PULLED OVER AND LOOKED IN MY DASH AGAINST THE STEERING COLUMN AND SAW FLAMES COMING OUT. IT WAS A TOTAL LOSS ENGULFING MY TRUCK IN FLAMES. *TR
FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2008-06-25
- VIN: 1FTCR14U6NP
- Components: FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE
- Summary: JUST THIS PAST TWO WEEKS, WE TRADED TRUCKS. WE RECEIVED A 1992 FORD RANGER. DURING THE SMOG TEST IT WAS DISCOVERED THAT THE FUEL FILLER NECK WAS CRACKED AND REQUIRED REPLACEMENT. THE PART COST $241 , LABOR $175 WHICH WAS A COSTLY SMOG CHECK. WE HAVE FOUND OUT THAT THIS TYPE OF REPAIR IS VERY COMMON IN FORD RANGERS, ESPECIALLY THE OLDER ONES. THE FORD CO. HAS NOW REDESIGNED THE PART, AND THERE HAS BEEN NO RECALL OR OFFER OF HELP TO THE PEOPLE WHO HAVE THE POORLY DESIGNED FUEL FILLER NECK. YOU ASKED HOW OFTEN THIS OCCURS - QUITE OFTEN - THE TWO TIMES I WAS IN THE OFFICE OF THE REPAIR SHOP, I ENCOUNTERED 3 OTHER CUSTOMERS THAT WERE IN THERE FOR THE SAME REASON !! I WOULD SAY THAT IS TOO OFTEN. AND, I WOULD LIKE TO ASK THE FORD CO TO REPLACE THE POORLY DESIGNED FUEL FILLER NECKS AND PAY FOR THE LABOR INVOLVED. ADDITIONALLY, I THINK THAT THIS INFORMATION NEEDS TO BE MADE KNOWN TO THE PUBLIC, SO THAT THEY WILL NOT BE DRIVING AROUND WITH A POTENTIALLY HAZARDOUS FUEL VAPOR LEAK, AND THAT THEY CAN GET SOME FINANCIAL HELP WHEN IT IS TIME TO SMOG THEIR TRUCK AND THIS PROBLEM IS DISCOVERED. CAROLYN NEUMAN *TR
TIRES PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2007-08-20
- VIN: 1FTCR14U4NP
- Components: TIRES
- Summary: TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 1992 FORD RANGER. THE VEHICLE HAS FUTURA GLS SUPER SPORT, SIZE P225/60R15 TIRES. THE FRONT DRIVER SIDE TIRE HAD TREAD SEPARATION. THE TIRE WAS ALSO BUBBLING, SPLITTING, AND HAD CRACKS ON THE SIDE. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE TIRES BOUNCED AND SQUEAKED MORE WHILE DRIVING GREATER THAN 40 MPH. THE OTHER THREE TIRES ON THE VEHICLE WERE EXPERIENCING THE SAME FAILURE, BUT THE FRONT DRIVER SIDE TIRE WAS THE WORST. THE PURCHASE DATE WAS UNKNOWN. THE TIRE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 15,000. THE VEHICLE CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 145,415 AND FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 142,415.
