2001 Ford Ranger problems
The Ford Ranger is a compact or mid-size pickup marketed globally by Ford over a series of generations, varying between both in-house or outside development and manufacturing — and with a hiatus in North America from 2011–2018.
Debuting as a compact pickup in North America in 1982 for the 1983 model year, the Ranger was later introduced in some South American countries. From 1998 to 2011, the Ranger nameplate was used for models developed by Mazda for sale outside the North American market. In 2011, Ford introduced the first Ranger based on the T6 platform. Considered a mid-size pickup truck, the model was developed in-house by Ford Australia. In that same year, the North American-market Ranger was discontinued, leaving the T6 platform-based Ranger as the sole Ranger model worldwide.
For the 2019 model year, the Ranger was reintroduced in North America using the globally-marketed T6 model. It is manufactured at the Michigan Assembly Plant at Wayne, Michigan. The Ranger is smaller than the F-150 and larger than the Maverick in the Ford North American pickup truck range, while for markets outside the Americas it is typically the only Ford pickup offered for sale.
The second generation of the T6-based Ranger was released in 2021 for worldwide markets, using a revised T6 platform.
Social links
Common 2001 Ford Ranger problems
The 2001 Ford Ranger has several common problems that have been reported by owners, including:
- Fuel Pump Failure: The fuel pump breaks down without warning. The pump cannot avail fuel to the engine; hence the vehicle does not start since compression doesn’t happen. The fuel pump has to be replaced for the vehicle to start again.
- High Fuel Consumption: The 2001 Ford Ranger consumes a lot of fuel per mile. The fuel economy of the vehicle is very high and hence it is expensive to operate.
- Poor Oil Pan Seal: The 2001 Ford Ranger has a poor oil pan seal that causes oil leaks which can drain the oil in just a few hours. The seal is substandard and causes the Ford owner a lot of money.
- Faulty Seat Belts: The seat belts fail on multiple occasions. After a few minutes of use, the seat belts loosen and fail to remain fastened. Most auto-dealers do not yet have the solution to this problem and customers are forced to drive the vehicle with loose seat belts.
- Headlight Pulsing: When the Ford is running and headlights on, they start pulsing. The more the truck keeps running, the more the lights keep flashing. The light flashing happens both with the exterior lighting and the interior lighting.
- Transmission Issues: With over 720 problems reported, with the majority of the reports on transmission issues, the Ford Ranger 2001 is one of the worst Ford Rangers. In many of the reports, car owners complained about gear shifts. Car users report these issues to have begun after the 100,000-mile mark.
- Faulty Air Conditioning System: The truck fan can stop running.
These problems have been reported by owners of the 2001 Ford Ranger and have caused inconvenience and additional expenses. It is important to note that these issues may not affect all 2001 Ford Rangers, but it is crucial to be aware of them when considering purchasing or maintaining this vehicle.
What is the most common problem with the Ford Ranger?
Common engine problems on a Ford Ranger include a turbo failure and engine crank damage which causes excessive overheating, dark smoke from the exhaust, and a dip in fuel economy. Engine problems can land your car in serious trouble. Thus, it is always better to consult a mechanic right after you've spotted any faults.
How many miles will a 2001 Ford Ranger last?
Ford Rangers can last up to 20 years and beyond if they are well maintained and well cared for. The Ranger is built to withstand up to 300,000 miles and years upon years of use. The Ford Ranger is considered the littler brother of the Ford F-150 and is a great alternative if you want a more gas-friendly truck.
Is the 2001 Ford Ranger a good truck?
The Ford Ranger falls far short of modern pickup-truck standards. It's ungainly and stiff-riding; has a rough and noisy, inefficient engine; and a cramped, uncomfortable cabin. The interior is crudely finished. Compact dimensions and a usefully sized bed are the Ranger's only pluses.
What year did Ford Ranger have problems?
Ford Ranger recent recalls
| Affected model dates | Issue |
|---|---|
| 01/09/18 - 31/05/19 | Heavy loading could cause the rear differential to fail |
| 01/12/16 - 28/02/19 | Rear silencer may detach from the exhaust pipe creating an accident risk |
| 01/01/04-31/12/06 | Gas generator on front airbag may be defective which could cause uncontrolled inflation |
Are 2001 Rangers good?
Fun to drive, sharp looking and well built, the Ranger delivers a solid compact-pickup experience. Its most serious competition comes from the Dodge Dakota and Toyota Tacoma models. The Dakota is slightly larger and offers V8 power, but we still recommend a look at the updated 2001 Ranger.
What is the most common problem with Ford Rangers?
Intermittent crankshaft sensor failure is a common problem with a Ford Ranger. A dip in fuel efficiency, engine misfires, and sluggish acceleration are some of the aftermaths of a faulty crankshaft sensor. There is also a possibility that your Ranger won't start due to a faulty crankshaft sensor.
How long does a 2001 Ford Ranger engine last?
