1995 Chevrolet Lumina problems
The Chevrolet Lumina is a mid-size car that was produced and marketed by the Chevrolet division of General Motors from 1989 until 2001.
Background
The first generation of the Lumina replaced the Chevrolet Celebrity and Chevrolet Monte Carlo under a single nameplate; the mechanically unrelated Chevrolet Lumina APV minivan served as the successor for the Celebrity station wagon. The model line was based on the front-wheel-drive GM10 platform (later designated the GM W platform), shared with Buick, Oldsmobile, and Pontiac. For 1995, the second-generation Lumina was introduced, serving as a substantial exterior revision of the previous generation (the two-door coupe was renamed the Monte Carlo). For the 2000 model year, the Lumina was replaced by the Chevrolet Impala; the model line would retain the W platform through the 2016 model year.
Throughout its production, both generations of the Lumina were produced by General Motors Canada at Oshawa Car Assembly (Oshawa, Ontario). For markets outside of North America, the Chevrolet Lumina was derived from other large GM sedans. From 1998 to 2013, the Lumina was marketed in the Middle East and South Africa as a Chevrolet-badged version of the Holden Commodore produced in Australia. From 2005 to 2006, GM Philippines sold the Lumina as a Chevrolet-badged version of the Buick Regal (sharing much of its body with its American counterpart).
Social links
Common 1995 Chevrolet Lumina problems
The 1995 Chevrolet Lumina has been known for several common problems based on complaints from owners. One of the most frequently reported issues is related to the intake manifold gaskets, which may leak coolant or engine oil. This problem can lead to significant engine damage if not addressed promptly.
Another common issue with the 1995 Chevrolet Lumina is the underpowered and rough-running four- and six-cylinder engines. These engines were not as efficient or powerful as their counterparts from competitors like Honda and Toyota, which negatively affected the car's performance and overall driving experience.
The 1995 Lumina also suffered from outdated styling, with long stretches of body extending beyond its wheels and an unflattering mix of curves and straight lines that robbed the look of any harmony. This design aspect made the car appear less modern and less attractive compared to its rivals.
Additionally, the 1995 Lumina's fuel pump has been known to fail, causing the engine to stall. This issue can be particularly problematic, as it can lead to safety concerns and the need for costly repairs.
Engine issues are a significant concern for the 1995 Lumina, with 62 complaints recorded. Electrical problems are also common, with 19 complaints, as well as cooling system issues, with 17 complaints.
In terms of long-term reliability, the 1995 Chevrolet Lumina ranks 10th out of 40 Chevrolet models, with 160 complaints made over 15 model years, mostly about engine issues. This ranking suggests that the Lumina may not be the most reliable choice for a car in the long term.
In summary, the 1995 Chevrolet Lumina has several common problems that owners have reported, including issues with the intake manifold gaskets, underpowered and rough-running engines, outdated styling, fuel pump failure, and engine, electrical, and cooling system issues. These problems suggest that the Lumina may not be the most reliable or efficient car, and potential buyers should be aware of these issues before making a purchase.
Is a Chevy Lumina a good car?
With a competent car and a pricing structure that undercuts Ford and Chrysler, Chevy's Lumina offers a fine blend of function, value and performance. This is one GM product that was done right the first time, just like the new Malibu, which should be investigated closely by buyers interested in the Lumina.
How long can a Chevy Lumina last?
Most of the 1995's and up that I know of have well over 200,000 miles on and still very strong. I had 278,000 on mine when I sold it. It still ran perfect and everything still worked on the car. The only issue that I had was an intake gasket at 200,000.
Why did Chevy discontinue the Lumina?
In North America Chevrolet discontinued the Lumina in 2000 due to dwindling sales and the success of the reborn Impala. The Lumina nameplate was still used in some markets, in parts of Asia it was applied to the mid-sized Buick Century/Regal and a badge engineered version of the Holden Commodore sports sedan.
How many miles per gallon does a 1995 Chevy Lumina get?
1995 Chevrolet Lumina MPG
Based on data from 16 vehicles, 536 fuel-ups and 135,299 miles of driving, the 1995 Chevrolet Lumina gets a combined Avg MPG of 21.29 with a 0.54 MPG margin of error.
Is a Chevy Lumina a good car?
With a competent car and a pricing structure that undercuts Ford and Chrysler, Chevy's Lumina offers a fine blend of function, value and performance. This is one GM product that was done right the first time, just like the new Malibu, which should be investigated closely by buyers interested in the Lumina.
Why did Chevy discontinue the Lumina?