SUSPENSION PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2007-05-29
- VIN: 1FTCR10A3NT
- Components: SUSPENSION
- Summary: OVER THE COURSE OF ABOUT TWO DAYS, I NOTICED A SCRAPING NOISE COMING FROM THE RIGHT FRONT WHEEL. ON THE SECOND DAY, I NOTICED UPON APPROACHING THE TRUCK THAT THE RIGHT FRONT FENDER WAS ALMOST TOUCHING THE TIRE. REMOVING THE WHEEL, I DISCOVERED THAT THE UPPER SPRING SEAT HAD DETERIORATED TO THE POINT THAT THE COIL SPRING WAS THIRTY DEGREES FROM ITS ORIGINAL POSITION. THE SHEET METAL IN THE SEAT CRUMBLED IN MY HAND WHEN I TOOK HOLD OF IT, AND THE HOUSING WAS TORN 75% OF THE WAY THROUGH FROM FRONT TO BACK. AT HIGH SPEED, THIS VEHICLE WOULD HAVE BEEN A DEATH TRAP. I NOTE 15 SIMILAR COMPLAINTS IN YOUR DATABASE. LEFT SIDE SPRING SEAT IS PERFECT AND INTACT. *TR
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2006-11-16
- Fire: 1
- VIN: 1FTCR10A1NP
- Components: ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
- Summary: DT*: THE CONTACT STATED WHILE DRIVING 5 MPH THROUGH AN ALLEYWAY, A FIRE ERUPTED FROM UNDERNEATH THE LEFT FRONT DRIVER SIDE DASH PANEL AREA WITHOUT WARNING. THE FIRE DEPARTMENT WAS ALERTED, AND EXTINGUISHED THE FIRE. THE VEHICLE SUSTAINED MODERATE FIRE DAMAGE; AN INSURANCE ADJUSTOR DEEMED THE VEHICLE TOTALED. THE POLICE WERE ALERTED, AND A REPORT WAS TAKEN. THE FIRE DEPARTMENT INSPECTED THE VEHICLE, AND DETERMINED THE FIRE WAS ELECTRICAL IN NATURE. THE MANUFACTURER WAS ALERTED.
ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2006-11-01
- VIN: 1FTCR10AXNT
- Components: ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING
- Summary: TRUCK OIL PRESSURE SUDDENLY DROPPED VERY LOW. TRUCK BEGAN MAKING KNOCKING SOUND COMING FROM ENGINE HEAD AREA. DISASSEMBLY OF OIL PAN, OIL PUMP, AND OIL PUMP TUBE SCREEN REVEALED COMPLETE BLOCKAGE OF SCREEN FROM OIL PAN GASKET MATERIAL. *NM
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM,VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2006-06-06
- Fire: 1
- VIN: 1FTCR10U3NU
- Components: ELECTRICAL SYSTEM,VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL
- Summary: MY 1992 FORD RANGER SPONTANEOUSLY COMBUSTED ON THE MORNING OF JUNE 6, 2006. THE CRUISE CONTROL WENT OUT UNEXPECTEDLY AND WOULDN'T START. I LEFT IT OVERNIGHT AND RECEIVED A PHONE CALL FROM THE POLICE AT 5 A.M IN THE MORNING SAYING MY TRUCK WAS ON FIRE. APPARENTLY IT HAD CAUGHT FIRE (WHILE IT WAS OFF) AND COMPLETELY TOTALED THE ENTIRE VEHICLE, LEAVING ME AT A COMPLETE LOSS (INSURANCE DID NOT COVER THIS TYPE OF CLAIM). BEING A 19 YEAR OLD IN COLLEGE THIS CAME AS A COMPLETE NIGHTMARE FINANCIALLY. FORD HAS REFUSED TO DO ANYTHING ABOUT IT. I WILL NEVER DRIVE A FORD AGAIN. VEHICLE WAS TOWED TO A NEARBY JUNKYARD, WHERE THE BRAND NEW 1,000 CLUTCH AND NEW TIRES WERE REMOVED AND SOLD FOR SOMEONE ELSE'S PROFIT. I GOT NOTHING. *NM
VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2005-02-11
- Number Of Injuries: 1
- Crash: 1
- VIN: 1FTCR14U5NP
- Components: VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL
- Summary: THE CONSUMER WAS PULLING OUT OF A DRIVEWAY WHEN ALL OF A SUDDEN HE EXPERIENCED SUDDEN ACCELERATION, AND CRASHED INTO TWO OTHER VEHICLES AND A BRICK WALL. *AK *NM *SC *JB
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2004-10-18
- VIN: 1FTCR14U1NP
- Components: ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
- Summary: THE STARTER SOLENOID CLIP CONNECTOR FAILED. AS A RESULT, THE VEHICLE WILL NOT START UP AGAIN UNTIL PART IS REPLACED. PLEASE PROVIDE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. *JB
TIRES PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2003-11-11
- VIN: 1FTCR14U5NP
- Components: TIRES
- Summary: WHILE DRIVING AT 70MPH, MY REAR TIRE CAME APART AND TOTALLED THE BED OF MY TRUCK AND BROKE THE BRAKE LINE AND NEARLY CAUSED A ROLLOVER. THIS WAS THE FOURTH OF THE SET OF TIRES TO COME APART OR DEVELOP A BUBBLE.
