1992 Ford F-250 problems

ford logo

The Ford Super Duty (also known as the Ford F-Series Super Duty) is a series of heavy-duty pickup trucks produced by the Ford Motor Company since the 1999 model year. Slotted above the consumer-oriented Ford F-150, the Super Duty trucks are an expansion of the Ford F-Series range, from F-250 to the F-600. The F-250 through F-450 are offered as pickup trucks, while the F-350 through F-600 are offered as chassis cabs.

Rather than adapting the lighter-duty F-150 truck for heavier use, Super Duty trucks have been designed as a dedicated variant of the Ford F-Series. The heavier-duty chassis components allow for heavier payloads and towing capabilities. With a GVWR over 8,500 lb (3,900 kg), Super Duty pickups are Class 2 and 3 trucks, while chassis-cab trucks are offered in Classes 3, 4, 5, and 6. The model line also offers Ford Power Stroke V8 diesel engines as an option.

Ford also offers a medium-duty version of the F-Series (F-650 and F-750), which is sometimes branded as the Super Duty, but is another chassis variant. The Super Duty pickup truck also served as the basis for the Ford Excursion full-sized SUV.

The Super Duty trucks and chassis-cabs are assembled at the Kentucky Truck Plant in Louisville, Kentucky, and at Ohio Assembly in Avon Lake, Ohio. Prior to 2016, medium-duty trucks were assembled in Mexico under the Blue Diamond Truck joint venture with Navistar International.

1992 Ford F-250

Social links

Common 1992 Ford F-250 problems

Based on the information gathered from the sources provided, here is a list of common problems with the Ford F-250 1992 based on complaints from owners:

  • Fuel System Problems:
    • Some owners experienced leaks in the fuel lines or tanks, which can be dangerous. Additionally, fuel pump failures were reported, leading to engine stalling or failure to start.
  • Steering System Concerns:
    • Complaints included power steering pump failures, resulting in difficulty steering, especially at lower speeds. Premature wear of the steering gear was also reported, leading to loose or erratic steering.
  • Brake Issues:
    • Owners reported premature wear or failure of brake pads and rotors, affecting the braking system of the F-250.
  • Electrical Problems:
    • Common electrical issues included faulty sensors or wiring problems, impacting various electrical components of the vehicle.

These common problems with the Ford F-250 1992 can significantly affect the performance, safety, and reliability of the vehicle. Owners should be aware of these issues to take appropriate steps in addressing them promptly to ensure the smooth operation of their Ford F-250.

1992 Ford F-250 engine

What are the bad years for the F-250?

The worst years for used Ford F-250 include: 2002 Ford F-250. 2006 Ford F-250. 2008 Ford F-250.

What is the best year F-250 to buy?

The most popular model year for the Ford F-250 is currently the 2016. The 2016 Ford F-250 for sale even ranks above the 2000 and 2001 models at Four Wheels Trend. The 2016 model has an outstanding maximum towing capacity, giving many owners the utility they need.

How many miles can a Ford 250 last?

300,000 miles as long as they are properly taken care of.

Is the Ford F-250 reliable?

Ford F-250 is a great choice for hauling and pickup. They are reliable, tough, and trusted on any terrain. However, some of its model years were a great failure. With multiple complaints, they did not impress their buyers.

What are the bad years for the F-250?

The worst years for used Ford F-250 include: 2002 Ford F-250. 2006 Ford F-250. 2008 Ford F-250.

Is the Ford F-250 reliable?

Ford F-250 is a great choice for hauling and pickup. They are reliable, tough, and trusted on any terrain. However, some of its model years were a great failure. With multiple complaints, they did not impress their buyers.

What is the best year F-250 to buy?

The most popular model year for the Ford F-250 is currently the 2016. The 2016 Ford F-250 for sale even ranks above the 2000 and 2001 models at Four Wheels Trend. The 2016 model has an outstanding maximum towing capacity, giving many owners the utility they need.

Are 1990 Ford F-250 reliable?

Very Reliable

Reliable and easy to maintain! Gas mileage and power could be better, but well worth the investment. Rating breakdown (out of 5): Comfort 4.0.

