Nissan Juke problems
The Nissan Juke (Japanese: 日産・ジューク, Hepburn: Nissan Jūku) is a subcompact crossover SUV (B-segment) produced by the Japanese car manufacturer Nissan since 2010. Debuted as a production vehicle at the 2010 Geneva Motor Show in March, it was introduced to North America at the 2010 New York International Auto Show to be sold for the 2011 model year, and it currently slots below the compact Qashqai.
The second-generation model was revealed for the European market in September 2019, offering larger dimensions by utilising the newer Renault–Nissan CMF-B platform. The second generation marks the withdrawal of the model from most markets outside Europe and Australasia to make way for the Nissan Kicks.
The name "juke" means to "dance or change directions demonstrating agility", and is also derived from the word "jukebox".
Social links
Nissan Juke model years
Common Nissan Juke problems
Based on complaints from Nissan Juke owners, several common problems have been reported with these cars:
By being aware of these common problems and conducting thorough pre-purchase inspections, potential Nissan Juke buyers can make informed decisions and minimize the risk of encountering these issues.
What are the main problems with Nissan Juke?
Nissan Juke Common Problems and Solutions
- Backfiring and Power Loss. Problem: ...
- Unresponsive Steering. Problem: ...
- Hard To Change Gear. Problem: ...
- Backfiring and Power Loss. Problem: ...
- Unresponsive Steering. Problem: ...
- Hard To Change Gear (Manuals) Problem: ...
- Gearbox problems. Problem: ...
- Fog lights condensation. Problem:
Are Nissan Jukes reliable cars?
Reliability Survey, the Juke finished mid-table in the small SUV class, while Nissan as a whole claimed 19th place (out of the 32 brands included). If you want a more reliable small SUV, take a look at the Q2 or Yaris Cross.
What is the bad year for the Nissan Juke?
One such problematic year is the 2011 Nissan Juke, known for its faulty transmission that can lead to premature failure. Another year to be cautious about is the 2013 model, which had problems with the timing chain that could cause engine damage if not addressed promptly.
What is the downside of Nissan Juke?
Space and practicality
Though you do sit quite high in the Juke, giving you a decent view out of the front, there's a bit of a cramped feeling inside. It's not uncomfortable, but if you want more space to stretch out, the likes of the Skoda Kamiq and Volkswagen T-Cross will appeal more.
Percentage distribution of complaints by Nissan Juke years
We have researched Nissan problems and analysed all the complaints filed against Nissan Juke cars and compiled the top 5 most problematic Nissan Juke model years:
Below you can see the percentage distribution of known problems by Nissan Juke model years.
Distribution of the number of complaints by Nissan Juke years
We've also compiled a chart for you with the number of complaints about Volkswagen Jetta cars of certain model years:
Nissan Juke car problems categorized by type of issue
After analysing all complaints related to Nissan Juke , it was concluded that the most common issues with these cars are:
- Engine problems
- Power train problems
- Fuel/propulsion system problems
- Electrical system problems
- Unknown or other problems
The graph below shows statistics for all Nissan Juke vehicle components and the number of complaints received.
Distribution of the number of complaints where the accident occurred by Juke model years
A total of 26 complaints were registered in which the accident occurred. In the graph you can see the distribution of the number of complaints by model year.
Distribution of the number of complaints with fire by Juke model years
There were a total of 9 complaints that resulted in a fire. In the graph you can see the distribution of the number of complaints by model year.
Distribution of the number of complaints with injuries by Juke model years
There were a total of 17 complaints that resulted in a injuries. In the graph you can see the distribution of the number of complaints by model year.
The NHTSA has received 450 complaints about various vehicle components related to the Nissan Juke . Below are the 25 most recent complaints reported for Nissan Juke vehicles.
Latest 25 complaints
Nissan Juke 2016
- Date Of Incident: 2016-09-10
- Date Complaint: 2024-09-10
- VIN: JN8AF5MR3GT
- Components: POWER TRAIN,ELECTRICAL SYSTEM,ENGINE
- Summary: For 8 years Since 20161st The struts, censor, Control panel, Window, 3 transmissions, Electronic multi-way control valve, EGR system, Radiator. All of these troubles since 2016 every year a problem.
