1991 Ford Ranger problems
The Ford Ranger is a compact or mid-size pickup marketed globally by Ford over a series of generations, varying between both in-house or outside development and manufacturing — and with a hiatus in North America from 2011–2018.
Debuting as a compact pickup in North America in 1982 for the 1983 model year, the Ranger was later introduced in some South American countries. From 1998 to 2011, the Ranger nameplate was used for models developed by Mazda for sale outside the North American market. In 2011, Ford introduced the first Ranger based on the T6 platform. Considered a mid-size pickup truck, the model was developed in-house by Ford Australia. In that same year, the North American-market Ranger was discontinued, leaving the T6 platform-based Ranger as the sole Ranger model worldwide.
For the 2019 model year, the Ranger was reintroduced in North America using the globally-marketed T6 model. It is manufactured at the Michigan Assembly Plant at Wayne, Michigan. The Ranger is smaller than the F-150 and larger than the Maverick in the Ford North American pickup truck range, while for markets outside the Americas it is typically the only Ford pickup offered for sale.
The second generation of the T6-based Ranger was released in 2021 for worldwide markets, using a revised T6 platform.
Social links
Common 1991 Ford Ranger problems
The Ford Ranger, first introduced in 1983, has been a popular compact truck for many years. However, like any vehicle, certain model years have been associated with specific problems. This article will discuss common problems with the Ford Ranger, focusing on the 1991 model based on complaints from owners.
- Loose Steering Wheel: Long-time Ford Ranger drivers have reported issues with loose steering wheels, which can become more pronounced after long mileage. This problem is often due to worn-out steering components or alignment issues, causing the vehicle to wander from side to side on the highway.
- Transmission Problems: Ford Rangers, including the 1991 model, have had complaints about shaky or delayed transmission, resulting in car jerking and gear slips. These issues can be caused by worn-out clutches or shift cables, or transmission overheating, which may require complete replacement.
- Stalling when Starting from Cold: Some Ford Ranger owners have experienced hesitation when attempting to start their vehicles from a cold state. This issue can be caused by a damaged air intake, faulty exhaust gas recirculation valve, defective engine coolant temperature sensor, or other factors.
- Turbocharger Failure and Crankshaft Damage: Ford Ranger owners have reported turbocharger failure and crankshaft damage, which can lead to significant drops in fuel economy and unusual noises coming from the engine.
- Fuel Injector Issues: Dirty or clogged fuel injector filters can cause engine light to come on, unsteady idling, or engine misfires at times.
- MAF Sensor (Mass Airflow Sensor) Issues: Similar to fuel injector problems, a defective or dirty MAF sensor can cause issues with detecting air levels properly, leading to symptoms such as engine misfires and unsteady idling.
These common problems with the Ford Ranger, particularly the 1991 model, should be considered when purchasing a used vehicle. Regular maintenance and inspections can help identify and address these issues before they become more serious and costly to repair.
How many miles does a 1991 Ford Ranger last?
The Ranger is built to withstand up to 300,000 miles and years upon years of use.
What problems did old Ford Rangers have?
From unusual slippage with the gearbox to transmission fluid leaks, both automatic and manual transmission Ford Rangers have shown issues, sometimes leading to recalls.
What are the bad years for Ford Ranger?
A: Yes, some Ford Ranger model years have proven less reliable than others. It's best to avoid the following years: 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2008, 2011, and 2019. These years have been subject to numerous customer complaints and issues.
What is the most common problem with the Ford Ranger?
Common engine problems on a Ford Ranger include a turbo failure and engine crank damage which causes excessive overheating, dark smoke from the exhaust, and a dip in fuel economy. Engine problems can land your car in serious trouble. Thus, it is always better to consult a mechanic right after you've spotted any faults.
How many miles does a 1991 Ford Ranger last?
The Ranger is built to withstand up to 300,000 miles and years upon years of use.
What year did Ford Ranger have problems?
Ford Ranger recent recalls
| Affected model dates | Issue |
|---|---|
| 01/09/18 - 31/05/19 | Heavy loading could cause the rear differential to fail |
| 01/12/16 - 28/02/19 | Rear silencer may detach from the exhaust pipe creating an accident risk |
| 01/01/04-31/12/06 | Gas generator on front airbag may be defective which could cause uncontrolled inflation |
Are 90s Ford Rangers reliable?
