1997 Toyota T100 problems
The Toyota T100 is a full-size pickup truck produced by Toyota between 1992 and 1998. It was developed strictly for the US (and Canadian) markets, where larger pickups have a sizable market share.
History
As Toyota firmly established itself in the North American compact pickup truck market in the 1980s through 1990s, the company offered a truck that was larger than the compact as an alternative to the traditional North American full-size pickup truck market. North American Toyota dealers had long been clamoring for a full-sized Toyota truck, especially in light of the high percentage of Toyota Pickup owners who moved on to domestic full-sized trucks. The T100 reflected a philosophy of designing products specifically for localized international markets, where traditional products sold and made in Japan wouldn't sell well. This approach is also demonstrated with the introduction of the mid-size Toyota Camry (XV10) which was larger than the compact Toyota Camry (V30) in 1991, and again in 1997 when the Toyota Sienna replaced the slow selling Toyota Previa.
Rumored for many years before, the 1993 Toyota T100 boasted a full-size (8 ft) pickup bed but retained the engine and suspension setup of its smaller and older sibling, the compact Toyota Truck. Although the T100 was a bit larger than the competitive mid-size Dodge Dakota, it was still markedly smaller than full-size American pickup trucks of the time. This meant that the T100 occupied its own niche in the truck market. Before introducing the T100, the company reflected on its history of commercial truck manufacture and products they offered in the past. Past products started with the Toyota G1, the Toyota FA, the Toyota BX, the Toyota Stout, the Toyota ToyoAce, and the Toyota Dyna, and its market successes with their Hino Division. Though economical, reliable, and practical, the T100 was slow to be accepted by traditional buyers of full-size competitors, while it was larger than both the Toyota Truck followed by the Toyota Tacoma compact trucks. Wary of the market pushback of competing directly with the Big Three, Toyota chose this somewhat smaller size (and limited lineup) so as not to risk blowback and import quotas. The T100 was designed and engineered for the North American market and was not sold in Japan.
Although sales were slow at the start, the T100 sales did reach into the mid 40,000 vehicles sold range (1996) in the United States. Sales of the Chevrolet C/K were roughly 700,000 per year, while sales of the Ford F-Series surged from 550,000 to nearly 850,000 and Dodge from 100,000 to 400,000 with the introduction of the new Dodge Ram in 1993. Sales of the T100 fell approximately 30 percent when the new Ram went on the market in October 1993, 11 months after the T100's launch in November 1992.
Social links
Common 1997 Toyota T100 problems
The Toyota T100, produced from 1993 to 1998, was known for its refinement and superior interior quality compared to other pickups of the time. However, several common problems were reported by owners, which include:
- Clutch bracket issues on 5-speed models: The factory clutch bracket on 5-speed T100 models is reportedly weak and prone to flexing, causing the bracket and firewall to crack. This issue is often indicated by a popping sound when the clutch is depressed. A stronger replacement part is available for approximately $70.
- Transmission problems: Some T100 owners have reported transmission issues, such as locking into 5th gear, which may require costly repairs. Regular servicing of the 5-speed transmission is recommended to prevent such problems.
- Front brake pad wear: The front brake pads on the T100 are reported to wear quickly, potentially due to the use of cheap parts. Frequent replacement may be necessary.
- Starter problems: Some T100 owners have experienced issues with the starter, including instances where it continues to run for a minute or more after the engine has started, potentially causing damage to the cables. Replacing the starter may be necessary to address this issue.
- Engine downgrade: In an effort to reduce costs, Toyota downgraded the T100's standard engine to a 2.7-litre inline-4, which was considered less powerful than the previous 3.4-litre V6.
Despite these issues, many T100 owners have reported positive experiences with the vehicle, praising its reliability, dependability, and fuel efficiency, particularly with the 3.4-litre V6 engine.
Why did the Toyota T100 fail?
But, in typical Toyota fashion, the company decided that truck buyers didn't need a V-8 or massive bulk. So the Japanese automaker combined a full-size eight-foot bed with a smaller cab and V-6 engine to achieve better fuel economy. American truck buyers of the 1990s weren't having it. The T100 was shunned.
How many miles will a Toyota T100 last?