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2003-10-06
- Fire: 1
- VIN: 1FTCR15X4NP
- Components: ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
- Summary: 1992 FORD RANGER HAD FIRE IN IGNITION WIRING HARNESS, BELOW DASH AND MOUNTED TO STEERING COLUMN. *LA
SEATS PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2003-09-15
- VIN: 1FTCR14X8NP
- Components: SEATS
- Summary: RIGHT FRONT UPPER SPRING SEAT BRACKET (PART NO. 5A318) HAS PREMATURELY RUSTED THROUGH ALLOWING BODY TO DROP ONTO FRONT TIRE. IT APPEARS AS THOUGH A THICK PLASTIC COATING ON THE PART ALLOWED MOISTURE TO BE TRAPPED CAUSING PREMATURE RUSTING. UPPER PART OF SPRING SEAT BRACKET PUSHED THROUGH FENDER LINER INTO ENGINE COMPARTMENT. IN VIEWING THE COMPLAINTS FOR THIS MODEL YEAR TRUCK THERE APPEAR TO BE NUMEROUS SIMILAR EVENTS ON THE APPARENT DEFECTIVE RIGHT FRONT UPPER SPRING SEAT BRACKET. *JB
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2003-09-02
- Fire: 1
- VIN: 1FTCR15X7NP
- Components: ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
- Summary: WHILE DRIVING AND/OR IDLING SMOKE COMES FROM BOTH THE STEERING COLUMN AND UNDER THE HOOD. NO FIRES AS OF YET BUT I WOULD LIKE TO HAVE THE PROBLEM RESOLVED BEFORE THE TRUCK BURNS DOWN.*AK
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2003-07-04
- Fire: 1
- VIN: 1FTCR15X7NP
- Components: ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
- Summary: IGNITION SWITCH CAUGHT ON FIRE WHILE DRIVING. *AK
STRUCTURE PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 1998-01-01
- Components: STRUCTURE
- Summary: INSIDE DOOR HANDLE NO LONGER WORKS DUE TO A BROKEN CABLE LINKAGE DURING COLD WEATHER. FORD SAYS MY VIN IS NOT PART OF THE RECALL GROUP. OTHER PEOPLE THAT HAVE HAD THE RECALL PERFORMED HAVE HAD THE SAME PROBLEM OCCUR AGAIN. IF MY VEHICLE IS NOT PART OF THE RECALL GROUP IT WOULD MEAN THAT IT HAS THE UPDATED CABLE, YET THIS "UPDATED" CABLE ALSO HAS A HISTORY OF BREAKING. WHY NOT A RECALL ON THE UPDATED CABLE THAT WAS SUPPOSED TO FIX THE PROBLEM AND DIDN'T? *JB
LATCHES/LOCKS/LINKAGES PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2003-06-17
- VIN: 1FTCR14U3NP
- Components: LATCHES/LOCKS/LINKAGES
- Summary: DRIVER SIDE DOOR HANDLE SNAPPED OFF FROM THE INSIDE CABLE. WHILE OPENING THE DOOR TO THE VEHICLE. *AK
SUSPENSION,STRUCTURE PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2003-05-14
- VIN: 1FTCR10A4NU
- Components: SUSPENSION,STRUCTURE