The average rating is a 3.9 out of 5 stars. The 1990 Ford Ranger Reliability Rating is 3.5 out of 5. It ranks 21st out of 32 for all car brands.
What is the best years for Ford Ranger to avoid?
A: Yes, some Ford Ranger model years have proven less reliable than others. It's best to avoid the following years: 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2008, 2011, and 2019. These years have been subject to numerous customer complaints and issues.
1991 Ford Ranger car problems categorized by type of issue
After analyzing all complaints sent to the NHTSA and researching popular Ford Ranger problems, we found that the most common problems with these 2023 model year vehicles are:
- Electrical system problems
- Suspension problems
- Engine and engine cooling problems
- Power train problems
- Service brakes problems
The graph below shows statistics for all 1991 Ford Ranger vehicle components and the number of complaints received.
Latest 25 complaints 1991 Ford Ranger
The NHTSA has received 143 complaints about various vehicle components related to the 1991 Ford Ranger. Below are the 25 most recent complaints reported for 1991 Ford Ranger vehicles.
ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING,ELECTRICAL SYSTEM PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2012-07-06
- Fire: 1
- VIN: 1FTCR10U0MU
- Components: ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING,ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
- Summary: TL* THE CONTACT OWNED A 1991 FORD RANGER. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE VEHICLE WAS PARKED WHEN IT CAUGHT ON FIRE. THE FIRE DEPARTMENT WAS NOTIFIED AND NO INJURIES WERE REPORTED AT THE SCENE. THE VEHICLE WAS DESTROYED. THE DEALER WAS NOT NOTIFIED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOT NOTIFIED. THE FAILURE AND CURRENT MILEAGES WERE 150,000. UPDATED 8/23/12 *CN
SUSPENSION PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2011-02-28
- VIN: 1FTCR14A1MP
- Components: SUSPENSION
- Summary: TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 1991 FORD RANGER. THE CONTACT NOTICED THAT THE FRONT PASSENGER SIDE OF THE VEHICLE HAD DROPPED APPROXIMATELY FIVE INCHES FROM THE REGULAR POSITION AND THE FRONT FENDER WAS COVERING THE TOP OF THE FRONT PASSENGER SIDE TIRE. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT TAKEN TO A DEALER FOR DIAGNOSTICS. AN INDEPENDENT MECHANIC INSPECTED THE VEHICLE AND NOTICED THAT THE PASSENGER SIDE COIL SPRING MOUNT WAS CORRODED AND NEEDED TO BE REPLACED. THE CONTACT STATED THAT A LOCAL AUTO SHOP WAS CONTACTED AND ADVISED THAT THE PART WAS NO LONGER AVAILABLE. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE APPROXIMATE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 65,000.
FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2003-01-19
- VIN: 1FTCR15T5MP
- Components: FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE
- Summary: TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 1991 FORD RANGER. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE FUEL TANK STRAP BECAME CORRODED AND WAS PARTIALLY FRACTURED FROM THE VEHICLE. THE CONTACT WAS CONCERNED THAT IT WOULD CAUSE THE FUEL TANK TO DETACH. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO AN AUTHORIZED DEALER WHO STATED THAT THE STRAP WOULD NEED TO BE REPLACED. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE CONTACT CALLED THE MANUFACTURER WHO ADVISED THAT THERE WERE NO RELATED RECALLS TO THE FAILURE AND PROVIDED NO FURTHER ASSISTANCE. THE CURRENT MILEAGE WAS APPROXIMATELY 142,800 AND THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS APPROXIMATELY 100,000.
