2004 Chevrolet Colorado problems
The Chevrolet Colorado (sharing mechanical commonality with the GMC Canyon), is a series of compact pickup trucks (mid-size since second generation) marketed by American automaker General Motors. They were introduced in 2004 to replace the Chevrolet S-10 and GMC S-15/Sonoma compact pickups. The Colorado is named after the U.S. state of Colorado, while the Canyon would be the deep chasm between cliffs.
First generation (2004)
The Chevrolet Colorado and its twin, the GMC Canyon were jointly designed by GM's North American operations, GM's Brazil operations, and Isuzu, which began selling its own version worldwide in 2002. In late 2005, Isuzu offered a version in North America called the Isuzu i-series. This North American model Isuzu shared North American powertrains, styling, and equipment with the Colorado/Canyon twins and differed from Isuzu's worldwide offering. All Chevrolet, GMC, and Isuzu versions worldwide are based on the GMT355, itself the basis for the GMT 345-based Hummer H3. Most vehicles for markets outside North America are manufactured at a GM plant in Rayong, Thailand. All North American-market vehicles were manufactured by Shreveport Operations.
The cooperation between GM and Isuzu to build a light-duty truck and offer it in North America returns to an original arrangement the two companies had in the 1970s with the Chevrolet LUV, a rebadged Isuzu Faster.
Social links
Common 2004 Chevrolet Colorado problems
The Chevrolet Colorado 2004 has been reported to have several common problems, primarily related to engine misfiring, air conditioning units, and brakes malfunctioning. This problem led to intermittent stalling of the vehicle, which was a significant inconvenience for owners.
Another common problem with the 2004 Chevrolet Colorado was related to the air conditioning (AC) units. Many owners reported that their AC units malfunctioned, leading to a loss of cool air or complete failure of the system. This issue was often accompanied by the check engine light coming on and refusing to turn off.
The brakes of the 2004 Chevrolet Colorado were also reported to have problems. Some owners reported that their brake warning lights came on, indicating a malfunction in the brake system. This issue could lead to a loss of braking power, which could be dangerous in certain situations.
In addition to these issues, the 2004 Chevrolet Colorado was also known for having problems with its transmission. Many owners reported that their transmissions shifted poorly, with delays and slipping being common complaints.
Another common problem with the Chevrolet Colorado was related to its power steering. Many owners reported that their power steering failed, leading to a loss of control over the vehicle.
Finally, the 2004 Chevrolet Colorado was known for having problems with its fuel level sensor. Many owners reported that their fuel gauges showed inaccurate readings, leading to the possibility of running out of fuel unexpectedly. This issue was often caused by a malfunctioning fuel level sensor, which needed to be replaced.
In summary, the 2004 Chevrolet Colorado had several common problems, primarily related to engine misfiring, air conditioning units, brakes malfunctioning, transmission issues, power steering loss, and faulty fuel level sensors. These issues could be costly to repair and were a significant inconvenience for owners.
How many miles can a 2004 Chevy Colorado last?
Owners of 2004 and 2005 Colorados state their engines are still running at 200,000 miles and well beyond. There are several owners that state their vehicle is at or near 400,000 miles.
What is the most common problem with the Chevy Colorado?
Perhaps the most common issue found in the Chevy Colorado is the tendency for the engine to misfire (or backfire) — something that's been documented to impact models as old as 2004 and as new as 2016.
What years was bad Colorado?
The most common model years with major problems were 2006, 2009, and 2010. Each of those years had reports of between eight and 10 issues.
Are there any recalls on a 2004 Chevy Colorado?
There are 3 recalls that may affect your 2004 Chevrolet Colorado. Check your 2004 Chevrolet Colorado for safety recalls and get them fixed for free at a Chevrolet dealership near you.
What is the most common problem with the Chevy Colorado?
Perhaps the most common issue found in the Chevy Colorado is the tendency for the engine to misfire (or backfire) — something that's been documented to impact models as old as 2004 and as new as 2016.
What years was bad Colorado?
The most common model years with major problems were 2006, 2009, and 2010. Each of those years had reports of between eight and 10 issues.
How many miles does a 2004 Chevy Colorado last?
How Long Does the Chevy Colorado Last? Owners of 2004 and 2005 Colorados state their engines are still running at 200,000 miles and well beyond. There are several owners that state their vehicle is at or near 400,000 miles.