In North America Chevrolet discontinued the Lumina in 2000 due to dwindling sales and the success of the reborn Impala. The Lumina nameplate was still used in some markets, in parts of Asia it was applied to the mid-sized Buick Century/Regal and a badge engineered version of the Holden Commodore sports sedan.
What engine is in a Lumina?
| Chevrolet Lumina APV | |
|---|---|
| Platform | GM U platform: GMT199 |
| Related | Oldsmobile Silhouette Pontiac Trans Sport |
| Powertrain | |
| Engine | 3.1 L LG6 V6 3.4 L LA1 V6 3.8 L L27 V6 |
How many miles per gallon does a 1995 Chevy Lumina get?
1995 Chevrolet Lumina MPG
Based on data from 16 vehicles, 536 fuel-ups and 135,299 miles of driving, the 1995 Chevrolet Lumina gets a combined Avg MPG of 21.29 with a 0.54 MPG margin of error.
1995 Chevrolet Lumina car problems categorized by type of issue
After analyzing all complaints sent to the NHTSA and researching popular Chevrolet Lumina problems, we found that the most common problems with these 2023 model year vehicles are:
- Visibility problems
- Service brakes problems
- Hydraulic problems
- Engine and engine cooling problems
- Power train problems
The graph below shows statistics for all 1995 Chevrolet Lumina vehicle components and the number of complaints received.
Latest 25 complaints 1995 Chevrolet Lumina
The NHTSA has received 584 complaints about various vehicle components related to the 1995 Chevrolet Lumina. Below are the 25 most recent complaints reported for 1995 Chevrolet Lumina vehicles.
AIR BAGS PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2014-10-01
- Number Of Injuries: 1
- Crash: 1
- VIN: 2G1WN52M1S9
- Components: AIR BAGS
- Summary: LETTER FROM SENATOR NELSON ON BEHALF OF CONSTITUENT RE 1995 CHEVY LUMINA AIRBAG DID NOT DEPLOY. *SMD THE CONSUMER WAS INVOLVED IN AN ACCIDENT AND SUFFERED INJURIES. *JB
ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2009-02-19
- VIN: UNKNOWN
- Components: ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING
- Summary: I DROVE A LUMINA THAT HAD A PROBLEM THAT SOUNDS LIKE SAME TYPE OF ENGINE SHUTOFF PROBLEM THAT HAS BEEN IN THE NEWS LATELY. IT HAPPENED MOST OFTEN WHEN DRIVING ON THE HIGHWAY. AS I DECELERATED ON EXIT RAMPS, THE ENGINE WOULD SHUTOFF. THIS BECAME A FAIRLY REGULAR OCCURRENCE WITH THIS CAR. SEVERAL MECHANICS WERE UNABLE TO SOLVE THE PROBLEM. (I BELIEVE IT WAS A 1994 OR 1995 LUMINA THAT I OWNED. I COULD NOT FIND A RECORD OF IT.) *TR
ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2011-06-11
- VIN: 2G1WN52M9S9
- Components: ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING
- Summary: VEHICLE INTAKE MANIFOLD GASKET IS LEAKING. THIS IS DUE TO THE MANIFOLD BEING MADE OF PLASTIC WHICH BREAKS AND CAUSES IT TO LEAK. GM IS AWARE OF THIS FLAW BUT I DID NOT SEE RECALLS SO I AM REPORTING THIS MATTER IN HOPES THERE CAN BE A RECALL FOR THE FAULTY PART. *TR
SUSPENSION,ELECTRONIC STABILITY CONTROL (ESC) PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2010-10-09
- Components: SUSPENSION,ELECTRONIC STABILITY CONTROL (ESC)
- Summary: ON OR ABOUT 10-6-10 I ASSISTED MY GRANDSON IN PURCHASING A VEHICLE FROM A CAR LOT IN CLEVELAND OHIO. THE CAR WAS A 1995 CHEVY LUMINA. WE WERE TOLD THE CAR HAD BEEN PURCHASED AT AN AUCTION IN PA. AND DRIVEN TO CLEVELAND WITHOUT A PROBLEM. I PAID $635 FOR THE DOWNPAYMENT WITH ADDITIONAL $300 TO BE PAID BY 11-5-10 FOR A TITLE TRANSFER. THEN $200 A MONTH THEREAFTER FOR 12 MONTHS. WE LEFT WITH AN ELATED YOUNG MAN WHO NOW HAD A WAY TO GET BACK AND FORTH TO WORK FOR HIS TWO JOBS. THE NEXT DAY HE TAKES IT FOR AN OIL CHANGE AND IS TOLD THAT THE CAR HAS NUMEROUS PROBLEMS, LEAKING GASKETS, BAD