1992 Toyota Camry problems
The Toyota Camry (/ˈkæmri/; Japanese: トヨタ・カムリ Toyota Kamuri) is an automobile sold internationally by the Japanese auto manufacturer Toyota since 1982, spanning multiple generations. Originally compact in size (narrow-body), the Camry has grown since the 1990s to fit the mid-size classification (wide-body)—although the two widths co-existed in that decade. Since the release of the wide-bodied versions, Camry has been extolled by Toyota as the firm's second "world car" after the Corolla. As of 2022, the Camry is positioned above the Corolla and below the Avalon or Crown in several markets.
In Japan, Camry was once exclusive to Toyota Corolla Store retail dealerships. Narrow-body cars also spawned a rebadged sibling in Japan, the Toyota Vista (トヨタ・ビスタ)—also introduced in 1982 and sold at Toyota Vista Store locations. Diesel fuel versions have previously retailed at Toyota Diesel Store. The Vista Ardeo was a wagon version of the Vista V50.
Etymology
The name "Camry" derives from the Japanese word kanmuri (ja:冠, かんむり), meaning "crown". This follows Toyota's naming tradition of using the crown name for primary models starting with the Toyota Crown (1955), continuing with the Toyota Corona (1957) and Corolla (1966); the Latin words for "crown" and "small crown", respectively. Maintaining this theme was the Toyota Tiara (1960) named after the "tiara" form of crown. The Atara trim level name used on the Camry in Australia since 2011 means "crown" in Hebrew. The rebadged Camry variant for Japan, the Toyota Scepter (1991)—took its name from "scepter", a royal accessory to a crown.
Social links
Common 1992 Toyota Camry problems
The Toyota Camry 1992 is known for several common problems based on complaints from its owners.
Another common problem with the Toyota Camry 1992 is transmission issues. There are 6 complaints of transmission problems in the 3rd generation Camry, with the 1996 Camry having 2 complaints of the car not shifting out of park.
The interior of the Toyota Camry 1992 is also known to have some problems, with 4 complaints in the 3rd generation Camry.
The fuel system of the Toyota Camry 1992 is also known to have some issues, with 3 complaints in the 3rd generation Camry.
The cooling system of the Toyota Camry 1992 is also known to have some problems, with 3 complaints in the 3rd generation Camry.
In addition to these common problems, the Toyota Camry 1992 is also known to have issues with the airbag warning light, which may require a special tool to turn off.
In summary, the Toyota Camry 1992 is known for several common problems, including engine problems, transmission issues, interior problems, fuel system problems, cooling system problems, and airbag warning light issues. These problems can affect the car's performance, safety, and overall user experience, and may require cleaning, replacement, or repair of the affected components.
What was the bad year for Camry?
2007 Toyota Camry
The 2007 model is on the top of the list for Toyota Camry years to avoid, simply because it has the most problems. One of the most significant complaints, according to RepairPal, is issues with the automatic transmission.
What year is the best old Camry?
Best Used Toyota Camry Years
- 2005 Toyota Camry. The 2005 Toyota Camry is a great choice for drivers who want to enjoy a smooth ride while on a budget. ...
- 2009 Toyota Camry. ...
- 2011 Toyota Camry. ...
- 2017 Toyota Camry. ...
- 2021 Toyota Camry.
Can a Toyota Camry last 30 years?
A well-maintained Toyota Camry can easily have a 200,000-mile lifespan. Assuming you drive 10,000 miles a year, the car can still last 20 years, which is nice if you buy an off-lease vehicle. But the Camry has also been known to reach the 300,000-mile mark.
How many miles can a 1993 Toyota Camry last?
They, 92s to 96s, usually go 285+ thousand miles without any engine or transmission work. The 4 cylinder 2.2 liter is almost indestructable.
What is the most common problem with Toyota Camry?
The motor mounts at higher mileage May wear out causing extra stress on other motor mounts. It's best to replace these motor mounts as they go.
What years did Toyota Camry have problems?
Q: Which Toyota Camry years should be on my avoid list? A: You should avoid the Toyota Camry models from the years 2007, 2008, and 2009. These years have been identified as having various issues, from transmission problems to excessive oil consumption, which have led to significant owner complaints and repairs.
Is an older Toyota Camry a good car?
The 2005 Camry is a dependable model that should be affordable for most customers. While you won't enjoy the newest and flashiest technology, you will get fantastic reliability from this used car. 2009-2011 Toyota Camry – The used Toyota Camrys from 2009-2011 all won 4/5 or 5/5 scores for reliability in every category.
Can Camry last 20 years?
How Long Can I Expect My Camry to Last? A well-maintained Toyota Camry can easily have a 200,000-mile lifespan. Assuming you drive 10,000 miles a year, the car can still last 20 years, which is nice if you buy an off-lease vehicle. But the Camry has also been known to reach the 300,000-mile mark.