Is the Colorado a good vehicle?
Is the 2024 Chevrolet Colorado a Good Truck? Yes, the 2024 Colorado is a good compact pickup truck. It tows up to 7,700 pounds, so it has the goods to pull trailers and campers without losing its breath. This Chevy has two solid engine options and is a poised partner in everyday driving.
2004 Chevrolet Colorado car problems categorized by type of issue
After analyzing all complaints sent to the NHTSA and researching popular Chevrolet Colorado problems, we found that the most common problems with these 2023 model year vehicles are:
- Electrical system problems
- Structure problems
- Service brakes problems
- Exterior lighting problems
- Suspension problems
The graph below shows statistics for all 2004 Chevrolet Colorado vehicle components and the number of complaints received.
Latest 25 complaints 2004 Chevrolet Colorado
The NHTSA has received 360 complaints about various vehicle components related to the 2004 Chevrolet Colorado. Below are the 25 most recent complaints reported for 2004 Chevrolet Colorado vehicles.
FUEL/PROPULSION SYSTEM PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2023-10-13
- Fire: 1
- VIN: 1GCCS196748
- Components: FUEL/PROPULSION SYSTEM
- Summary: There apparently was fuel dripping onto the starter and soaking the starter so when we went to start the truck. It caught on fire And my truck is a total loss
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM,EXTERIOR LIGHTING PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2022-09-15
- VIN: 1GCDT136148
- Components: ELECTRICAL SYSTEM,EXTERIOR LIGHTING
- Summary: One day, after I turned my truck off, I noticed that my taillights and overhead cargo light remained on. Key was out, truck was off, but the lights stayed on. So for the time being, I disconnected the battery. I brought it to a mechanic, who ran the codes that came back that the rear driver turn signal was high, the rear passenger turn signal was high, and the overhead cargo light was high. He checked the entire truck for a short, replaced the taillights, replaced the fuse box, replaced the body control module, and numerous other attempts at a repair, with no success. I was without a vehicle for many months, since I can't afford the absurd prices of the current vehicle market and was hopeful it could be fixed. Reading through some other complaints/online threads, this seems like a fairly common problem with these vehicles. Electrical issues that affect my ability to use a turn signal are a huge safety concern and this needs to be addressed.
UNKNOWN OR OTHER PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2023-06-21
- VIN: 1GCDT196248
- Components: UNKNOWN OR OTHER
- Summary: The frame on my 2004 Chevy Colorado has rusted/rotted to the point that it snapped, causing the bed to rub against the cab. Mechanic said it is not fixable.
STRUCTURE,UNKNOWN OR OTHER PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2023-06-09
- VIN: 1GCCS136448
- Components: STRUCTURE,UNKNOWN OR OTHER
- Summary: Frame rust
UNKNOWN OR OTHER PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2022-11-23
- VIN: 1GCDT136248
- Components: UNKNOWN OR OTHER
- Summary: Frame of my vehicle is rotting away causing to fail inspection. Just finding out that Toyota did a recall on one of there pick up models replacing their frame due rotting frames that may be a safety factor if it gets into an accident. Does Chevy Colorado have a recall as such? Just had my frame recently welded on a piece of heavy metal to reinforce my frame in order to pass a safety inspection
POWER TRAIN,ELECTRICAL SYSTEM PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2022-12-10
- VIN: 1GCCS196348
- Components: POWER TRAIN,ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
- Summary: Ignition safety module known as pass lock security. This causes my vehicle not to start and give a code and a light on the dash for the Pass Lock security. The vehicle was fine then I went into a store came out and put the key in the ignition, the lights on the dash came on but it would not crank. This is very hazardous cause It could happen while you’re driving anytime, which could cause the vehicle to go into security mode and turn vehicle off making it very dangerous for passengers in vehicle. This is a problem with other Chevy Colorado's when I research this problem.
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2022-08-17
- VIN: 1GCCS146548
- Components: ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
- Summary: Body Control Module, BCM. Controls everything. Air bag can deploy, breaks can lock up. Mine, the hazards were staying on. Chevy Dealer says they are on National Back Order and GM is canceling those orders after so long placed. “We can get you one from a junk yard for $350 but GM won’t let us properly program them with correct codes, and so many times they won’t take, and I can’t return the part”. My response to GM already and to Congressman Westerman, BBB, and the WH. A part such as the on board computer, SAFETY first, should never come from a junk yard and if GM doesn’t want to supply the part AS we all know they need them for newer cars right now….. You, the NHTSB and all of us are in danger. There is an expiration date on our cars, but we’re not being told. A computer that controls EVERYTHING in a vehicle is more important than a safety belt. Me not wearing it kills me. Me being told by the dealer I could leave my fuses out and put my arm out the window. Boy I hate being a retired SGM, cause I ain’t allowed to put my boot in a six.