1992 Ford F-250 car problems categorized by type of issue

After analyzing all complaints sent to the NHTSA and researching popular Ford F-250 problems, we found that the most common problems with these 2023 model year vehicles are:

  • Fuel system problems
  • Gasoline problems
  • Service brakes problems
  • Power train problems
  • Hydraulic problems

The graph below shows statistics for all 1992 Ford F-250 vehicle components and the number of complaints received.

Latest 25 complaints 1992 Ford F-250

The NHTSA has received 141 complaints about various vehicle components related to the 1992 Ford F-250. Below are the 25 most recent complaints reported for 1992 Ford F-250 vehicles.

2018-06-13

FUEL/PROPULSION SYSTEM PROBLEM

  • Date Of Incident: 2018-04-02
  • VIN: 1FTHX25G1NK
  • Components: FUEL/PROPULSION SYSTEM
  • Summary: THE CHECK VALVE IS BAD AND GAS IS TRANSFERRED TO THE FRONT TANK CAUSING IT TO SPILL OVER. SOME F250 FROM THAT YEAR ARE UNDER RECALL. WHY IS MINE NOT
2015-09-23

STEERING PROBLEM

  • Date Of Incident: 2015-09-22
  • VIN: 1FTHX25G4NK
  • Components: STEERING
  • Summary: TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 1992 FORD F-250. WHILE DRIVING APPROXIMATELY 35 MPH, THE VEHICLE STARTED TO SHAKE. WHEN THE SPEED DECREASED TO 20 MPH, THE VEHICLE STOPPED SHAKING. THE FAILURE OCCURRED ON MULTIPLE OCCASIONS. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO AN INDEPENDENT MECHANIC WHERE THE FAILURE WAS UNABLE TO BE DUPLICATED. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOTIFIED OF THE FAILURE. THE APPROXIMATE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 153,000. UPDATED 02/12/16*LJ *JS
2012-08-14

ELECTRICAL SYSTEM,SERVICE BRAKES PROBLEM

  • Date Of Incident: 2012-07-30
  • VIN: 2FTHF25G7NC
  • Components: ELECTRICAL SYSTEM,SERVICE BRAKES
  • Summary: TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 1992 FORD F250. THE CONTACT STATED THE EMERGENCY BRAKE WOULD NOT ENGAGE. IN ADDITION, THE ODOMETER GAUGE WAS INOPERABLE. THE DEALER WAS NOTIFIED WHO STATED THAT THERE WAS A RECALL FOR THE FAILURE UNDER NHTSA CAMPAIGN ID NUMBER: 94V169001 (PARKING BRAKE: CONVENTIONAL) HOWEVER, THE VEHICLE WAS NOT INCLUDED. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOT NOTIFIED OF THE FAILURE. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 91,000.
2009-12-10

FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE PROBLEM

  • Date Of Incident: 2009-11-02
  • VIN: 1FTHX26HXNK
  • Components: FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE
  • Summary: WITH MY 3 GRANDDAUGHTERS IN THE CAB OF MY FORD F250 I STOPPED AT THE BICYCLE SHOP TO DROP OFF 2 BICYCLES THAT NEEDED REPAIR, THIS TOOK LESS THAN 5 MINUTES. WHEN I RETURNED TO MY TRUCK THERE WAS NO LESS THAN 1/2 GALON OF FUEL ON THE PAVEMENT AND FUEL WAS STILL LEAKING OUT OF THE REAR TANK FILLER NECK. I QUICKLY TOOK MY GRANDDAUGHTERS OUT OF THE TRUCK TO SAFETY AND HAD MY TRUCK TOWED TO MY MECHANIC. HE CALLED THE FORD DEALER IN ALHAMBRA CA. AND WAS TOLD OF THE DEFECTIVE VALVE, BUT THERE WAS NO RECALL AND THAT IT WOULD COST NO LESS THAN $ 400.00 TO CORRECT. I TOOK MY TRUCK TO THAT SAME DEALER THE FOLLOWING WEEK TO HAVE NEW SHOCKS INSTALLED AND WAS TOLD THE SAME THING BY THE SHOP MANAGER. THIS PREVENTS ME FROM FILLING BOTH TANKS OR LEAKAGE WILL OCCUR. ANOTHER INCIDENT OCCURRED WHEN A DRIVER OF ANOTHER VEHICLE PULLED ME OVER TO REPORT THAT HIS CAR HAD FUEL ALL OVER HIS NEW CAR AND TOOK DOWN MY INFORMATION, BUT WENT TO A NEARBY CAR WASH, BUT THAT I WOULD BE RESPONSIBLE IF ANY DAMAGE TO THE FINISH OCCURRED. THIS VALVE PROBLEM PUT MY FAMILY IN POTENTIAL GRAVE DANGER AND I FEEL THAT FORD IS RESPONSIBLE TO CORRECT THE PROBLEM AT THEIR EXPENSE. ACCORDING TO THE "AUTO RECALL CAR REPORT" FORD HAS EXTENDED THE WARRANTY FOR 12 YEAR OR 150,000 MILES. IS THE DOT ABLE TO HELP MY SITUATION AND ORDER FORD TO CORRECT THE FUEL CROSSOVER AND FUEL SPILLAGE PROBLEM? *TR
2007-09-26

VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL PROBLEM

  • Date Of Incident: 2007-08-27
  • VIN: 1FTHX26G6PK
  • Components: VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL
  • Summary: TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 1992 FORD F250. THE CONTACT RECEIVED A RECALL NOTICE FOR NHTSA CAMPAIGN ID NUMBER 07V336000 (VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL) ON AUGUST 27, 2007. HE TOOK THE VEHICLE TO THE DEALER AND THEY INFORMED HIM THAT THE PARTS WOULD BE UNAVAILABLE UNTIL JANUARY OF 2008. THEY ADVISED HIM TO DEACTIVATE HIS SPEED CONTROL SWITCH, HOWEVER, THE CONTACT REFUSED. THERE HAD BEEN NO FAILURE TO DATE. THE CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 120,000.
2007-03-29

TIRES PROBLEM

  • Date Of Incident: 2007-03-29
  • VIN: 1FTHX26G3NK
  • Components: TIRES
  • Summary: TIRE BLOWOUT. *JB
2005-01-31

VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL PROBLEM

  • Date Of Incident: 2004-01-30
  • Fire: 1
  • VIN: 1FTNX20F21E
  • Components: VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL
  • Summary: CONSUMER PARKED THE VEHICLE, WENT INTO THE HOUSE, AND SMELLED SMOKE. BY THE TIME THE CONSUMER COULD RESPOND THE WINDOWS BLEW OUT BECAUSE OF THE FIRE.*AK
2004-11-30

FUEL SYSTEM, OTHER PROBLEM

  • Date Of Incident: 2004-10-01
  • VIN: 1FTHX26G5NK
  • Components: FUEL SYSTEM, OTHER
  • Summary: CONSUMER COMPLAINED ABOUT A FUEL TANK PROBLEM. HOWEVER, THERE TWO RECALLS, RECALL 011008000 AND RECALL 93V125000 WERE ISSUED. THIS VEHICLE WA SNOT INCLUDED. CONSUMER CONTACTED THE FORD DEALER AND THE MANUFACTURER. *AK
2003-05-14

FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE PROBLEM

  • Date Of Incident: 2003-05-14
  • Components: FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE
  • Summary: NHTSA# 93-V-125-000 THE VEHICLE EXPERIENCED THE SAME PROBLEM AS STATED IN RECALL 93 V 125 000, HOWEVER THE DEALER REFUSED TO FIX. *JB
2002-11-15

TIRES PROBLEM

  • Date Of Incident: 2002-10-30
  • VIN: 1FTHX2FG1NK
  • Components: TIRES
  • Summary: CONSUMER STATES WHILE HIS WIFE WAS DRIVING THEIR TRUCK, THE TIRE ON THE FRONT OF THE TRUCK BLEW. HE STATES THAT THE SIDEWALL ON THE TIRE EXPLODED. HE ALSO STATES THAT HE OR HIS WIFE HAD HIT ANYTHING PRIOR. CONSUMER STATES THAT THE TIRES WAS SUPPOSE TO BE GOOD FOR 50,000 MILES INSTEAD HE JUST HAD 20,000 MILES ON THEM. HE ALSO STATES THAT THE TIRE WAS A UNIROYAL SIZE LT 235 85 R/16. TS
2002-08-11