Ford Rangers can last up to 20 years and beyond if they are well maintained and well cared for. The Ranger is built to withstand up to 300,000 miles and years upon years of use. The Ford Ranger is considered the littler brother of the Ford F-150 and is a great alternative if you want a more gas-friendly truck.
What is the best years for Ford Ranger to avoid?
A: Yes, some Ford Ranger model years have proven less reliable than others. It's best to avoid the following years: 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2008, 2011, and 2019. These years have been subject to numerous customer complaints and issues.
2001 Ford Ranger car problems categorized by type of issue
After analyzing all complaints sent to the NHTSA and researching popular Ford Ranger problems, we found that the most common problems with these 2023 model year vehicles are:
- Structure problems
- Suspension problems
- Air bags problems
- Vehicle speed control problems
- Service brakes problems
The graph below shows statistics for all 2001 Ford Ranger vehicle components and the number of complaints received.
Latest 25 complaints 2001 Ford Ranger
The NHTSA has received 536 complaints about various vehicle components related to the 2001 Ford Ranger. Below are the 25 most recent complaints reported for 2001 Ford Ranger vehicles.
ENGINE PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2023-01-18
- VIN: 1FTYR10D31P
- Components: ENGINE
- Summary: The contact owns a 2001 Ford Ranger. The contact stated that while driving at an undisclosed speed, the vehicle stalled. The vehicle failed to restart. The check engine warning light was illuminated. The vehicle was towed to the contact's family member's residence. The vehicle was not diagnosed nor repaired by an independent mechanic or dealer. The manufacturer was not made aware of the failure. The failure mileage was unknown.
SUSPENSION PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2022-11-19
- VIN: 1FTZR15U81T
- Components: SUSPENSION
- Summary: so I recently purchased this truck thinking it was all safe, the pictures were too good to be true thats for sure, When I brought the truck back the old owner even drove with me knowing what he just sold me. The next day I was so happy so I get it registered and insured and I was so eager to hope in and drive around in my new "safe" truck I also went out with my loved one and it sickens me that the old owner was ok with selling me a not so safe truck and I could have died if the frame bracket broke or the frame cracked while i was driving but when I started to look under I saw the problem and I was scared I saw that the upper control arm bracket mount was rusted and the strut tower as well it had a Hole forming and a crack on the strut tower. I also found out that there was a crack in the frame and i've looked up online and it seems that the frame and other components rust I don't know what to do. Im also a college student who is trying to get into the mechanic world and this scares me with how many trucks like this are out on the road.
STRUCTURE PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2022-05-04
- VIN: 1FTZR15E51T
- Components: STRUCTURE
- Summary: The rear frame rusted so bad the bumper fell off and the frame actually cracked. This is a common issue with the late 1990s & early 2000s Ford Ranger, I do not understand why this isn't a recall yet as is it very dangerous. This happened on the highway. The front end frame, engine and all the components work flawlessly while the rear frame is just crumbling in rust.
SUSPENSION PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2021-07-01
- VIN: 1FTYR10U01T
- Components: SUSPENSION
- Summary: The rear leaf spring shackle rust causing the leaf spring to go through the bed. When going highway speeds the vehicle shakes and not safe to drive over 60.
SUSPENSION,STRUCTURE PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2022-03-04
- VIN: 1FTYR14U01P
- Components: SUSPENSION,STRUCTURE
- Summary: The frame has rusted so bad it has completely separated from the body. The Ranger frame rusting is a known problem but it has not been recalled like the Toyota Takoma has been.
SEAT BELTS PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2021-08-01
- VIN: 1ftyr14u51p
- Components: SEAT BELTS
- Summary: The contact owns a 2001 Ford Ranger. The contact stated that the front passenger’s side seat belt would not latch properly. The contact also stated that the vehicle would hesitate upon the depression of the accelerator while driving at various speeds. The contact noticed that the temperature gauge would indicate the vehicle was hot once the hesitation started. The contact took the vehicle to an independent mechanic where both failures were linked to recalls. The mechanic linked the seat belt failure to NHTSA Campaign Number: 01V227001 (Seat Belts) and the overheating failure to NHTSA Campaign Number: 09V399000 (Vehicle Speed Control). The dealer was notified of both failures and informed her that the VIN was not included in either recall. The vehicle had yet to be repaired. The failure mileage was approximately 200,000.
STRUCTURE PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2021-10-15
- VIN: 1FTZR15EX1T
- Components: STRUCTURE
- Summary: The frame is rotted and broken on both side in the rear
SUSPENSION PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2021-07-24
- VIN: 1FTZR15U01T
- Components: SUSPENSION
- Summary: Frame rusted in several places behind the cab at the rear spring shackles. Frame cracked both sides and bed is up against the cab and ready to break in two. Ford will not do anything. 145 k miles and the rest of the truck is in very good shape everything works except the cruise and is a loaded edge…..very upset just had a transmission rebuilt in it. Love the truck all the one I have looked at have the same issues over several years on fb marketplace and cannot find a good frame in any salvage yard. Didn’t Toyota’s have the same issues and they had a recall. Why doesn’t Ford have one? Call Ford directly and they won’t do a thing. Tried selling as is and replacing but can’t get a buyer for what I have in the truck. Trying to find a good frame to fix it now, but there are none out there. Very Dissatisfied.