SUSPENSION,STRUCTURE,UNKNOWN OR OTHER PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2022-04-06
- VIN: 1GCDT136X48
- Components: SUSPENSION,STRUCTURE,UNKNOWN OR OTHER
- Summary: Mechanic had the truck on the lift raised up to check the brakes for squeaking and while under the truck the mechanic inspected the frame because he noticed a lot of rust and called me to come look at it and pointed out that the frame has rotted to the point that he should not be driven and could break in half and cause major problems for the safety of the occupants and other drivers on the road. I looked up online if other Colorado owners had the same issue and others have the same problem. I’m am forced to junk this vehicle even though the rest of the truck is in very good condition
STRUCTURE PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2022-03-20
- VIN: 1gcdt136448
- Components: STRUCTURE
- Summary: I was checking on the common rear cab rust and noticed the frame looked rusted through just in front of the rear wheel suspension mount. I took it to my local mechanic (Bob's Repair of Mayer) and they said it was not safe to drive. It is a complete blindside to me and now I have to find a spare (safe) car to help drive around my newborn and toddler. I am going to attempt to repair the frame as I do not have any other options for vehicles. There were obviously no warnings are notices that about this issue, but it seems to be uncannily common for this generation of Chevrolet vehicles. The truck only has 160,000 miles on it and surface rust on the cab. The vehicle is not drivable and not safe as the frame could give away at any moment.
UNKNOWN OR OTHER PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2021-03-01
- VIN: 1GCDT196448
- Components: UNKNOWN OR OTHER
- Summary: FRAME RUSTED OUT LIKE THE TOYOTAS DID AND IS NO LONGER SAFE TO DRIVE.
SUSPENSION PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2021-03-27
- VIN: 1GCDT196448
- Components: SUSPENSION
- Summary: THE FRAME OF THE TRUCK ROTTED AND IS NO LONGER DRIVEABLE WITHOUT A CHANCE OF AN ACCIDENT. THE PA INSPECTION IS ABOUT TO RUN OUT ALSO AND WILL NOT PASS INPECTION. I BOUGHT THIS TRUCK USED AND JUST PAID IT OFF AND WAS HOPING I WAS CLEAR OF ANY VEHICLE PAYMENTS. AT THIS POINT THERE IS NO WAY I WILL EVEN GET CLOSE TO WHAT I PAID FOR IT AS IT IS ONLY GOOD FOR SCRAP. I AGREE WITH ANOTHER POST I SAW ON HERE THAT SAID IF TOYOTA HAD TO RECALL THEIR VEHICLES FOR THE SAME REASON THEN WHY DOES GM NOT HAVE TO DO THE SAME THING? IT ONLY SEEMS RIGHT. I KNOW THEY HAVE HEARD OF THIS ISSUE BUT ARE JUST TRYING TO BRUSH IT UNDER THE RUG HOPING IT DOESN'T COME UP. HOPING YOU HAVE OUR BACK ON THIS WITH TRYING TO PROTECT THE CONSUMER.
SUSPENSION,STRUCTURE PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2021-02-19
- VIN: 1GCDT136648
- Components: SUSPENSION,STRUCTURE
- Summary: VEHICLE HAS 96,800 MILES, AND THE FRAME HAS COMPLETELY RUSTED THROUGH CAUSING THE REAR SUSPENSION TO DETACH FROM THE FRAME, AS WELL AS THE BED TO DETACH FROM THE FRAME. VEHICLE IS NO LONGER ABLE TO BE PUT ON LIFT TO HAVE TIRES ROTATED AS THE FRAME DISINTEGRATES UPON CONTACT. THIS IS A VERY WELL KNOWN PROBLEM, AND I AM CURIOUS WHY THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT HAS NOT FORCED GM TO RECALL THESE VEHICLES LIKE TOYOTA WAS FORCED TO DO WITH THEIR IDENTICAL SITUATION. DO YOUR JOBS, AND HOLD THESE CORPORATIONS ACCOUNTABLE FOR CHEAP WORKMANSHIP.