Nissan Juke 2012
- Date Of Incident: 2024-03-02
- Date Complaint: 2024-06-10
- VIN: JN8AF5MR3CT
- Components: AIR BAGS
- Summary: SRS AIRBAG LIGHT FLASHES CONTINUOUSLY. STARTED ABOUT 3 MONTHS AGO (MARCH 2024) TOOK CAR TO REPAIR SHOP, STATED OCS CONTROL UNIT AND PASSENGER OCCUPANT SENSORS NEED TO BE REPLACED. TOOK TO A NISSAN DEALER FOR 2ND OPINION. STATED TODAY THEY WILL REPLACE OCS CONTROL UNIT & PASSENGER OCCUPANT SENSORS. IS THIS SOMETHING THAT COULD BE COVERED BY A RECALL EVENT?
Nissan Juke 2013
- Date Of Incident: 2024-05-07
- Date Complaint: 2024-05-28
- VIN: JN8AF5MV9DT
- Components: FUEL/PROPULSION SYSTEM
- Summary: Smelling and leaking gas. Smell in stronger when driving the vehicle. Took it to a car shop and they stated that the fuel pressure sensor was leaking. There was a recall at one time for this and I have called the Nissan customer service and filled a claim. The Nissan makers states that they could not fix the problem due to the recall had already been fixed in 2018. Even though it has been 6 years, I think they should be liable to fix this issue. There is either something wrong with the sensors or it was not tight enough to start with.
Nissan Juke 2016
- Date Of Incident: 2024-03-02
- Date Complaint: 2024-05-11
- Crash: 1
- VIN: JN8AF5MV8GT
- Components: STEERING,WHEELS,SERVICE BRAKES
- Summary: The brakes in my car failed to work, leaving me swirling around on the highway. Yes it is available for inspection. I was a car accident that left me with a concussion and minor injuries. No the car is now totaled. The vehicle did receive an appraisal inspection. No they were absolutely no warnings or anything that made me feel I shouldn’t have been driving my car. I kept up on the maintenance well with the help of my warranty company. I did notice in the last few weeks of driving my car though that my check engine light was on.
Nissan Juke 2013
- Date Of Incident: 2024-04-14
- Date Complaint: 2024-04-15
- VIN: JN8AF5MRXDT
- Components: FUEL/PROPULSION SYSTEM
- Summary: I am asking about the fuel system recall 12V069000 calling to tighten the fuel pressure sensor. Why has the turbo part number been rescinded a few times. Along with the TSB # NTB16-035a calling for the oil line to be replaced whenever turbocharger MX is performed. Since the recall was performed before the TSB and it required the oil one to be removed, could this have caused the faulty turbocharger. I have had one turbo charger replaced in 2019 - 5 years ago and my turbo charger went out again yesterday - 4/14/2024 at 150,000 miles. It threw a code P2263. Clearly this is a defect and beyond costing a lot of money, a safety issue.
Nissan Juke 2014
- Date Of Incident: 2024-03-06
- Date Complaint: 2024-03-26
- Fire: 1
- VIN: JN8AF5MV7ET
- Components: ELECTRICAL SYSTEM,SEATS
- Summary: A couple of weeks ago on my way home from school I could smell something burning. I stopped my car and started looking around to find that the front passengers seat was smoldering and burning a hole in my backpack, toque and the seat itself. The seat warmer switch was in the off position. My dad has since disconnected the wiring to the seat warmers on both drivers and passenger sides. This seems to be a safety issue. Has there been other complaints like this for these vehicles? We have not been to the dealer, we have contacted Nissan and were told the following "Your vehicle is out of warranty and therefore is not our problem" The car has 170,000 kms on it but this is a safety issue not a warranty complaint.
Nissan Juke 2013
- Date Of Incident: 2023-10-17
- Date Complaint: 2024-02-02
- VIN: JN8AF5MV1DT
- Components: FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE
- Summary: The contact owns a 2013 Nissan Juke. The contact stated that while her husband was driving at an undisclosed speed, he became aware of a fuel odor inside the vehicle. The vehicle was taken to the dealer where the vehicle was diagnosed with a failed fuel rail washer, and it was determined that the fuel rail washer needed to be replaced. The vehicle was repaired. The contact was informed that the vehicle had previously been repaired under NHTSA Campaign Number: 12V069000 (Fuel System, Gasoline). The contact was also informed that the fuel pressure sensors were not replaced at the time, however the fuel rail washer were retorqued. The manufacturer was made aware of the failure and a case was filed. The failure mileage was approximately 65,000.