STRUCTURE PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2021-07-01
- VIN: 1ftzr15e51p
- Components: STRUCTURE
- Summary: I noticed that there was significantly more rust than there should be. There are places where the frame has rusted through. It is a major safety concern. I researched the issue and found several others with the same concern. I also found that Toyota has previously recalled several vehicles for the same issue.
SEAT BELTS PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2021-02-17
- VIN: 1FTYR14E51T
- Components: SEAT BELTS
- Summary: PASSENGER SEATBELT RELEASES RANDOMLY FOR NO REASON.
AIR BAGS,SEAT BELTS PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2021-01-01
- VIN: 1FTYR14E61T
- Components: AIR BAGS,SEAT BELTS
- Summary: THE PASSENGER SEAT BELT DOESN'T LATCH AND THE AIRBAG LIGHT ILLUMINATES SPORADICALLY. OCCASIONALLY FOR THE ENTIRE TRIP AND SOMETIMES IT GOES ON AND OFF THROUGHOUT THE TRIP, YET OTHER TIMES IT FUNCTIONS PROPERLY!
SUSPENSION,STRUCTURE PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2020-11-20
- VIN: 1FTYR14E51P
- Components: SUSPENSION,STRUCTURE
- Summary: REAR FRAME HAS RUSTED THROUGH. REAR DRIVER SIDE SPRING MOUNT HAS RUSTED AND BROKEN FROM THE FRAME. REAR BUMPER MOUNTS AND SPARE TIRE MOUNTS ARE RUSTED OUT. VEHICLE WAS STATIONARY WHEN PROBLEM WAS DISCOVERED .
SEAT BELTS PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2020-07-01
- VIN: 1FTYR10E21P
- Components: SEAT BELTS
- Summary: SEAT BELTS CONSTANTLY COMING UNBUCKLED. WHILE DRIVING AND STOPPED
VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL,ENGINE PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2020-06-10
- VIN: 1FTYR10U51P
- Components: VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL,ENGINE
- Summary: MY 2001 FORD RANGER 3.0 HAS A IDLE WHEN IM DEPRESSING THE CLUTCH IDLE WOULD STAY AROUND 1,300 RPM. HAPPENS USUALLY MORE WHEN AC IS ON. *TR
SEAT BELTS PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2020-06-08
- VIN: 1FTZR15E21P
- Components: SEAT BELTS
- Summary: DRIVING DOWN THE ROAD MY SEAT BELT POPS OUT RANDOMLY ANY PHASE OF DRIVING AFTER I LATCHED IT AND PULLED ON IT TO CHECK. THIS HAS HAPPENED NUMEROUS TIMES NOW. *TR
UNKNOWN OR OTHER PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2018-04-30
- VIN: 1FTZR15EX1T
- Components: UNKNOWN OR OTHER
- Summary: THE FRAMES ON THESE VEHICLES ARE PURE JUNK, THEY BREAK USUALLY ON THE DRIVERS SIDE RIGHT IN FRONT OF THE REAR SPRING SHACKLE OR AT IT, MINE IS BROKE JUST IN FRONT OF THE REAR SPRING SHACKLE OF THE REAR PART OF THE FRAME. IF YOU GO SEARCHING FOR A FRAME, AS I HAVE, YOU WILL FIND ALMOST ALL OF THESE VEHICLES IN DESCRIPTION WILL SAY THE FRAME IS SHOT WHICH IS THE CASE OF MOST FORDS IT SEEMS ANYMORE. IT WOULD HAVE BEEN A GOOD TRUCK IF NOT FOR THE FRAMES RUSTING DOWN AND POSSIBLY CAUSING SOMEONE TO HAVE AN ACCIDENT AND LOSE THEIR LIFE OVER THIS IF THEY DON'T KEEP CHECK ON THESE TUCKS. THIS TRUCK WAS AN EVERY DAY WORK VEHICLE AND I ENDED UP HAVING TO PARK IT AND FIND ANOTHER ONE BEFORE THE CHAOS STARTED WITH IT.
UNKNOWN OR OTHER PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2019-08-01
- VIN: 1FTZR15E01P
- Components: UNKNOWN OR OTHER
- Summary: FRAME ROT ,STRUCTURAL CRACK IN LEFT SIDE REAR, DID NOT PASS NYS INSPECTION
STRUCTURE PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2019-07-05
- VIN: 1FTYR10UX1T
- Components: STRUCTURE
- Summary: THESE ARE PICTURES OF THE FRAME ON MY RANGER. THE FRAME IS RUSTING OUT AND IT ONLY HAS 76,619 MILES ON IT. MY MECHANIC FOUND THIS WHEN I WAS HAVING THE BRAKE LINE REPAIRED AND HE LIFTED THE TRUCK.