UNKNOWN OR OTHER PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2021-02-18
- VIN: 1GCDT136048
- Components: UNKNOWN OR OTHER
- Summary: I SOLD THIS TRUCK LAST SPRING WITH 243,829 ON THE ODOMETER, IT IS NOW FOR SALE WITH 155,000 ON IT
STRUCTURE PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2020-10-14
- VIN: 1GCDT196348
- Components: STRUCTURE
- Summary: THE FRAME UNDER THE CAB IS RUSTED OUT
STRUCTURE PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2020-12-30
- VIN: 1GCDT196348
- Components: STRUCTURE
- Summary: 2004 CHEVY COLORADO THE WHOLE FRAME UNDERNEATH IS ROTTED OUT AND UNSAFE. I DON'T HAVE MONEY OR INCOME OR CREDIT TO GET A NEW VEHICLE. I WANT TO KNOW HOW CHEVY COULD ALLOW SUCH A TRAGIC MISTAKE ON THE METAL USED FOR THIS VEHICLE? I AM NOT THE ONLY PERSON WHO HAS HAD THIS ISSUE WITH THE FRAMES ON THESE VEHICLE?. IT IS ALL I HAVE TO DRIVE AND I AM PUTTING CHEVY UNDER WARNING!, THIS IS A DEFECT IN THE METAL YOU HAVE USED. IF ANYTHING HAPPENS TO ME OR ANYONE ELSE THEY ARE TO SUE CHEVY. THIS IS NOT A PROBLEM NOT CAUSED BY BUYER. THIS IS CAUSED BY CHEAP METALS FOR VEHICLE. THIS IS MY FIRST SUPPOSEDLY MADE IN USA VEHICLE AND NOW IT HAS LEFT A BAD TASTE IN MY MOUTH. I AM NOT GOING TO BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR YOUR DEFECT. I AM NOT THE ONLY ONE WITH THIS PROBLEM. IT NEEDS TO BE TAKEN CARE OF ASAP.
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2020-09-16
- Fire: 1
- VIN: 1GCDT148548
- Components: ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
- Summary: I'VE HAD TO REPLACE 2 HEATER BLOWER RESISTORS DUE TO A MELTDOWN, THIS IS A POTENTIAL FIRE HAZARD AND SHOULD BE PUT ON A RECALL NOTICE. I WAS DRIVING AROUND 40 MPH AT THE TIME .
SUSPENSION,STRUCTURE PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2019-03-20
- VIN: 1GCCS196448
- Components: SUSPENSION,STRUCTURE
- Summary: TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2004 CHEVROLET COLORADO. THE CONTACT DISCOVERED THAT THE UNDERCARRIAGE OF THE VEHICLE WAS SEVERELY CORRODED. THE CONTACT EXPRESSED CONCERN THAT THE CORROSION CENTERED AROUND THE SUSPENSION AND SUBFRAME SPRING MOUNTS. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT TAKEN TO BE DIAGNOSED BY A DEALER OR INDEPENDENT MECHANIC. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOTIFIED OF THE FAILURE. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 134,000.
AIR BAGS PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2020-01-02
- VIN: 1GCDT196448
- Components: AIR BAGS
- Summary: THE AIRBAGS WERE DEACTIVATED DUE TO THE WIRES BEING DAMAGED THROUGH NORMAL USE OF THE EXTENDED CAB REAR DOOR. A NORMAL MECHANIC SHOP WOULDN'T FIX IT, BECAUSE IT WAS A SAFETY ISSUE, SO TOOK THE TRUCK TO THE CHEVROLET DEALER, WHO CONFIRMED THE PROBLEM, AND HAD TO REPLACE THE WIRING HARNESS IN THAT DOOR.
STRUCTURE PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2019-12-09
- VIN: 1GCDT196848
- Components: STRUCTURE
- Summary: FRAME HAS RUSTED OUT TO THE POINT THAT IT IS UNREPAIRABLE, VEHICLE HAS 92000 MILES GOOD CONDITION EVERYWHERE ELSE. THIS IS QUITE A COMMON PROBLEM WITH COLORADOS. IT WILL NOT PASS SAFETY STANDARDS, QUITE HONESTLY IT IS A VERY DANGEROUS SITUATION THAT MANY PEOPLE ARE EXPERIENCING WITH THESE VEHICLES. IT SEEMS ODD THAT TOYOTA WAS FORCED TO REPLACE FRAMES DUE TO POOR QUALITY AND RUST ISSUES YET THESE COLORADOS ARE JUST AS BAD.
