1990 Buick Regal problems

buick logo

The Buick Regal is a line of mid-size cars marketed by Buick since 1973. For nearly its entire production, the Regal has served as the premium mid-size/intermediate offering of the Buick product range. Introduced as a submodel of the Buick Century, the model line is currently in its sixth generation. From the 1970s to the 1990s, the Regal served as the Buick counterpart of the Pontiac Grand Prix and Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme.

Originally introduced as a personal luxury coupe, the Regal was later expanded to a full model line. To showcase its success in NASCAR racing, from 1982 to 1987, Buick introduced the Buick Regal Grand National, Regal T-Type, and the limited-production Buick GNX. During the 1990s, while the four-door sedan superseded the two-door coupe entirely, forced-induction engines made their return, with superchargers replacing turbochargers.

For 1999, the Buick Regal inaugurated the sale of GM vehicles in the Chinese market, with the 1997 design lasting through 2008. Following the 2004 model year, Buick retired the nameplate in North America, with the Regal replaced by the Buick LaCrosse.

For 2008, Opel introduced the Opel Insignia as its largest sedan, with Buick rebranding the model line as the Regal for the Chinese market. For 2011, GM reintroduced the Regal to North America, rebranding the Insignia sedan for North America. For 2018, Buick introduced the second-generation Opel Insignia, sourcing all production from Germany; alongside a first-ever liftback sedan, the Regal TourX was the first Buick station wagon in 22 years.

After 2020, as the division shifted away from car model lines, Buick ended sales of the Regal in North America.

1990 Buick Regal

Social links

Common 1990 Buick Regal problems

Based on the complaints from owners of the 1990 Buick Regal, several common problems have been reported:

  1. Ignition Key Getting Stuck: Owners have experienced issues with the ignition key getting stuck in the ignition, particularly in models from 1994 to 2016. This problem arises when the automatic transmission fails or the wire relaying gear information is faulty. Restarting the vehicle or adjusting the gears has been a temporary fix for this issue.
  2. Mass Air Flow Sensor and Crankshaft Position Sensor Issues: The 1990 Buick Regal is prone to problems with the mass air flow sensor (MAF) and crankshaft position sensor (CPS). Owners have reported random stalling and stuttering while driving at various speeds, which can be dangerous. Replacing these faulty sensors is the solution, with replacement costs ranging from $20 to $70.
  3. Power Window Malfunction: Another common problem reported by owners is the power windows stopping working in models from 1990 to 2011. This issue is often caused by a faulty switch. Replacement power window switches are more affordable to replace compared to the power window motor or regulator, costing between $10 to $80.

These issues can be frustrating for Buick Regal owners and may require timely attention to prevent further damage or inconvenience. Regular maintenance and prompt replacement of faulty components can help address these common problems effectively.

1990 Buick Regal engine

Is the Buick Regal a reliable car?

The Buick Regal is considered reliable, with a reliability rating of 4.0 out of 5.0 from RepairPal.

What is the best year for a Buick Regal?

This is the overall most reliable Buick Regal year. According to motorandwheels.com, the 2011 Buick Regal is the best in the entire line. Featuring an excellent engine, solid powertrain, and great performance and comfort, it is still a top choice for anyone seeking a midsize and reliable sedan.

How many miles can a Buick Regal last?

A Buick Regal will live around 150,000-200,000 miles with excellent care. Thus, high mileage for the vehicle is around 150,000 miles. This number is solid, and once you pass it, the maintenance you perform will shine. The Regal is far more likely here to break down and could run into some expensive repair needs.

Why did they stop making Buick Regal?

Why did Buick stop making the Regal? The end of the Regal line came as a result of a shift in Buick's corporate strategy. The company decided to shift its focus to its line of SUVs, and the Regal's discontinuation was part of a larger reduction in Buick's passenger car lineup.

Is Buick Regal a reliable car?

The Buick Regal is considered reliable, with a reliability rating of 4.0 out of 5.0 from RepairPal.

What is the best year for a Buick Regal?

This is the overall most reliable Buick Regal year. According to motorandwheels.com, the 2011 Buick Regal is the best in the entire line. Featuring an excellent engine, solid powertrain, and great performance and comfort, it is still a top choice for anyone seeking a midsize and reliable sedan.

Why did they stop making Buick Regal?

Why did Buick stop making the Regal? The end of the Regal line came as a result of a shift in Buick's corporate strategy. The company decided to shift its focus to its line of SUVs, and the Regal's discontinuation was part of a larger reduction in Buick's passenger car lineup.

Is a 1990 Buick Regal front wheel drive?