TIRES PROBLEM

  • Date Of Incident: 2002-08-11
  • VIN: 1FTHX25H3NK
  • Components: TIRES
  • Summary: AT APPROX. 9:30 AM, TRUCK (WITH 3 PASENGERS AND NO CARGO) WAS TRAVELING ON A DRY, STRAIGHT PORTION OF HIGHWAY WHEN SUDDEN VIBRATION OCCURRED AT APPROX. 60-65 MPH FOLLOWED BY TREAD SEPARATION AND BLOWOUT. AFTER REGAINING CONTROL OF VEHICLE, I PULLED OFF ONTO RIGHT SHOULDER OF HIGHWAY TO INSPECT DAMAGE. MY RUNNING-BOARD AND INNER FENDERWELL SUTAINED DAMAGE. MFR. RECOMMENDED AIR PRESSURE (MAX. 80 PSI) REGULARLY MAINTAINED.*AK
2002-08-05

ELECTRICAL SYSTEM PROBLEM

  • Date Of Incident: 2002-08-01
  • VIN: 1FTHX25M5NK
  • Components: ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
  • Summary: WHEN USING EMERGENCY FLASHER IT CAUSES DUTCHMAN TRAVEL TRAILER WHEELS TO LOCK UP. DEALER NOTIFIED. FEEL FREE TO PROVIDE ANY FURTHER INFORMATION.*AK
2002-04-22

FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE PROBLEM

  • Date Of Incident: 2001-09-11
  • Components: FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE
  • Summary: GAS TANKS PROBLEM. THAT WHEN FILLING SECOND GAS TANK, IT WILL OVER FLOW INTO THE FIRST ONE. CONTACTED DEALER, THE PROBLEM HAS NOW BEEN CORRECTED TO THE CONSUMERS SATISFACTION. *AK *NLM
2002-03-08

FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE PROBLEM

  • Date Of Incident: 2002-03-07
  • VIN: 1FTHF25HONL
  • Components: FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE
  • Summary: GAS IS FLOWING BETWEEN THE DUAL GAS TANKS. WHEN BOTH TANKS ARE FULL GAS FLOWS TO THE GROUND. CONSUMER FEELS THIS IS VERY UNSAFE. *AK. CONSUMER STATES A PORTION OF THE UNUSED FUEL FROM ONE TANK RETURNS TO THE SECOND TANK, WHEN THIS OCCURS THE CAPACITY OF THE SECOND TANK CAN BE EXCEEDED, CAUSING FUEL SPILLAGE.*JB
2002-01-30

POWER TRAIN PROBLEM

  • Date Of Incident: 1993-03-01
  • VIN: FILL IN PLE
  • Components: POWER TRAIN
  • Summary: CLUTCH WILL SLIP DURING OPERATION WHEN PULLING A BOAT OUT OF THE WATER AND ONTO A TRAILER. ALSO, OVERDRIVE LIGHT ON THE INSTRUMENT PANEL WILL INTERMITTENTLY ILLUMINATE. DEALERSHIP REPLACED TRANSMISSION AT 30,000 MILES, AND HAS CHANGED COMPUTER CODES SEVERAL TIMES. THESE REPAIRS HAVE FAILED TO EFFECTIVELY REMEDY THE PROBLEM. PLEASE PROVIDE ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION / DOCUMENTATION.*AK
2001-10-11

TIRES PROBLEM

  • Date Of Incident: 2001-05-01
  • VIN: 1FTHX26M8NK
  • Components: TIRES
  • Summary: REPLACEMENT TIRES ON A FORD, F250, DOT VNW81X, WHILE TRAVELING AT 70 MPH VEHICLE STARTED TO SHAKE. CONSUMER PULLED OVER, AND LOOKED AT FRONT DRIVER SIDE TIRE AND NOTICED THAT TREAD HAD SEPARATED FROM TIRE AND RAPPED AROUND AXLE. THERE WAS SEVERE VEHICLE DAMAGE. *AK DOT NUMBER VNW81XL038 EXPERIENCED BLOWOUT ON DRIVER REAR, DOT NUMBER VNW81XL028 EXPERIENCED BLOWOUT ON PASSENGER REAR, ALL TIRES DID DAMAGE TO VEHICLE. *SLC
2001-03-23

ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING PROBLEM

  • Date Of Incident: 2000-03-01
  • Components: ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING
  • Summary: SERPENTINE BELT TENSIONER FAILED TWICE ON VEHICLE WHILE CONSUMER WAS DRIVING, CONSUMER LOST STEERING AND BRAKES. CONTACED DEALER ,AND THE DEALER WAS NOT WILLING TO DO ANYTHING.*AK *SLC
2001-02-02