SUSPENSION,STRUCTURE,FUEL/PROPULSION SYSTEM PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2019-07-20
- VIN: 1FTYR10C11T
- Components: SUSPENSION,STRUCTURE,FUEL/PROPULSION SYSTEM
- Summary: TAKATA RECALL. MY VEHICLE WAS STATIONARY WHEN I GOT TO WORK I NOTHING MY REAR BUMPER FELL OFF WITH NO GIVEN WARNING AND I DIDN'T HEAR IT HIT THE GROUND I GOT HOME AND LOOKED UNDER THE FRAME AND NOTICED THE WHOLE FRAME WAS ROTTEN AWAY AND IS NOT SAFE TO DRIVE
UNKNOWN OR OTHER PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2019-07-12
- VIN: 1FTZR15U21P
- Components: UNKNOWN OR OTHER
- Summary: BACK LEAF SPRING RUST OUT.
STRUCTURE PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2019-07-12
- VIN: 1FTYR1OUX1T
- Components: STRUCTURE
- Summary: I PURCHASED A USED 2001 FORD RANGER, WENT TO HAVE IT INSPECTED AND THERE WAS SEVERE RUST UNDERNEATH OF THE FRAME TO THE POINT THE INSPECTOR SAID IT WAS HIGHLY DANGEROUS TO BE DRIVING MY VEHICLE AROUND. WOULD LIKE TO KNOW IF THERE WAS ANY RECALLS FOR THE TRUCKS FRAME UNDERNEATH? WILL PROVIDE PICTURES IF NEEDED.
STRUCTURE PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2013-05-30
- VIN: 1FTYR10UX1T
- Components: STRUCTURE
- Summary: I BOUGHT THIS TRUCK USED. THIS IS THE FIRST VEHICLE THAT I'VE HAD THE FRAME RUST OUT. I JUST HAD SOME WORK DONE TO THE TRUCK AND MY MECHANIC SAID THAT A CHUNK OF THE FRAME FELL OFF WHEN HE LIFTED THE TRUCK TO DO WORK TO THE BRAKE LINES. I'VE ALREADY HAD WELDING WORK DONE TO THE TRUCK RIGHT AFTER I BOUGHT IT BECAUSE IT WASN'T DISCLOSED THAT THE FRAME WAS RUSTING OUT. THIS HAS BEEN AN ON GOING ISSUE. THE ATTACHED IMAGE IS FROM WHEN I HAD THE WELDING WORK DONE THE FIRST TIME.
STRUCTURE PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2019-05-28
- VIN: 1FTZR15E71P
- Components: STRUCTURE
- Summary: TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2001 FORD RANGER. WHILE DRIVING 25 MPH OVER A RAILROAD TRACK, THE SPARE TIRE LOOSENED FROM THE VEHICLE WITHOUT WARNING. THE CONTACT PULLED THE VEHICLE OVER TO THE SHOULDER OF THE ROAD, LOOKED UNDERNEATH, AND NOTICED NOTHING BUT RUST WHERE THE FRAME FOR THE SPARE TIRE WAS LOCATED. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT DIAGNOSED OR REPAIRED. THE DEALER AND MANUFACTURER WERE NOT MADE AWARE OF THE FAILURE. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS APPROXIMATELY 136,092. *BF *TR
SUSPENSION PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2019-05-05
- VIN: 1FTZR15U01P
- Components: SUSPENSION
- Summary: THE FRAME ON THIS TRUCK HAS RUSTED TO THE POINT WHERE IT IS UNSAFE TO DRIVE. THE REAR BUMPER ACTUALLY FELL OF THE VEHICLE WHILE IT WAS BEING DRIVEN. I TOOK OFF THE BED AND CUT OFF THE REAR PART OF THE FRAME AND WELDED ON A NEW REAR SECTION AND PUT ON NEW LEAF SPRING HANGERS AND RE INSTALLED THE BUMPER A FEW YEARS AGO AND RE COATED THE FRAME WITH PAINT BUT NOW IT HAS GOTTEN WORSE TO THE POINT WHERE I CAN NO LONGER DRIVE IT AS THERE ARE ACTUAL HOLES RUSTED THRU. IT NEEDS A FRAME REPLACEMENT OR IT JUST A PARTS VEHICLE.
STRUCTURE PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2010-05-01
- VIN: 1FTZR15E71P
- Components: STRUCTURE
- Summary: THE SALT ON THE ROADS RUSTED THE FRAME HORRIBLY CAUSING HOLES AND WEAK POINTS THROUGH THE BODY.
2001 Ford Ranger recalls
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has issued 9 recalls for different components of the 2001 Ford Ranger.