The new W platform was designed for better handling and comfort. It was the first front-wheel-drive Regal, and it showed a lack of experience in that area.

1990 Buick Regal car problems categorized by type of issue

After analyzing all complaints sent to the NHTSA and researching popular Buick Regal problems, we found that the most common problems with these 2023 model year vehicles are:

  • Service brakes problems
  • Hydraulic problems
  • Engine and engine cooling problems
  • Structure problems
  • Suspension problems

The graph below shows statistics for all 1990 Buick Regal vehicle components and the number of complaints received.

Latest 25 complaints 1990 Buick Regal

The NHTSA has received 103 complaints about various vehicle components related to the 1990 Buick Regal. Below are the 25 most recent complaints reported for 1990 Buick Regal vehicles.

2017-09-26

ELECTRICAL SYSTEM PROBLEM

  • Date Of Incident: 2016-09-25
  • VIN: 2G4WD14TXL1
  • Components: ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
  • Summary: ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS CONTROLLED BY SIGNAL LEVER DO NOT WORK EXCEPT BY HOLDING LEVER IN CERTAIN POSITIONS: I.E. BRAKE LIGHTS, SIGNAL LEVER L UP, TURN SIGNALS SWITCH LEVER UP, HIGH BEAMS NO GO ETC. ALL THE TIME.
2007-11-15

LATCHES/LOCKS/LINKAGES PROBLEM

  • Date Of Incident: 2007-10-20
  • Number Of Injuries: 1
  • Crash: 1
  • Components: LATCHES/LOCKS/LINKAGES
  • Summary: 1990 BUICK REGAL HAD EQUIPMENT FAILURE. CONSUMER WAS ABLE TO PULL OVER TO THE SHOULDER UNDER CONTROL WITHOUT ANY PROBLEMS. *KB ACCORDING TO THE POLICE REPORT, UPON INSPECTION OF THE HOOD LATCH AND BRACKET, THE OFFICER DISCOVERED PART OF THE BRACKET AT THE FRONT OF THE ENGINE BAY WAS MISSING. THE BOLT WAS MISSING AS WELL. THE CRASH WAS DUE TO THE HOOD LATCH AND BRACKET COMING APART, WHICH CAUSED THE HOOD TO OPEN AND SLAM AGAINST THE WINDSHIELD. THE CONSUMER WAS INJURED. (OHIO TRAFFIC CRASH REPORT).
2004-09-28

STRUCTURE PROBLEM

  • Date Of Incident: 2004-07-06
  • VIN: 2G4WB14L0L1
  • Components: STRUCTURE
  • Summary: THE REAR CRADLE BOLTS BROKE AND THE CRADLE SEPARATED FROM THE BODY OF THE VEHICLE. THIS CAUSED THE STEERING LINKAGE COUPLERS TO SEPARATE AND FALL OFF, RESULTING IN LOSS OF STEERING. THIS OCCURRED BECAUSE THE CRADLE BOLTS RUSTED. THIS WOULD NOT HAVE OCCURRED IF CORROSIVE RESTRAINT PARTS WERE USED WHEN THE REAR CRADLE BOLT RECALL 97V058000 REPAIRS WERE PERFORMED, PER THE DEALERSHIP.*AK A RECALL WAS ISSUED FOR THE FRONT AND REAR CRADLE BOLTS. THE CONSUMER CONTACTED THE MANUFACTURER TO FIND OUT WHEN OR IF THE BOLTS WERE EVER REPLACED. THE REPRESENTATIVE INDICATED THAT THERE WERE NO OUTSTANDING RECALL ON THE VEHICLE BUT COULD NOT TELL THE CONSUMER WHEN THE RECALL WERE DONE. *NM
2004-02-09

WHEELS PROBLEM

  • Date Of Incident: 2024-11-24
  • VIN: 2G4WB14T6L1
  • Components: WHEELS
  • Summary: RIGHT FRONT WHEEL VIBRATED. DRIVER PULLED OVER, PULLED OFF LUGS, AND NOTICED THE RIM WAS CRACKED. DEALER WAS CONTACTED. RECALL 94V041000 WAS ISSUED ON THIS MAKE, MODEL, AND YEAR, BUT THIS VEHICLE WAS NOT INCLUDED UNDER RECALL DUE TO VIN. *AK
2003-04-14

STRUCTURE PROBLEM

  • Date Of Incident: 2024-11-24
  • VIN: 2G4WD14T8L1
  • Components: STRUCTURE
  • Summary: AFTER THE RECALL FOR THE CRADLE BOLTS WAS COMPLETED, THE STEERING FAILED. RECALL #00 V 189 000. *JB AFTER THE RECALL FOR THE CRADLE BOLTS WAS COMPLETED, THE STEERING FAILED. RECALL #00 V 189 000. THERE WAS A CLASS ACTION SUIT ON BRAKES-CONSUMER'S BRAKES FAILED AFTER THE CLASS ACTION SUIT.*MR
2002-11-26