STRUCTURE PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2011-03-17
- VIN: 1FTCR10U6MU
- Components: STRUCTURE
- Summary: THE FRAME HAS HORRIBLE CORROSION. ALL THE SPRING HANGERS ARE WERE FAILING BAD. I DON'T EVEN THINK IT CAN BE WELDED BECAUSE IT IS RUSTED FROM ONE END TO ANOTHER. FORD REALLY MESSED THIS ONE UP. AND WHY DO ALL THE FUEL GAUGES QUIT WORKING? *TR
STRUCTURE PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2009-11-26
- VIN: 1FTCR14U9MP
- Components: STRUCTURE
- Summary: PEELING FACTORY PAINT PRIMARILY ON TOP SURFACES..I.E. HOOD, CAB ROOF, COWLING. I HAVE OWNED TRUCK SINCE 12/8/99 AND HAS HAD PROBLEM SINCE,IT HAS LOST NEARLY ALL PAINT ON ROOF , HOOD HAS ABOUT 1/3 LEFT. PRIMARILY LIFTS/PEELS WHEN WASHED OR WHEN LEFT OUT IN RAIN. HAS HAD BITS PEEL BACK AT HIGHWAY SPEEDS. MAINLY OCCURS THOUGH WITH WASHING. HAVE INQUIRED WITH DEALERS TO NO AVAIL. WAS TOLD BY ONE THAT THERE WAS A RECALL BUT THAT THE PERIOD FOR REPAIR OF CONDITION HAD PASSED. I HAVE NOT RECEIVED NOR HEARD ANYTHING FROM MFR REGARDING THIS ISSUE WHATSOEVER. *TR
ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2009-05-20
- Fire: 1
- VIN: 1FTCR14U5MP
- Components: ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING
- Summary: TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 1991 FORD RANGER. WHILE DRIVING 5 MPH WITH THE DEFROSTER ACTIVATED, THE VEHICLE BEGAN TO SMOKE. THE CONTACT PULLED THE VEHICLE OVER AND NOTICED FLAMES UNDER THE HOOD. THE FIRE DEPARTMENT WAS CALLED AND STATED THAT THERE WAS A FAULTY WIRE UNDER THE HOOD THAT CAUSED THE FIRE. PRIOR TO THE FAILURE, THE CLUTCH AND POWER STEERING WERE REPAIRED AND THE GAS LINE WAS CLEANED. THE VEHICLE HAS NOT BEEN TAKEN TO A DEALER OR MECHANIC. A POLICE REPORT WAS FILED. THE CURRENT AND FAILURE MILEAGES WERE 100,000. UPDATED 062909 *BF UPDATED 07/01/09
SUSPENSION PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2004-11-02
- VIN: 1FTCR14UXMP
- Components: SUSPENSION
- Summary: THE CONSUMER MADE CONTACT WITH THE MANUFACTURE FOR THE FRONT END SUSPENSION PART THAT WAS DISCONTINUED. *JB
VISIBILITY PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2004-09-07
- VIN: 1FTCR14U1MP
- Components: VISIBILITY
- Summary: BOTH MIRRORS FOLDED UP AGAINST THE VEHICLE WHEN DRIVING. DRIVER'S SIDE WAS REPLACED THREE TIMES, AND THE PASSENGER'S SIDE TWICE. HOWEVER, DRIVER'S SIDE MIRROR MALFUNCTIONED AGAIN. *AK TRUCK IS IN GARAGE FROM 11-1 TOMAY 1. AND I STIKK ONLY GET1 YEAR TO 18 MONTHS PER MIRROR. I REALIZE THE VEHICLE IS 13 YEARS OLD AND REDESIGNING THE MIRROR IS NOT ANOPTION. HOWEVER, FORD MOTOR CORP SURELY COULD DO SOMETHING ABOUT THE PRICE! RETAIL IS CLOSRE TO $7500 PER PIECE. I KNOW REDESIGNING IS OUT OF QUESTION, BUT FOR THOSE OF US THAT INTEND ON KEEPING OUR VEHICLES, THE COMPANY COULD REDUCE THE PRICE. *AK
STRUCTURE PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2004-07-15
- VIN: 1FTCR10A0MP
- Components: STRUCTURE
- Summary: CONSUMER STATES THAT HIS MOTOR MOUNTS ARE RUSTING RIGHT OUT FROM THE FRAME. HE STATES HE HAS NEVER SEEN ANYTHING LIKE IT. HE STATES HE HAS NOT SEEN A RECALL FOR THIS PROBLEM, BUT HE DOES NOT THINK THIS IS NORMAL. *NM
SUSPENSION PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2001-06-04
- Components: SUSPENSION
- Summary: RIGHT FRONT SPRING BRACKET RUSTED THROUGH ALLOWING BODY TO DROP ONTO FRONT TIRE, AND I NOTICED THERE ARE A LOT OF COMPLAINTS ON THIS ISSUE AND WAS WANTING TO KNOW IS FORD GOING TO FIX THIS PROBLEM OR ARE WE THE PUBLIC GOING TO GET STUCK WITH THIS PROBLEM ? *JB