- Manufacturer: FORD MOTOR COMPANY
- Components: VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL
- Summary: FORD IS RECALLING MODEL YEARS 1995-2003 WINDSTAR, 2000-2003 EXCURSION DIESEL, 1993-1997 AND 1999-2003 F-250 SD THROUGH F-550 SD DIESEL, 1992-2003 E-150 THROUGH E-550, 1995-2002 EXPLORER, 1997 AND 2002 MERCURY MOUNTAINEER, 1995-1997 AND 2001-2003 RANGER, AND 1994 F53 VEHICLES EQUIPPED WITH THE TEXAS INSTRUMENTS SPEED CONTROL DEACTIVATION SWITCH (SCDS). THE SCDS MAY LEAK INTERNALLY AND THEN OVERHEAT, SMOKE, OR BURN.
- Consequence: A VEHICLE FIRE COULD OCCUR WITH OR WITHOUT THE ENGINE RUNNING.
- Remedy: FORD WILL NOTIFY OWNERS THAT DEALERS WILL INSTALL A FUSED WIRING HARNESS IN LINE WITH THE SCDS. ON 1999-2003 WINDSTAR VEHICLES WITH A LEAKING SCDS, DEALERS WILL ALSO INSPECT THE ABS CONTROL MODULE CONNECTOR AND REPAIR AS NECESSARY. REPAIRS WILL BE COMPLETED FREE OF CHARGE. THE SAFETY RECALL BEGAN ON OCTOBER 27, 2009. OWNERS MAY CONTACT FORD AT 1-888-222-2751.
- Manufacturer: DOPE, INC.
- Components: EXTERIOR LIGHTING:HEADLIGHTS
- Summary: DOPE, INC. IS RECALLING 42,540 COMBINATION CORNER AND BUMPER LAMP ASSEMBLIES OF VARIOUS PART NUMBERS SOLD FOR USE AS AFTERMARKET EQUIPMENT FOR VARIOUS PASSENGER VEHICLES. THESE HEADLAMPS FAIL TO CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF FEDERAL MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY STANDARD NO. 108, "LAMPS, REFLECTIVE DEVICES, AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT." THESE LAMPS DO NOT CONTAIN THE REQUIRED AMBER SIDE REFLECTORS.
- Consequence: DECREASED LIGHTING VISIBILITY MAY RESULT IN A VEHICLE CRASH.
- Remedy: DOPE, INC. WILL NOTIFY OWNERS AND OFFER A FULL REFUND FOR THE NONCOMPLIANT COMBINATION LAMPS. THE SAFETY RECALL BEGAN ON JULY 28, 2009. OWNERS MAY CONTACT DOPE, INC. AT 1-626-272-1798.
- Manufacturer: SABERSPORT
- Components: EXTERIOR LIGHTING
- Summary: SABERSPORT IS RECALLING 16,270 COMBINATION CORNER AND BUMPER LAMP ASSEMBLIES OF VARIOUS PART NUMBERS SOLD FOR USE AS AFTERMARKET EQUIPMENT FOR VARIOUS PASSENGER VEHICLES. THESE HEADLAMPS FAIL TO CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF FEDERAL MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY STANDARD NO. 108, "LAMPS, REFLECTIVE DEVICES, AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT." THESE LAMPS DO NOT CONTAIN THE REQUIRED AMBER SIDE REFLECTORS.
- Consequence: DECREASED LIGHTING VISIBILITY MAY RESULT IN A VEHICLE CRASH.
- Remedy: SABERSPORT WILL NOTIFY OWNERS AND OFFER A FULL REFUND FOR THE NONCOMPLIANT COMBINATION LAMPS. THE SAFETY RECALL BEGAN ON MAY 11, 2009. OWNERS MAY CONTACT SABERSPORT AT 1-909-598-7589.
- Manufacturer: FORD MOTOR COMPANY
- Components: VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL
- Summary: ON CERTAIN PICKUP TRUCKS, PASSENGER VEHICLES, SPORT UTILITY VEHICLES, AND MOTOR HOMES CHASSIS, THE SPEED CONTROL DEACTIVATION SWITCH MAY, UNDER CERTAIN CONDITIONS, LEAK INTERNALLY AND THEN OVERHEAT, SMOKE, OR BURN.
- Consequence: THIS COULD RESULT IN AN UNDERHOOD FIRE.
- Remedy: DEALERS WILL INSTALL A FUSED WIRING HARNESS. OWNERS OF THE PASSENGER CARS INCLUDED IN THIS CAMPAIGN WILL BE INSTRUCTED TO RETURN THEIR VEHICLES TO THEIR DEALERS TO HAVE THE SPEED CONTROL DEACTIVATION SWITCH DISCONNECTED AS AN INTERIM REPAIR. AS SOON AS REPAIR PARTS ARE AVAILABLE (EXPECTED OCTOBER 2007), OWNERS WILL BE INSTRUCTED TO RETURN TO THE DEALERS FOR INSTALLATION OF A FUSED WIRING HARNESS. THE RECALL BEGAN ON AUGUST 13, 2007, AND MAILING COMPLETED BY SEPTEMBER 19, 2007. OWNERS MAY CONTACT FORD AT 1-888-222-2751.