1992 Toyota Camry car problems categorized by type of issue
After analyzing all complaints sent to the NHTSA and researching popular Toyota Camry problems, we found that the most common problems with these 2023 model year vehicles are:
- Structure problems
- Latches/locks/linkages problems
- Engine and engine cooling problems
- Air bags problems
- Electrical system problems
The graph below shows statistics for all 1992 Toyota Camry vehicle components and the number of complaints received.
Latest 25 complaints 1992 Toyota Camry
The NHTSA has received 612 complaints about various vehicle components related to the 1992 Toyota Camry. Below are the 25 most recent complaints reported for 1992 Toyota Camry vehicles.
STRUCTURE PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2019-07-13
- VIN: 4T1SK11E8NU
- Components: STRUCTURE
- Summary: BOTH FRONT DOORS CANNOT OPEN EITHER FROM EXTERIOR NOR INTERIOR WITH KEY. KEYS WORK FINE. LATCH/DOOR KNOB BOTH INSIDE AND OUTSIDE DON'T WORK AND NO SAFE EXIT OF VEHICLE EXCEPT THROUGH BACK DOOR. DEALERSHIP WANTS TO CHARGE $500 PER DOOR PLUS OTHER DIAGNOSTIC FEES TO FIX. I WOULD ALSO HAVE TO HAVE CAR TOWED IN FOR THEM TO DO DIAGNOSTICS ON IT. STATED THEY WOULD HAVE TO REMOVE THE DOORS. THIS IS A SAFETY ISSUE AND I FEEL THAT TOYOTA SHOULD FIX THE PROBLEM. THE DEALER STATED THAT THIS HAS TO BE HANDLED BY THE TOYOTA CORPORATE OFFICE. I CALLED THE CORPORATE OFFICE AND THE CUSTOMER AGENT STATED THAT THIS IS NOT TOYOTA'S PROBLEM AS THE CAR IS NOT UNDER ANY WARRANTY.
AIR BAGS PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2018-10-21
- VIN: 4T1VK12E4NU
- Components: AIR BAGS
- Summary: AIR BAG DEPLOYED DURING JUMP START. CAR HAD NOT BEEN USED IN SEVERAL WEEKS AND ON JUMP START AIR BAG DEPLOYED.
AIR BAGS,SEAT BELTS PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2018-05-31
- Number Of Injuries: 1
- Crash: 1
- VIN: JT2SK12E4N0
- Components: AIR BAGS,SEAT BELTS
- Summary: TAKATA RECALL. I WAS DRIVING A 1992 TOYOTA CAMRY AND WAS GOING 38 MILES PER HOUR AND HAD A SEIZURE AND BLACKED OUT. I HIT A CAR HEAD ON AND THE AIRBAG DIDNT DEPLOY SO MY CHEST AND FACE HIT THE STEERING WHEEL EVEN THOUGH I WAS WEARING MY SEATBELT. THE SEATBELT MALFUNCTIONED ALSO, THE PARAMEDICS HAD TO CUT IT OFF OF ME.
AIR BAGS PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2016-02-17
- Number Of Injuries: 1
- VIN: 4T1SK13E9NU
- Components: AIR BAGS
- Summary: TAKATA RECALL - THE VEHICLE WAS STATIONARY IN A PARKING LOT. I ENTERED THE CAR, BUCKLED MY SEATBELT, INSERTED THE KEY INTO THE IGNITION, STARTED THE CAR, AND THE AIRBAG DEPLOYED. THERE HAD BEEN NO IMPACT.
TIRES PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2015-03-15
- Components: TIRES
- Summary: HERCULES ROADTOUR 655 TIRE DEVELOPED A LARGE BULGE IN SIDEWALL AREA. THIS WAS NOTICED AND THE TIRE WAS TAKEN OUT OF SERVICE AS BEING UNSAFE. THE LOCAL HERCULES TIRE DEALER SAID THAT THEY WOULD NOT REPLACE TIRE OR GIVE PARTIAL CREDIT ON A REPLACEMENT TIRE.
STEERING,ELECTRICAL SYSTEM,LATCHES/LOCKS/LINKAGES PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2014-05-09
- Fire: 1
- VIN: 4T1SK12E4NU
- Components: STEERING,ELECTRICAL SYSTEM,LATCHES/LOCKS/LINKAGES
- Summary: TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 1992 TOYOTA CAMRY. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE DRIVER'S DOOR COULD NOT BE UNLOCKED OR OPENED FROM THE INSIDE OR OUTSIDE OF THE VEHICLE. THE STEERING COLUMN WOULD ALSO EXHIBIT AN ABNORMAL CRUNCHING SOUND WHEN TURNING THE WHEEL IN ANY DIRECTION. ADDITIONALLY, THERE WAS AN ELECTRICAL BURNING SMELL RADIATING FROM INSIDE THE VEHICLE. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT TAKEN TO THE DEALER FOR DIAGNOSIS OR REPAIRS. THE MANUFACTURER WAS MADE AWARE OF THE FAILURE. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS UNKNOWN AND THE CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 180,000.