- Summary: I OWN 92 FORD RANGER. LAST THURSDAY,5/15/2003, WHILE DRIVING TO WORK I NOTICED MY PASSENGER SIDE FRONT LOWER THAN THE REST OF THE TRUCK. AFTER I PARKED AT WORK I INVESTIGATED AND NOTICED THAT THE SHOCK/SPRING TOWER WAS RUSTED SO BAD THAT IT WAS ALMOST READY TO FALL OFF. THE SPRING WAS BENT BACKWARDS AND THE SHOCK WAS BROKEN AT THE BOTTOM. AT THE FORD DEALER, THE MECHANIC SAID HE HAD NEVER SEEN ANYTHING LIKE THAT. HE ALSO TOLD ME THAT THEY ONLY MAKE THAT PART FOR THE RIGHT SIDE? THE LEFT SIDE LOOKS LIKE BRAND NEW. APPARENTLY ONLY THE RIGHT ( PASSENGER ) SIDE RUSTS OUT AND NOT THE LEFT. IT SEEMS THAT METAL IS INFERIOR AND CAN CAUSE A SERIOUS ACCIDENT. FORD MUST KNOW ABOUT THIS PROBLEM BECAUSE THEY ONLY MAKE THE PART FOR ONE SIDE AND NOT THE OTHER. I CAN'T FIND ANY RECALL INFO ON THIS. BESIDES THE $800.00 COST TO REPAIR, THIS CAN CAUSE A SERIOUS ACCIDENT. *NLM
WHEELS PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2024-11-24
- Components: WHEELS
- Summary: THE RIGHT FRONT WHEEL SEPARATED FROM THE VEHICLE. *JB
SUSPENSION PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2003-05-19
- VIN: PROVIDE
- Components: SUSPENSION
- Summary: WHILE DRIVING THE LEFT LEAF SPRING AND SHOCK ABSORBER FELL APART DUE TO RUSTED MOUNT ATTACHMENTS. *NLM
SEATS PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2003-05-09
- VIN: 1FTCR14X6NP
- Components: SEATS
- Summary: WHILE DRIVING MY 1992 FORD RANGER XLT PICK-UP TRUCK THE DRIVERS SEAT MECHANISM WITHOUT WARNING OR ANY ACTION TO INITIATE THE FAILURE EMITTED A NOISE AND SUDDENLY FAILED. MY TORSO IMMEDIATELY FELL BACKWARDS AS THE DRIVERS SEAT RECLINED COMPLETELY. FORTUNATELY I WAS ABLE TO CONTROL THE VEHICLE AND AVOID ANY ACCIDENT, COLLISION OR INJURY SAVE FOR A BIT OF A STRAIN ON MY ABDOMINAL MUSCLES WHICH WAS NOT SERIOUS. THE SEAT WILL NOT RETURN AND STAY IN THE UPRIGHT POSITION NOR WILL IT LATCH DOWN SECURELY (TO PREVENT FROM SLIDING FORWARDS AND BACKWARDS). THE FAILURE HAS RENDERED THE VEHICLE UNUSABLE WITHOUT REPAIR OR REPLACEMENT OF THE DRIVERS SEAT. I AM CONCERNED THAT SHOULD THE FAILURE HAVE OCCURRED AT ANY OTHER TIME I MIGHT NOT HAVE BEEN ABLE TO CONTROL THE VEHICLE AND SERIOUS INJURY OR DAMAGE COULD HAVE OCCURRED. IF THIS EVENT CAN HAPPEN IN OTHER SUCH VEHICLES OWNERS SHOULD BE WARNED TO INSPECT THIS MECHANISM FOR WEAR OR WHATEVER CAUSED IT TO FAIL. ALSO I AM RELUCTANT TO HAVE IT REPAIRED BY REPLACING IT WITH A USED SEAT SINCE A USED PART MAY BE JUST AS UNRELIABLE. I UNDERSTAND THAT NEW PARTS ARE NO LONGER AVAILABLE FROM FORD IN ORDER TO REPLACE THE INOPERATIVE DRIVERS SEAT. *JB
WHEELS PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2003-04-22
- VIN: 1FPCR14U4NP
- Components: WHEELS
- Summary: THE PASSENGER SIDE WHEEL WAS RUSTED. *JB
1992 Ford Ranger recalls
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has issued 6 recalls for different components of the 1992 Ford Ranger.
- Manufacturer: PRO-A MOTORS, INC.