STRUCTURE PROBLEM

  • Date Of Incident: 2002-02-15
  • VIN: 2G4WB14T1L1
  • Components: STRUCTURE
  • Summary: CONSUMERS SON WAS IN OPERATION OF THE VEHICLE WHEN SUDDENLY ALL STEERING WAS LOST. THE VEHICLE WAS TOWED AND IT WAS EXPLAINED THAT THE FRAME HAD SEPARATED FROM THE CHASSIS AND HAD DROPPED, DISENGAGING THE STEERING ASSEMBLY. THE CAUSE WAS THE CRADLE BOLTS HAD PULLED THROUGH THE RETAINERS DUE TO CORROSION. BUICK SENT CONSUMER A RECALL NOTICE SHORTLY AFTER REGARDING THE SAME PROBLEM. BUICK TOLD CONSUMER TO SEND THE REPAIR BILL TO THEM FOR REIMBURSEMENT. CONSUMER HAS NOT HEARD FROM THEM SINCE. *JG
2002-07-09

SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC PROBLEM

  • Date Of Incident: 2002-06-18
  • VIN: 1G4EC13C9L9
  • Components: SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC
  • Summary: WHILE APPLYING BRAKES AT 20 MPH BRAKE PEDAL WENT TO THE FLOOR ,AND VEHICLE CONTINUE ON BEFORE STOPPING. DEALER CONTACTED. FEEL FREE TO PROVIDE ANY FURTHER INFORMATION.*AKI
2001-08-29

SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC PROBLEM

  • Date Of Incident: 2024-11-24
  • VIN: 2G4WB14L3L1
  • Components: SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC
  • Summary: REAR BRAKE CALIPERS WOULD LOCK UP WHEN BRAKES WERE APPLIED. HAD BRAKES REPLACED TWICE DUE TO PADS WEARING EXCESSIVELY. MECHANIC INDICATED CAUSE OF PROBLEM WAS MASTER CYLINDER.*AK
2001-08-24

SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC PROBLEM

  • Date Of Incident: 2001-03-20
  • Number Of Injuries: 1
  • Crash: 1
  • VIN: 2G4WB14L3L1
  • Components: SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC
  • Summary: REAR CALIPERS CONSITANTLY FAILING. *AK
2001-04-27

SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC PROBLEM

  • Date Of Incident: 2024-11-24
  • VIN: 1GMFAD886RT
  • Components: SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC
  • Summary: WHEN APPLYING THE BRAKES PEDAL GOES TO FLOOR, CAUSING EXTENDED STOPPING DISTANCE. CAUSE UNKNOWN. PLEASE GIVE ANY FURTHER DETAILS.*AK
2001-03-05

STRUCTURE PROBLEM

  • Date Of Incident: 2001-03-02
  • VIN: 2G4WB14L7L1
  • Components: STRUCTURE
  • Summary: WHILE MAKING A TURN HEARD A LOUD NOISE COMING FROM LEFT SIDE OF CAR. TOOK TO DEALER, AND PUT ON FRONT CRADLE BOLTS AND WASHER, BUT NEVER DID REAR. CONSUMER FELT LIKE REAR HAS GONE BAD, AND THEY MAY LOOSE STEERING.*AK
2001-01-28

POWER TRAIN,EXTERIOR LIGHTING PROBLEM

  • Date Of Incident: 2001-01-25
  • VIN: 2G4WB14L7L1
  • Components: POWER TRAIN,EXTERIOR LIGHTING
  • Summary: NO SUMMARY LISTED FOR ABOVE VEHICLE. *AK
2000-12-27

AIR BAGS PROBLEM

  • Date Of Incident: 2000-12-01
  • Crash: 1
  • VIN: 2G4WB14L6L1
  • Components: AIR BAGS
  • Summary: CONSUMER WAS TRAVELING AT 65MPH ON EXPRESSWAY AND ANOTHER VEHICLE MADE A SUDDEN U-TURN IN MIDDLE OF STREET, AND HIT CONSUMER'S VEHICLE FROM SIDE OF CAR. UPON IMPACT, AIR BAGS FAILED TO DEPLOY. *AK
2000-11-20