STRUTS, RUSTED FLOOR, AND LEAK IN GAS TANK AND TRANSMISSION. THE NEXT DAY, IT STOPPED RUNNING. CONTACTED THE DEALER WHO TOWED IT AND CLAIMED TO REPAIR LEAKING TRANS. THREE DAYS LATER IT STOPS AGAIN, THEY TOW IT FROM I-480 HIGHWAY AND EACH TOW WE HAVE TO PAY THEM $45. THEY ARE GIVEN A LIST OF REPAIRS NEEDED, EVEN THOUGH PURCHASED WITH NO WARRANTY THE CAR BARELY LEAVES THE LOT BEFORE IT BREAKS DOWN. ON PAYDAY, HE GETS CAR BACK THIS TIME AND FILLS TANK UP ONLY FOR HIS JOB PARKING LOT TO BE COVERED WITH LEAKING GAS AND THE POLICE AND FIRE DEPT. ARE CALLED AND TELL HIM NOT TO DRIVE THE CAR AS THE LEAK IS A DEATH TRAP. AGAIN I PAY FOR A TOW FROM AAA $64. THEY ARE INFORMED AND STATE THEY PUT A GAS TANK ON AND THAT WE CANNOT CONTACT THEM REGARDING ANYMORE PROBLEMS. TWO DAYS AGO THE CAR STOPS AGAIN, BATTERY DEAD. I PURCHASE A NEW BATTERY AND TODAY, THE STABILIZER BAR FALLS AND THE STRUTS ARE HANGING LEAVING THE CAR UNDRIVEABLE. SOMETHING MUST BE DONE REGARDING UNSCRUPULOUS DEALERS THAT SELL THESE HARD WORKING PEOPLE UNRELIABLE TRANSPORTATION. *TR
STRUCTURE PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2009-03-22
- VIN: 2G1WL52M8S1
- Components: STRUCTURE
- Summary: TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 1995 CHEVROLET LUMINA. WHILE DRIVING APPROXIMATELY 10 MPH, THE CONTACT HEARD A LOUD BANGING NOISE UNDERNEATH THE VEHICLE. UPON FURTHER INSPECTION, SHE NOTICED THAT THE FRAME OF THE VEHICLE WAS FRACTURED, WHICH CAUSED IT TO SEPARATE FROM THE VEHICLE. THE VEHICLE WAS PUSHED TO HER PLACE OF RESIDENCE. THE CONTACT IS IN THE PROCESS OF HAVING THE VEHICLE INSPECTED TO DETERMINE THE CAUSE OF THE FAILURE. THE FAILURE AND CURRENT MILEAGES WERE 150,000.
POWER TRAIN PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2008-11-12
- Components: POWER TRAIN
- Summary: THE CAR WAS RUNNING FINE AND THEN WHEN IT SHIFTED THROUGH THE GEARS WHEN IT WENT TO CHANGE INTO OVERDRIVE IT WAS LIKE IT JUST WENT INTO NEUTRAL. I PULLED OVER AND TRIED ALL THE GEARS AGAIN AND THERE WAS A LIGHT GRINGING SOUND AND ALL IT WOULD WORK IN WAS 1ST GEAR SO I GOT TO DRIVE HOME AT A LIGHTNING SPEED OF BOUT 10 TO 15 MPH. *TR
VISIBILITY PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2008-05-15
- VIN: 1GNDU06D1ST
- Components: VISIBILITY
- Summary: TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 1995 CHEVROLET LUMINA. THE CONTACT STATED THAT HIS WINDSHIELD WIPERS WORK INTERMITTENTLY. THE MANUFACTURER INFORMED HIM THAT HIS VIN WAS NOT INCLUDED IN NHTSA CAMPAIGN ID NUMBER 97V017000 (VISIBILITY:WINDSHIELD WIPER/WASHER:SWITCH/WIRING). THE CONTACT WILL HAVE THE DEALER REPLACE THE WASHER WIPER SWITCH. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 41,718 AND CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 42,000.
EXTERIOR LIGHTING PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2008-03-06
- VIN: 2G1WL52M6S9
- Components: EXTERIOR LIGHTING
- Summary: 95 LUMINAS AND MONTE CARLOS AS WELL AS OTHER GM W-BODY VEHICLES HAVE A PROBLEM WITH THE TURN SIGNAL SWITCH GOING BAD AND CAUSING THE BRAKE LIGHTS NOT TO WORK. *TR
ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2005-06-22
- Fire: 1
- VIN: 2G1WL52M6S9
- Components: ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING
- Summary: TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 1995 CHEVROLET LUMINA. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE VEHICLE CONTINUES TO OVERHEAT AND MUST CONSTANTLY APPLY ANTIFREEZE. THE VEHICLE HAS NO VISIBLE LEAKS AND WHILE DRIVING APPROXIMATELY 45 MPH, THE VEHICLE STALLED. THE MECHANIC STATED THAT ANTIFREEZE LEAKED INTO THE ENGINE AND CAUSED THE FAILURE. THE CURRENT AND FAILURE MILEAGES WERE 86,558.
ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING,POWER TRAIN PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2006-11-13
- VIN: 2G1WL52M6S9
- Components: ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING,POWER TRAIN
- Summary: DT*: THE CONTACT STATED WHILE DRIVING 55 MPH, THE ENGINE HESITATED WITHOUT WARNING. UPON INITIAL INSPECTION BY THE CONTACT, IT WAS DETERMINED THE FAILURE WAS POSSIBLY RELATED TO THE EXHAUST SYSTEM. THE DEALER AND MANUFACTURER WERE NOT ALERTED.
SEAT BELTS PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2006-08-23
- Number Of Injuries: 3
- Number Of Deaths: 1
- Crash: 1
- Fire: 1
- VIN: 2G1WL52M2S9
- Components: SEAT BELTS
- Summary: MY DAUGHTER WAS INVOLVED IN A FATAL AUTO ACCIDENT. SHE WAS THE REAR PASSENGER OF A CHEVORLET 1995 LUMINA. SHE HAD ON HER SEAT BELT. HER GIRLFRIEND ALSO IN THE REAR, DISTRACTED THE DRIVER WHO LOST CONTROL OF THE CAR AND HIT A TELEPHONE POLE. MY DAUGHTER RECEIVED A FATAL BLOW TO THE HEAD, LIVER LACERATIONS , FRACTURED RIBS, AND SEAT BELT CONTUSIONS. SHE REMAINED IN A COMA FOR NINE DAYS BEFORE PASSING AWAY. THE GIRL WHO DID NOT HAVE HER SEAT BELT SURVIVED WITH ONLY MINOR ABRASIONS. THE OTHER TWO FRONT SEAT DRIVER AND PASSENGER RECEIVED ONLY MINOR ABRASIONS. THE CAR EXPLODED INTO FLAMES. *JB
VISIBILITY PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2006-04-01
- VIN: 1GNDU06D3ST
- Components: VISIBILITY
- Summary: DT*: THE CONTACT STATED THAT ON MANY OCCASIONS THE WINDSHIELD WIPERS WOULD MALFUNCTION. ON ONE OCCASION, THE WINDSHIELD WIPERS MALFUNCTIONED WHILE DRIVING IN THE EVENING DURING A RAIN STORM. RECALLS WERE FOUND ON NHTSA WEBSITE THAT MATCHED THE SYMPTOMS THAT THE VEHICLE WAS EXPERIENCING. THE DEALERS AND THE MANUFACTURER WERE CONTACTED AND DETERMINED THAT THE VEHICLE'S VIN NUMBER WAS NOT INCLUDED IN THE RECALLS. THE VEHICLE HAS NOT BEEN SERVICED.
EXTERIOR LIGHTING PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2006-07-14
- VIN: 2G1WN52M0S9
- Components: EXTERIOR LIGHTING
- Summary: TURN SIGNALS DO NOT FLASH. *JB
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2006-07-07
- VIN: 2G1WN52M3S1
- Components: ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
- Summary: I TURNED CAR OFF WENT INTO THE HOUSE CAME BACK TRIED TO START CAR IT WOULD NOT START IT HAD FULL POWER I REPLACED THE STARTER HAD BATTERY CHECKED IT WAS FULLY CHARGED NO PROBLEMS TRIED TO START IT SECURITY LIGHT IS FLASHING CLEANED KEY UNABLE TO START THIS IS A 1995 CHEVY LUMINA THIS IS A DANGER. IT NEEDS TO BE INVESTIGATED . *NM
UNKNOWN OR OTHER PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2006-03-15
- VIN: 2G1WL52M8S1
- Components: UNKNOWN OR OTHER
- Summary: CHIPPING & CRACKING OF PAINT. *JB
EXTERIOR LIGHTING,VISIBILITY PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2005-08-11
- VIN: 2G1WN52M1S1
- Components: EXTERIOR LIGHTING,VISIBILITY
- Summary: DT: THE CONTACT STATES THERE IS A NHTSA RECALL CAMPAIGN 97V017000 CONCERNING WINDSHIELD WIPER/WASHER SWITCH POWER FEED WIRE. THIS VEHICLE IS EXPERIENCING THE SAME PROBLEMS AS INDICATED IN THE RECALL, BUT IS NOT INCLUDED IN THE RECALL DUE TO VIN. THE CONTACT REPAIRED THE VEHICLE AT HIS OWN EXPENSE.*AK UPDATED 12/27/2005. THE TURN SIGNAL SWITCH WAS DEFECTIVE. THE BRAKE LIGHTS FAILED INTERMITTENTLY. THE WIPERS FAILED INTERMITTENTLY. *NM