- Components: EXTERIOR LIGHTING
- Summary: CERTAIN PRO-A MOTORS CORNER LAMPS, TURN SIGNALS, AND HEADLIGHTS SOLD AS REPLACEMENT LAMPS FOR USE ON CERTAIN PASSENGER VEHICLES LISTED ABOVE. SOME COMBINATION LAMPS THAT ARE NOT EQUIPPED WITH AMBER SIDE REFLECTORS FAIL TO CONFORM TO FEDERAL MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY STANDARD NO. 108, LAMPS, REFLECTIVE DEVICES, AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT.
- Consequence: WITHOUT THE AMBER REFLECTORS, THE VEHICLE WILL BE POORLY ILLUMINATED, POSSIBLY RESULTING IN A VEHICLE CRASH WITHOUT WARNING.
- Remedy: PRO-A MOTORS WILL NOTIFY OWNERS AND OFFER TO REPURCHASE THE LAMPS. THE RECALL BEGAN ON APRIL 3, 2006. OWNERS MAY CONTACT PRO-A MOTORS AT 323-838-2988.
- Manufacturer: FORD MOTOR COMPANY
- Components: TIRES:TREAD/BELT
- Summary: THIS IS NOT A SAFETY RECALL IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SAFETY ACT. HOWEVER, IT IS DEEMED A SAFETY IMPROVEMENT CAMPAIGN BY THE AGENCY. EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION: FORD IS REPLACING ALL FIRESTONE WILDERNESS AT 15, 16, AND 17 INCH TIRES MOUNTED ON FORD TRUCKS AND SUVS. FORD REPORTS TREAD SEPARATION CAN OCCUR DUE TO A COMBINATION OF THE SENSITIVITY OF THE TIRE DESIGN TO STRESS, AGING, AND MANUFACTURING DIFFERENCES BETWEEN PLANTS. FORD IS REPLACING THESE TIRES TO PREVENT POSSIBLE PREMATURE TIRE FAILURE. VEHICLE DESCRIPTION: THE VEHICLES LISTED BELOW MAY HAVE BEEN ORIGINALLY EQUIPPED WITH FIRESTONE WILDERNESS AT TIRES OR MAY HAVE HAD WILDERNESS AT TIRES INSTALLED DURING THE FIRESTONE RECALL LAUNCHED IN AUGUST 2000. CERTAIN 1991 THROUGHT 2002 FORD EXPLORER CERTAIN 2001 THROUGHT 2002 EXPLORER SPORT, AND SPORT TRAC CERTAIN 1997 THROUGH 2002 MERCURY MOUNTAINEER CERTAIN 1991 THROUGH 2001 RANGER CERTAIN 1999 THROUGH 2001 EXPEDITION CERTAIN 1991 THROUGH 1994, AND 1997 MODEL YEAR F-SERIES CERTAIN 1991 THROUGH 1994 BRONCO NOTE: BOTH ORIGINAL EQUIPMENT AND REPLACEMENT TIRES ARE AFFECTED.
- Consequence: SHOULD THE TREAD SEPARATE AT HIGHWAY SPEEDS, A VEHICLE CRASH COULD OCCUR, POSSIBLY RESULTING IN PERSONAL INJURY OR DEATH.
- Remedy: THE REPLACEMENT/REIMBURSEMENT PROGRAM FOR THIS CAMPAIGN EXPIRED ON MARCH 31, 2002. HOWEVER, CUSTOMERS CAN CONTACT FORD AT 1-877-917-3673 OR GO ON-LINE TO WWW.FORD.COM FOR POSSIBLE ASSISTANCE.
- Manufacturer: BRIDGESTONE/FIRESTONE, INC.
- Components: TIRES:TREAD/BELT
- Summary: TIRE DESCRIPTION: FIRESTONE WILDERNESS AT, SIZE P235/75R15, PRODUCED AT THE DECATUR, ILLINOIS TIRE PLANT AND ALL FIRESTONE RADIAL ATX AND RADIAL ATX II TIRES, SIZE P235/75R15. OPERATION OF THESE TIRES AT LOW INFLATION PRESSURES, HIGH SPEED, AND IN HOT WEATHER, CAN CONTRIBUTE TO SEPARATION OF THE TIRE TREAD.