POWER TRAIN PROBLEM

  • Date Of Incident: 1999-11-30
  • VIN: 1FTHX26G6NK
  • Components: POWER TRAIN
  • Summary: BOTH FRONT AXLE U-JOINTS COMPLETELY WORN OUT AND ARE FALLING APART. NLM
2001-02-02

ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING PROBLEM

  • Date Of Incident: 1999-11-30
  • VIN: 1FTHX26G6NK
  • Components: ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING
  • Summary: ALL COOLING SYSTEM HOSES WERE GETTING VERY SOFT. NLM
2001-02-02

STRUCTURE PROBLEM

  • Date Of Incident: 1999-11-30
  • VIN: 1FTHX26G6NK
  • Components: STRUCTURE
  • Summary: THE VEHICLE HAS A RUBBING NOISE WHEN MAKING RIGHT TURNS DEALER FOUND THAT THE FRONT BUMPER AND BRACKETS BENT ALLOWING THE TIRE TO RUB ON THE BUMMPER. NLM
2001-02-02

ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING PROBLEM

  • Date Of Incident: 1999-11-30
  • VIN: 1FTHX26G6NK
  • Components: ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING
  • Summary: THE RIGHT SIDE MANIFOLD WAS WARPED RESULTING IN AN EXHAUST LEAK, 2 BOLTS WERE ALSO BROKEN IN THE CYLINDER HEAD. NLM
2001-02-02

SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC PROBLEM

  • Date Of Incident: 2000-11-08
  • VIN: 1FTHX26G6NK
  • Components: SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC
  • Summary: THE BRAKES WERE REPAIRED SEVERAL TIMES BECAUSE THEY DID NOT STOP THE TRUCK WHICH WAS USED FOR PULLING A TRAILER, THE CONSUMER TOOK THE VEHICLE TO ANOTHER DEALER WHO FIXED THE PROBLEM BY FIXING THE RABS VALVE, NOW THE VEHICLE CAN BE STOPPED PROPERLY, THE CONSUER REQUEST REIMBURSEMET FOR THE MONEY SPENT TRYING TO CORRECT THE BRAKING PROBLEM. NLM
2001-01-03

POWER TRAIN PROBLEM

  • Date Of Incident: 2000-12-16
  • VIN: 1FTHX26M4NK
  • Components: POWER TRAIN
  • Summary: GEAR SHIFT SHAFT BROKE. NLM
2000-12-28

POWER TRAIN PROBLEM

  • Date Of Incident: 2000-12-14
  • VIN: 1FTHX26M4NK
  • Components: POWER TRAIN
  • Summary: GEAR SHIFT SHAFT FAILED WHEN CONSUMER SHIFTED INTO DRIVE, CONSUMER BELIEVES THIS IS POORLY DESIGNED. NLM
2000-10-28

POWER TRAIN PROBLEM

  • Date Of Incident: 2000-09-23
  • VIN: 1FTHF26M2NN
  • Components: POWER TRAIN
  • Summary: THIS IS THE THIRD TRANSMISSIONS FAILURE CAUSED BY PRE-MATURE TORQUE CONVERTER BUSHING FAILURE, CREATING EXCESSIVE HEAT AND PUMP MELT-DOWN AND TRANSMISSION FAILURE.*AK

1992 Ford F-250 recalls

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has issued 7 recalls for different components of the 1992 Ford F-250.