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2019-12-20
- VIN: 1GCDT196748
- Components: ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
- Summary: TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2004 CHEVROLET COLORADO. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE INTERIOR LIGHTING, DOOR CHIME, AND RADIO DID NOT TURN OFF. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO MAYSE AUTOMOTIVE GROUP (2032 S ELLIOTT AVE, AURORA, MO 65605) WHERE IT WAS DETERMINED THAT THE WIRES RUNNING FROM THE REAR DRIVER'S SIDE DOOR HAD TO BE REPLACED; HOWEVER, THE PARTS FOR THE REPAIR WERE NO LONGER BEING MANUFACTURED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOT NOTIFIED OF THE FAILURE. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE APPROXIMATE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 190,000.
UNKNOWN OR OTHER PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2019-12-12
- VIN: 1GCDT196448
- Components: UNKNOWN OR OTHER
- Summary: I OWN A 2004 CHEVY COLORADO EXTENDED CAB. THIS TRUCK HAS 110,XXX MILES ON IT. THE PROBLEM IS THE FRAME ON THE VEHICLE, IT BROKE IN 2 PIECES WHERE THE CAB MEETS THE BED. THE FRAME IS COMPLETELY RUSTED AND RUINED. THERE ARE A LOT OF FORUMS ONLINE WITH PEOPLE WITH THE SAME ISSUE IN THE SAME SPOT OF THE FRAME. IT IS VERY UNSETTLING KNOWING EVEN IF I DONT DRIVE THIS TRUCK AGAIN ANOTHER CHEVY COLORADO ON THE HIGHWAY COULD RIP IN 2 PEICES CAUSING AN ACCIDENT DUE TO THE FAULTY FRAME ON THESE TRUCKS. THIS IS AN OBVIOUS ISSUE THAT CHEVY WILL NOT ADDRESS. WHEN MY FRAME BROKE INTO 2 PIECES INWARD DRIVING DOWN THE ROAD. THE BED CAME FREE ON THE DRIVER SIDE AND SMASHED IN THE BACK CORNER OF MY CAB. LUCKILY I WAS NOT ON THE HIGH WAY BECAUSE IF I WAS IT WOULD HAVE CAUSED AN ACCIDENT. I HOPE CHEVY MAKES RIGHT BY THIS.
STRUCTURE PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2019-10-25
- VIN: 1GCDT196X48
- Components: STRUCTURE
- Summary: TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2004 CHEVROLET COLORADO. WHILE THE VEHICLE WAS AT AN INDEPENDENT MECHANIC FOR ROUTINE MAINTENANCE, THE MECHANIC FOUND THAT THE FRAME WAS SEVERELY CORRODED AND THE CORROSION EXTENDED TO THE VEHICLE'S SIDE WALL. THE MECHANIC STATED THAT THE VEHICLE WAS UNSAFE TO BE DRIVEN. THE MANFUACTURER AND DEALER WERE NOT CONTACTED. THE APPROXIMATE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 140,000.
STRUCTURE,SERVICE BRAKES PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2019-10-14
- VIN: 1GCDT136248
- Components: STRUCTURE,SERVICE BRAKES
- Summary: AFTER TAKING MY 2004 COLORADO TO A MECHANIC FOR A BRAKE REPAIR HE INFORMED ME I HAD RUST SO BAD ON THE FRAME IT CREATED HOLE AND HE RECOMMENDED I NO LONGER DRIVE MY TRUCK ALSO HE CANNOT REPAIR THE BRAKES AND THE ABS SENSOR BECAUSE OF THE RUST. I PURCHASE THE TRUCK 2 1/2 YEARS AGO FROM A CHEVY DEALER AND STILL OWE MONEY ON A VEHICLE I CAN'T DRIVE. ONLY 135428 MILES.