STRUCTURE PROBLEM

  • Date Of Incident: 2000-11-08
  • VIN: 2G4WB14L4L1
  • Components: STRUCTURE
  • Summary: VEHICLES STEERING FAILED SUDDENLY WHILE PULLING OUT OF A PARKING LOT, CONSUMER TOOK THE VEHICLE TO THE DEALER TO SEE IF IT WAS COVERED UNDER RECALL 00V-189 BUT THE DEALER WAS NOT VERY COOPERATIVE. NLM
2000-10-17

WHEELS PROBLEM

  • Date Of Incident: 2000-10-01
  • VIN: 2G4WD14T3L1
  • Components: WHEELS
  • Summary: CONSUMER CONTACTED DEALER AND THE PART WAS ON ORDER.*AK
2000-08-01

SUSPENSION,ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING PROBLEM

  • Date Of Incident: 2000-07-31
  • Components: SUSPENSION,ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING
  • Summary: WHILE DRIVING DOWN THE ROAD VEHICLE WAS SOUNDING LIKE SOMETHING WAS RATTLING AND IT WAS JERKING. ALSO, CONSUMER SAW A LOT OF SMOKE, THEN VEHICLE CUT OFF.*AK
2000-06-29

SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC PROBLEM

  • Date Of Incident: 2024-11-24
  • VIN: 2G4WD14L7L1
  • Components: SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC
  • Summary: REAR BRAKES FAILED. YH
2000-04-25

ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING PROBLEM

  • Date Of Incident: 2000-03-01
  • VIN: 2G4WB14T1L1
  • Components: ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING
  • Summary: WHILE TRAVELING AND DEPRESSING THE BRAKES VEHICLE STALLED/SURGED AND IDLED TO HIGH RPMS. CONSUMER STATED BRAKES HAVE TO BE DEPRESSED MOST OF TRAVELING. *AK *ML
1999-10-25

SUSPENSION PROBLEM

  • Date Of Incident: 1999-09-01
  • VIN: 2G4WB14TXL1
  • Components: SUSPENSION
  • Summary: CRADLE BOLTS RUSTED AND BROKEN CAUSING FRAME TO COME APART, RESULTING IN LOSS OF STEERING CONTROL. MJS
1999-09-21

STEERING PROBLEM

  • Date Of Incident: 1999-09-19
  • VIN: 2G4WB14TXL1
  • Components: STEERING
  • Summary: FRONT CRADLE RUSTED AND FELL DOWN WHILE DRIVING CAUISING LOSS OF STEERINF ABILITY AND LOSS OF CONTROL. *YC
1999-07-26

SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC PROBLEM

  • Date Of Incident: 2024-11-24
  • Components: SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC
  • Summary: WHEN APPLYING THE BRAKES PEDAL GOES TO THE FLOOR . OWNER HAS TO USE THE EMERGENCY BRAKE TO STOP. DEALER SAYS NOTHING WRONG WITH VEHICLE. BRAKES ARE COMPLETELY GONE AGAIN. *AK
1999-07-19

WHEELS PROBLEM

  • Date Of Incident: 1999-06-27
  • Number Of Injuries: 3
  • VIN: 2G4WF5412N1
  • Components: WHEELS
  • Summary: LEFT REAR WHEEL FELL OFF OF VEHICLE CAUSING LOSS OF CONTROL AND VEHICLE COLLISION. (OHIO TRAFFIC CRASH REPORT). MJS
1999-06-29

STRUCTURE PROBLEM

  • Date Of Incident: 1999-04-04
  • VIN: 264WB14TXL1
  • Components: STRUCTURE
  • Summary: WHILE DRIVING APPROXIMATELY 20MPH FRAME ON VEHICLE BROKE. IT HAPPENED WHERE THE CRADLE BOLTS ARE LOCATED. THE ENGINE DROPPED & BROKE THE STEERING SHAFT. NO STEERING CONTROL. THE CRACKS HAD OCCURRED IN THE FRAME. HAD VEHICLE TOWED TO DEALER TO CHECK. *AK
1999-03-08

SEAT BELTS PROBLEM

  • Date Of Incident: 2024-11-24
  • Number Of Injuries: 3
  • Number Of Deaths: 1
  • Crash: 1
  • VIN: 2G4WB14LXL1
  • Components: SEAT BELTS
  • Summary: DOOR WAS FORCED OPENED BY THE FORCE, DOOR LATCH PULLED STRIKER FROM DOOR PILLAR AND DOOR OPEN LEAVING THE SEAT BELT USELESS , AS A SAFETY RESTRAINT, AND PASSANGER WAS EJECTED AND KILLED. THE DOOR MOUNTED DESIGN IS TOTALLY USELESS ON DOOR OPENING, SEATBELTS SHOULD STAY ON PELVIS, IN ALL ACCIDENT CONDITIONS, G.M INSTALLED THIS DESIGN IN THOUSANDS OF VEHICLES, THEY SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN ABLE TO PUT THESE TYPE OF RESTAINT IN THEIR VEHICLES, ANYBODY WITH ANY KIND OF BRAINS SHOULD HAVE SEEN THAT, THEIR ENGINEERS ARE STUPID OR THEY DON'T CARE. THIS TYPE OF SEAT BELT RESTRAINT SYSTEM KILLED MY DAUGHTER, AND THERE WILL BE MANY PEOPLE DYING BECAUSE OF THIS, G.M. SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN ALLOWED PUT THIS TYPE OF RESTRAINT IN THERE DOOR.
1998-11-10