2006-05-24
  • Manufacturer: CK MOTORSPORT, INC.
  • Components: EXTERIOR LIGHTING
  • Summary: CERTAIN CK MOTORSPORTS COMBINATION HEADLIGHTS, CLEAR CORNER, BUMPER, AND SIDE MARKER LIGHTS SOLD AS REPLACEMENT LAMPS FOR USE ON THE PASSENGER VEHICLES LISTED ABOVE. SOME COMBINATION LAMPS THAT ARE NOT EQUIPPED WITH AMBER SIDE REFLECTORS FAIL TO CONFORM TO FEDERAL MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY STANDARD NO. 108, LAMPS, REFLECTIVE DEVICES, AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT.
  • Consequence: WITHOUT THE AMBER REFLECTORS, THE VEHICLE WILL BE POORLY ILLUMINATED, POSSIBLY RESULTING IN A VEHICLE CRASH WITHOUT WARNING.
  • Remedy: CK MOTORSPORT WILL NOTIFY OWNERS AND REPLACE THE NONCOMPLIANT LAMPS FREE OF CHARGE. THE RECALL BEGAN ON JULY 1, 2006. OWNERS MAY CONTACT CK MOTORSPORT AT 1-909-610-7211.
2001-07-19
  • Manufacturer: FORD MOTOR COMPANY
  • Components: FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE
  • Summary: THIS IS NOT A SAFETY RECALL IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SAFETY ACT. HOWEVER, IT IS DEEMED A SAFETY IMPROVEMENT CAMPAIGN BY THE AGENCY. VEHICLE DESCRIPTION: 1990-1993 FORD F-SERIES VEHICLES EQUIPPED WITH DUAL FUEL TANKS AND 4.9, 5.0,5.8, OR 7.5 LITER GASOLINE FUELED ENGINES. SOME VEHICLES CAN EXPERIENCE A CROSS TANK FUEL FLOW CONDITION DUE TO A DAMAGED CHECK VALVE IN THE FUEL PUMP/SENDER ASSEMBLY. FUEL MAY BE SUPPLIED FROM ONE TANK AND SOME OR ALL OF THE UNUSED FUEL MAY BE RETURNED TO THE OTHER TANK.
  • Consequence: SHOULD THIS OCCUR, THE CAPACITY OF THE RECEIVING TANK MAY BE EXCEEDED AND FUEL MAY OVERFLOW FROM THE FILLER CAP.
  • Remedy: FORD IS EXTENDING THE WARRANTY FOR POTENTIAL FUEL CROSS-FLOW TO 12 YEARS OF SERVICE OR 150,000 MILES FROM THE VEHICLE'S WARRANTY START DATE, WHICHEVER OCCURS FIRST. THIS COVER WILL AUTOMATICALLY TRANSFER TO SUBSEQUENT OWNERS AT NO CHARGE. IF A VEHICLE ALREADY HAS MORE THAN 150,000 MILES, THIS OVERAGE WILL LAST UNTIL DECEMBER 31, 2001. IF THE VEHICLE IS EXPERIENCING A FUEL CROSS-FLOW CONDITION, DEALERS WILL REPAIR THE CONDITION FREE OF CHARGE.
2001-05-22
  • Manufacturer: FORD MOTOR COMPANY
  • Components: TIRES:TREAD/BELT
  • Summary: THIS IS NOT A SAFETY RECALL IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SAFETY ACT. HOWEVER, IT IS DEEMED A SAFETY IMPROVEMENT CAMPAIGN BY THE AGENCY. EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION: FORD IS REPLACING ALL FIRESTONE WILDERNESS AT 15, 16, AND 17 INCH TIRES MOUNTED ON FORD TRUCKS AND SUVS. FORD REPORTS TREAD SEPARATION CAN OCCUR DUE TO A COMBINATION OF THE SENSITIVITY OF THE TIRE DESIGN TO STRESS, AGING, AND MANUFACTURING DIFFERENCES BETWEEN PLANTS. FORD IS REPLACING THESE TIRES TO PREVENT POSSIBLE PREMATURE TIRE FAILURE. VEHICLE DESCRIPTION: THE VEHICLES LISTED BELOW MAY HAVE BEEN ORIGINALLY EQUIPPED WITH FIRESTONE WILDERNESS AT TIRES OR MAY HAVE HAD WILDERNESS AT TIRES INSTALLED DURING THE FIRESTONE RECALL LAUNCHED IN AUGUST 2000. CERTAIN 1991 THROUGHT 2002 FORD EXPLORER CERTAIN 2001 THROUGHT 2002 EXPLORER SPORT, AND SPORT TRAC CERTAIN 1997 THROUGH 2002 MERCURY MOUNTAINEER CERTAIN 1991 THROUGH 2001 RANGER CERTAIN 1999 THROUGH 2001 EXPEDITION CERTAIN 1991 THROUGH 1994, AND 1997 MODEL YEAR F-SERIES CERTAIN 1991 THROUGH 1994 BRONCO NOTE: BOTH ORIGINAL EQUIPMENT AND REPLACEMENT TIRES ARE AFFECTED.
