1992 Ford Probe problems
The Ford Probe is a liftback coupé produced by Ford, introduced in 1988 and produced until 1997. The Probe was the result of Ford's collaboration with its longtime Japanese partner Mazda, and both generations of Probe were derived from the front-wheel drive Mazda G platform that underpinned the Mazda Capella.
The Probe succeeded the Ford EXP, and the instrument cluster of the first-generation Probe and pop-up headlight mechanisms were borrowed from the FC Series RX-7.
Based on the Mazda MX-6 as a sport compact coupe, the Probe was intended to fill the market niche formerly occupied by the Capri in Europe, and it was originally intended to be the fourth generation Ford Mustang in the North American market as a direct competitor with the Acura Integra, Isuzu Piazza, Nissan 200SX, and the Toyota Celica. During that time, Ford's marketing team had deemed that a front-wheel drive platform (borrowed Mazda GD and GE platforms) would have lower costs for production, and also because the platform had been gaining popularity with consumers.
Mustang fans objected to the front-wheel drive configuration, Japanese engineering, and lack of a V8, so Ford began work on a new design for the Mustang instead. On March 17, 1997, Ford announced the discontinuation of the Probe.
Social links
Common 1992 Ford Probe problems
The Ford Probe, produced between 1989 and 1997, has had its fair share of common issues across its various trim levels and configurations. This article will discuss some of the most common problems reported by owners of the Ford Probe, focusing on the first and second generations.
1. Power Windows and Door Locks Malfunction (First Generation)
One common issue with the first-generation Ford Probe was the tendency for the power windows and door locks to malfunction. In some cases, the windows and locks would stop working altogether, while in other cases, they would operate sporadically. This was often caused by faulty wiring or a malfunctioning power window regulator. Replacing the regulator or repairing the wiring can often fix this issue.
2. Engine Oil Leaks (First Generation)
Another problem that was common with the first-generation Ford Probe was engine oil leaks. These leaks were typically caused by worn gaskets or seals, and could lead to a loss of engine oil and potential engine damage if left unchecked. Regularly checking the engine oil level and addressing any leaks promptly can prevent this issue from becoming a major problem.
3. Manual Transmission Problems (First Generation)
Some first-generation Ford Probe models experienced problems with their manual transmissions. The transmissions would often grind or fail to shift properly, especially when shifting into third gear. This issue was often caused by worn synchronizers or damaged shift forks, and could require transmission repair or replacement to fully resolve.
4. Dashboard and Instrument Cluster Problems (First Generation)
Some first-generation Ford Probe models had problems with the dashboard and instrument cluster. The dashboard lights would often fail to illuminate properly or stop working altogether, making it difficult to monitor the vehicle's speed and other important metrics. Replacing the faulty bulbs or fuses can often fix this issue.
5. Cooling System Problems (Second Generation)
Some 1993 Ford Probe models were prone to overheating due to a malfunctioning thermostat, which could lead to engine damage if not addressed promptly. Replacing the thermostat and performing a cooling system flush can often fix this issue.
6. Engine Oil Pressure Gauge Malfunction (Second Generation)
Some 1994 and 1995 Ford Probe models had issues with the engine oil pressure gauge. The gauge would often malfunction or read incorrectly, leading to confusion about the actual oil pressure in the engine. Replacing the faulty gauge or sensor can often fix this issue.
7. Automatic Transmission Slipping or Failure (Second Generation)
Some second-generation Ford Probe models had issues with the automatic transmission. The transmission would often slip or fail altogether, especially in 1996 and 1997 models. This issue was often caused by worn or damaged transmission bands or clutches, and could require transmission repair or replacement to fully resolve.
8. Electrical System Problems (Second Generation)
Some 1996 and 1997 Ford Probe models experienced problems with the electrical system, including issues with the alternator and battery. These issues would often cause the battery to drain quickly, leading to starting problems and other electrical malfunctions. Replacing the faulty alternator or battery can often fix this issue.
While these common issues can be frustrating for Ford Probe owners, regular maintenance and prompt repairs can help keep these issues from becoming major problems. Additionally, it is important to note that the Ford Probe is a well-regarded sports coupe that offers excellent handling and performance, despite these common issues.
How much is a 1992 Ford Probe worth?