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2002-09-08
- Fire: 1
- Components: ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
- Summary: THE VEHICLE WAS SITTING OUT SIDE WHEN THE BATTERY EXPLODED. THE VEHICLE CAUGHT ON FIRE AS A RESULT. *JG *JB
TIRES PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2002-12-20
- Components: TIRES
- Summary: TRAVELING N ON I-95 ON 12/20/2002 AT APPROX 4 P.M. RIGHT FRONT TIRE TREAD SEPARATED, BEAT AND DAMAGED FENDER; HOWEVER, TIRE MAINTAINED SAME PRESSURE. 1 WAS ASSISTED BY OFFICER K.R. MEARES OF TOBESON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT,TEL 910-671-3100. DIMSII IVOQ ENTRY POSTED AFTER 12/12/02 CUT-OVER TO ARTEMIS------770783. *AK *NLM
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2002-11-09
- Number Of Injuries: 1
- Fire: 1
- VIN: 1FTCR10A3MP
- Components: ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
- Summary: WHILE PARKED, THE VEHICLE CAUGHT FIRE DUE TO A FAILED IGNITION SWITCH, MANUFACTURER INFORMED CONSUMER THAT THE FAILED PART WAS NOT WORTHY OF ANY TYPE OF ASSISTANCE TO COMPENSATE FOR A VEHICLE DESTROYED BY FIRE. PH. CONSUMER WAS INJURED WHILE TRYING TO PUT THE FIRE OUT. *JB
TIRES PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2024-11-24
- VIN: 1FTCR10A5MU
- Components: TIRES
- Summary: WHILE DRIVING VEHICLE 70MPH, FELT THE FRONT STARTING TO VIBRATE. HAD PULLED OVER AND CHECKED TIRES. THE RIGHT FRONT TIRE HAD A LARGE BUBBLE. THE TREAD WAS STARTING TO SEPARATE. WENT TO AN INDEPENDENT TIRE DEALER AND THE SPARE TIRE REPLACED THE BLOWN TIRE. NOT ORIGINAL TIRES. FIRESTONE FR 480 P215/70R14 TS
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2002-10-15
- Fire: 1
- VIN: PLEASE PROV
- Components: ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
- Summary: CONSUMER STATED THAT A BATTERY EXPLODED, AND VEHICLE CAUGHT FIRE. CONSUMER STATES THIS WAS VERY DANGEROUS. MANUFACTURE OF BATTERY IS JOHNSON CONTROLS INC. /SEAR DIE HARD. PLEASE PROVIDE ANY FURTHER INFORMATION. MR
VISIBILITY PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2002-08-28
- VIN: 1FCR14X5MPA
- Components: VISIBILITY
- Summary: BOTH MIRRORS HAVE BEEN REPLACED MORE THAN ONE TIME BECAUSE THEY DO NOT STAY POSITIONED. DEALER HAS BEEN NOTIFIED. NLM CONSUMER STATED THAT WHEN THE MIRRORS DO NOT STAY IN POSITIONED DRIVERS HAVE NO VIEW OF REAR LANES, THE MIRRORS FOLD BACK AT HIGHWAY SPEEDS. *YH
TIRES PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2002-08-27
- VIN: 1FTCR14U8MP
- Components: TIRES
- Summary: TIRES WERE PURCHASE AT COSTCO WHOLESALE. THESE TIRES SEEM TO HAVE A WEAKER SIDEWALL THAN THE OTHERS TIRES THEY SALE. POSSIBLY A SAFETY HAZARD. THESE TIRES WERE WARRANTED TO 80,000 MILES. S.*AK
SUSPENSION PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2002-03-01
- VIN: 1FTCR14U2MP
- Components: SUSPENSION
- Summary: CONSUMER STATED THAT THE RIGHT FRONT SHOCK MOUNT COMPLETELY RUSTED. *YH
STRUCTURE PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2002-05-09
- VIN: 1FTCR10X5MP
- Components: STRUCTURE
- Summary: FIREWALL SEPARATING AND CRACKING AT CLUTCH MASTER CYLINDER. *AK
SUSPENSION PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2002-05-01
- VIN: 1FTCR10U9MU
- Components: SUSPENSION