SUSPENSION,STRUCTURE,UNKNOWN OR OTHER PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2019-04-02
- VIN: 1GCCS146848
- Components: SUSPENSION,STRUCTURE,UNKNOWN OR OTHER
- Summary: THE FRAME HAS ALOT OF RUST PLUS THE FRAME IS CRACKED AND THE BACK,THE ENGINE LIGHT IS ON YOU CAN NOT GET A RESPONSE FROM THE PLUGING UNIT. WHE YOU TO CHECK THE PROBLEM.
STRUCTURE PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2019-07-03
- VIN: 1GCDT136448
- Components: STRUCTURE
- Summary: THE FRAME HAS RUST HOLES THROUGH IT THAT SUDDENLY APPEARED THE LAST THREE MONTHS. THE DEALER THAT HAVE ALWAYS GONE TO SAYS THE CAR CANNOT BE WORKED ON. EVERYTHING LOOKS LIKE PERFECT CONDITION EXCEPT THE FRAME HAS RUSTED AWAY.
2004 Chevrolet Colorado recalls
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has issued 3 recalls for different components of the 2004 Chevrolet Colorado.
- Manufacturer: GENERAL MOTORS CORP.
- Components: CHILD SEAT
- Summary: GM IS RECALLING CERTAIN MODEL YEAR 2004-2011, CHEVROLET COLORADO, GMC CANYON, MODEL YEAR 2006, ISUZU I-280/I-350, AND MODEL YEAR 2007-2008, I-290/I-370, REGULAR CAB VEHICLES AND EXTENDED CAB VEHICLES WITHOUT A REAR SEAT AND EQUIPPED WITH A FRONT 60/40 SPLIT BENCH SEAT. THESE VEHICLES FAIL TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF FEDERAL MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY STANDARD NO. 225, "CHILD RESTRAINT ANCHORAGE SYSTEMS." THE TOP TETHER ANCHOR FOR THE FRONT CENTER SEAT IS NOT ACCESSIBLE AND THE OWNER MANUAL DOES NOT INCLUDE INSTRUCTIONS REGARDING HOW TO USE THE TOP TETHER.
- Consequence: BOTH NHTSA AND GM DISCOURAGE PLACEMENT OF A CHILD IN A FRONT SEAT. NEVERTHELESS, THERE ARE INDIVIDUAL CIRCUMSTANCES THAT MAY REQUIRE PLACEMENT OF A CHILD IN A RESTRAINT IN THE FRONT CENTER SEATING POSITION OF THIS VEHICLE THAT DOES NOT OFFER A REAR SEAT. LACK OF ACCESS TO THE TOP TETHER ANCHOR AND A LACK OF INSTRUCTIONS AS TO HOW TO USE IT, MAY RESULT IN IMPROPER INSTALLATION OF A CHILD RESTRAINT. IMPROPER INSTALLATION OF A CHILD RESTRAINT CAN RESULT IN A REDUCTION IN THE RESTRAINT'S PERFORMANCE IN THE EVENT OF A CRASH AND AN INCREASED RISK OF INJURY OR DEATH TO THE CHILD SEATED IN THE RESTRAINT.
- Remedy: DEALERS WILL CUT A HOLE INTO THE BACK PANEL TRIM COVER TO ALLOW ACCESS TO THE TOP TETHER ANCHOR FOR THE FRONT CENTER SEAT POSITION AND WILL PROVIDE SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION AS TO USE IN THE OWNER'S MANUAL. THE MANUFACTURER HAS NOT YET PROVIDED AN OWNER NOTIFICATION SCHEDULE FOR THIS CAMPAIGN. OWNERS MAY CONTACT CHEVROLET AT 1-800-630-2438, GMC AT 1-866-996-9463, ISUZU AT 1-800-255-6727 OR VISIT GM'S WEBSITE AT WWW.GMOWNERCENTER.COM.
- Manufacturer: GENERAL MOTORS CORP.
- Components: EXTERIOR LIGHTING:BRAKE LIGHTS:SWITCH
- Summary: GM IS RECALLING 185,903 MODEL YEAR 2004-2009 COLORADO, GMC MODEL YEAR 2009-2004 CANYON, MODEL YEAR 2006 I-280, I-350, MODEL YEAR 2007-2008 I-290, AND I-370, PASSENGER VEHICLES ORIGINALLY SOLD IN OR CURRENTLY REGISTERED IN THE STATES OF ALABAMA, ARIZONA, FLORIDA, GEORGIA, HAWAII, LOUISIANA, MISSISSIPPI, NEVADA, NEW MEXICO, PUERTO RICO, SOUTH CAROLINA, TEXAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS AND UTAH. SOME OF THESE VEHICLES HAVE A BRAKE LAMP SWITCH THAT MAY NOT WORK AS DESIGNED DUE TO CONTAMINATION IN THE SWITCH.