AIR BAGS PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2012-10-17
- Number Of Injuries: 1
- VIN: 4T1SK12E0NU
- Components: AIR BAGS
- Summary: I STOPPED AT A GAS STATION YESTERDAY MORNING TO PUT AIR IN MY TIRE AND HAD MY SON WITH ME , I LEFT CAR IN PARK WITH ENGINE RUNNING , WHEN DONE I WAS PUTTING MY SON BACK INTO CAR SEAT , I LEANED INTO CAR WITH MY BACK TO THE STEERING WHEEL LEANING OVER THE DRIVER SEAT FIXING TO BUCKLE CAR SEAT WHEN OUT OF NOWHERE THE AIRBAG DEPLOYED FROM THE STEERING WHEEL AND HIT ME ON THE LEFT SIDE OF MY BACK AND NOW THERE ARE 3 HUGE BRUISES WHICH I HAVE TAKEN PICS OF , THERE WAS A MAN AT THE GAS PUMP WHO SAW AND HEARD THE COMMOTION HE CAME OVER FROM THE GAS PUMPS TO HELP ME , ITS MY OPINION THAT THE AIRBAG SHOULD NOT HAVE DEPLOYED FOR ANY REASON OTHER THAN A WRECK , AND NOW I CANT GET THE DEALERSHIPS TO EVEN LOOK TO SEE WHY IT DEPLOYED WITHOUT MONEY BECAUSE IT IS AN OLDER CAR WHICH SHOULD MAKE NO DIFFERENCE , ITS MY OPINION THAT THEY SHOULD ALWAYS CHECK SOMETHING LIKE THAT FOR ANYONE THAT HAS A FAILURE OF SUCH A KIND WITHOUT JUST CAUSE AND FIX IT WITHOUT PREJUDICE IF THERE'S NO REASON ON THE OWNERS PART IT DEPLOYED , IT SHOULD HAVE NEVER DEPLOYED WITHOUT PROPER CAUSE AND NOW THE STEERING WHEEL IS CROOKED AND THE AIRBAG HANGING OUT , PLEASE HELP I HAVE NO IDEA OF WHAT TO DO ABOUT THIS , I OWN MY CAR , I NEED IT TO TRANSPORT MY KIDS , ANY HELP WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED , THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME . *TR
AIR BAGS PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2012-08-22
- Number Of Injuries: 1
- VIN: 4T1SK12E4NU
- Components: AIR BAGS
- Summary: TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 1992 TOYOTA CAMRY. THE CONTACT STATED THAT WHILE DRIVING 30 MPH THE DRIVER SIDE AIR BAG DEPLOYED WITHOUT ANY WARNING. THE CONTACT SUSTAINED MINOR INJURIES. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT TAKEN TO THE DEALER. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOT MADE AWARE OF THE FAILURE. THE FAILURE AND THE CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 120,000.
AIR BAGS PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2011-10-25
- Number Of Injuries: 1
- VIN: 4T1SK12E7NU
- Components: AIR BAGS
- Summary: ON THE AFTERNOON OF OCTOBER 25, 2011, I DECIDED TO RUN THE ENGINE OF MY TEENAGE DAUGHTER?S 1992 TOYOTA CAMRY. THE CAR HAD BEEN STORED IN A COVERED AREA, AND NOT DRIVEN, SINCE AUGUST 15, 2011. BECAUSE THE BATTERY WAS CONNECTED, I FELT I SHOULD RUN THE ENGINE FOR A SHORT PERIOD. I UNLOCKED AND OPENED THE DRIVER DOOR AND SAT ON THE EDGE OF THE DRIVER SEAT WITH THE DOOR OPEN. MY INTENTION WAS TO START THE PARKED CAR AND LET IT RUN FOR A SHORT PERIOD (SEVERAL MINUTES) IN ORDER TO CHECK AND CHARGE THE BATTERY. IN ORDER TO PLACE THE KEY IN THE IGNITION, I PLACED MY LEFT ARM ACROSS THE TOP OF THE STEERING WHEEL, AND LEANING ACROSS THE FRONT OF THE STEERING WHEEL, INSERTED THE KEY IN THE IGNITION. UPON TURNING THE KEY IN THE IGNITION (1/4 TURN-THE ENGINE DID NOT TURN OVER), THE DRIVER AIR BAG EXPLODED AND THE CAR FILLED WITH BLACK SMOKE. THE IMPACT OF THE BAG HIT ME IN THE STERNUM, ACROSS THE CHEST AND LEFT CLAVICLE WITH THE FORCE OF THE BAG EXPANSION HITTING ME IN THE SOFT TISSUE OF MY NECK, THROAT AND UNDER MY JAW. I WAS THROWN BACK AGAINST THE SEAT AND MY GLASSES WERE THROWN INTO THE BACK SEAT OF THE CAR. THE