- Summary: RIGHT FRONT SHOCK TOWER COLLAPSED ON VEHICLE WHICH CAME APART FROM FRAME. DEALER CONTACTED. *AK. CONSUMER STATES THE RIGHT FRONT SUSPENSION HOUSING CORRODED AND FAILED, CONSUMER STATES PART MAY NOT HAVE BEEN PROPERLY HEAT TREATED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.*JB
STRUCTURE PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2002-02-13
- VIN: 1FTCR14U7MP
- Components: STRUCTURE
- Summary: THE COMPONENT HAD CORRODED AND FAILED. REPAIR SHOP SAID THEY HAD NEVER SEEN THIS BEFORE. SUGGESTED THAT THE PART MAY NOT HAVE BEEN PROPERLY TREATED PRIOR TO INSTALATION. LEFT SIDE MATCHING COMPONENT SHOWES NO CORROSION. WAS MAKING A LEFT TURN WHEN THE PART MADE A SNAPPING SOUND AND THE RIGHT FRONT OF THE TRUCK DROPPED RUBBING THE TIRE.*AK
POWER TRAIN PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2002-01-24
- VIN: 1FTCR11T3MU
- Components: POWER TRAIN
- Summary: CONSUMER PURCHASED MANUAL LOCKING HUBS FROM DEALERSHIP TO REPLACE AUTOMATIC LOCKING HUBS THAT WERE ORIGINAL EQUIPMENT FOR VEHICLE. AFTER MANUAL LOCKING HUBS WERE INSTALLED ON FRONT WHEELS VEHICLE WAS TAKEN FOR A TEST DRIVE. AFTER DRIVING FOR FIVE MILES AT A SPEED OF 10 TO 15 MPH, HOUSING FOR RIGHT/FRONT HUB CRACKED AND DISCONNECTED. PLEASE PROVIDE ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION / DOCUMENTATION.*AK
TIRES PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2001-10-12
- VIN: 1FTCR10A8MU
- Components: TIRES
- Summary: WE BOUGHT THIS TIRES IN NOVEMBER AT ROBERTSON TIRES IN TULSA, OK. I WAS DRIVING DOWN THE ROAD AND THE TIRE JUST SEPARATED FROM THE RIM. I TOOK PICTURES OF THE TIRE AND WENT TO SEE IF THEY WOULD FIX IT AND THEY SAID THAT THEY WOULD HAVE TO CHARGE ME $40 TO REPLACE THAT TIRE. THEY COULDN'T CHANGE ALL THE TIRES BECAUSE THEY DIDN'T COME WITH THE TRUCK. MY MOM HAD THE SAME PROBLEM WITH WILD COUNTRY TIRES AND FIRESTONE ENDED UP REPLACING ALL 4. THIS IS THE SECOND TIME IN MY LIFE THAT I HAVE SEEN A TIRE SEPARATE LIKE THAT AND WAS WONDERING IF THERE WAS ANYTHING I CAN DO TO GET ALL 4 REPLACED OR DO I HAVE TO GO AHEAD AND PAY TO GET THAT ONE FIXED AND PRAY THAT THE OTHERS DON'T SEPERATE LIKE THAT ONE? THE TIRE IS A FIREHAWK SS20 RWL P215/70R14. I AM SCARED TO DRIVE ON THESE TIRES. I HAVE 2 KIDS THAT RIDE AROUND IN THE VEHICLE WITH ME AND WHAT HAPPENS IF ANYMORE BLOW AND IS FATAL? I HAVE THE RECEIPT FOR THE TIRES AND PICTURES OF IT AND NEED TO KNOW WHAT TO DO. I WILL WAIT TO DO ANYTHING MORE UNTIL I HEAR FROM YOU. I WILL BE CALLING THE CORPORATE OFFICE OF ROBERTSON TIRE AND FIRESTONE. ANY INFORMATION THAT YOU CAN GIVE ME OR HELP ME WITH WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. SINCERELY, TAMMY. *AK (DOT NUMBER: HYHYF21529 TIRESIZE: P215/70R14)
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2024-11-24
- Components: ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
- Summary: CONSUMER IS HAVING PROBLEMS WITH A DEFECTIVE IGNITION SWITCH THAT IS POSSIBLY CAUSING VEHICLE TO STALL. *TT
SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2001-02-07
- VIN: 1FTCR10A8MT
- Components: SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC
- Summary: CONSUMER STATES HE WAS UNABLE TO STOP VEHICLE BECAUSE OF A HIGHLY CORRODED RUPTURED BRAKE LINE, VEHICLE REAR ENDED ANOTHER VEHICLE AND CONSUMERS VEHICLE WAS DEEMED TOTALED, CONSUMER IS SEEKING REIMBURSEMENT FROM MANUFACTURER FOR THE REPAIRS OF THE BRAKES.*YH
1991 Ford Ranger recalls
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has issued 6 recalls for different components of the 1991 Ford Ranger.