The 3.4L is a good motor but you must do preventive maintenance on valve cover gaskets and timing belt. These motors will easily get 250K+ miles if this is done.
What engine is in a 1997 Toyota T100?
3.4 L V61997 Toyota T100 / Engine
Why did Toyota stop making the T100?
In theory, a full-size pickup truck from Toyota in the early-1990s sounded like a recipe for success. However, in practice the T100 was a commercial failure, never selling more than 40,000 units in a single year when some Big Three competitors were selling upwards of 700,000.
Why did the Toyota T100 fail?
But, in typical Toyota fashion, the company decided that truck buyers didn't need a V-8 or massive bulk. So the Japanese automaker combined a full-size eight-foot bed with a smaller cab and V-6 engine to achieve better fuel economy. American truck buyers of the 1990s weren't having it. The T100 was shunned.
Is Toyota T100 a good car?
T100 has super reliablilty, gas mileage & comfort
Reliable, easy to do routine maintenance like oil and filter changes. We always get compliments on it. It is 350k miles and still going strong after nearly 24 years. Nobody beats Toyota.
Why did Toyota stop making the T100?
In theory, a full-size pickup truck from Toyota in the early-1990s sounded like a recipe for success. However, in practice the T100 was a commercial failure, never selling more than 40,000 units in a single year when some Big Three competitors were selling upwards of 700,000.
What is the fuel capacity of a Toyota T100?
Mechanical
| 121.8" wheelbase | Standard |
|---|---|
| 24.0 gallon fuel tank | Standard |
| Pwr-assisted ventilated front disc/rear drum brakes w/rear load-sensing proportioning valve | Standard |
| Dual cupholders | Standard |
| Rear-wheel drive | Standard |
1997 Toyota T100 car problems categorized by type of issue
After analyzing all complaints sent to the NHTSA and researching popular Toyota T100 problems, we found that the most common problems with these 2023 model year vehicles are:
- Structure problems
- Power train problems
- Steering problems
- Suspension problems
- Seat belts problems
The graph below shows statistics for all 1997 Toyota T100 vehicle components and the number of complaints received.
Latest 25 complaints 1997 Toyota T100
The NHTSA has received 75 complaints about various vehicle components related to the 1997 Toyota T100. Below are the 25 most recent complaints reported for 1997 Toyota T100 vehicles.
STRUCTURE PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2022-11-10
- VIN: JT4TN12D8V0
- Components: STRUCTURE
- Summary: The contact owns a 1997 Toyota T100. The contact stated that while performing an oil change on the vehicle, he noticed the sub-frame was corroded. The vehicle was not diagnosed nor repaired by an independent mechanic or dealer. The manufacturer was made aware of the failure but provided no assistance. The failure mileage was approximately 122,000.
STRUCTURE PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2016-10-01
- VIN: JT4UN24DXV0
- Components: STRUCTURE
- Summary: TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 1997 TOYOTA T100. THE CONTACT, A MECHANIC, NOTICED THAT THE FRAME HAD EXTENSIVE RUST CORROSION, AND FRACTURED WITHOUT WARNING. THE VEHICLE WAS TO BE REPAIRED BY THE MECHANIC THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOTIFIED OF THE FAILURE. THE APPROXIMATE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 201,000. UPDATED 03/16/17*LJ UPDATED 09/07/2017*JS
UNKNOWN OR OTHER PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2015-06-28
- VIN: JT4TN14D6V0
- Components: UNKNOWN OR OTHER
- Summary: CRUISE CONTROL ACCELERATES WHEN ENGAGED (65MPH UP TO 90 MPH). HAD TO HIT BRAKES REALLY HARD TO COMPLETELY A NEAR STOP. DID VARIOUS TIMES AND NOW NOT USING IT. I UNDERSTANDING THIS WAS AN ISSUE ON 1996 T100 AND THERE WAS A RECALL. BOUGHT THIS AS CERTIFIED PREOWNED TOYOTA IN 1999. ONLY 120,000 MILES AT TIME OF INCIDENTS.