- Manufacturer: AJ MOTORSPORT
- Components: EXTERIOR LIGHTING
- Summary: CERTAIN AJ MOTORSPORT COMBINATION LAMPS SOLD AS REPLACEMENT LAMPS FOR USE ON THE ABOVE LISTED PASSENGER VEHICLES. COMBINATION LAMPS NOT EQUIPPED WITH AMBER SIDE REFLECTORS FAIL TO CONFORM WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF FEDERAL MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY STANDARD NO. 108, LAMPS, REFLECTIVE DEVICES, AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT.
- Consequence: LACK OF AMBER SIDE REFLECTORS IN THE LAMPS WILL DECREASE LIGHTING VISIBILITY TO OTHER DRIVERS AND MAY POSSIBLY RESULT IN A VEHICLE CRASH.
- Remedy: AJ MOTORSPORT WILL NOTIFY OWNERS AND OFFER REIMBURSEMENT FOR THE LAMPS. THE RECALL BEGAN ON JULY 31, 2006. OWNERS MAY CONTACT AJ MOTORSPORT AT 626-618-2026.
- Manufacturer: CK MOTORSPORT, INC.
- Components: EXTERIOR LIGHTING
- Summary: CERTAIN CK MOTORSPORTS COMBINATION HEADLIGHTS, CLEAR CORNER, BUMPER, AND SIDE MARKER LIGHTS SOLD AS REPLACEMENT LAMPS FOR USE ON THE PASSENGER VEHICLES LISTED ABOVE. SOME COMBINATION LAMPS THAT ARE NOT EQUIPPED WITH AMBER SIDE REFLECTORS FAIL TO CONFORM TO FEDERAL MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY STANDARD NO. 108, LAMPS, REFLECTIVE DEVICES, AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT.
- Consequence: WITHOUT THE AMBER REFLECTORS, THE VEHICLE WILL BE POORLY ILLUMINATED, POSSIBLY RESULTING IN A VEHICLE CRASH WITHOUT WARNING.
- Remedy: CK MOTORSPORT WILL NOTIFY OWNERS AND REPLACE THE NONCOMPLIANT LAMPS FREE OF CHARGE. THE RECALL BEGAN ON JULY 1, 2006. OWNERS MAY CONTACT CK MOTORSPORT AT 1-909-610-7211.
- Manufacturer: FORD MOTOR COMPANY
- Components: SEAT BELTS:FRONT:BUCKLE ASSEMBLY
- Summary: VEHICLE DESCRIPTION: PASSENGER AND SPORT UTILITY VEHICLES, PICKUP TRUCKS, AND MINIVANS. EQUIPPED WITH SEAT BELTS SUPPLIED BY TRW. IT IS POSSIBLE THAT THE DRIVER'S AND/OR FRONT PASSENGER'S OUTBOARD SEAT BELT BUCKLE MAY NOT FULLY LATCH. FORD CROWN VICTORIA BUILT AT ST. THOMAS ASSEMBLY PLANT FROM 4/17/00 - 5/29/01 MERCURY GRAND MARQUIS BUILT AT ST. THOMAS ASSEMBLY PLANT FROM 4/17/00 - 5/29/01. LINCOLN TOWN CARS BUILT AT WIXOM ASSEMBLY PLANT FROM 3/27/00 - 5/30/01. LINCOLN NAVIGATORS BUILT AT MICHIGAN TRUCK PLANT FROM 4/11/00 - 5/31/01. FORD WINDSTARS BUILT AT OAKVILLE ASSEMBLY PLANT FROM 3/23/00 - 5/30/01. FORD RANGERS BUILT AT TWIN CITIES PLANT FROM 3/28/00 - 5/30/01, AND ALSO AT THE EDISON PLANT FROM 3/13/00 - 5/25/01. FORD F-150 TRUCK BUILT AT NORFOLK PLANT FROM 4/18/00 - 5/25/00; AT ONTARIO PLANT FROM 5/10/00 - 5/28/01; AT KANSAS CITY PLANT FROM 9/11/99 - 5/25/01; AND AT CUAUTITLAN PLANT FROM 5/16/00 - 6/9/01. FORD SUPER DUTY F-250, F-350, F-450, AND F-550 TRUCKS BUILT AT KENTUCKY PLANT FROM 4/17/00 - 5/27/01; AND AT CUAUTITLAN PLANT FROM 5/16/00 - 6/19/01. FORD EXCURSIONS BUILT AT KENTUCKY PLANT FROM 4/17/00 - 10/2/00. FORD EXPEDITIONS BUILT AT MICHIGAN TRUCK PLANT FROM 4/11/00 - 5/31/01.
- Consequence: IN THE EVENT OF A CRASH, THE RESTRAINT SYSTEM MAY NOT PROVIDE ADEQUATE OCCUPANT PROTECTION, INCREASING THE RISK OF PERSONAL INJURY TO THE SEAT OCCUPANT.