- Consequence: IF THE TREAD SEPARATES FROM THE TIRE, THE DRIVER CAN LOSE CONTROL OF THE VEHICLE, POSSIBLY RESULTING IN A CRASH CAUSING INJURY OR DEATH.
- Remedy: THE REPLACEMENT/REIMBURSEMENT PROGRAM FOR THIS CAMPAIGN EXPIRED ON AUGUST 29, 2001. HOWEVER, CUSTOMERS SHOULD CONTACT FIRESTONE CUSTOMER SERVICE AT 1-800-465-1904 FOR POSSIBLE ASSISTANCE.
- Manufacturer: AIMCO PRODUCTS INC.
- Components: SERVICE BRAKES, AIR:DISC:ROTOR
- Summary: EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION: AFTERMARKET BRAKE ROTORS FOR USE ON CERTAIN FORD AND MAZDA TRUCKS. CRACKED CASTINGS CAUSED CRACKS TO APPEAR ON THE OUTER DIAMETER OF THE ROTOR HAT OR AROUND THE STUD HOLE.
- Consequence: LOSS OF BRAKING CAN RESULT.
- Remedy: AIMCO WILL REIMBURSE CONSUMERS/INSTALLERS FOR THE COST OF REPLACEMENT ROTORS AND INSTALLATION. CONSUMERS ARE REQUESTED TO RETURN TO THE LOCATION WHERE THE ROTORS WERE ORIGINALLY PURCHASED/INSTALLED FOR REPLACEMENT.
- Manufacturer: FORD MOTOR COMPANY
- Components: SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC:POWER ASSIST:HYDRAULIC
- Summary: THE STUDS WHICH ATTACH THE BRAKE MASTER CYLINDER TO THE POWER BRAKE VACUUM BOOSTER ASSEMBLY CAN DEVELOP STRESS CORROSION CRACKING AFTER BEING OPERATED FOR AN EXTENDED PERIOD OF TIME IN THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA LOCATION.
- Consequence: IF A CRACK OCCURS, IT COULD RESULT IN ONE OR BOTH STUDS FRACTURING. THE MASTER CYLINDER COULD THEN SEPARATE FROM THE VACUUM BOOSTER, WHEN THE BRAKES ARE APPLIED, PREVENTING THE SERVICE BRAKES FROM ACTIVATING INCREASING THE RISK OF A VEHICLE ACCIDENT.
- Remedy: DEALERS WILL REPLACE THE POWER BRAKE VACUUM BOOSTER ASSEMBLY.
- Manufacturer: FORD MOTOR COMPANY
- Components: STRUCTURE:BODY:DOOR
- Summary: WATER CAN ENTER THE DOOR LATCH RELEASE CABLE. IF THE VEHICLE IS OPERATED IN BELOW FREEZING TEMPERATURES, THE WATER IN THE DOOR LATCH RELEASE CABLE CAN FREEZE AND CAUSE THE LATCH MECHANISM TO MALFUNCTION.
- Consequence: THE MALFUNCTION OF THE DOOR LATCH RELEASE CAN RESULT INTHREE DIFFERENT PROBLEMS: 1) THE DOOR WILL NOT BE ABLE TO BE RELATCHED, 2) THEINSIDE DOOR HANDLE CAN BECOME INOPERATIVE, AND 3) THE DOOR COULD APPEAR TO BELATCHED WHEN IT IS NOT, ALLOWING THE DOOR TO OPEN UNEXPECTEDLY IF IT IS JARRED,AND INCREASING THE RISK OF INJURY TO THE ADJACENT SEAT OCCUPANT.
- Remedy: REVISED DOOR RELEASE CABLES AND WATER SHIELDS WILL BE INSTALLED.
Negative 1992 Ford Ranger car reviews
Positive 1992 Ford Ranger car reviews
-
Hi there! I hope you're doing well. I just wanted to share some information about my truck with you. I bought it new and have been taking great care of it with frequent oil changes. It's been a reliable vehicle, with no repairs needed until 103,000 miles when I replaced the brakes. Recently, at 135,000 miles, I decided to do some maintenance and put in a new clutch, replaced the timing belt and water pump. I'm happy to report that the engine compression is still perfect! This 4-cylinder truck has done a lot of long-distance traveling and still averages 22 mpg. Thanks for taking the time to read about my truck!