ELECTRICAL SYSTEM PROBLEM

  • Date Of Incident: 1998-08-10
  • VIN: 2G4WB14T8L1
  • Components: ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
  • Summary: NOT STARTING (ENGINE TRIES TO START BUT JUST WON'T CATCH) AND STALLING WHILE IDLING. #1 OF 6: TOOK CAR FROM HOME, DROVE ABOUT 15 MILES, TURNED IT OFF FOR OVER AN HOUR, DROVE ABOUT 1/10 MILE, TURNED IT OFF FOR OVER AN HOUR, WOULDN'T START. LEFT IT SIT FOR 30 MINUTES. STARTED UP JUST FINE. #2 OF 6: TOOK CAR FROM HOME, DROVE ABOUT 5 MILES, TURNED IT OFF FOR 2 HOURS, DROVE ABOUT 1/2 MILE, TURNED IT OFF FOR ABOUT 15 MINUTES, WOULDN'T START. LEFT IT SIT FOR 10 MINUTES. STARTED UP FINE, ALTHOUGH I FOLLOWED PROCEDURE FOR FLOODED ENGINE. STOPPED ABOUT 2 BLOCKS AGAIN TO GET GAS. STARTED UP FINE AGAIN. #3 OF 6: TOOK CAR FROM HOME, DID A LOT OF START/STOP DRIVING THAT MORNING. LATER THAT AFTERNOON DROVE ABOUT 10 MILES, TURNED IF OFF FOR OVER AN HOUR, STARTED UP FINE, DROVE ABOUT 1/2 MILE, HAD TO STOP AT STOP LIGHT. WHILE IDLING, STALLED OUT. WOULDN'T START FOR ABOUT 10 MINUTES. AT THIS POINT I TOOK IT TO THE DEALER. THE DEALER REPLACED THE PROM AND IDLE AIR CONTROL VALVE. #4 OF 6: 2 DAYS AFTER DEALER REPLACED THE ABOVE, IT STALLED AFTER FILLING THE GAS TANK AND DRIVING JUST A SHORT DISTANCE. HOWEVER, UNLIKE ALL OTHER TIMES IT STARTED UP WITHIN A MINUTE. (IT WAS RAINY THAT EVENING.) TOOK BACK TO DEALER. HE SEALED THE CONNECTIONS - THOUGHT MAYBE THEY GOT WET. #5 OF 6: ABOUT 5 WEEKS LATER WE WENT ON A LONG TRIP AND ALL WAS WELL UNTIL WE WENT TO A STORE AND BACK AND THEN ABOUT 30 MINUTES LATER IT WOULD NOT START. #6 OF 6: DROVE HOME FROM WORK (14 MILES), STOPPED FOR GAS ABOUT 1 MILE FROM HOME, FILLED TANK, DROVE HOME, LEFT CAR SIT FOR 45 MINUTES, DROVE ABOUT 3 MILES, LEFT CAR SIT FOR 1 AND 1/4 HOURS, WOULDN'T START. HAD RAINED EARLIER IN THE DAY, BUT THE ROADS WERE FAIRLY DRY. THIS HAPPENED TONIGHT. TOMORROW I WILL PHONE THE DEALER. DOES THIS HAPPEN TO OTHER REGAL OWNERS AND WHAT HAS BEEN DONE TO CORRECT IT? I AM ALMOST SCARED TO DRIVE ANYMORE. DEPENDING WHERE IT STALLS, THIS COULD CAUSE AN ACCIDENT. MIGHT I ADD THAT I HAVEN'T HAD ANY MAJOR PRO

1990 Buick Regal recalls

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has issued 9 recalls for different components of the 1990 Buick Regal.