- Consequence: THIS CONDITION COULD CAUSE THE SIMULTANEOUS LOSS OF ALL BRAKE LAMPS OR CAUSE ALL OF THE BRAKE LAMPS TO STAY ON CONTINUOUSLY. BOTH OF THESE CONDITIONS COULD FAIL TO WARN OTHERS OF THE DRIVER'S INTENTIONS AND COULD LEAD TO A VEHICLE CRASH.
- Remedy: DEALERS WILL INSPECT AND REPLACE THE NECESSARY COMPONENTS AS SPECIFIED IN THE RECALL BULLETIN FREE OF CHARGE. GM ANTICIPATES THAT PARTS WILL BE AVAILABLE BY JUNE 2010. A SPECIAL COVERAGE FOR VEHICLES REGISTERED IN ALL OTHER STATES WILL BE IMPLEMENTED IN THE SAME TIME FRAME. IN THE INTERIM, OWNERS WHO EXPERIENCE THE FAILURE CAN OBTAIN A FREE REPAIR, HOWEVER THEY WILL BE REQUIRED TO RETURN WHEN THE NEW DESIGN PART BECOMES AVAILABLE. OWNERS MAY CONTACT CHEVROLET AT 1-800-630-2438, GMC AT 1-866-996-9463, ISUZU AT 1-800-255-6727 OR AT WWW.GMOWNERCENTER.COM.
- Manufacturer: GENERAL MOTORS CORP.
- Components: EXTERIOR LIGHTING:BRAKE LIGHTS:SWITCH
- Summary: CERTAIN PICKUP TRUCKS MAY EXPERIENCE THE PERMANENT LOSS OF BRAKE LAMP FUNCTION OR BRAKE LAMPS THAT ARE ILLUMINATED AT ALL TIMES. THE CENTER HIGH-MOUNTED STOP LAMP (CHMSL) IS AFFECTED IN BOTH INSTANCES. ALSO, IF EQUIPPED, THE CRUISE CONTROL WILL BECOME INOPERATIVE. ANY TRAILER BRAKE LAMPS WHICH ARE CONNECTED TO THE VEHICLE'S BRAKE LAMP WIRING WILL MIMIC THE VEHICLE'S BRAKE LAMPS WHEN EITHER CONDITION OCCURS.
- Consequence: A FOLLOWING DRIVER MAY NOT KNOW WHEN THE BRAKES HAVE BEEN APPLIED, AND A REAR-END CRASH COULD OCCUR WITHOUT PRIOR WARNING.
- Remedy: DEALERS WILL REPLACE THE BRAKE LAMP SWITCH ASSEMBLY. THE RECALL BEGAN ON DECEMBER 5, 2006. OWNERS MAY CONTACT CHEVROLET AT 1-800-630-2438; GMC AT 1-866-996-9463 OR ISUZU AT 1-800-255-6727.
Negative 2004 Chevrolet Colorado car reviews
Positive 2004 Chevrolet Colorado car reviews
-
I had to let my S10 go due to financial reasons, but I absolutely loved the truck. I was pleasantly surprised by the Colorado, as it has proven to be just as good, if not better. The 2.8 engine provides great mileage and power, and the sound system is the best I have heard in a stock vehicle so far.
-
Hi there! I've been driving trucks for a while now. I used to drive a standard Isuzu with no comfort options. However, I recently got my Colorado almost fully loaded (all except the leather and the Onstar). Now, instead of dreading the drive to work, I absolutely love it! This truck is comfortable yet rugged, sporty yet serious, and generally a damn good truck. The 4x4 with the rear wheel differential is excellent in snow, ice, and heavy off-roading - a must-have for anyone in Canada. I did a lot of investigating before I bought this truck, and I can tell you that compared to this truck, the Ranger, Dakota, or even the Toyota Tundra seem like WWII technology.
-
I have the Z-85 extended cab. It's a great truck! The I-5 cylinder with 220 hp is really gutsy. If you're looking for a mid-size truck, this is the one for you. As you can see, I love everything about this truck. The S-10 is no match for this one. This is a real cruiser. Check out my ratings!