EXTERIOR LIGHTING PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2004-06-08
- Components: EXTERIOR LIGHTING
- Summary: BRAKE LIGHTS STOPPED WORKING. WILL WORK IF PULL TURN SIGNAL ARM TOWARD DRIVER, BUT ONLY WHILE IT IS PULLED FORWARD. THIS WILL REQUIRE A 350$ FIX. SEEN LOTS OF OTHER COMPLAINTS ON THE INTERNET ABOUT THIS SAME ISSUE. IF A TURN SIGNAL ARM THAT IS KNOWN TO GO LOOSE THAT CAUSES BRAKE LIGHTS GO OUT IS NOT A HAZARD I DON'T KNOW WHAT IS. *NM
SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2005-09-15
- Components: SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC
- Summary: ON A ROAD TEST FOR A CUSTOMER I LOST THE BRAKES, AS IT DEVELOPED A HARD PEDAL WITHOUT POWER ASSIST. THE CONDITION WAS INTERMITTENT. UPON INVESTIGATION I DISCOVERED THE VACUUM HOSE FROM THE BACK OF THE INTAKE TO THE POWER BOOSTER WAS SOFTENED WITH OIL CONTAMINATION AND HAD BEGUN TO COLLAPSE CUTTING OFF VAC TO THE BOOSTER. I INSTALLED A NEW HOSE ASSEMBLY BUT THIS CAME OUT OF NOWHERE AND COULD CAUSE PROBLEMS FOR ANY DRIVER AT ANY TIME. THE VEHICLE WAS A 1995 CHEVY LUMINA 3.4 V6. CLEARANCE IS VERY TIGHT WHERE THE HOSE RUNS. I THINK GM SHOULD GO TO A HARD HOSE INSTEAD OF A PERFORMED RUBBER HOSE. THE ENGINE WAS NOT LEAKING OIL. THIS FAILURE WAS HEAT AN NORMAL WEAR. BEING THESE CARS ARE 10 YEARS OLD THEY ARE STARTING TO FAIL. I SUSPECT EVERY VEHICLE WITH THE 3.4 L ENGINE WILL HAVE THIS SAME PROBLEM NOT JUST THE LUMINA. *JB
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2005-09-14
- Fire: 1
- VIN: 2G1WN52M2S1
- Components: ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
- Summary: DT: 1995 CHEVROLET LUMINA. THE CONSUMER STATED THAT WHEN THE VEHICLE WAS STARTED, IT CAUGHT ON FIRE. A CO-WORKER CAME OUT AND HAD AWAKEN THE CONSUMERS SON. THE FIRE AND POLICE DEPARTMENTS RESPONDED. A FIRE REPORT WAS TAKEN. THE FIRE DEPARTMENT STATED THAT THE FIRE STARTED IN THE REAR OF THE VEHICLE ON THE PASSENGER'S SIDE NEAR THE BUMPER. ALSO, A POLICE REPORT WAS TAKEN. THE MANUFACTURER SENT AN INSPECTOR, WHO STATED THAT IT WAS IMPOSSIBLE FOR A FIRE TO START. THERE WAS NO EXHAUST LEAK, THEREFORE GM COULD NOT DO ANYTHING FOR THE CONSUMER. THIS HAPPENED ON SEPTEMBER 14, 2005. THE VEHICLE HAD NOT BEEN REPAIRED. *AK (11/21/05) *SC
EXTERIOR LIGHTING PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2005-09-23
- VIN: 2G1WN52M1S1
- Components: EXTERIOR LIGHTING
- Summary: BRAKE LIGHT FAILURE CONNECTED WITH THE TURN SIGNAL STALK. THE WINDOW BRAKE LIGHT WORKS FINE, BUT THE BOTTOM BREAK LIGHTS DON'T WORK. ALL FUSES AND LIGHT BULBS ARE WORKING. THERE SEEMS TO BE A LOT OF PEOPLE HAVING THIS SAME PROBLEM. HTTP://WWW.AUTOFAN.COM/FORUM_THREAD.ASP?MESSAGE=6440 I FEEL THIS IS A VERY DANGEROUS SITUATION. *NM
VISIBILITY PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2005-06-01
- VIN: 1GNDU06D3ST
- Components: VISIBILITY