STRUCTURE PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2015-08-26
- Components: STRUCTURE
- Summary: SEVERLY BAD FRAME ROT HOLES! BY THE CONTROL ARMS AND WAS TOLD THAT THE FRAME CAN SNAP AT ANY GIVEN MOMENT I CANT TOW ANYTHING WITH THE TRUCK ANYMORE FOR THE FACT THAT THE BACK HALF THE FRAME IS ALSO ROTTED AWAY TO WEAR IF I PUT A TRAILER ON IT THE FRAME WILL PROBABLY SNAP NO WERE ON THE FRAME IS SOLID ITS A SHAME THE TRUCK RUNS AND DRIVES FANTASTIC BUT I WILL NO LONGER DRIVE IT FOR THE FACT OF HAVING A ROTTED OUT FRAME AND WILL SNAP SOON
SUSPENSION,POWER TRAIN,SERVICE BRAKES PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2015-03-06
- VIN: JT4UN24D5V0
- Components: SUSPENSION,POWER TRAIN,SERVICE BRAKES
- Summary: TOOK TRUCK TO REPAIR SHOP FOR EXHAUST REPAIR. TECHNICIAN FOUND THE FRAME TO BE RUSTED BADLY WITH HOLES THROUGH THE FRAME. TOLD ME THAT I NEED TO HAVE THIS LOOKED AT BY A TOYOTA DEALER BECAUSE THERE SHOULD BE A RECALL BECAUSE IT COULD GET DANGEROUS. HE ALSO POINTED OUT RUST ON BRAKE LINES AND OTHER SUSPENSION PARTS THAT NEEDED REPLACED SOON. *TR
STRUCTURE PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2007-01-18
- VIN: JT4UN22D3W0
- Components: STRUCTURE
- Summary: TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 1997 TOYOTA T-100 TRUCK. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE FRAME OF THE FLOORBOARD WAS SEVERELY COVERED WITH RUST AND CRACKED. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT TAKEN TO A DEALER OR AN INDEPENDENT MECHANIC FOR DIAGNOSTIC TESTING. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOT MADE AWARE OF THE FAILURE. THE FAILURE AND CURRENT MILEAGE WERE UNKNOWN.
SUSPENSION,POWER TRAIN,STRUCTURE PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2014-05-16
- VIN: JT4UN22D1V0
- Components: SUSPENSION,POWER TRAIN,STRUCTURE
- Summary: I HAVE READ SEVERAL OF THE DESCRIPTIONS ON THE SITE AND AM AFRAID I'M DRIVING AN UNSAFE VEHICLE NOW BECAUSE OF THE UNDERLYING RUST ISSUES WHICH COULD BE AT THE ROOT OF SHIFTER ISSUES, AS IN A PREVIOUS COMPLAINT AND THE DANGEROUS FRAME RUST ISSUE. I AM NOT A MECHANIC, BUT I RECOGNIZE MANY OF THE RUST ISSUES DESCRIBED HERE ON MY T100. NHTSA SHOULD RE-EXAMINE THE DECISION TO GIVE TOYOTA A BREAK BY NOT REQUIRING THAT THEY BUY BACK VEHICLES AS DONE WITH SIMILAR MODELS IN THEIR FAMILY WITH THE FRAME RUST ISSUES. THE ALLOWANCE TO CONTINUE T100S BE DRIVEN PUTS PASSENGERS AND OTHER MOTORISTS AT RISK. I PURCHASED THIS VEHICLE USED, AND THE MECHANICALS AND APPEARANCE BELIES THE SIGNIFICANT SAFETY ISSUES BENEATH.THE NHTSA IS REMISS TO NOT PUT PRESSURE ON TOYOTA TO INCLUDE THESE VEHICLES IN THEIR RECALL AS A GOOD FAITH AND SAFETY MEASURE... AS THE OWNER OF NEWER, ALLEGEDLY SAFE, TOYOTA PRODUCTS, I AM ALSO CONCERNED BY THEIR LACK OF RESPONSE... DOES SOMEONE HAVE TO LOSE THEIR LIFE BEFORE A SUITABLE RESPONSE IS MANDATED? AFTER ALL, THIS VEHICLE COULD BE BEHIND YOU ON THE DRIVE HOME TONIGHT. THIS IGNORES HOW THIS VEHICLE WOULD LIKELY JUST CRUMBLE IN AN ACCIDENT. I PLAN TO BRING THIS VEHICLE IN FOR A COMPREHENSIVE CHECK NOW, BUT IN THE INTERIM, WORRY ABOUT ITS SAFE USE. THE FACT THAT MY KIDS ARE EVEN NEAR IT WHEN IT IS PARKED GIVES ME PAUSE NOW. PLEASE USE YOU INFLUENCE TO IMPRESS UPON TOYOTA THAT WHAT IS RIGHT FOR THE SAFETY OF THEIR CUSTOMERS IS RIGHT FOR THEM. THANKS FOR READING MY THOUGHTS AND FOR YOU CONSIDERATION IN WORKING TOWARDS A RESOLUTION. *TR
SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC,FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE,STRUCTURE PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2013-05-01