2006-05-19
  • Manufacturer: HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC.
  • Components: FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE
  • Summary: CERTAIN REPLACEMENT FUEL FILTERS, FRAM BRAND NAME P/N G3727, WITH DATE CODES X52911 THROUGH X60801 SEQUENTIALLY OR X600141 AND A MEXICO COUNTRY OR ORIGIN MARKING ON THE FUEL FILTER HOUSING MANUFACTURED FROM OCTOBER 18, 2005, THROUGH MARCH 21, 2006, SOLD FOR USE ON THE VEHICLES LISTED ABOVE AND ON CERTAIN SCHOOL BUSES. (TO SEE THE SCHOOL BUS ENGINE SIZES, CLICK ON "DOCUMENT SEARCH" AND THEN "BUS APPLICATIONS"). THE CONNECTOR ON THE FUEL FILTER WAS NOT MANUFACTURED TO HONEYWELL'S SPECIFICATION. AS A RESULT, THE O-RING MAY NOT SEAT CORRECTLY ON THE FUEL LINE.
  • Consequence: THIS CONDITION MAY CAUSE AN INADEQUATE SEAL AT THE CONNECTION, POTENTIALLY LEADING TO A FUEL LEAK. IN THE PRESENCE OF AN IGNITION SOURCE, A FIRE COULD OCCUR.
  • Remedy: HONEYWELL WILL NOTIFY OWNERS AND REPLACE THE FUEL FILTERS FREE OF CHARGE. THE RECALL BEGAN ON OCTOBER 18, 2006. OWNERS MAY CONTACT FRAM CUSTOMER SERVICE AT 1-800-890-2075 (OPTION 1).
2000-07-11
  • Manufacturer: GENERAL MOTORS CORP.
  • Components: STRUCTURE
  • Summary: VEHICLE DESCRIPTION: PASSENGER VEHICLES ORIGINALLY SOLD OR CURRENTLY REGISTERED IN THE STATES OF CONNECTICUT, DELAWARE, ILLINOIS, INDIANA, IOWA, MAINE, MARYLAND, MASSACHUSETTS, MICHIGAN, MINNESOTA, MISSOURI, NEW HAMPSHIRE, NEW JERSEY, NEW YORK, OHIO, PENNSYLVANIA, RHODE ISLAND, VERMONT, WEST VIRGINIA, WISCONSIN, AND THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, WHERE ROAD SALT USE IS HEAVY. A CONDITION WHERE ONE OR BOTH FRONT ENGINE CRADLE BOLTS CAN PULL THROUGH THE RETAINERS DUE TO CORROSION OF THE RETAINERS.
  • Consequence: IF BOTH BOLTS PULL THROUGH, THE FRONT OF THE CRADLE WOULD NO LONGER BE SUPPORTED AT THE MOUNTING LOCATIONS AND THE STEERING INTERMEDIATE SHAFT COULD SEPARATE FROM THE STEERING GEAR.
  • Remedy: DEALERS WILL REPLACE THE FRONT AND REAR FRAME/CRADLE BOLTS AND RETAINERS.
1997-04-08
  • Manufacturer: GENERAL MOTORS CORP.
  • Components: STRUCTURE
  • Summary: VEHICLE DESCRIPTION: PASSENGER VEHICLES AND MINI VANS ORIGINALLY SOLD OR CURRENTLY REGISTERED IN THE FOLLOWING STATES: CONNECTICUT, ILLINOIS, INDIANA, MAINE, MASSACHUSETTS, MICHIGAN, NEW HAMPSHIRE, NEW JERSEY, NEW YORK, OHIO, PENNSYLVANIA, RHODE ISLAND, VERMONT AND WISCONSIN. THE REAR CRADLE BOLTS PULL THROUGH THE RETAINERS DUE TO CORROSION OF THE RETAINER. IF BOTH BOLTS PULL THROUGH, THE REAR CRADLE WOULD NOT LONGER BE SUPPORTED AT THESE MOUNTING LOCATIONS AND THE STEERING INTERMEDIATE SHAFT CAN SEPARATE FROM THE STEERING GEAR.
  • Consequence: IF THIS WERE TO OCCUR WHILE THE VEHICLE WAS IN MOTION, A VEHICLE CRASH COULD RESULT.
  • Remedy: DEALERS WILL REPLACE THE REAR CRADLE BOLTS AND RETAINERS.
1995-06-05
  • Manufacturer: GENERAL MOTORS CORP.
  • Components: WHEELS
  • Summary: CRACKS DEVELOP IN THE WHEEL MOUNTING SURFACE. IF THESE CRACKS BECOME SEVERE ENOUGH, THE WHEEL WILL COMPLETELY SEPARATE FROM THE VEHICLE.