The value of a used 1992 Ford Probe ranges from $1,592 to $7,521, based on vehicle condition, mileage, and options.
Why did the Ford Probe fail?
By 1997, the Probe's final year, Ford sold less than 20,000 units compared to 108,000 Mustangs. Ford did such a poor job of positioning and marketing the Probe it was almost destined to fail. A third-generation Probe was planned, but that design became the early-2000s Mercury Cougar, also an unsuccessful car.
How long did the Ford Probe last?
The Ford Probe is a liftback coupé produced by Ford, introduced in 1988 and produced until 1997.
What happened to all the Ford probes?
Why Was the Ford Probe Taken Off the Market? By 1997, Probe sales had dropped to less than 20,000 as buyer interest was lured away from the coupe and towards the Mustang it was meant to replace. It also lost sales to the Thunderbird and Mazda's Miata, all of which had rear-wheel drive.
Why did the Ford Probe fail?
By 1997, the Probe's final year, Ford sold less than 20,000 units compared to 108,000 Mustangs. Ford did such a poor job of positioning and marketing the Probe it was almost destined to fail. A third-generation Probe was planned, but that design became the early-2000s Mercury Cougar, also an unsuccessful car.
How much is a 1992 Ford Probe worth?
The value of a used 1992 Ford Probe ranges from $1,592 to $7,521, based on vehicle condition, mileage, and options.
How long did the Ford Probe last?
The Ford Probe is a liftback coupé produced by Ford, introduced in 1988 and produced until 1997.
What happened to all the Ford probes?
Why Was the Ford Probe Taken Off the Market? By 1997, Probe sales had dropped to less than 20,000 as buyer interest was lured away from the coupe and towards the Mustang it was meant to replace. It also lost sales to the Thunderbird and Mazda's Miata, all of which had rear-wheel drive.
1992 Ford Probe car problems categorized by type of issue
After analyzing all complaints sent to the NHTSA and researching popular Ford Probe problems, we found that the most common problems with these 2023 model year vehicles are:
- Seat belts problems
- Electrical system problems
- Power train problems
- Equipment problems
- Engine and engine cooling problems
The graph below shows statistics for all 1992 Ford Probe vehicle components and the number of complaints received.
Latest 25 complaints 1992 Ford Probe
The NHTSA has received 98 complaints about various vehicle components related to the 1992 Ford Probe. Below are the 25 most recent complaints reported for 1992 Ford Probe vehicles.
SEAT BELTS PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2010-02-13
- VIN: 1ZVPT20C2N5
- Components: SEAT BELTS
- Summary: TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 1992 FORD PROBE. WHILE THE VEHICLE WAS PARKED SHE ATTEMPTED TO USE THE DRIVER'S SEAT BELT AND THE SEAT BELT WOULD NOT MOVE OUT OF THE RETRACTOR. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE DEALER AND THE DEALER ADVISED HER THAT THEY NO LONGER HAVE ANY BOOKS ON HOW TO REPAIR THE SEAT BELT. SHE REFERENCE RECALL NHTSA CAMPAIGN ID NUMBER: 96V172001, SEAT BELTS:FRONT:WEBBING AND STATED THE RECALL WORK WAS PERFORMED. SHE CALLED THE MANUFACTURER AND THEY HAVE SENT HER SEVERAL LETTERS. THE APPROXIMATE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 108,000 AND THE CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 110,000. UPDATED 11/08/10 * BF THE CONSUMER STATED SHE HAS BEEN WITHOUT THE SHOULDER BELT FOR ABOUT 1 YEAR. UPDATED 11/10/10