FORCE OF THE IMPACT BROKE THE BUTTONS ON THE FRONT OF MY POLO SHIRT AND CAUSED THE NECKLACE I WAS WEARING TO CUT MY THROAT. I SUFFERED CHEMICAL BURNS ON MY FACE AND CHEST FROM THE SODIUM AZIDE. I HAVE A PERMANENT SCAR ON MY NECK. INITIALLY MY HEARING AND SWALLOWING WERE ADVERSELY AFFECTED. THE IMPACT HAD A BLAST AND ?STUNNING? EFFECT. I HAVE HAD CORRESPONDENCE WITH TOYOTA CORPORATE SEVERAL TIMES OVER THE LAST FEW MONTHS. THEY ARE REFUSING TO OFFER ANY COMPENSATION FOR INJURIES AND HAVE ADMITTED FAULT BASED ON THE REPORT OF THEIR ENGINEER, WHO EXAMINED THE VEHICLE. THEY HAVE OFFERED TO "BUY BACK" THE CAR ($2500) IN EXCHANGE FOR A HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT SIGNED BY ME. I FIND THEIR OFFER UNACCEPTABLE. *TR
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2010-09-27
- VIN: 4T1VK13E3NU
- Components: ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
- Summary: WHILE DRIVING MY 1992 TOYOTA CAMRY XLE 6 ON THE INTERSTATE, WITH THE RADIO ON, SMOKE SUDDENLY STARTED COMING OUT FROM UNDER THE RIGHT FRONT PASSENGER SEAT AND QUICKLY FILLED THE CABIN. I PULLED OFF THE ROAD AND SHUT OFF THE ENGINE. I LOOKED UNDER THE PASSENGER SEAT AND SAW A WIRED ELECTRIC MODULE WHICH WAS RED-HOT TO THE TOUCH. (SLIGHTLY BURNED FINGERTIP) I THEN CALLED FOR HELP AND HAD THE CAR TOWED TO MY HOME. THE NEXT DAY I FOUND OUT THAT THE UNDERSEAT SMOKING MODULE WAS THE STEREO POWER AMPLIFIER FOR THE RADIO. ALSO, I FOUND ON THE INTERNET REPORTS OF THE SAME PROBLEM ON OTHER CAMRYS WHICH RESULTED IN FIRES. *TR
VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 1999-04-08
- VIN: 4T1SK12E9NU
- Components: VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL
- Summary: TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 1992 TOYOTA CAMRY. THE CONTACT STATED WHEN DRIVING AT SPEEDS BETWEEN 25 TO 30 MPH, HE WOULD EXPERIENCE SUDDEN ACCELERATION AND A STUCK BRAKE PEDAL. HE WAS ABLE TO SLOW THE VEHICLE BY REPEATEDLY DEPRESSING THE BRAKE PEDAL. THE CONTACT HAD NOT YET TAKEN THE VEHICLE TO THE DEALER FOR DIAGNOSTIC TESTING. THE MANUFACTURER WAS CONTACTED BUT WOULD PROVIDE NO ASSISTANCE. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 143,000.
SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 1901-01-01
- Components: SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC
- Summary: 1992 TOYOTA CAMRY BRAKE FAILURE *GR THE CONSUMER STATED THE BRAKE PEDAL WENT DOWN TO THE FLOOR WITH NO WARNING AND WITHOUT ANY RESISTANCE. ALL THE PEDAL PUSHING WAS USELESS. IF THE CONSUMER TURNED THE VEHICLE OFF FOR ABOUT 5 MINUTES AND THEN RESTARTED IT, THE BRAKE PEDAL WOULD RESUME NORMAL OPERATION. THE CONSUMER WENT TO A BRAKE SHOP AND THEY SUGGESTED FLUSHING THE OLD BRAKE FLUID. SINCE THE FLUID WAS CHANGED, THE CONSUMER HAS NOT EXPERIENCED ANOTHER BRAKE FAILURE. *JB
VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2009-12-15
- VIN: JT2SK12E9N0
- Components: VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL
- Summary: SEVERAL TIMES IN THE LAST 6 MONTHS SINCE MY WIFE PURCHASED A PREVIOUSLY OWNED 1992 TOYOTA CAMRY, THE CAR HAS ACCELERATED ON IT'S OWN WITH NO ONE DEPRESSING THE ACCELERATOR PEDAL. SHE SAID IT FEELS AS THOUGH THE CRUISE CONTROL SYSTEM HAS TAKEN OVER CONTROL OF THE CAR. THIS PHENOMENON HAS TAKEN PLACE AT SPEEDS ABOVE 55 MPH AND AS SLOW AS 15 MPH. A CO-WORKER OF MY WIFE'S SISTER HAS A TOYOTA AND HAS DESCRIBED EXACTLY THE SAME THING HAPPENING WHILE SHE IS DRIVING HER CAR. *TR
ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2009-11-18
- VIN: JT2SK12E4N0
- Components: ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING
- Summary: INTERMITTENT SPONTANEOUS ACCELERATION OF ENGINE DESPITE MY FOOT ON THE BRAKE. IT HAS OCCURRED SEVERAL TIMES. AT FIRST I THOUGHT MY FOOT WAS ON BOTH PEDALS. THEN I PULLED BACK THE FLOOR MAT. NEITHER WAS THE CAUSE. THIS WAS BEFORE ANY PUBLICITY THAT OTHERS HAD THE SAME PROBLEM. *TR
VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2010-02-09
- VIN: 4T1SK12E5NU
- Components: VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL
- Summary: VEHICLE ACCELERATES WHEN APPLYING BRAKES WITH CRUISE CONTROL ON. *TR
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2007-03-10
- Fire: 1
- Components: ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
- Summary: ELECTRICAL WIRING IN FACTORY CAR STEREO STARTED ON FIRE, CAUSING CAR FIRE WHILE DRIVING. RADIO HAD TO BE REPLACED. MAY STILL HAVE OLD RADIO. *TR
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2007-11-20
- Crash: 1
- VIN: 4T1SK12E3NU
- Components: ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
- Summary: TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 1992 TOYOTA CAMRY. THE VEHICLE HAD BEEN PARKED FOR 45 MINUTES WHEN IT ROLLED BACKWARDS AND STRUCK ANOTHER VEHICLE. BOTH VEHICLES WERE DAMAGED, BUT THE CONTACT WAS ABLE TO DRIVE FROM THE SCENE. THE CONTACTS VEHICLE SUSTAINED DAMAGE TO THE BUMPER, TAIL LIGHT, AND REAR PASSENGER SIDE PANEL. THE OTHER VEHICLE SUSTAINED DAMAGE TO THE FRONT PASSENGER SIDE DOOR. THE DOOR WILL HAVE TO BE REPLACED. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT INCLUDED IN NHTSA CAMPAIGN ID NUMBER 97V213000 (ELECTRICAL SYSTEM: IGNITION). A POLICE REPORT WAS FILED. THE PURCHASE DATE WAS UNKNOWN. THE CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 150,475 AND FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 150,460. UPDATED 02-04-08. *KB THE CONSUMER STATED THE CAR IGNITION SWITCH HAS SUDDENLY BROKEN DOWN ALLOWING THE KEY TO BE REMOVED, WHEN THE CAR IS NOT IN PARK WITH THE AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION. MOON TOWNSHIP POLICE REPORT UPDATED 02/04/08 *TR
TIRES PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2005-10-19
- Components: TIRES
- Summary: TIRE FAILURE OF GOODYEAR ALLEGRA TIRE PURCHASED FROM SAM'S CLUB WITH LESS THAN 500 MILES. FAILURE DUE TO SEPARATION OF THE BELT. THE TIRE WAS REPLACED WITH AN UPGRADED TIRE THAT DID NOT HAVE THE FAILURE RATE OF THE ORIGINAL TIRE. A SECOND TIRE HAD TO BE PURCHASED TO MAINTAIN THE SAME TREAD DESIGN ON THE SAME AXLE (WHICH WAS ALSO WAS OF THE SAME MILEAGE AS THE TIRE REPLACED). *JB
SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC,POWER TRAIN PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2005-09-13
- Number Of Injuries: 1
- Crash: 1
- VIN: JT2VK13E7N0
- Components: SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC,POWER TRAIN