Nissan Juke 2015
- Date Of Incident: 2023-12-13
- Date Complaint: 2024-01-12
- VIN: JN8AF5MV6FT
- Components: VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL,SERVICE BRAKES,FUEL/PROPULSION SYSTEM
- Summary: Breakes not wanting to stop, the petal gets stuck as well and when you fill it up gas fumes come in the vechile that caused me headaches and Nauseous. I reported it to Firestone who seemed to think it wasn't a problem several times, also reported to dealership i could of hit someone or someone hit me . I got two tickes by traffic recorder back to backn 1) petal getting stuck 2) Accelerating because gas petal got stuck. Inspected by Firestone anyone else unknown. I was scared didnt notice any warnings but could of been just got the vehicle from Drivetime 9/9/23
Nissan Juke 2011
- Date Of Incident: 2022-11-01
- Date Complaint: 2024-01-03
- VIN: JN8AF5MV5BT
- Components: ENGINE,FUEL/PROPULSION SYSTEM
- Summary: Engine Failure and Exhaust issue.
Nissan Juke 2012
- Date Of Incident: 2023-12-01
- Date Complaint: 2023-12-05
- VIN: JN8AF5MV9CT
- Components: POWER TRAIN
- Summary: Timing chain needs replacement however the timing chain was already replaced in 2014 under Nissan recall NTB14-030c campaign P4213. This car has 54,000 miles on it and has been serviced at Nissan dealerships according to the Nissan service schedule. There is no reason for this part to need replacing again after so few miles unless the Nissan part was bad, there is an underlying manufacturing issue with the vehicle or the recall replacement was done incorrectly. Nissan Consumer Affairs refuses to assist because the car is out of warranty.
Nissan Juke 2012
- Date Of Incident: 2019-01-01
- Date Complaint: 2023-12-05
- VIN: JN8AF5MV9CT
- Components: UNKNOWN OR OTHER
- Summary: I have a 2012 Nissan Juke and every one of the door lock actuators has had to be replaced. The problems started early on, but the door locks intermittently fail when using the key fob or external door button. Using the internal door lock button is more likely to work even when the key fob and external button fail. Because the failures are intermittent, it is hard to get this diagnosed and replaced at the dealerships. I have had to take the car to the dealership many times, pay a $200 diagnostic fee and then sometimes they replace the door actuator and sometimes do not. Over the past 4 years I have replaced 3 of 4 door actuators and will be replacing the 4th door actuator now. I contacted Nissan Consumer Affairs regarding the issue, as it is a known issue, but they refused to assist because the car is no longer under warranty.
Nissan Juke 2012
- Date Of Incident: 2023-11-17
- Date Complaint: 2023-12-02
- VIN: JN8AF5MR9CT
- Components: FUEL/PROPULSION SYSTEM
- Summary: The car smelling of burning and is not safe to drive.
Nissan Juke 2012
- Date Of Incident: 2023-04-12
- Date Complaint: 2023-09-25
- VIN: JN8AF5MVXCT
- Components: STEERING,SUSPENSION,UNKNOWN OR OTHER
- Summary: Sept 2022 i bought my 2012 Nissan Juke from Jeff Wyler’s Nissan King AutoMall. April 23 the left, lower ball joint/axle (drivers side) broke. Needed fixed. Almost $2,000. I specifically asked them to check right sided ball joint/axle. Oh it’s fine. We checked it out and it’s all good. Less than 3 months later-the right sided axle and ball joint broke. It only took over 6 weeks and 3 different places (discount tires, tire discounters and Jeff Wyler’s dealership) to figure out what was wrong with my vehicle at this time. This time it cost me more (but since jeff wylers mechanics fix things and then jack up the price by $800) it actually cost me $1550 to fix it this time.I could have died. On both occasions and now it feels like the backend of my juke is shaking apart. I’m scared to death to drive my vehicle and I’ve told Jeff Wyler I think they sold me an unsafe vehicle and I am now terrified to drive it. But it’s the only car we have in our family and I can’t afford to buy another one. You have no idea as to how terrified I am to drive my car now; especially with that rear end shaking. omg! I’ve never owned a Nissan before and this is my last I have also asked Jeff Wyler’s dealership-wouldn’t this have been caught on their inspection of selling a used car? Wouldn’t the mechanic in April seen signs/symptoms of stress on the right sided ball joint when they looked at it when they fixed the left side? How do things like this get missed? & put MY LIFE IN DANGER as well as every other person on the roads while I drove with broken axles and ball joints? How can they sell vehicles that are not safe? omg! You cannot comprehend the terrified feeling along with anxiety/nausea and just pure terror of driving a vehicle that shakes still and where I’ve had to fix 2 separate massive breakages in the driveway mechanics or frame (idk. The 2nd time it happened; I thought its a bad tire). I am now more religious and spiritual because of this. I now pray several times daily