  • Consequence: SHOULD THE TREAD SEPARATE AT HIGHWAY SPEEDS, A VEHICLE CRASH COULD OCCUR, POSSIBLY RESULTING IN PERSONAL INJURY OR DEATH.
  • Remedy: THE REPLACEMENT/REIMBURSEMENT PROGRAM FOR THIS CAMPAIGN EXPIRED ON MARCH 31, 2002. HOWEVER, CUSTOMERS CAN CONTACT FORD AT 1-877-917-3673 OR GO ON-LINE TO WWW.FORD.COM FOR POSSIBLE ASSISTANCE.
1994-09-07
  • Manufacturer: FORD MOTOR COMPANY
  • Components: PARKING BRAKE:CONVENTIONAL
  • Summary: THE PARKING BRAKE CONTROL SELF-ADJUST PAWL DOES NOT LINE UP PROPERLY WITH THE SELF-ADJUST RACHET CAUSING THE PAWL TO SLIP OVER ONE OR MORE TEETH IN THE RACHET.
  • Consequence: WHEN THE ABOVE OCCURS, IT CAN RESULT IN PARKING BRAKE SYSTEM INEFFECTIVENESS. THE PARKING BRAKE WILL NOT HOLD THE VEHICLE, CAUSING THE VEHICLE TO ROLL FREELY, IF THE TRANSMISSION IS NOT LEFT IN GEAR.
  • Remedy: A WEDGE WILL BE INSTALLED WHICH WILL SERVE TO LOCK THE PARKING BRAKE SELF-ADJUST MECHANISM PAWL INTO ENGAGEMENT WITH THE RACHET. ALSO, OWNERS WILL BE ADVISED TO RELEASE AND REAPPLY THE PARKING BRAKE WHENEVER TOOTH SKIP OCCURS AND WILL BE REMINDED TO ALWAYS TURN OFF THE ENGINE AND LEAVE THE VEHICLE IN GEAR WHEN THE VEHICLE IS PARKED.
1993-08-02
  • Manufacturer: FORD MOTOR COMPANY
  • Components: FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE:STORAGE:TANK ASSEMBLY
  • Summary: A MALFUNCTIONING CHECK VALVE WITHIN THE FUEL PUMP ASSEMBLY CAUSES A PORTION OF THE UNUSED FUEL FROM ONE TANK TO BE RETURNED TO THE SECOND TANK. WHEN THIS OCCURS, THE CAPACITY OF THE SECOND TANK CAN BE EXCEEDED, CAUSING FUEL SPILLAGE.
  • Consequence: SPILLED FUEL CAN RESULT IN A FIRE WHEN EXPOSED TO ASOURCE OF IGNITION.
  • Remedy: REPLACEMENT OF THE FUEL PRESSURE REGULATOR AND INSTALLATION OF REDUNDANT CHECK VALVES.
1992-08-04
  • Manufacturer: FORD MOTOR COMPANY
  • Components: ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING:ENGINE:GASOLINE
  • Summary: THE SOUND INSULATION ON THE ENGINE SIDE OF THE DASH PANEL CAN CONTACT THE EXHAUST MANIFOLD.
  • Consequence: CONTACT BETWEEN THE INSULATION AND THE HOT EXHAUSTMANIFOLD MAY RESULT IN A ENGINE COMPARTMENT FIRE.
  • Remedy: DEALERS WILL MODIFY THE SOUND INSULATOR AT NO COST TO OWNERS.
1992-01-14
  • Manufacturer: FORD MOTOR COMPANY
  • Components: STRUCTURE:BODY:DOOR
  • Summary: WATER CAN ENTER THE DOOR LATCH RELEASE CABLE. IF THE VEHICLE IS OPERATED IN BELOW FREEZING TEMPERATURES, THE WATER IN THE DOOR LATCH RELEASE CABLE CAN FREEZE AND CAUSE THE LATCH MECHANISM TO MALFUNCTION.
  • Consequence: THE MALFUNCTION OF THE DOOR LATCH RELEASE CAN RESULT INTHREE DIFFERENT PROBLEMS: 1) THE DOOR WILL NOT BE ABLE TO BE RELATCHED, 2) THEINSIDE DOOR HANDLE CAN BECOME INOPERATIVE, AND 3) THE DOOR COULD APPEAR TO BELATCHED WHEN IT IS NOT, ALLOWING THE DOOR TO OPEN UNEXPECTEDLY IF IT IS JARRED,AND INCREASING THE RISK OF INJURY TO THE ADJACENT SEAT OCCUPANT.
  • Remedy: REVISED DOOR RELEASE CABLES AND WATER SHIELDS WILL BE INSTALLED.