- Summary: DT: THE CONTACT CHANGED THE DISC BRAKES SHOE PADS BECAUSE HIS WIFE WAS COMPLAINED THAT BRAKES FAILED, AND THERE WAS EXTENDED STOPPING DISTANCE. AFTERWARDS , THE CONTACT PARKED IN A PARKING STALL AT HOME. THEN THE CONTACT JUST PULLED OUT OF THE WAY, AND WITH HAND STILL ON THE SHIFT INDICATOR THERE WAS SUDDEN ACCELERATION WITH THE VEHICLE IN REVERSE. THE CONTACT CLAIMED HE DID NOT PLACE THE VEHICLE IN REVERSE. THIS CAUSED THE VEHICLE TO ACCELERATE BACKWARDS INTO A BRICK WALL. THERE WAS EXTENSIVE DAMAGE TO THE CAR. THE VEHICLE HAS NOT BEEN TO A DEALERSHIP. NEIGHBORS HELPED TO PUSH THE VEHICLE BACK INTO THE PARKING SPACE. NO REPAIRS OR CORRECTIONS HAVE BEEN MADE AT THIS TIME. HIS WAS THE FIRST INCIDENT OF THIS TYPE OTHER THAN THE BRAKE PADS. WHEN TRYING TO STOP THE CAR THE BRAKES WOULD HAVE TO BE PUMPED BUT NEVER ACCELERATING BACKWARDS. *AK
TIRES PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2004-10-12
- Number Of Injuries: 1
- Crash: 1
- VIN: 4T1SK12E1NU
- Components: TIRES
- Summary: WHILE DRIVING A LOUD NOISE WAS HEARD COMING FROM THE REAR. CONSUMER WAS UNABLE TO MAINTAIN CONTROL OF THE VEHICLE AND HIT A SHOULDER GUARD RAIL. UPON IMPACT, BOTH AIR BAGS DID NOT DEPLOY. DRIVER SUSTAINED HEAD AND BACK INJURIES, AND WAS TRANSPORTED TO A HOSPITAL BY AMBULANCE. VEHICLE WAS TOWED, AND TOTALED BY THE INSURANCE COMPANY. GOODYEAR, COOPER, P195/70R13.*AK THE CONSUMER STATED THAT THE TREAD CAME OFF. *TC
FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2005-02-23
- Components: FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE
- Summary: GAS TANK SEAL BROKE CAUSING GAS LEAK WHICH COULD HAVE IGNITED FIRE WHILE DRIPPING OVER THE EXHAUST PIPE. *NM
TIRES PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2004-08-07
- Number Of Injuries: 1
- Crash: 1
- Components: TIRES
- Summary: FRONT DRIVER'S SIDE TIRE TREAD SEPARATED. CONSUMER LOST CONTROL AND HIT THE GUARD RAIL. VEHICLE WAS TOWED. CONSUMER SUSTAINED MINOR INJURIES. DEALERSHIP WAS NOTIFIED, BUT DID NOT RESOLVE THE PROBLEM. GOODYEAR, 19570R13. *AK
STEERING PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 1992-08-15
- Components: STEERING
- Summary: IN THE YEAR OF 1992 APPROXIMATELY 7/92 THROUGH 1993 I WORKED IN THE MACHINING AREA FOR THE SPINDLE CONPONENT MADE FOR THE 1992-1993 TOYOTA CAMRY. DURING THAT TIME IN APPROXIMATELY THE MONTH OF OCTOBER OF 1992 THE SPINDLE UNIT WHERE FOUND TO HAVE BEEN OVER HEATED AND HAD VERY DEEP CRACKS UPON WHERE THE BEARING UNIT WOULD BE SEATED. UPON FINDING THE PROBLEM MANAGERS COMPANY CARS WERE DISASSEMBLED FOR TRY TO TRACK BACK HOW FAR THE PROBLEM WENT BACK. THE MANAGERS CAR WERE ALSO FOUND TO HAVE CRAKS IN THEIR SPINDLE UNITS.THE COUNTERMEASURES TAKEN PLACE WAS TO PUT SAND BAGS IN THE TRUNKS OF THE CARS AFTER THEY WERE RE-ASSEMBLED AND DROVE ON THEIR TEST TRACK AT THEIR FECILITIES THERE IN GEORGETOWN,KY.. MANY PICTURES OF CONPONENTS WERE TAKEN AND PLACE ON A COMPUTER HARD DRIVE WITHIN THE QC DEPT. AREA TO DO AN COMPARISON WITH OTHER CONPONENTS. THE FAILURE OF THIS CONPONENT COULD CAUSE THE TIRES TO COME COMPLETE AWAY FROM THE VEHICLE IN THE EVENT THAT THE SPINDLE WOULD HAVE BROKEN.AS FAR AS I'M AM AWARE THERE WAS NEVER ANY RECALLS OR REPAIRS DONE TO THE VEHICLES SOLD.PLEASE COMP;ETE AN INVESTIGATION OF THIS PROBLEM. THERE ARE OTHERS WHO STILL WORK WITHIN THE POWERTRAIN DEPT. THAT CAN VERIFY THIS STORY.AMOUNT OR NUMBER OF VEHICLES INVOLVED IN THIS PROBLEM IS UNKNOWN. *AK
STEERING,ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING,VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2004-05-01
- Number Of Injuries: 1
- Crash: 1
- VIN: JT2VK12E9N0
- Components: STEERING,ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING,VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL
- Summary: 1992 V6 3.0 CAMRY HISTORY OF MULTIPLE PROBLEMS AND REPAIRS, GOOD MAINT. RECORD, NONE COVERED RECOGNIZED BY TOYOYA WARRANTY. ENGINE AND STEERING AND SUSPENSION IN THIS CAR AND MANY OTHERS IS LLISTED AS SIGNIFICANT PROBLEMS IN RESEARCH REPORTS FOR A REASON. MANUFACTURING, ENGINEERING DESIGN ALL PROBLEM AREAS. DRIVING CAR AT SLOW SPEED, HAD UNCONTROLLABE PULL TO LEFT AND SURGING CAR INTO A WALL. DRIVER AIRBAG AND SUSTAINED NONLIFE THREATENING INJURIES. PROPERTY DAMAGE TO WALL AND TO CAR SIGNIFICANT. INVESTIGATOR SAYS MOST LIKELY RACK AND PINION STEERING AT FAULT. READING UP ON TOYOTA CARS WITH V6 3.0 ENGINE AND DESIGN OF CAR, BELIEVE THIS CAR AND OTHERS SHARE THE SAME PROBLEMS, SO COMPLICATED, DIFFICULT COSTLY TO ADDRESS, TOYOTA CHOOSING TO IGNORE ADDRESSING PROBLEMS. THIS CAR IS XAMPLE OF ONE VEHICLE BEEN AROUND MANY YEARS AND WHAT ULTIMATELY CAN HAPPEN WHEN THE PROBLEMS NOT FIXED. BELIEVE DESIGN FLAWS SIGNIFICANT AND DANGEROUS SAFETY HAZARD. BELIEVE IN THE V6 ENGINES AND STEERING DESIGN( SAME DESIGN SOME LEXUS AND OTHER TOYOTA MODELS ) ARE PERSISTANT PROBLEMS. ONLY MATTER OF TIME BEFORE LIVES WILL BE LOST DUE TO WHAT I THINK IS NEGLIGENCE IN ACKNOWLEDGING (NOT FIXING THE PROBLEMS WHICH MAY NOT BE FIXABLE WHICH IN THAT CASE THE CARS SHOULD BE RECALLED.OVERWHELMING COST, SEE WHY TOYOTA WOULD NOT WANT TO DO THAT.) UNFORTUNATELY, DOESNT STOP PROBLEMS RISKS FOR PEOPLE WITH THESE CARS. REALLY BELIEVE IF GET A LIST OF ALL THE CARS OUT THERE WITH THE V6 ENGINE AND THE STEERING DESING AS IN THIS CAMRY, YOU WOULD FIND THE SAME TYPE CONSISTENT PROBLEMS AND KEY TO WHAT REALLY IS CAUSING THEM TO SLUDGE, BLOW HEAD GASKETS, CATCH FIRE, BLUE SMOKE, SIEZE SURGE FORWARD PULL TO THE LEFT IN A MATTER OF ANYTHING FROM WANDERING TO UNCONTROLLABLE PULLING INTO HEAD ON TRAFFIC. PROBLEMS ARE CLEARLY NOTED AND REPEATED IN THE LITTLE TIME I HAVE SPENT REVIEWING COMPLAINTS. IT SHOULD BE MORE READILY AVAILABLE FOR TOYOTA TO LOOK INTO. *AK
ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2004-03-05
- VIN: JT2VK12E7N0
- Components: ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING
- Summary: MY 1992 CAMRY, V-6, EXPERIENCES SUDDEN ACCELERATION WHEN I EITHER PUT THE CAR INTO DRIVE FROM PARK, OR IF I JUST TOUCH THE THROTTLE AND RELEASE IT, THE ENGINE RPM'S INCREASE OVER 1000 RPMS AND REMAIN HIGH FOR 15 SECS RATHER THAN DROPPING BACK IN SYNC WITH THE THROTTLE RELEASE. SIMILAR SYMPTONS WITH THE NEWER CAMRYS.*AK
1992 Toyota Camry recalls
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has issued 2 recalls for different components of the 1992 Toyota Camry.
- Manufacturer: CK MOTORSPORT, INC.
- Components: EXTERIOR LIGHTING
- Summary: CERTAIN CK MOTORSPORTS COMBINATION HEADLIGHTS, CLEAR CORNER, BUMPER, AND SIDE MARKER LIGHTS SOLD AS REPLACEMENT LAMPS FOR USE ON THE PASSENGER VEHICLES LISTED ABOVE. SOME COMBINATION LAMPS THAT ARE NOT EQUIPPED WITH AMBER SIDE REFLECTORS FAIL TO CONFORM TO FEDERAL MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY STANDARD NO. 108, LAMPS, REFLECTIVE DEVICES, AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT.
- Consequence: WITHOUT THE AMBER REFLECTORS, THE VEHICLE WILL BE POORLY ILLUMINATED, POSSIBLY RESULTING IN A VEHICLE CRASH WITHOUT WARNING.
- Remedy: CK MOTORSPORT WILL NOTIFY OWNERS AND REPLACE THE NONCOMPLIANT LAMPS FREE OF CHARGE. THE RECALL BEGAN ON JULY 1, 2006. OWNERS MAY CONTACT CK MOTORSPORT AT 1-909-610-7211.
- Manufacturer: PRO-A MOTORS, INC.