Nissan Juke 2012
- Date Of Incident: 2023-09-03
- Date Complaint: 2023-09-03
- VIN: JN8AF5MV1CT
- Components: ELECTRICAL SYSTEM,UNKNOWN OR OTHER
- Summary: I purchased this Nissan 2012 from Hyundai Santa Maria. It has had a problem starting consistently. There are recorded records all over the net. Simply google Nissan Juke Push Button won't start. I have already spent some money trying to figure out the issue. People have been stranded in my car Calling triple A. It drains the batteries which are $250 each. Nissan indicates that the remote keyless entry that stalls in the accesory mode. It has been 10 yrs an people are having to dump their cars. Mine I pay $224 a month an 11k loan for it to sit in my driveway. It is a danger as if the car cannot be started in a hazardous situation then someone will die. The contact stated that Nissan has not offered any assistance so far. The contact was informed by Nissan that their vehicle does not apply to the recall and recommended that they pay for diagnostic testing.
Nissan Juke 2012
- Date Of Incident: 2023-07-14
- Date Complaint: 2023-07-15
- VIN: JN8AF5MR7CT
- Components: ENGINE
- Summary: Belt in the engine snapped made the car overheat leak oil and radiator fluid. Mechanic said there was a recal for this issue.
Latest 5 recalls Nissan Juke
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has issued 14 recalls for different components of the Nissan Juke.You can explore the year of the Volkswagen Jetta you are interested in by selecting it from the list.
- Model: Nissan Juke 2012
- Report Received Date: 2018-03-07
- Manufacturer: Nissan North America, Inc.
- Components: FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE
- Summary: Nissan North America, Inc. (Nissan) is recalling certain 2011-2012 Nissan Juke vehicles previously remedied under recall 12V-069. During that recall remedy, the fuel pressure sensor may not have been properly tightened, potentially causing the sensor to loosen and leak fuel.
- Consequence: A fuel leak in the presence of an ignition source can increase the risk of a fire.
- Remedy: Nissan will notify owners, and dealers will tighten the fuel pressure sensor to the proper torque, free of charge. The recall began on April 24, 2018. Owners may contact Nissan customer service at 1-800-867-7669.
- Model: Nissan Juke 2011
- Report Received Date: 2018-03-07
- Manufacturer: Nissan North America, Inc.
- Components: FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE
- Summary: Nissan North America, Inc. (Nissan) is recalling certain 2011-2012 Nissan Juke vehicles previously remedied under recall 12V-069. During that recall remedy, the fuel pressure sensor may not have been properly tightened, potentially causing the sensor to loosen and leak fuel.
- Consequence: A fuel leak in the presence of an ignition source can increase the risk of a fire.
- Remedy: Nissan will notify owners, and dealers will tighten the fuel pressure sensor to the proper torque, free of charge. The recall began on April 24, 2018. Owners may contact Nissan customer service at 1-800-867-7669.
- Model: Nissan Juke 2015
- Report Received Date: 2018-01-31
- Manufacturer: Nissan North America, Inc.
- Components: SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC:FOUNDATION COMPONENTS:MASTER CYLINDER
- Summary: Nissan North America, Inc. (Nissan) is recalling certain 2015-2017 Nissan Juke Nismo RS vehicles. Due to a problem within the brake master cylinder, brake fluid may leak into the brake booster, reducing brake performance.
- Consequence: If brake fluid leaks into the brake booster it can lengthen the distance needed to stop the vehicle, increasing the risk of a crash.
- Remedy: Nissan will notify owners, and dealers will replace the brake master cylinder, free of charge. The recall began March 19, 2018. Owners may contact Nissan customer service at 1-800-647-7261.
- Model: Nissan Juke 2017
- Report Received Date: 2018-01-31
- Manufacturer: Nissan North America, Inc.