Positive 1992 Ford F-250 car reviews

  1. Kory Kunde 2024-10-07

    I can tell that you are a true Ford enthusiast! Your 92 F250, 4X4 sounds like an amazing truck that has served you well over the years. It's great to hear that it has been able to handle all of your hauling needs without any problems, even in below zero weather. I appreciate your honesty in acknowledging that there is always room for improvement in anything. It's clear that you have a lot of love for your truck and I'm sure it will continue to serve you and your family for many years to come. Thank you for sharing your positive experience with Ford!

  2. Dylan Goodwin 2024-08-12

    The can be no better vehicle. I drove a Chevy three quarter ton with a 454 engine for just over 125,000 miles. Then I bought my Ford F-250 diesel. Now after more than 223,000 miles I still enjoy it. The only problem I have had is a rough shift from first gear to second gear, so I just manually shift from 2 to Drive. Air conditioner has never had to be charged. I change the oil every three thousand miles. The paint has held up really well (white). All my friends keep asking when I will get me a new truck. I see no need to spend $30,000, when you have a great 1991 Ford F-250.

Leave your review of 1992 Ford F-250

Additional sources

More sources of information about 1992 Ford F-250 problems:

buying an 86-96 f150/250, common problems to look for? - Ford ...
buying an 86-96 f150/250, common problems to look for? - Ford ...
https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/1117933-buying-an-86-96-f150-250-common-problems-to-look-for.html

Nov 25, 2011 ... 1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks - buying an 86-96 f150/250, common problems to look for? - ok, i'm looking for a clean 86-96 ...

1996 Ford F-250 - common problems?
1996 Ford F-250 - common problems?
https://repairpal.com/common-problems-321

Feb 11, 2011 ... I am looking into buying a 1996 f-250 with a 5.8l engine, and a standard transmission, with four wheel drive. it has about 100000 miles on ...

What causes stall as I was driving a 1992 Ford F250 5.8 with dual
What causes stall as I was driving a 1992 Ford F250 5.8 with dual
https://www.justanswer.com/ford/2fhfw-1992-ford-f250-5-8-dual-tanks-having.html

Aug 17, 2009 ... Thank you for asking your question on JustAnswer. The common problem you are describing on the 1992 is likely a bad fuel pressure regulator and ...

1992 Ford F-250 Problems and Complaints - 10 Issues
1992 Ford F-250 Problems and Complaints - 10 Issues
https://repairpal.com/1992-ford-f-250/problems

Problem with your 1992 Ford F-250? Our list of 10 known complaints reported by owners can help you fix your 1992 Ford F-250.

Q&A: Troubleshooting Cold Air Blowing from Ducts | 92 Ford F250
Q&A: Troubleshooting Cold Air Blowing from Ducts | 92 Ford F250
https://www.justanswer.com/ford/0zhkb-getting-cold-air-blowing-ducts.html

Dec 19, 2007 ... Was this answer helpful? up Yes. down No. Finish.

Other years of Ford F-250

ford f-250 1993 photo
F-250 1993
Ford

165

9

9

  • 5
  • 4
  • 3
  • 2
  • 1
ford f-250 1994 photo
F-250 1994
Ford

146

10

12

  • 5
  • 4
  • 3
  • 2
  • 1
ford f-250 1995 photo
F-250 1995
Ford

204

4

17

  • 5
  • 4
  • 3
  • 2
  • 1
ford f-250 1996 photo
F-250 1996
Ford

191

5

14

  • 5
  • 4
  • 3
  • 2
  • 1
ford f-250 1997 photo
F-250 1997
Ford

311

14

9

  • 5
  • 4
  • 3
  • 2
  • 1
ford f-250 1998 photo
F-250 1998
Ford

58

9

14

  • 5
  • 4
  • 3
  • 2
  • 1

Are you having problems with your 1992 Ford F-250?

Add car complaint
1992 Ford F-250 photo