- Components: EXTERIOR LIGHTING
- Summary: CERTAIN PRO-A MOTORS CORNER LAMPS, TURN SIGNALS, AND HEADLIGHTS SOLD AS REPLACEMENT LAMPS FOR USE ON CERTAIN PASSENGER VEHICLES LISTED ABOVE. SOME COMBINATION LAMPS THAT ARE NOT EQUIPPED WITH AMBER SIDE REFLECTORS FAIL TO CONFORM TO FEDERAL MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY STANDARD NO. 108, LAMPS, REFLECTIVE DEVICES, AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT.
- Consequence: WITHOUT THE AMBER REFLECTORS, THE VEHICLE WILL BE POORLY ILLUMINATED, POSSIBLY RESULTING IN A VEHICLE CRASH WITHOUT WARNING.
- Remedy: PRO-A MOTORS WILL NOTIFY OWNERS AND OFFER TO REPURCHASE THE LAMPS. THE RECALL BEGAN ON APRIL 3, 2006. OWNERS MAY CONTACT PRO-A MOTORS AT 323-838-2988.
Negative 1992 Toyota Camry car reviews
Positive 1992 Toyota Camry car reviews
-
Extremely reliable. Solid performer. Remember to change the oil regularly and the timing belt every 60,000 miles. If you maintain it well, you can get up to 200,000 miles out of it.
-
I bought this car over a year ago for $2,500, and it has been the best car I have ever owned. It had 113,000 miles on it when I bought it. Now it has about 135,000 miles on it, and it is still going strong. I have driven it all the way to Texas and back (from Alabama), and I would trust it to take me anywhere. I have only had to replace the front struts and an O2 sensor. Other than that, I've only had to perform routine maintenance on it. The total amount of money spent on maintenance is less than $500. I'll take that over a monthly car payment any day. It rides great, is super comfortable, and I wouldn't trade it for most anything. And no, it's not for sale. :)
-
You're going to love this story! We bought this car for my teenage son as his first car, and it's been such a great ride. It had 217K miles on it when we got it, but the lady we bought it from had bought it new and put three teenage girls through it as their first car. She even had all of the maintenance records, and was so sad to see it go when we drove away. Since then, I've done some work on it, like putting on new brakes, struts, and stabilizer links, but nothing major. And you know what? It just keeps on ticking!
-
Your 92 Camry SE V6 sounds like an amazing car! With 130,000 miles and still in great shape, it's clear that it's been well taken care of. The SE body style is very sporty and the paint job is fantastic. It's great to hear that it's been extremely reliable and provides a fantastic ride on the open road. It's understandable that you wish Toyota still made them like this. It's a shame that your '97 Camry doesn't quite live up to the quality of your 92 Camry SE V6.
-
I've owned 15 cars in 30 years, ranging from Minis to Mercedes, but this one beats them all. This is my second V6 Toyota, and the first one lasted for 245,000 miles. The comfort is superb, the V6 power is effortless, the ride is smooth, and it's always reliable. In my opinion, this is the best body shape of all the models, and it's a shame they changed it.
Additional sources
More sources of information about 1992 Toyota Camry problems:
1992 Toyota Camry Problems and Complaints - 21 Issues
Top 1992 Toyota Camry Problems · Automatic Transmission May Not Shift Correctly at High Mileages · Power Steering Pump and Hoses May Leak and Need Replacing.
1992 Camry 2.2 Turns over Won't start | Toyota Nation Forum
Feb 27, 2004 ... This sounds like a common problem in the early 90's Camry's. I have a 93' Camry that won't start. It will crank but that's it. We first ...
Common 1992 Toyota Camry Problems - Expert Q&A | JustAnswer
Jun 6, 2009 ... The other possibility is the return hose to tank is clogged resulting in excessive pressure and flooding when trying to start. If this is the ...
1992 Toyota Camry - Oil is leaking
Feb 20, 2009 ... The Toyota Camry is a great car. There are some common oil leaks which can be down right annoying. The valve cover gaskets frequently leak ( ...
Buying a 92 Camry LE V6 ~ Have Some Questions | Toyota Nation ...
Oct 12, 2016 ... Coolant leak (1992-96): Head-gasket failure on 3.0-liter engines allows coolant to enter the cylinders. Hard starting (1992-96): A "cold soak" ( ...
Other years of Toyota Camry
Are you having problems with your 1992 Toyota Camry?
Peyton Fahey 2024-10-18
This car has been magnificent in reliability!
Nigel Langosh 2024-06-20
After only 7 and a half days, the car caught on fire and caused a lot of inconvenience, including towing fees and registration costs. Despite my attempts to get a refund, I was unsuccessful. This experience has left me with serious concerns about Toyota's safety standards. I cannot help but think about what could have happened if my daughter was in the car. While some may argue that this was an isolated incident, I have decided that I will not be purchasing a Toyota again.