- Components: SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC:FOUNDATION COMPONENTS:MASTER CYLINDER
- Summary: Nissan North America, Inc. (Nissan) is recalling certain 2015-2017 Nissan Juke Nismo RS vehicles. Due to a problem within the brake master cylinder, brake fluid may leak into the brake booster, reducing brake performance.
- Consequence: If brake fluid leaks into the brake booster it can lengthen the distance needed to stop the vehicle, increasing the risk of a crash.
- Remedy: Nissan will notify owners, and dealers will replace the brake master cylinder, free of charge. The recall began March 19, 2018. Owners may contact Nissan customer service at 1-800-647-7261.
- Model: Nissan Juke 2016
- Report Received Date: 2018-01-31
- Manufacturer: Nissan North America, Inc.
- Components: SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC:FOUNDATION COMPONENTS:MASTER CYLINDER
- Summary: Nissan North America, Inc. (Nissan) is recalling certain 2015-2017 Nissan Juke Nismo RS vehicles. Due to a problem within the brake master cylinder, brake fluid may leak into the brake booster, reducing brake performance.
- Consequence: If brake fluid leaks into the brake booster it can lengthen the distance needed to stop the vehicle, increasing the risk of a crash.
- Remedy: Nissan will notify owners, and dealers will replace the brake master cylinder, free of charge. The recall began March 19, 2018. Owners may contact Nissan customer service at 1-800-647-7261.
Latest negative Nissan Juke car reviews
Latest positive Nissan Juke car reviews
-
Vehicle year: 2014
I'm glad to hear that you enjoyed your time with the Juke! While it may be small and have limited cargo space, it sounds like it was the perfect fit for your needs. It's great to hear that you were satisfied with its performance, even if your mileage wasn't as high as some others'. And it's always a plus when a vehicle has good road-handling! I hope you're enjoying your new Hyundai Kona as well, it sounds like a great choice.
-
Vehicle year: 2011
I've owned 5 Jeeps, but I've also had the pleasure of owning a Mustang GT convertible, Camaro, and Celica GT convertible. I enjoy vehicles with sporty intentions. However, my most recent vehicle was a Vibe, which I chose for its thrifty gas mileage and practicality. Somehow, all the best features of my previous vehicles were combined into one, and it works! When you slide behind the wheel, it feels sporty and you start noticing cues all over. Once in motion, it feels like the perfect height for rally cross. You can carve up a twisty mountain road until the pavement ends, and not even slow down as you dig into a good two-track. Best of all, I don't have to feel guilty about gas consumption.
-
Vehicle year: 2015
As of July 2019, I still have my Juke and it's been running great with no major issues, even with 55,000 miles on it. The gas mileage is still fantastic and I have no complaints. The only downside is the limited space, but I usually put the backseat down to make it work. Overall, I absolutely love my car! *Updated review* It's now 2018 and I'm still very satisfied with my Juke. If you need a lot of space, this car may not be the best fit for you, but the gas mileage is still amazing. I even drove from South Florida to GA and only had to fill up twice. I've had very few issues with it and the warranties that come with the car are a huge plus. I would definitely recommend this car. Updated 01/20/18* I am extremely satisfied with my purchase of the 2015 Nissan Juke S. The base model comes with a lot of great technology and the gas mileage is unbeatable. I used to have a Honda Civic DX, which was reliable but had expensive parts. The back seats are a bit cramped, but as a mother of one, it's perfect for us. I highly recommend this car.
-
Vehicle year: 2011
The JUKE has a unique look that I found quite amusing. I was pleasantly surprised when I drove it as it brought a smile to my face. It is a very engaging car to drive, with a spirited performance, and the seats are extremely comfortable, which is not something you usually find in cars at this price point. Our Juke has been very reliable, with just over 20,000 miles on it. The interior is also a plus, with comfortable seats, easy-to-read gauges, and large rearview side mirrors. Although I wish there was a center armrest and that the window and door lock switches would light up, and ambient lighting would be a nice touch. The only downside is that the rear seat room could be increased a couple of inches both in legroom and headroom. Lastly, I think that the 5th gear could be more fuel economy-minded.