-
This little truck has been amazing! Despite all the abuse I've put it through, it still runs like a dream. The A/C is still as good as new, although the gas mileage could be better. The body is starting to show some wear and tear, but overall, I absolutely love this truck. It's going to be tough to say goodbye when it finally goes to the Ford graveyard.
-
I love my ranger.
-
Hi there! I hope you're doing well. I just wanted to share my experience with my truck. I've had to replace the starter twice in the past two months, but the mechanic finally figured out that the cables were the issue. Despite that, it's generally a dependable truck. However, I do wish it had cup holders - that's a major drawback for me. Also, it's a little slow to start when running the air conditioner. Lastly, I found that replacing the outside door mirrors can be quite expensive. If you're having starter problems, I recommend replacing the cables as well. Take care!
-
The manual transmission on my vehicle failed due to a slowly leaking rubber boot that caused a loss of transmission oil. It is important to regularly check your transmission oil to prevent such issues. However, the 3L engine is highly reliable and powerful, requiring only regular maintenance. It is recommended to only install OEM fuel pumps and avoid aftermarket ones. If necessary, consider cutting through the bed or removing it to access the pump.
Additional sources
More sources of information about 1992 Ford Ranger problems:
1992 Ford Ranger Problems and Complaints - 8 Issues
Problem with your 1992 Ford Ranger? Our list of 8 known complaints reported by owners can help you fix your 1992 Ford Ranger.
1992 Ford Ranger Engine Issues - Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums
May 3, 2018 ... EDIT: This vehicle has a "return" fuel system, such that there is a return line for unused fuel to flow from the FPR back to the fuel tank, so ...
1992 Ford Ranger Repair: Service and Maintenance Cost
Most Common 1992 Ford Ranger Problems ... The engine may misfire and/or buck while driving at freeway speeds with no fault code stored in the powertrain...
1992 Ford 5-Speed Transmission Issues | The Ranger Station
While there are no common problems with this transmission running low on oil will cause input gear failure. 4th gear doesn't use input gear, the ...
Common Problems with Ford 2.9 V6 | Q&A on 1988 Ford Ranger ...
Aug 30, 2014 ... 1988 Ford RANGER 2.9 V6 - will not start unless you use an aid. After starting will run perfect. What can be the - Answered by a verified ...
Other years of Ford Ranger
Are you having problems with your 1992 Ford Ranger?
Keshaun Smith 2024-09-16
The transmission has gone out three times. I would recommend not buying one.
Hank Bogan 2024-08-19
Hi there! Overall, your truck has been pretty good. However, there have been a few issues that have come up. For example, the passenger window burst while it was still under warranty, and the oil pan gasket slipped and needed to be replaced. Additionally, the rear brakes exploded (possibly due to a spring issue), but it was an easy fix. Unfortunately, the door pillar is rusting at the base, and the fuel gauge isn't working properly. On the bright side, the original tires lasted a long time! Just be careful not to use the spare as a permanent tire since the carrier cut into the side of it.
Joesph Bailey 2024-07-29
1. The oil pan had been dropped and a new gasket was installed, but unfortunately excess gasket sealant was used which was sucked up into the oil pump. This resulted in the need for a new engine at approximately 10,000 miles. 2. There was a repair and repaint of a one square foot area, but unfortunately the paint did not match, causing an eyesore. 3. The big 4-cylinder engine unfortunately lacks sufficient power, making it unsafe for passing.
Adolfo Waters 2024-07-02
I hope you're doing well! I just wanted to share my experience with my Ranger. I bought it at 92000 miles and have driven it to 130300 miles. So far, I've only had to fix a small problem with the fan and an exhaust leak at the muffler. However, at 129000 miles, the manual shifter is getting stiff. Overall, I've had a great experience with my Ranger and I'm looking forward to potentially buying my 4th one. I hope the newer models are just as good!
Darius Hegmann 2024-02-19
This truck has been great! While the paint may chip and it may struggle on hills, it's the perfect vehicle for commuting.