- Remedy: DEALERS WILL INSPECT THE FRONT OUTBOARD SEAT BELT BUCKLES AND IF THE BUCKLE FAILS THE INSPECTION PROCESS, IT WILL BE REPLACED. OWNER NOTIFICATION BEGAN JULY 25, 2001. OWNERS WHO TAKE THEIR VEHICLES TO AN AUTHORIZED DEALER ON AN AGREED UPON SERVICE DATE AND DO NOT RECEIVE THE FREE REMEDY WITHIN A REASONABLE TIME SHOULD CONTACT FORD AT 1-866-436-7332.
- Manufacturer: FORD MOTOR COMPANY
- Components: TIRES:TREAD/BELT
- Summary: THIS IS NOT A SAFETY RECALL IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SAFETY ACT. HOWEVER, IT IS DEEMED A SAFETY IMPROVEMENT CAMPAIGN BY THE AGENCY. EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION: FORD IS REPLACING ALL FIRESTONE WILDERNESS AT 15, 16, AND 17 INCH TIRES MOUNTED ON FORD TRUCKS AND SUVS. FORD REPORTS TREAD SEPARATION CAN OCCUR DUE TO A COMBINATION OF THE SENSITIVITY OF THE TIRE DESIGN TO STRESS, AGING, AND MANUFACTURING DIFFERENCES BETWEEN PLANTS. FORD IS REPLACING THESE TIRES TO PREVENT POSSIBLE PREMATURE TIRE FAILURE. VEHICLE DESCRIPTION: THE VEHICLES LISTED BELOW MAY HAVE BEEN ORIGINALLY EQUIPPED WITH FIRESTONE WILDERNESS AT TIRES OR MAY HAVE HAD WILDERNESS AT TIRES INSTALLED DURING THE FIRESTONE RECALL LAUNCHED IN AUGUST 2000. CERTAIN 1991 THROUGHT 2002 FORD EXPLORER CERTAIN 2001 THROUGHT 2002 EXPLORER SPORT, AND SPORT TRAC CERTAIN 1997 THROUGH 2002 MERCURY MOUNTAINEER CERTAIN 1991 THROUGH 2001 RANGER CERTAIN 1999 THROUGH 2001 EXPEDITION CERTAIN 1991 THROUGH 1994, AND 1997 MODEL YEAR F-SERIES CERTAIN 1991 THROUGH 1994 BRONCO NOTE: BOTH ORIGINAL EQUIPMENT AND REPLACEMENT TIRES ARE AFFECTED.
- Consequence: SHOULD THE TREAD SEPARATE AT HIGHWAY SPEEDS, A VEHICLE CRASH COULD OCCUR, POSSIBLY RESULTING IN PERSONAL INJURY OR DEATH.
- Remedy: THE REPLACEMENT/REIMBURSEMENT PROGRAM FOR THIS CAMPAIGN EXPIRED ON MARCH 31, 2002. HOWEVER, CUSTOMERS CAN CONTACT FORD AT 1-877-917-3673 OR GO ON-LINE TO WWW.FORD.COM FOR POSSIBLE ASSISTANCE.
- Manufacturer: FORD MOTOR COMPANY
- Components: STRUCTURE:BODY:HOOD:HINGE AND ATTACHMENTS
- Summary: VEHICLE DESCRIPTION: SPORT UTILITY VEHICLES WITH STEEL HOODS AND CERTAIN PICKUP TRUCKS EQUIPPED WITH SHEET MOLDING COMPOUND HOODS. A WIRE FORMED HOOD STRIKER COULD BE SUSCEPTIBLE TO FATIGUE FRACTURES. IF THE HOOD STRIKER FRACTURES, THE HOOD COULD FLY OPEN WHILE THE VEHICLE IS BEING DRIVEN.
- Consequence: A HOOD FLY-UP WHILE THE VEHICLE IS BEING OPERATED COULD RESULT IN REDUCED DRIVER VISIBILITY.
- Remedy: DEALERS WILL REPLACE THE HOOD STRIKER.
Negative 2001 Ford Ranger car reviews
Positive 2001 Ford Ranger car reviews
-
I hope you're doing well! I wanted to share my experience with my 2003 Ranger. I purchased it used with 7500 miles for $7000 and have been driving it for 14 months now. While the ride can be a bit harsh and the rear end jumps on some bumps, I'm extremely pleased with the gas mileage. It has increased from mid-20's at purchase to 31 mpg at my last fill-up! I've had no maintenance problems and it's been very dependable. In fact, I took it on a trip from VA to WI and back this summer with no mechanical problems. I also think it's the best looking little truck out there and would definitely consider buying another one in the future.
-
Great to hear that you had a positive experience with your Ranger! It's impressive that you only needed to replace a tensioner in three years of ownership. Despite some criticism of its 'outdated style', it sounds like you appreciate the classic pickup look with modern improvements in the engine, transmission, interior, and electronics. Best of luck with your new 2005 Ranger!
-
Hi there! It's great to hear that you've had such a positive experience with your 2001 Ranger! It's impressive that you've already driven it up to 60,000 miles without any issues. While the 4.0L V6 can be a bit sluggish at times, it still seems to be a good fit for the truck. I can understand your frustration with the fuel economy, though. Thanks for sharing your thoughts with us!