-
Vehicle year: 2017
The Juke is a small crossover with a unique design that resembles a cyborg frog. While this has been known for years, it's important to appreciate it for what it is - a fun and easy-to-drive vehicle that is efficient and versatile in different weather conditions. The interior is small and can seat up to five people, but legroom may be limited for taller individuals. However, this is to be expected with a compact SUV, and if you frequently drive around tall people, it may be better to consider a larger vehicle like the Rogue. The Juke is perfect for single people, childless married couples, or small families. It's easy to park, especially with Nissan's around view camera system available on SL models. The car is also fuel-efficient, has a user-friendly touchscreen Nav, and a fun-to-play-with I-CON system. The Turbo kicks in around 2500 RPM and stays strong to around 5500 RPM. However, there are some downsides to the Juke. The door panels are not of the highest quality, and the Sentra, which costs $6-10k less, has a higher quality interior overall. The dash and console trim are okay, but could be better. The optional armrest should be standard. The car is sometimes too tiny, and legroom in the backseats may be limited for taller individuals. The Rockford Fosgate sound system has great bass, but the mids are average and the highs are lacking. The AWD model's 11.5-gallon fuel tank is inconvenient, as it's hard to make it to 300 miles on one tank. The biggest issue to me is the lack of a telescoping steering wheel, which makes the seating position feel awkward.You can either long-arm the steering wheel to drive with your legs in comfort, or scoot up two or three clicks on the seat track and have your knees and ankles feel uncomfortable after half an hour. However, these minor issues do not detract from the overall appeal of the Juke, which is a really nice vehicle.
Are you having problems with your Nissan Juke?
Bobby Blanda 2025-05-08
Vehicle year: 2017
The car is a joy to drive and handles well. Unfortunately, I had a negative experience with the dealer support at Auto Nation in Miami, FL. However, I was able to receive excellent service from a local Nissan dealer named Bill S. When the intake manifold needed to be replaced at 10 months and 11,000 miles, it took several trips to the dealer to determine the issue, but ultimately it was resolved within 7 days at no cost to me other than the toll cost of the loaner provided by the dealer. At 2 and a half years, I had to pay $135 to reprogram both key fobs, which was not covered by the warranty. Overall, I do not believe the car is worth the price due to its low-tech features, multiple minor and major electrical and mechanical issues, and the requirement to use premium gas. Additionally, the Nissan warranty did not cover the reprogramming of the key fobs. On a positive note, the car is quick and fun to drive. I ultimately traded the Juke for a 2017 Toyota Tacoma TRD Off Road, which has unmatched reliability. I will not be purchasing a Nissan again.
Harrison McLaughlin 2025-05-03
Vehicle year: 2013
Nissan's CVT transmissions have been a source of frustration for many customers, including myself. Despite having to replace mine at the dealership under 100,000 miles due to overheating and lack of horsepower, the issue resurfaced after only 30,000 miles, resulting in another costly $300.00 flush. When I contacted Nissan, their response was a list of information unrelated to my vehicle and a request to return to the dealership. However, it is important to note that this issue is not unique to Nissan and many other car manufacturers have faced similar challenges with CVT transmissions.
Brendan Dicki 2025-05-03
Vehicle year: 2011
We've had this car since March 1st and unfortunately, we've been experiencing some issues. The MPG is only averaging 18.5 with 90% of our driving on the freeway. In town, we get 13-15 MPG and the best we have ever gotten was 24.63 MPG in Economy mode during a 100% Freeway Trip. We've had some electrical problems where the radio goes off and the car dies, which has happened twice. We took it to the dealer for a week, but they couldn't find the electrical problem or improve the MPG. We've owned other Nissan products in the past, but unfortunately, this JUKE has been a bit of a disappointment. If you're looking for a car with good fuel economy, we wouldn't recommend this one. Thank you for your understanding.
Marshall Durgan 2025-04-14
Vehicle year: 2014
After a rocky start, I was about ready to give up on the service department. However, I decided to give them one more chance and I'm glad I did. On my sixth visit, the service manager Doug Monaco and the service representative Brian Valdivia were able to find an electrical short that was causing all of my problems. Since then, I have had no issues and I am really enjoying my car! Although the mileage could be better, I still really like the car.
Alexys Prosacco 2025-03-25
Vehicle year: 2011
The timing chain on my 2011 Juke recently broke, causing significant engine damage that requires a replacement. Despite having 75000 miles on it due to my job requiring travel, I am confident that this car is built to handle anything. While Nissan has agreed to cover the cost of the engine and parts, they have requested that I pay for the labor. However, I am confident that this investment will be worth it in the long run. Although the new engine is only covered for 12 months or 12000 miles, I am confident that it will perform well beyond that. While this experience has been frustrating, I am confident that Nissan will continue to stand behind their products and provide excellent service.