- Summary: I BEGAN HAVING PROBLEMS WITH MY WINDSHIELD WIPERS ONLY WORKING SPORADICALLY, AND WHEN DISCUSSING WITH A FRIEND, I DISCOVERED THERE MIGHT BE A RECALL REGARDING MY VEHICLE. WHEN I WENT ONLINE TO SEARCH IF I WAS COVERED, I DISCOVERED MULTIPLE GM RECALLS THAT COVERED THE PROBLEM I WAS HAVING, AND ONLINE IT SEEMED AS THOUGH MY VAN QUALIFIED. WHEN I PHONED A DEALER WITH MY VIN #, I WAS TOLD I WAS NOT COVERED UNDER THE RECALL. I BELIEVE THAT MY VEHICLE IS EXPERIENCING THE SAME PROBLEM COVERED BY THE RECALL OF THOUSANDS OF OTHER GM VEHICLES. *NM
EXTERIOR LIGHTING PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2005-07-01
- VIN: 2G1WL52M5S1
- Components: EXTERIOR LIGHTING
- Summary: DT: THE CONSUMER STATES THE 1995 CHEVROLET LUMINA HAD NO BRAKES LIGHTS. THE CONSUMER SAID THAT THE DIRECTIONAL SWITCH WAS FAULTY. ALSO, THAT SOMEONE COULD HIT THE CONSUMER IN CAR. THE CONSUMER HAD IT FIXED AT $260.96. THE CAR WAS FINE NOW. HE JUST WANTED EVERYONE TO KNOW ABOUT THE SWITCH AND THE COST OF THE SWITCH. THE DEALERSHIP WAS NOT CONTACTED. HOWEVER, THE MANUFACTURER WAS CONTACTED AND THEY SAID TO CONTACT THE DEALER. *AK
VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2005-08-10
- VIN: 2G1WL52M6S9
- Components: VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL
- Summary: THERE IS A RECALL LISTED ON THIS WEBSITE BUT THE MANUFACTUAR SAYS THERE ISN'T ONE? MY CAR IS DOING THE EXACT THING THE RECALL SAYS ON THIS PAGE. *JB
EXTERIOR LIGHTING PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2005-03-01
- Components: EXTERIOR LIGHTING
- Summary: I HAVE A 1995 CHEVROLET LUMINA. THE THIRD, OR UPPER BRAKE LIGHT WORKS FINE, THE DIRECTIONALS IN THE BACK WORK FINE, THE LIGHTS COME ON WHEN I TURN THE HEADLIGHTS ON, AND MY BACKING UP LIGHT WORK FINE. BUT THE BRAKE LIGHTS DO NOT WORK WHEN I HIT THE BRAKE PEDAL. I AM FINDING THAT MANY PEOPLE WITH LUMINAS ARE EXPERIENCING THE SAME PROBLEM. MY MECHANIC SUGGESTS REPLACING THE ENTIRE BRAKE LIGHT ASSEMBLY, AT A COST OF OVER $300. CHEVROLET SHOULD RECALL AND CORRECT THIS PROBLEM.*AK
FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2005-03-21
- VIN: 4C3AG52H91E
- Components: FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE
- Summary: A FUEL SMELL STARTED COMING FROM THE VENTS OF THE VEHICLE, AND THE DRIVER WAS ABLE TO DRIVE THE VEHICLE TO THE DEALER. MECHANIC COULD NOT DUPLICATE THE PROBLEM. *AK
1995 Chevrolet Lumina recalls
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has issued 7 recalls for different components of the 1995 Chevrolet Lumina.
- Manufacturer: DELPHI
- Components: FUEL SYSTEM, OTHER:STORAGE:TANK ASSEMBLY:PRESSURE RELIEF DEVICES
- Summary: CERTAIN DELPHI FUEL PRESSURE REGULATORS, P/NOS. FP10020-11B1, FP10026-11B1, AND FP10027-11B1, SOLD AFTER JANUARY 9, 2007, AS AFTERMARKET EQUIPMENT FOR VARIOUS PASSENGER VEHICLES LISTED ABOVE. THE UNIVERSAL PRESSURE REGULATORS (UPR) WERE PRODUCED WITHOUT AN O'RING AND RETAINER.
- Consequence: FUEL MAY LEAK, POSSIBLY RESULTING IN A FIRE.
- Remedy: DELPHI WILL NOTIFY OWNERS AND REPLACE THE UPR FREE OF CHARGE. THE RECALL BEGAN ON APRIL 23, 2007. OWNERS CAN CONTACT DELPHI AT 877-411-8770.
- Manufacturer: GENERAL MOTORS CORP.