- VIN: JT4UN24DV00
- Components: SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC,FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE,STRUCTURE
- Summary: RUSTING FRAME BUMPER FUEL LINES BRAKE LINES. *TR
STEERING PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2014-03-19
- VIN: JT4TN14D1V0
- Components: STEERING
- Summary: WHILE MAKING A LEFT TURN THE STEERING WHEEL WON'T RETURN TO CENTER UPON COMPLETION OF THE TURN. I UNDERSTAND THERE WAS A MAJOR SAFETY VEHICLE RECALL FOR THIS TRUCK HOWEVER TWO DEALERS IN MERCED AND MODESTO, CALIFORNIA HAVE TOLD ME THERE IS NO SAFETY RECALL. THE 1995 TO 1998 RECALL WAS FOR TOTAL LOSS OF STEERING DUE TO A BROKEN STEERING ROD. I BOUGHT THIS TRUCK IN CALIFORNIA ONE YEAR AGO AND WE KNOW FOR CERTAIN THAT IT WAS ORIGINALLY SOLD IN TEXAS. *TR
STRUCTURE PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2013-12-09
- Components: STRUCTURE
- Summary: TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 1997 TOYOTA T100. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE SUB FRAME WAS SEVERELY CORRODED AND SPREAD TO THE REAR BUMPER, CAUSING THE BUMPER TO FRACTURE. THE CONTACT'S PERSONAL MECHANIC ADVISED THAT THE VEHICLE SHOULD NOT BE DRIVEN. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE VIN WAS NOT AVAILABLE. THE MANUFACTURER WAS MADE AWARE OF THE FAILURE. THE FAILURE AND CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 160,000.
STRUCTURE PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2013-09-19
- VIN: JT4UN24D9V0
- Components: STRUCTURE
- Summary: FRAME IS RUSTING OUT. WILL NOT PASS INSPECTION. *TR
STRUCTURE PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2013-03-05
- VIN: JT4UN22D4V0
- Components: STRUCTURE
- Summary: TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 1997 TOYOTA T100. THE CONTACT STATED THAT WHILE WASHING THE VEHICLE, HE NOTICED THAT THE FRAME WAS CORRODED AND HOLES HAD RUSTED THROUGH THE FRAME. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT TAKEN TO THE DEALER. THE MANUFACTURER WAS MADE AWARE OF THE FAILURE BUT DID NOT OFFER ANY ASSISTANCE SINCE THE VEHICLE WAS NO LONGER UNDER WARRANTY. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE FAILURE AND CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 196,000. *TR
SUSPENSION,STRUCTURE PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2012-09-18
- VIN: JT4JM11DXV0
- Components: SUSPENSION,STRUCTURE
- Summary: RENEWED MY REGISTRATION SEPT 18 2012, BUT THE FRAME DIDN'T PASS INSPECTION, TOO MANY HOLES AND THIN WALLS ON THE FRAME. ALL OF THE FRAMEWORK JUST FALLING APART, REST OF THE TRUCK, DRIVE TRAIN JUST FINE. IF THE CLOTHE SEAT, WHICH HAS NEVER BEEN COVERED HAD TO PASS INSPECTION, IT WOULD EASILY! DIRTY, BUT NO HOLES OR RIPS. HOW UTTERLY RIDICULOUS IS THAT? TRIED 3 TIMES TO GET SOMEONE FROM TOYOTA TO TALK ABOUT IT, BUT THEY JUST PLAY REAL STUPID AND SAY THEY DON,T KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT THE FRAMES ROTTING ON THE T100'S AND CAN'T HELP ME. CAN AND WILL TAKE PICTURES. *TR
SUSPENSION PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2012-10-23
- VIN: JT4UN24D8V0
- Components: SUSPENSION
- Summary: TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 1997 TOYOTA T100. THE CONTACT STATED THAT WHILE DRIVING 65 MPH THE FRONT LOWER CONTROL ARM BROKE IN HALF. THE VEHICLE WAS DRIVEN TO THE DEALER WHO STATED IT WAS RUSTY AND CORRODED AND THE VEHICLE WAS INOPERABLE. THEY WILL NOT REPAIR THE FAILURE. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOT NOTIFIED. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 173,818.