- Manufacturer: PRO-A MOTORS, INC.
- Components: EXTERIOR LIGHTING
- Summary: CERTAIN PRO-A MOTORS CORNER LAMPS, TURN SIGNALS, AND HEADLIGHTS SOLD AS REPLACEMENT LAMPS FOR USE ON CERTAIN PASSENGER VEHICLES LISTED ABOVE. SOME COMBINATION LAMPS THAT ARE NOT EQUIPPED WITH AMBER SIDE REFLECTORS FAIL TO CONFORM TO FEDERAL MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY STANDARD NO. 108, LAMPS, REFLECTIVE DEVICES, AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT.
- Consequence: WITHOUT THE AMBER REFLECTORS, THE VEHICLE WILL BE POORLY ILLUMINATED, POSSIBLY RESULTING IN A VEHICLE CRASH WITHOUT WARNING.
- Remedy: PRO-A MOTORS WILL NOTIFY OWNERS AND OFFER TO REPURCHASE THE LAMPS. THE RECALL BEGAN ON APRIL 3, 2006. OWNERS MAY CONTACT PRO-A MOTORS AT 323-838-2988.
- Manufacturer: FORD MOTOR COMPANY
- Components: TIRES:TREAD/BELT
- Summary: THIS IS NOT A SAFETY RECALL IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SAFETY ACT. HOWEVER, IT IS DEEMED A SAFETY IMPROVEMENT CAMPAIGN BY THE AGENCY. EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION: FORD IS REPLACING ALL FIRESTONE WILDERNESS AT 15, 16, AND 17 INCH TIRES MOUNTED ON FORD TRUCKS AND SUVS. FORD REPORTS TREAD SEPARATION CAN OCCUR DUE TO A COMBINATION OF THE SENSITIVITY OF THE TIRE DESIGN TO STRESS, AGING, AND MANUFACTURING DIFFERENCES BETWEEN PLANTS. FORD IS REPLACING THESE TIRES TO PREVENT POSSIBLE PREMATURE TIRE FAILURE. VEHICLE DESCRIPTION: THE VEHICLES LISTED BELOW MAY HAVE BEEN ORIGINALLY EQUIPPED WITH FIRESTONE WILDERNESS AT TIRES OR MAY HAVE HAD WILDERNESS AT TIRES INSTALLED DURING THE FIRESTONE RECALL LAUNCHED IN AUGUST 2000. CERTAIN 1991 THROUGHT 2002 FORD EXPLORER CERTAIN 2001 THROUGHT 2002 EXPLORER SPORT, AND SPORT TRAC CERTAIN 1997 THROUGH 2002 MERCURY MOUNTAINEER CERTAIN 1991 THROUGH 2001 RANGER CERTAIN 1999 THROUGH 2001 EXPEDITION CERTAIN 1991 THROUGH 1994, AND 1997 MODEL YEAR F-SERIES CERTAIN 1991 THROUGH 1994 BRONCO NOTE: BOTH ORIGINAL EQUIPMENT AND REPLACEMENT TIRES ARE AFFECTED.
- Consequence: SHOULD THE TREAD SEPARATE AT HIGHWAY SPEEDS, A VEHICLE CRASH COULD OCCUR, POSSIBLY RESULTING IN PERSONAL INJURY OR DEATH.
- Remedy: THE REPLACEMENT/REIMBURSEMENT PROGRAM FOR THIS CAMPAIGN EXPIRED ON MARCH 31, 2002. HOWEVER, CUSTOMERS CAN CONTACT FORD AT 1-877-917-3673 OR GO ON-LINE TO WWW.FORD.COM FOR POSSIBLE ASSISTANCE.
- Manufacturer: BRIDGESTONE/FIRESTONE, INC.
- Components: TIRES:TREAD/BELT
- Summary: TIRE DESCRIPTION: FIRESTONE WILDERNESS AT, SIZE P235/75R15, PRODUCED AT THE DECATUR, ILLINOIS TIRE PLANT AND ALL FIRESTONE RADIAL ATX AND RADIAL ATX II TIRES, SIZE P235/75R15. OPERATION OF THESE TIRES AT LOW INFLATION PRESSURES, HIGH SPEED, AND IN HOT WEATHER, CAN CONTRIBUTE TO SEPARATION OF THE TIRE TREAD.