-
My 01 Ranger XLT 4.0L only gets 16-17 mpg, which is disappointing given that my 1998 Ranger XLT consistently achieves 20 mpg or better. Despite needing a 4X4, the 01 model squeaks loudly in all weather conditions. However, I am confident in my ability to find a solution to these issues.
-
I was shopping for a daily driver to replace my 79 F150 and decided to test drive the Edge on a whim. I fell in love with it! The semi dual exhaust sounds great and the truck rides higher than the base R, giving it a more truck-like feel. The suspension is a bit stiff, but that's to be expected. The basic pickup interior has vinyl floors and seats, crank windows, and no power features, but the CD player is a nice touch. My only regret is that it's not a long bed. I needed a dependable work truck and the smaller size helps in downtown traffic. The 3.0L motor isn't too punchy and doesn't get great gas mileage, but it gets the job done. The motor may struggle on inclines and the auto transmission downshifts to compensate, but overall I'm very happy with my purchase.
Additional sources
More sources of information about 2001 Ford Ranger problems:
Q&A: Common Problems with 2001 Ford Ranger - JustAnswer
May 30, 2020 ... If the fuel pump loses enough pressure it will set lean codes and can cause a misfire. That is why it is important to verify the pump is failing ...
2001 Ford Ranger Problems and Complaints - 14 Issues
Problem with your 2001 Ford Ranger? Our list of 14 known complaints reported by owners can help you fix your 2001 Ford Ranger.
Problem with 2001 Ranger 4.0 liter - Ranger-Forums - The Ultimate ...
Sep 21, 2023 ... 4.0L OHV & SOHC V6 Tech - Problem with 2001 Ranger 4.0 liter - I have a 2001 Ford Ranger 4 door XLT w whel drive that I bought recently ...
2001 Ranger for sale - $2,700 but high mileage. Worth it or not? : r ...
Apr 28, 2022 ... 4.0L SOHC has reliability issues so try to get a full history and inspection of engine. This gens best were actually the 3.0L Vulcans. 94 gen ...
2001 Ford Ranger Problems - Flagship One Blog
Apr 6, 2022 ... According to car complaints, the 2001 Ford Ranger Edge has rough shifting and sometimes does not even shift out of parking mode after starting.
Other years of Ford Ranger
Are you having problems with your 2001 Ford Ranger?
Winfield Kuphal 2025-01-09
I hope you're doing well! I just wanted to share my experience with the truck I received for my 16th birthday. While the outside looks stylish, I've found the inside to be a bit cramped and uncomfortable. Unfortunately, I've also noticed that the cab starts to shake when I drive over 70mph, which is a bit concerning. Additionally, I've found that the trade-in value for this truck is quite low. Thanks for listening!
Noe Jones 2024-11-04
The exterior of the vehicle has a cool appearance, but it may not be the most practical choice for hauling larger items such as an ATV or a sheet of plywood. The interior is functional, but it may be considered bland with its all-gray color scheme and lack of frills. However, it still provides a comfortable and functional driving experience. In terms of performance, the 5-speed automatic transmission provides decent acceleration in gears 1, 2, and 3, but struggles in 4th and 5th gear. The constant shifting of the automatic transmission can be frustrating, and it would be better if Ford offered a solid 4-speed automatic instead. The engine may not provide enough power on the highway, even when taken out of overdrive, resulting in higher RPMs and lower gas mileage. Despite this, the vehicle still manages to achieve a respectable 17 mpg in both city and highway driving, and up to 19 mpg downhill with a tailwind.
Murphy Abernathy 2024-10-21
The Ranger is a great vehicle to own, with its off-road capabilities and enjoyable driving experience. Although some owners have reported issues with the rear doors and rear wheels, these are common problems that can be easily resolved. In the rare event that a problem does occur, the transmission can be fixed with minimal hassle. Overall, the Ranger is a reliable and trustworthy vehicle that is sure to impress any driver.
Art Jaskolski 2024-09-09
The vehicle had several issues, including rust on the inside bottoms of the doors, poor fuel economy averaging 14.9, an inaccurate fuel gauge, and a blown gasket inside the transmission that required a rebuild at only 8000 miles. Additionally, the fog lamps had to be replaced 9 times due to moisture build-up inside the lens, and there were 3 recalls in just 1 year. The driver rear door needed to be re-adjusted because the striker wasn't aligned, and there was a squealing noise coming from the front drive wheels. Unfortunately, these issues made my ownership experience with the vehicle the worst I have ever had.
Nicholaus Casper 2024-07-10
I am so glad to hear that you are enjoying your Ranger! It sounds like it handles really well and is reliable with minimal upkeep. I understand that you would like better fuel economy and more space in the stepside bed for hauling things. Overall, it sounds like you are very happy with your Ranger and would definitely recommend it to others. It's great to hear that it is also very affordable.