STRUCTURE PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2010-02-03
- VIN: JT4UN24D1V0
- Components: STRUCTURE
- Summary: TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 1997 TOYOTA T100 SR5. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE FRAME, REAR WHEEL WELLS AND ROCKER PANELS WERE CORRODED. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT TAKEN TO THE DEALER. THE MANUFACTURER WAS MADE AWARE OF THE FAILURE WHO DID NOT OFFER ANY ASSISTANCE SINCE THE VEHICLE WAS NOT INCLUDED IN ANY RECALLS. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 150,000 AND THE CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 165,000.
SEAT BELTS PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2012-08-27
- VIN: JT4TN12D9V0
- Components: SEAT BELTS
- Summary: WELL ON MY 1997 TOYOTA T-100 EXTENDED CAB THE REAR SEAT BELT TO HOLD THE CHILD SEAT IN PLACE KEEPS COMING LOOSE AND I HAVE NOT OTHER OPTION THAT PLACE THE CHILD SEAT ON THE RT OR LT REAR SEATS AND THIS WILL OR MIGHT RISK MY KID IN A DANGEROUS SITUATION IN CASE OF A COLLISION, ALSO THE DRIVERS SEAT COME LOOSE SUPER LOOSE IT WONT RESTRAIN AND IN GOING TO HAVE TO GET ONE SOON. SO I ASK TO THE NSTHS TO CONTACT TOYOTA'S MANUFACTURER AND HAVE THEM HANDLE THIS PROBLEM. I DID INCLUDE MY TRUCK INFORMATION AND HOPE TO HEAR FROM TOYOTA'S MANUFACTURES SOON, THANKS AGAIN AND HAVE A WONDERFUL DAY. *TR
STEERING,SUSPENSION,STRUCTURE,SERVICE BRAKES PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2011-05-10
- VIN: JT4UN22D7V0
- Components: STEERING,SUSPENSION,STRUCTURE,SERVICE BRAKES
- Summary: MECHANICALLY THIS TRUCK IS VERY SOUND, BUT THE FRAME AND MANY PARTS ARE RUSTING EXCESSIVELY. WHEN I FIRST BOUGHT THE TRUCK I HAD IT UNDERCOATED. THIS DIDN'T LAST LONG AND I'VE HAD TO REPLACE THE CONTROL ARMS, THE LOAD SENSING PROPORTIONING VALVE AND WAS RECENTLY TOLD THAT I AM AT RISK OF NOT BEING INSPECTED IN JULY DUE TO THE RUST ON THE FRAME. THE VEHICLE ONLY HAS 153,000 MILES ON IT AND IT SHOULD STILL RUN STRONG, BUT THE FRAME MAY MAKE IT IMPOSSIBLE TO GET MY VALUE OUT OF THE VEHICLE. I FEEL LIKE I WASTED MY MONEY ON A TOYOTA PRODUCT THAT USED TO HAVE A GOOD REPUTATION. *TR
POWER TRAIN,STRUCTURE PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2012-01-14
- VIN: JT4UN24D0V0
- Components: POWER TRAIN,STRUCTURE
- Summary: ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING CLAIM NO. 10451047. IN REVIEWING CLAIM I REALIZED THE SAFETY ISSUES NOT FULLY COVERED. A SERIOUS INCIDENT OCCURRED WHILE USING THIS VEHICLE. WHILE BRINGING BAGGED LEAVES TO TOWN RECYCLING AREA, A BAG FELL FROM THE TRUCK. MY SON AND I STOPPED IN THE ROAD TO RETRIEVE THE DEBRIS BEHIND THE TRUCK. WHILE RETRIEVING THE DEBRIS THE VEHICLE BEGAN BACKING UP AND ALMOST STRUCK US. I HAD TO RUN TO THE DRIVERS DOOR AND ENTER THE MOVING VEHICLE TO APPLY THE BRAKE TO PREVENT A CRASH. IT BECAME APPARENT THAT WHEN PLACED IN PARK THE SHIFTER MAY IN FACT BE IN REVERSE. THIS ALLOWS THE VEHICLE TO MOVE UNEXPECTEDLY. UNFORTUNATELY THIS CAN NOT BE EASILY REPAIRED AS FAILURE OF THE FRAME WAS IDENTIFIED AS THE CAUSE FOR LOSS OF THE SHIFTER SUPPORT. THIS SERIOUS DEFECT CAN BE EXPECTED TO PRODUCE THIS TYPE OF DANGEROUS SITUATION OF THE VEHICLE BEING INADVERTENTLY IN REVERSE INSTEAD OF IN PARK! *TR
FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE,POWER TRAIN,STRUCTURE PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2010-08-30
- VIN: JT4UN24D0V0
- Components: FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE,POWER TRAIN,STRUCTURE
- Summary: VEHICLE DEVELOPED FUEL LEAK DISCOVERED DURING INSPECTION DUE TO SEVERE CORROSION. TOYOTA FAILED TO MAKE REPAIRS DESPITE BEING COVERED BY A FEDERAL EMISSIONS WARRANTY ENHANCEMENT. SEVERE RUST OF FRAME IDENTIFIED. NOW SHIFTER NOT WORKING DUE TO FURTHER CORROSION. LETTERS TO TOYOTA HAVE BEEN FRUITLESS. INTERNET FULL OF SIMILAR PROBLEMS WITH THESE VEHICLES. SIMILAR AGE TUNDRA AND TACHOMAS RECALLED FOR THE SAME PROBLEM. THE T-100'S ARE A SERIOUS THREAT TO PUBLIC SAFETY AND PROBLEM SHOULD BE ADDRESSED BY NHTSA AS TOYOTA IS NOT TAKING APPROPRIATE ACTIONS DESPITE NUMEROUS COMPLAINTS. *TR
STRUCTURE PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2009-10-01
- VIN: JT4UN24D3V0
- Components: STRUCTURE
- Summary: TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 1997 TOYOTA T100. WHILE PARKED, THE CONTACT NOTICED THAT THE FRAME WAS COMPLETELY CORRODED. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO AN INDEPENDENT MECHANIC FOR DIAGNOSTICS. THE MECHANIC STATED TO THE CONTACT THAT HE COULD WELD THE FRAME BUT WAS NOT SURE THAT THE VEHICLE COULD BE REPAIRED DUE TO THE POOR CONDITION AND SEVERITY OF THE FAILURE. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE APPROXIMATE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 120,000.
STRUCTURE PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2011-10-29
- VIN: JT4UN24D7V0
- Components: STRUCTURE
- Summary: THE FRAME HAS RUSTED AND HAS BECOME UNSAFE, JUST LIKE THE TACOMA AND TUNDRA. I HAD THE FRAME INSPECTED BY TOYOTA, THEY AGREED "FRAME PERCH IS ROTTED". *TR
SEAT BELTS PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 1997-10-10
- VIN: JT4TN12D5V0
- Components: SEAT BELTS
- Summary: 1997 TOYOTA T-100, SEAT BELTS FAIL TO PERFORM PROPERLY SINCE ORIGINALLY PURCHASED IN 1997. SEAT BELTS FAIL TO RETRACT AND ARE CONSTANTLY HANGING OUTSIDE THE TRUCK THROUGH THE BOTTOM OF THE TRUCK DOOR WHETHER IN USE OR NOT. SEAT BELTS HAVE BEEN WET HUNDREDS OF TIMES, HAVE BEEN EXPOSED TO ROAD SALT FOR EVERY WINTER SINCE 1997. SINCE THE PROBLEM WAS DISCOVERED IN 1997 SOON AFTER THE TRUCK WAS PURCHASED IT WAS BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE DEALERSHIP SEVERAL TIMES WHO QUICKLY DISMISSED THE PROBLEM BY INFORMING ME "WHAT DO YOU WANT US TO DO, THESE BELTS CONFORM TO ALL FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS...THERE IS NOTHING WE CAN DO...EVEN IF WE WERE TO INSTALL NEW BELTS THEY WOULD BE JUST LIKE WHAT IS ON THE VEHICLE NOW". I GUESS THE QUESTION I HAVE IS, ARE THESE SEAT BELTS AS SAFE TODAY AS THEY SHOULD BE? IF THE ANSWER IS NO, THEN MY NEXT QUESTION IS, WHY NOT? *TR
FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE,STRUCTURE PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2010-12-12
- VIN: JT4UN24D5V0
- Components: FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE,STRUCTURE
- Summary: TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 1997 TOYOTA T100. THE CONTACT STATED THAT WHILE THE VEHICLE WAS PARKED, HE NOTICED THAT THE VEHICLE HAD A FUEL LEAK. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE GARAGE WHERE IT WAS DIAGNOSED THAT THERE WAS EXCESSIVE CORROSION AT THE FUEL LINES, BRAKE LINES, THE FRAME, FRONT BUMPER, THE A-FRAMES, BED-HOLDER AND REAR AXLE HOUSING. THE FUEL LINES WERE REPLACED BY AN INDEPENDENT MECHANIC. THE FAILURE AND CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 135,000. THE VIN WAS UNAVAILABLE. UPDATED 02/18/11 *BF UPDATED 12/01/2011 *LN
STRUCTURE PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2010-07-07
- VIN: JT4UN24D1V0
- Components: STRUCTURE
- Summary: 1997 TOYOTA T-100 HAS FRAME RUST ROT AND IS NOT DRIVABLE ANY MORE. THE BRAKES DO NOT WORK. THE FRAME IS IN INCREDIBLY TERRIBLE SHAPE. VERY UNSAFE AND IS IN FACT NOT DRIVABLE ANY MORE. THE BODY AND THE REST OF THE TRUCK ARE IN VERY GOOD SHAPE WITH NO RUST AND THE MOTOR IS IN EXCELLENT CONDITION. I HAVE HAD THE TRUCK FOR ALMOST TWO YEARS BUT HAVE ONLY PUT 5,000 MILES ON IT. THE TRUCK NOW HAS 65,000 MILES ON IT. I PURCHASED IT FROM A DEALER IN PENNSYLVANIA. I THINK TOYOTA SHOULD HONOR THEIR COMMITMENT TO T-100 OWNERS JUST AS THEY HAVE TACOMA AND TUNDRA OWNERS. I BACKED THE TRUCK OUT OF MY DRIVEWAY RECENTLY AND FOUND THAT THE BRAKES DIDN'T WORK AS I ROLLED OUT OF CONTROL DOWN A HILL. LUCKILY THERE WERE NO OTHER VEHICLES COMING AND I WAS ABLE TO GET THE TRUCK STOPPED BY TURNING THE IGNITION OFF. THE REPAIR SHOP NEAR MY HOUSE INFORMED ME THAT THE FRAME WAS SO BAD THAT IT WAS NOT FIXABLE. *TR
STRUCTURE PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2010-11-18
- VIN: JT4JM11D8V0
- Components: STRUCTURE
- Summary: TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 1997 TOYOTA T100. THE CONTACT NOTICED THAT THE FRAME WAS COVERED WITH RUST. THE DEALER HAD NOT BEEN NOTIFIED. THE MANUFACTURER OFFERED NO ASSISTANCE. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE CURRENT AND FAILURE MILEAGES WERE 46,600.
1997 Toyota T100 recalls
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has issued 1 recalls for different components of the 1997 Toyota T100.
- Manufacturer: TOYOTA MOTOR NORTH AMERICA, INC.
- Components: STEERING:LINKAGES:ROD:RELAY:CONNECTING
- Summary: ON CERTAIN PICKUP TRUCKS AND SPORT UTILITY VEHICLES, IF THE STEERING WHEEL IS REPEATEDLY TURNED UNDER CERTAIN CONDITIONS WHERE HIGH STEERING EFFORT AND POWER ASSIST ARE REQUIRED, FOR INSTANCE, WHEN FULLY TURNING THE WHEEL WHILE THE VEHICLE IS STOPPED, A FATIGUE CRACK MAY DEVELOP IN THE STEERING RELAY ROD.