  • Consequence: IF WHEEL SEPARATION OCCURS WHILE THE VEHICLE IS IN MOTION, LOSS OF STEERING AND BRAKE CONTROL OF THE VEHICLE OCCURS, AND A VEHICLE CRASH COULD RESULT WITHOUT PRIOR WARNING.
  • Remedy: DEALERS WILL INSPECT THE MANUFACTURING DATE CODES STAMPED ON EACH WHEEL OF THE VEHICLE AND IF A WHEEL FALLS WITHIN THE SPECIFIED DATE CODE RANGE, THE DEALER WILL REPLACE THAT WHEEL ASSEMBLY.
1995-03-28
  • Manufacturer: GENERAL MOTORS CORP.
  • Components: WHEELS
  • Summary: CRACKS DEVELOP IN THE WHEEL MOUNTING SURFACE. IF THESE CRACKS BECOME SEVERE ENOUGH, THE WHEEL WILL COMPLETELY SEPARATE FROM THE VEHICLE.
  • Consequence: IF WHEEL SEPARATION OCCURS WHILE THE VEHICLE IS IN MOTION, LOSS OF STEERING AND BRAKE CONTROL OF THE VEHICLE OCCURS, AND A VEHICLE CRASH COULD RESULT WITHOUT PRIOR WARNING.
  • Remedy: DEALERS WILL INSPECT THE MANUFACTURING CODES STAMPED ON EACH WHEEL OF THE VEHICLE AND IF A WHEEL FALLS WITHIN THE SPECIFIED DATE CODE RANGE, THE DEALER WILL REPLACE THAT WHEEL ASSEMBLY.
1991-10-02
  • Manufacturer: GENERAL MOTORS CORP.
  • Components: SEAT BELTS
  • Summary: FRONT SHOULDER SAFETY BELT WEBBING MAY SEPARATE AT FRONT BELT UPPER GUIDE LOOPS ON EITHER SIDE OF THE FRONT SEAT.
  • Consequence: WEBBING SEPARATION COULD OCCUR WITHOUT PRIOR WARNING ANDINCREASE THE RISK OF INJURY TO BELTED FRONT OUTBOARD OCCUPANTS IN A HIGH ENERGYCRASH.
  • Remedy: INSTALL A CONTROLLED ROTATION BRACKET ON DRIVER AND PASSENGER SIDE FRONT SEAT BELT GUIDE LOOPS.
1990-10-16
  • Manufacturer: GENERAL MOTORS CORP.
  • Components: EXTERIOR LIGHTING:BRAKE LIGHTS:SWITCH
  • Summary: BRAKE STOPLAMPS MAY NOT ILLUMINATE OR, IN SOME CASES, STOPLAMPS WILL NOT STAY ILLUMINATED ALL THE TIME WHEN BRAKES ARE APPLIED DUE TO A FAULTY STOPLAMP SWITCH. ALSO IN VEHICLES EQUIPPED WITH CRUISE CONTROL, A FAULTY STOPLAMP SWITCH CAN RESULT IN RESUMPTION OF THE CRUISE CONTROL FUNCTION UPON RELEASE OF THE BRAKE PEDAL.
  • Consequence: A TRAILING VEHICLE MAY NOT RECOGNIZE A BRAKING ACTIONIN TIME TO RESPOND APPROPRIATELY. ALSO, CRUISE CONTROL WILL REENGAGE UPONRELEASE OF THE BRAKE PEDAL AND RESUME THE SET SPEED. IN EITHER CASE, IT COULDRESULT IN A CRASH WITHOUT PRIOR WARNING.
  • Remedy: INSTALL AN IMPROVED DESIGN STOPLAMP SWITCH.
1990-06-06
  • Manufacturer: GENERAL MOTORS CORP.
  • Components: SEAT BELTS:FRONT:WEBBING
  • Summary: OWNERS MANUALS DID NOT FULLY EXPLAIN HOW FRONT SHOULDER BELT COMFORT FEATURE WORKS.
  • Consequence: CARS WOULD NOT COMPLY WITH FMVSS 208, AND INCORRECT USE OF SAFETY RESTRAINTS COULD LEAD TO PERSONAL INJURY TO OCCUPANTS IF AN ACCIDENTSHOULD OCCUR.
  • Remedy: INSERT STICKER THAT PROVIDES MISSING INFORMATION IN OWNERS MANUALS.
1990-03-14
  • Manufacturer: GENERAL MOTORS CORP.
  • Components: SEAT BELTS
  • Summary: FRONT SHOULDER BELT GUIDE LOOP ATTACHMENT FASTENER MAY PULL THROUGH DOOR MOUNTED ANCHOR PLATE.
  • Consequence: SEAT BELT MAY NOT SUSTAIN LOADS REQUIRED BY FMVSS 210, AND IN A VEHICLE ACCIDENT, THE SEAT BELT MAY NOT PROPERLY RESTRAIN A PASSENGER, RESULTING IN INCREASED RISK OF GREATER INJURY TO AN OCCUPANT.
  • Remedy: REPLACE FRONT SHOULDER BELT GUIDE LOOP ATTACHMENT NUTS AND INSTALL NEW GUIDE COVER.