- Components: SEAT BELTS:FRONT:ANCHORAGE
- Summary: THE CENTER REAR SEAT BELT ANCHOR PLATE EXHIBITS STRESS CRACKS.
- Consequence: IN THE EVENT OF A VEHICLE CRASH, THE SEAT BELT SYSTEM CAN FRACTURE, INCREASING THE RISK OF INJURY TO THE SEAT OCCUPANT.
- Remedy: DEALERS WILL REPLACE THE CENTER REAR SEAT BELT SYSTEM.
- Manufacturer: GENERAL MOTORS CORP.
- Components: SEAT BELTS:FRONT:ANCHORAGE
- Summary: THE CENTER REAR SEAT BELT ANCHOR PLATE EXHIBITS STRESS CRACKS.
- Consequence: IN THE EVENT OF A VEHICLE CRASH, THE SEAT BELT SYSTEM CAN FRACTURE AND INJURY TO THE SEAT OCCUPANT CAN OCCUR.
- Remedy: DEALERS WILL REPLACE THE CENTER REAR SEAT BELT SYSTEM.
- Manufacturer: GENERAL MOTORS CORP.
- Components: VISIBILITY:WINDSHIELD WIPER/WASHER:SWITCH/WIRING
- Summary: SOME OF THESE VEHICLES HAVE A STRAINED OR SEPARATED WASHER/WIPER SWITCH POWER FEED WIRE.
- Consequence: THIS CAN CAUSE THE WINDSHIELD WASHER/WIPER TO WORK INTERMITTENTLY AND COULD ULTIMATELY RESULT IN INOPERATIVE WIPERS. IF THIS WERE TO OCCUR IN A SEVERE WEATHER SITUATION, DRIVER VISIBILITY COULD BE REDUCED, INCREASING THE RISK OF A VEHICLE CRASH.
- Remedy: DEALERS WILL INSPECT AND REPLACE THE OLD DESIGNED WASHER/WIPER SWITCHES WITH A NEWLY DESIGNED SWITCH.
- Manufacturer: GENERAL MOTORS CORP.
- Components: VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL
- Summary: THESE VEHICLES WERE ASSEMBLED WITH THROTTLE CABLE SUPPORT BRACKETS THAT COULD CONTACT THE THROTTLE LEVER SYSTEM AND INHIBIT THE THROTTLE RETURN. THIS DOES NOT MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF FMVSS NO. 124, "ACCELERATOR CONTROL SYSTEMS."
- Consequence: CONSEQUENCE OF NON-COMPLIANCE: THE THROTTLE MAY FAITL TO RETURN QUICKLY CAUSING THE ENGINE SPEED TO NOT DECREASE TO A LEVEL ANTICIPATED BY THE DRIVER.
- Remedy: DEALERS WILL REPLACE THE THROTTLE CABLE SUPPORT BRACKET.
- Manufacturer: GENERAL MOTORS CORP.
- Components: STEERING: STEERING WHEEL/HANDLE BAR
- Summary: THE FOUR (4) STEERING COLUMN SUPPORT BRACKET ATTACHING BOLTS WERE UNDER TORQUED DURING ASSEMBLY.
- Consequence: INADEQUATE TORQUE CAN CAUSE THESE BOLTS TO VIBRATE, LOOSEN, OR FALL OUT RESULTING IN LOSS OF STEERING CONTROL AND INCREASE THE POTENTIAL FOR A VEHICLE CRASH.
- Remedy: DEALERS WILL RETORQUE THE STEERING COLUMN SUPPORT BRACKET ATTACHING BOLTS TO THE CORRECT SPECIFICATIONS.
- Manufacturer: GENERAL MOTORS CORP.
- Components: SUSPENSION:FRONT:CONTROL ARM:LOWER BALL JOINT
- Summary: A RIGHT-HAND LOWER CONTROL ARM TAPERED BALL JOINT MOUNTING HOLE WAS INCORRECTLY MACHINED. MOVEMENT WITHIN THIS ATTACHMENT CAN ALLOW THE BALL JOINT STUD TO FATIGUE AND FRACTURE.
- Consequence: IF THE BALL JOINT FRACTURED WHILE THE VEHICLE WAS IN MOTION, LOSS OF STEERING CONTROL TO THE VEHICLE CAN OCCUR.
- Remedy: DEALERS WILL REPLACE THE RIGHT-HAND LOWER CONTROL ARM AND BALL JOINT STUD ON ALL INVOLVED VEHICLES.
Negative 1995 Chevrolet Lumina car reviews
Positive 1995 Chevrolet Lumina car reviews
-
I hope you're doing well! I just wanted to share that I absolutely adore my Chevy. Even after driving it for 112K miles, it still manages to get an impressive 26 miles to the gallon in the city. Plus, I haven't had any major issues with it. The pick-up is fantastic and the ride is super comfortable.