- Consequence: IF THE TREAD SEPARATES FROM THE TIRE, THE DRIVER CAN LOSE CONTROL OF THE VEHICLE, POSSIBLY RESULTING IN A CRASH CAUSING INJURY OR DEATH.
- Remedy: THE REPLACEMENT/REIMBURSEMENT PROGRAM FOR THIS CAMPAIGN EXPIRED ON AUGUST 29, 2001. HOWEVER, CUSTOMERS SHOULD CONTACT FIRESTONE CUSTOMER SERVICE AT 1-800-465-1904 FOR POSSIBLE ASSISTANCE.
- Manufacturer: AIMCO PRODUCTS INC.
- Components: SERVICE BRAKES, AIR:DISC:ROTOR
- Summary: EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION: AFTERMARKET BRAKE ROTORS FOR USE ON CERTAIN FORD AND MAZDA TRUCKS. CRACKED CASTINGS CAUSED CRACKS TO APPEAR ON THE OUTER DIAMETER OF THE ROTOR HAT OR AROUND THE STUD HOLE.
- Consequence: LOSS OF BRAKING CAN RESULT.
- Remedy: AIMCO WILL REIMBURSE CONSUMERS/INSTALLERS FOR THE COST OF REPLACEMENT ROTORS AND INSTALLATION. CONSUMERS ARE REQUESTED TO RETURN TO THE LOCATION WHERE THE ROTORS WERE ORIGINALLY PURCHASED/INSTALLED FOR REPLACEMENT.
- Manufacturer: FORD MOTOR COMPANY
- Components: SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC:POWER ASSIST:HYDRAULIC
- Summary: THE STUDS WHICH ATTACH THE BRAKE MASTER CYLINDER TO THE POWER BRAKE VACUUM BOOSTER ASSEMBLY CAN DEVELOP STRESS CORROSION CRACKING AFTER BEING OPERATED FOR AN EXTENDED PERIOD OF TIME IN THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA LOCATION.
- Consequence: IF A CRACK OCCURS, IT COULD RESULT IN ONE OR BOTH STUDS FRACTURING. THE MASTER CYLINDER COULD THEN SEPARATE FROM THE VACUUM BOOSTER, WHEN THE BRAKES ARE APPLIED, PREVENTING THE SERVICE BRAKES FROM ACTIVATING INCREASING THE RISK OF A VEHICLE ACCIDENT.
- Remedy: DEALERS WILL REPLACE THE POWER BRAKE VACUUM BOOSTER ASSEMBLY.
- Manufacturer: FORD MOTOR COMPANY
- Components: POWER TRAIN:AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION
- Summary: WHEN THE AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION SHIFT LEVER IS PLACED IN THE PARK POSITION, THE PARK PAWL DOES NOT ALWAYS ABUT OR ENGAGE THE PARK GEAR.
- Consequence: DRIVER MAY BELIEVE THE VEHICLE IS SAFELY ENGAGED IN PARKWHEN THE GEAR IS NOT TRULY ENGAGED. THIS CAN LEAD TO THE VEHICLE JUMPING OUT OFGEAR UNINTENTIONALLY, VEHICLE ROLLAWAY WHEN PARKED ON A SLOPED SURFACE, ANDINADVERTENT MOTION WHEN THE VEHICLE IS STARTED. ALL OF THESE CONDITIONS CANRESULT IN A VEHICLE ACCIDENT.
- Remedy: REPAIR THE TRANSMISSION WITH A NEW PARK PAWL.
Negative 1991 Ford Ranger car reviews
Positive 1991 Ford Ranger car reviews
-
You're in for a treat! This truck has a great history. It was originally purchased by my father in 1990 and has been in our family ever since. It's a 1990 Ford Ranger XLT Extended Cab, 4.0 Liter V6 - VORTEC Engine, Automatic. It's been well-maintained and rides like a dream, especially since we installed new sensatrac shocks. You'll love the comfortable ride and great gas mileage - it gets about 25 MPG HWY and 20 MPG in City. Plus, it has plenty of towing and pulling power when you need it. It's still running great after all these years!
-
Hey there! I just wanted to share my experience with my 1990 Ranger ex-cab that I bought back in 2005. It had 80,000 original miles on it and I drove that truck through every terrain imaginable. The best part? It never quit on me! It was a real steal for the price I paid - only $2500. I ended up selling it in 2009 for $1900 cash, but not before putting over 1000,000 miles on it. It did have a few minor hiccups, but nothing major. Unfortunately, I had to sell it because my family outgrew it, but I still wish I had it. It truly was the best truck ever!