Positive 1990 Buick Regal car reviews

  1. Ransom Emard 2024-07-04

    The car handles well in turns and accelerates with power, even though it is 26 years old - a classic, lol! As a single mother with an 18-year-old daughter, it has never failed us yet! The transmission is still in good condition and the tires are a great size for a smooth ride. The legroom is spacious, making it very comfortable. It has been well-maintained by the previous owner, who was from Oregon, so there is little rust. It has held up great and now that it is an AZ car, the AC keeps us cool even in 130-degree heat! The car is good for highway miles, like 26-30 miles per hour, with its V6 (3.1) engine and cruise control that works well. The brakes are good and it holds the car back with no problems. I would highly recommend it to my friends or anyone wanting a great, smooth, and dependable ride. I have only had it for a year and have put in modern AC and some motor mounts, one front shock, and other than regular oil changes, it's just the way I bought it. Thanks, Leah!

  2. Kiel Ziemann 2024-02-05

    Hi there! I hope you're doing well. I just wanted to share my experience with my car. I bought it with 162,000 miles and it ran great the whole time. I only had to do a tune-up. I eventually traded it to my father, who is extremely rough on cars, and it ran for another 15,000 miles despite his abuse. Unfortunately, he ran it out of transmission fluid and burnt up the transmission. But even then, it still drove! The transmission needed a rebuild at 178,000 miles due to the lack of transmission fluid. Thanks for listening to my story!

Leave your review of 1990 Buick Regal

Additional sources

More sources of information about 1990 Buick Regal problems:

1990 Buick Regal Repair: Service and Maintenance Cost
1990 Buick Regal Repair: Service and Maintenance Cost
https://repairpal.com/cars/buick/regal/1990

The Buick Regal Reliability Rating is 4.0 out of 5.0, which ranks it 13th out of 24 for midsize cars.

Common 2011 Buick Regal Transmission Problems - Q&A
Common 2011 Buick Regal Transmission Problems - Q&A
https://www.justanswer.com/buick/jar8o-buick-not-moving-when-it-s-gear-2011-buick-regal.html

May 3, 2022 ... My Buick is not moving when it's in gear. 2011 Buick Regal. No transmission fluid leaking - Answered by a verified Buick Mechanic.

1990 Buick Regal Problems and Complaints - 27 Issues
1990 Buick Regal Problems and Complaints - 27 Issues
https://repairpal.com/1990-buick-regal/problems

Top 1990 Buick Regal Problems · Ignition Key Stuck Due to Failed Shifter · Power Window Switches May Fail · Water Pump May Fail Prematurely · Failed Fuel Pump ...

Buick Regal Electrical Problems - Page 5 — Car Forums at ...
Buick Regal Electrical Problems - Page 5 — Car Forums at ...
https://forums.edmunds.com/discussion/15908/buick/regal/buick-regal-electrical-problems/p5

Jun 15, 2005 ... I have recently aquired a 1990 buick regal 6 cyl with electric seats and windows. ... Is this a common problem ... Than I looked up known issues ...

Buick Reliability? : r/Buick
Buick Reliability? : r/Buick
https://www.reddit.com/r/Buick/comments/s42gs1/buick_reliability/

Jan 14, 2022 ... It is too early to know if the Encore GX has any problems but I do believe any car can last with the proper care. Upvote

Other years of Buick Regal

buick regal 1991 photo
Regal 1991
Buick

249

7

14

  • 5
  • 4
  • 3
  • 2
  • 1
buick regal 1992 photo
Regal 1992
Buick

173

2

14

  • 5
  • 4
  • 3
  • 2
  • 1
buick regal 1993 photo
Regal 1993
Buick

108

2

17

  • 5
  • 4
  • 3
  • 2
  • 1
buick regal 1994 photo
Regal 1994
Buick

136

3

17

  • 5
  • 4
  • 3
  • 2
  • 1
buick regal 1995 photo
Regal 1995
Buick

192

8

18

  • 5
  • 4
  • 3
  • 2
  • 1
buick regal 1996 photo
Regal 1996
Buick

230

4

21

  • 5
  • 4
  • 3
  • 2
  • 1

Are you having problems with your 1990 Buick Regal?

Add car complaint
1990 Buick Regal photo