- Consequence: IF THE VEHICLE IS CONTINUED TO BE OPERATED IN THIS CONDITION, THE RELAY ROD MAY FRACTURE, INCREASING THE RISK OF A CRASH.
- Remedy: DEALERS WILL REPLACE THE STEERING RELAY ROD. THE RECALL BEGAN OCTOBER 5, 2005. OWNERS MAY CONTACT TOYOTA AT 1-800-331-4331.
Positive 1997 Toyota T100 car reviews
Additional sources
More sources of information about 1997 Toyota T100 problems:
T100 Problems to look for - YotaTech Forums
Feb 9, 2006 ... I have a 97 T100 4x4 SR5 Extra Cab. Has ... Stock Toyota pads are better ... problem, racks, recirculating, room, steering, t100, transmission.
1997 Toyota T100 Problems and Complaints - 23 Issues
Top 1997 Toyota T100 Problems · Vehicle Won't Crank Due To Starter · Automatic Transmission May Not Shift Correctly at High Mileages · Throttle Position Sensor ...
T100 Common Problem Sticky Thread? | Toyota Nation Forum
Nov 29, 2010 ... glad someone started this thread, i bought a 97 t100 recently and same problems .... the hood doesnt bother me cause it seems to be latched ...
Curbside Classic: 1997 Toyota T100 - Small Can Be A Big Problem ...
Oct 24, 2019 ... I've got to wonder what modern truck you've been in. The weight distribution of the most common configuration the 1/2 ton crew cab 5.5′ bed 4×4 ...
1997 T100 SR5 w/ 220K miles a bad buy? | Toyota Nation Forum
Apr 30, 2017 ... Also, they found that the body is banged up (obvious) including rust on the drivers side door, cracked mirrors and a loose mirror on the ...
Other years of Toyota T100
Are you having problems with your 1997 Toyota T100?
Gussie Schiller 2024-11-27
This truck has been a reliable companion, running smoothly even after 85k miles. While I have encountered some minor issues with the exhaust crossover pipe and the antilock brakes, they were quickly resolved. Although I personally prefer not to use antilock brakes, I must say that Toyota's system is quite good. Overall, I am confident in the quality and durability of Toyota vehicles, especially as the mileage increases.
Nils Lindgren 2024-10-11
I bought my T100 in January 1997 with the intention of using it for commuting and light hauling, such as towing my 14ft. Alumnacraft boat. Throughout my 11 years of ownership, it has never let me down. I have only encountered two issues with the truck, both of which cost over $150 to repair. The first issue was related to the AC and was covered by the standard warranty. The second repair was due to wear and tear, as the valve cover gaskets needed to be replaced. The truck started leaking small amounts of oil. All other repairs have been minor or routine maintenance. I am selling the truck to a friend who needs a reliable and fuel-efficient vehicle. Best of luck finding one!
Robert Flatley 2024-08-27
Hi there! Just wanted to let you know that you've successfully purchased a new item!
Adolfo Dibbert 2024-08-07
Your truck came to me with 144,000 miles on it. It drives great on the highway, straight and true and smooth. It takes the bumps like a pickup, but then that's what it's called. I previously owned a '79 4WD Toyota, and this truck is like a Cadillac to me. It has a reasonable sized rear bed with an extra back seat for shopping and inside packages. The 4WD sits as tall as all its bigger brothers and sounds great! Even after my wife drove it into the end of the garage, with a new bumper and headlight, it looks the same as before. This is one tough truck!
Rahul Gutmann 2024-07-19
What a great vehicle! Despite putting it through some serious abuse, including hauling heavy oilfield equipment and towing trailers, it has held up incredibly well. I've even taken it through mud with chains on all four wheels and it still runs like a dream. It's amazing that after all that, it hasn't burned a drop of oil. I've had to replace a few parts like the clutch, brakes, muffler, and timing belt, but overall it's been a wonderful vehicle. It's slightly smaller than a full-size pickup, but it matches up well with other trucks in deep mud. I've even found it to be better than the Tacoma. I loved it so much that I ended up buying a new Crew Cab Tundra in 2004!