-
The Z71 crew cab package is a great choice! Although the box could have been a little longer, I don't need to haul big loads anymore. I was pleasantly surprised by the power and acceleration, and the gas mileage is better than I expected. The transmission is smooth and effortless, unlike that of a Ford Ranger. The stiffer frame also gives it a smooth feel over rough roadways. The interior is very roomy and comfortable. Thanks, Chevy!
-
I'm so glad I ended up with a crew cab Colorado, even though I wasn't initially sold on the smaller bed. Since having a baby, it's been the perfect fit for my family and all of our hauling needs. Although we did have some trouble with the traction control early on, the dealership was very helpful in resolving the issue and the truck has been running smoothly ever since. With its 220 hp 5 cyl and ZQ8 package, this truck has a really sporty feel and is a blast to drive!
Additional sources
More sources of information about 2004 Chevrolet Colorado problems:
2004 Colorado and most common problems | Chevy Colorado ...
Feb 14, 2008 ... 2004 Colorado and most common problems · 1) Mis-aligned driver door warranty · 2) broken hood latch warranty · 3) buzzing exhaust heat shield
2004 Chevrolet Colorado Problems and Complaints - 9 Issues
Top 2004 Chevrolet Colorado Problems · AC Blower Not Working Correctly Due to Failed Resistor · Worn Valve Seats May Cause Engine Misfire · CD Player in Radio ...
2004 Colorado Not Starting | Chevy Colorado & GMC Canyon
Sep 20, 2012 ... ... issues with my 2004 Chevy Colorado. When I bought the truck only 60k was on it and I never had any issue until about a month ago. The first ...
How common is the 3.5L cylinder head problem? | Chevrolet ...
Sep 18, 2012 ... 2004-2012 Chevrolet Colorado Forum / GMC Canyon · Engines/Performance/Tech Questions · I4/I5 Engine & Drivetrain. JavaScript is disabled. For a ...
2004 Chevrolet Colorado Review, Problems, Reliability, Value, Life ...
Feb 17, 2023 ... It is a great truck it just has problems starting and with the ac. It does 250, 000 miles plus on it, so it runs very well for its age and for ...
Other years of Chevrolet Colorado
Are you having problems with your 2004 Chevrolet Colorado?
Al Witting 2024-11-02
I purchased this vehicle in April and unfortunately, it has been in the shop three times since then. The first time was due to mold in the A/C, the second time was due to water damage from a defective door, and the third time was for a transmission replacement. As someone who has owned many Chevy vehicles, I must say that I am quite dissatisfied with the Colorado Truck. However, I must admit that it is a fun truck to drive when it is not in the shop for repairs. It is also quite fuel-efficient for a truck. Overall, I would advise caution when considering purchasing this truck until all of the issues have been resolved.
Cruz Lind 2024-07-02
You've already driven 2,400 miles and unfortunately have had to go back to the shop for a second time. It seems like the dealer is having trouble fixing the alignment. Additionally, you've noticed that the interior feels a bit cheap and the rear headrests are blocking your rearview. As for the XM radio, you don't feel like it's worth paying extra for it as it hasn't met your expectations.
Kole Lakin 2024-05-05
I have always been a loyal customer of GM products and have had positive experiences in the past. However, I am disappointed with my recent purchase. The fuel efficiency is lower than expected at 15 mpg, while my full-size truck and Tahoe get 21 mpg. Additionally, the towing capacity is comparable to my wife's Escape. I have also experienced some issues with the vehicle, such as a leaking roof, damaged headliners and carpet, and easily breakable plastic parts. The front turn signals have also been prone to corrosion and require frequent cleaning. Despite my disappointment, I have not mistreated the vehicle in any way.
Brock Barrows 2024-04-20
I noticed that the inline 5 engine option is not listed in the pull-down menu. Additionally, the seats are quite uncomfortable and there is a high level of engine noise in the cab. The interior features also appear to be of a cheaper quality and the radio speakers are not very good.
Miguel Daugherty 2024-04-12
This truck has been in the shop three times in the past two months for transmission repairs, yet the issue remains unresolved. It is unfortunate that GM representatives have not been helpful in addressing safety concerns. However, it is important to prioritize safety when considering purchasing a vehicle. It may be worth exploring other truck options that offer better quality and value for the price.