-
I hope you're doing well! I just wanted to share that I've had this car for five years now and it's been great. It's an older car, so I've had to get some repairs done, but nothing too serious. When I bought it, it had a little over 100000 miles, but now it's almost at 160K and still running strong!
-
I'm glad to hear that you've never had a problem!
-
Hi there! I hope you're doing well. I just wanted to share my experience with this car. I actually acquired it from the original buyer 4 years ago when it had 82,000 miles on it. I have to say, it's been a great car for me! It's really roomy and comfortable, especially considering the price. I have put a lot of miles on it, including some cross country trips, and it has been totally reliable. The only thing to keep in mind is that the brakes tend to wear out around 40,000 miles. Recently, at 130,000 miles, I did need to do a major tuneup, replace the spark plugs, and replace the intake manifold gasket, but overall it's been a great car for me.
-
This car has taken me to so many wonderful places in such comfort. It's getting close to the time to replace it, but let's see how long she lasts.
Additional sources
More sources of information about 1995 Chevrolet Lumina problems:
1995 Chevrolet Lumina Problems and Complaints - 23 Issues
Top 1995 Chevrolet Lumina Problems · Intake Manifold Gaskets May Leak Coolant or Engine Oil · Failed Fuel Pump Can Cause Engine to Stall · High Pressure Power ...
1995 Chevy Lumina APV - Transmission problems? - Maintenance ...
Sep 27, 2010 ... I have come across two 1995 Chevy Lumina APV with about 130,000 miles. Both owners mention something about the transmission. Both said it hd ...
Chevrolet Lumina Problems and Complaints - 60 Issues
Top Chevrolet Lumina Problems · Intake Manifold Gaskets May Leak Coolant or Engine Oil · Failed Fuel Pump Can Cause Engine to Stall · High Pressure Power Steering ...
Common 1999 Chevy Lumina Problems: Q&A with Experts
Dec 27, 2012 ... I have a 1999 Chevy Lumina with 3100 engine, recently the temp gage goes all the up and the coolent is pushed into the - Answered by a ...
Electrical problems on a chevy lumina - Chevrolet Forum - Chevy ...
Apr 24, 2011 ... General Tech - Electrical problems on a chevy lumina - I have a 95 chevy lumina, 3.1 ltr V 6, and it is having issues.
Other years of Chevrolet Lumina
Are you having problems with your 1995 Chevrolet Lumina?
Davonte Bashirian 2024-10-24
Considering the price (under 16G) when new, this one was a sleeper. It has a surprisingly tight and smooth ride, although that has deteriorated somewhat as the tires have worn. There have been some repairs, including a transmission pan leak, so it's worthwhile to keep current with various filter replacements. The engine is a willing worker, but not very refined. Contrary to Consumer Reports' review, the handling with Goodrich tires is sharp and precise for a car its size.
Willard Becker 2024-09-10
I purchased the car with 75000 miles on it. Unfortunately, at 82000 miles, the transmission failed and at 90000 miles, the head gasket went out. The block being iron and the heads being aluminum caused the heads to warp. I felt sorry for those who had the 3.4L engine as the head gasket kits were NATIONALLY BACK ORDERED. It must have been a tough winter for that not-so-good engine. Now, at 93000 miles, I have noticed transmission fluid leaking. It is frustrating that I still owe more than the car is worth and that I have spent over $1300 on repairs in the two years I have owned it. If you are considering purchasing a car, I would recommend looking elsewhere.
Jamel Corkery 2024-07-26
Hi there! I hope you're doing well. I wanted to share a story about a car my wife and I bought from a 'lemon lot' in the NW. We got it for a little over 2k when it had around 130,000 miles on it. Surprisingly, the only thing we had to replace was the ECM, and that was a year after we bought it. The car has never left me stranded and always starts (unless she forgets to turn off the dome light). I eventually sold it to my sister at 189,000 miles, but ended up buying it back at 192,000. However, the OEM struts were totally shot and the car felt like it was going to leave the road. After replacing them, it now rides like a lumber truck. Overall, it was a great car and I have many fond memories with it.
Kris Morissette 2024-07-07
Hey there! I hope you're doing well. I just wanted to let you know that these cars may have some issues with their engines. Specifically, they may experience coolant leaks. Just thought you should be aware!
Geo Bode 2024-05-08
The 3.4 spun a rod bearing at 50,000. Ever since, there has been a 'tack' noise in the upper end of the motor. However, overall it has been a great car to own and drive.