-
This is such a great vehicle! Despite its age, it still runs really well and is incredibly comfortable.
-
Hey there! I hope you're doing well. I just wanted to share with you that I bought this car from my father back in '93 and it's been through a lot, but it's still running smoothly and quietly. It's got 193,000 miles on it now. The only problem I've had is that the valve cover seals keep breaking. Have you ever experienced something like this?
-
You made a great choice when you bought your Ranger with 139,000 miles on it from the original owner. Even though the overdrive went out in the transmission at 170,000 miles, you had it rebuilt and it has been running smoothly ever since. It's amazing that you've put almost 100,000 miles on it in the last 5 years and it's still going strong with over 230,000 miles on it. It's clear that you take good care of your vehicle and it's great to hear that it has been the best vehicle you've ever owned!
Additional sources
More sources of information about 1991 Ford Ranger problems:
Thoughts on buying 1991 Ranger? : r/fordranger
Nov 12, 2022 ... Going to check out this truck in a couple days. Never owned a ranger before, what should I look at before buying? Common issues with this year?
1991 Ford Ranger Problems and Complaints - 10 Issues
Problem with your 1991 Ford Ranger? Our list of 10 known complaints reported by owners can help you fix your 1991 Ford Ranger.
Q&A: 2002 Ford Ranger Common Problems & Clutch Replacement
Jul 31, 2010 ... What causes clutch problems in my 2002 Ford Ranger that has clutch problems? - Answered by a verified Ford Mechanic.
1991 Ford Ranger Repair: Service and Maintenance Cost
Most Common 1991 Ford Ranger Problems ... The engine may misfire and/or buck while driving at freeway speeds with no fault code stored in the powertrain...
1991 ford ranger 3.0l v6 automatic transmission problem - Ford ...
Sep 3, 2019 ... Ford Ranger - 1991 ford ranger 3.0l v6 automatic transmission problem - I was driving around yesturday when it was very hot outside when the ...
Other years of Ford Ranger
Are you having problems with your 1991 Ford Ranger?
Gregorio Parisian 2024-10-27
Sorry to hear about your bad experience with your truck. It must have been frustrating to have two transmission failures within a year. I understand why you may not want to purchase a Ford again. Thank you for sharing your feedback.
Leonardo O'Conner 2024-10-11
You can count on this car to be very reliable. It did require one major repair in its second year, but thankfully it was covered by warranty. While it may not be the fastest when it comes to acceleration, it certainly makes up for it with its impressive torque.
Lemuel Lesch 2024-09-03
You're so lucky to have received this truck from your friend, who was the original owner. It's great to hear that it was always kept in the garage and only driven in the city. The XLT package is really nice, and the two-tone paint (light blue top/light gray bottom) is a great touch.
Jose Wyman 2024-08-25
I'm 18 and my father gave me this truck when I was 17. It has never failed me and the mileage reads approximately 745,367 miles. I love the acceleration of the manual transmission, it can blow most cars off the road.
Consuelo Lakin 2024-08-24
Hey there! When it's up and running, this little truck is great! The first time it needed repair, I thought it was the transmission and had already bought a rebuilt one. However, it turned out that the big round clutch plate was quite worn down, so I replaced that and put on the rebuilt transmission. After 5 years, I had to replace the slave cylinder, which involved dropping the drive shaft and backing off the transmission. Then, after another 3 years, I had to back off the transmission again, just enough to replace the bearings on the slave. Two years later, the master cylinder locked up and bent the small shaft in it. I'm currently in the process of changing out the master cylinder, but after an afternoon of trying to get that clip in on the hose male plug into the slave cylinder female, I found out that the connection was entirely different. GRRRR! Now I have to drop the shaft and back off the transmission again to install the new slave! I was thinking that the slave cylinder is not that old and still good, maybe there's an adaptor to connect the new male plug into the old female, but I doubt it. Unfortunately, I just don't have the money. I'm deaf in one ear all my life and have worked many jobs, but I never went to school, so I'm really not a mechanic. I'm one of those types, if it comes apart, I can put it back together. I think I was 52 when I did the clutch. Now at 65, I know that transmission is going to be heavy. Wish me luck. Leo