SEAT BELTS PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2010-02-15
- VIN: 1ZVPT20C2N5
- Components: SEAT BELTS
- Summary: TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 1992 FORD PROBE. THE CONTACT STATED THAT WHEN SHE ATTEMPTED TO BUCKLE THE SEAT BELT, IT WOULD NOT RETRACT TO SECURE THE DRIVER. THE CONTACT DISENGAGED THE BELT. THE CONTACT CALLED THE AUTHORIZED DEALER AND WAS INFORMED THAT THE VEHICLE WAS TOO OLD FOR THEM TO LOOK UP THE REMEDY IN THE DIAGNOSTIC MANUAL. THERE WAS A RECALL RELATED TO THE FAILURE (96V172001 SEAT BELTS:FRONT:WEBBING). THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS APPROXIMATELY 106,000. THE CURRENT MILEAGE WAS APPROXIMATELY 110,000. UPDATED 07/06/10. *LJ THE CONSUMER STATED THE SEAT BELT STOPPED WORKING. UPDATED 09/21/10
SEAT BELTS PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2010-02-15
- VIN: 1ZVPT20C2N5
- Components: SEAT BELTS
- Summary: TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 1992 FORD PROBE. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE REPAIR FOR RECALL 96V172001 (SEAT BELTS:FRONT:WEBBING) WAS PERFORMED IN 2007 BUT THE FAILURE RECURRED THE COMPLAINT DOES NOT EXPLAIN WHAT WAS REPAIRED. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO AN AUTHORIZED DEALERSHIP WHERE THE CONTACT WAS INFORMED THAT THE REPAIR COULD NOT BE PERFORMED AGAIN FREE OF CHARGE DUE TO THE AGE OF THE VEHICLE. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS APPROXIMATELY 106,000. THE CURRENT MILEAGE WAS APPROXIMATELY 108,000. UPDATED 7/06/10. *LJ UPDATED 07/09/10.*JB
POWER TRAIN PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2002-12-12
- Components: POWER TRAIN
- Summary: SIX MONTHS AFTER PURCHASING A 92 PROBE V6 WITH 59,000 MILES ON IT I HAD TRANSMISSION TROUBLE. THE TRANSMISSION BEGAN SLIPPING ONE WEEK WHEN I WAS TRAVELING TO SCHOOL AND WHEN I CAME HOME THAT WEEKEND IT WOULDN'T SHIFT INTO ANY GEAR. AFTER LETTING IT SIT I WAS ABLE TO BRING IT HOME, ALTHOUGH IT SHIFTED ROUGH FROM NEUTRAL TO 1ST AND TO SECOND, THEN WOULDN'T SHIFT INTO THIRD AT ALL. I HAD TO USE MANUAL SHIFT MODE TO KEEP IT FROM SHIFTING INTO THIRD. WHILE CHANGING TRANSMISSION FLUID IT WE NOTICED A BURNT OIL SMELL TO IT. CHANGING THE FLUID HAD LITTLE EFFECT. THE WORST THING IS THAT I WAS ALSO LOOKING AT A 91 GRAND AM 4 CYL FOR $200 LESS. *TR
SEAT BELTS PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2006-09-07
- VIN: 1ZVPT21UXN5
- Components: SEAT BELTS
- Summary: DRIVERS SIDE (LEFT) PASSIVE SEAT BELT ASSEMBLY. THE RAIL OF THE AUTOMATIC SHOULDER BELT HAS WORN SUFFICIENTLY SUCH THAT THE CABLE WHICH RETRACTS THE BUCKLE ASSEMBLY HAS BECOME JAMMED IN THE RAIL RENDERING THE SHOULDER BELT INOPERATIVE. ACCORDING THE LETTER WRITTEN BY MR. JONATHAN D. WHITE RECALL ANALYSIS DIVISION OFFICE OF DEFECT INVESTIGATION SAFETY ASSURANCE. "FORD IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE REMEDY OF THESE VEHICLES FROM THE DATE OF AUG 22, 1996 FORWARD,REGARDLESS OF VEHICLE AGE MILEAGE OR OWNERSHIP." NOT GIVING AN ENDING DATE. THERE RECALL INVOLVES 224,000 FORD MOTOR COMPANY VEHICLES 1990 THROUGH 1992 FORD PROBE MODEL EQUIPPED WITH FRONT SEAT MOTORIZED (PASSIVE) SHOULDER BELTS AS STANDARD EQUIPMENT AND MANUFACTURED FROM AUG 14, 1989 THROUGH FEB 7, 1992. MY VEHICLE WAS MADE NOV 1, 1991 WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THE RECALL. RECALL NO.96S48. I PURCHASED THE VEHICLE USED. I CALLED FORD MOTOR COMPANY AT 800-392-3673. I WAS TOLD THAT THERE WERE NO RECALLS ON MY VEHICLE AND THE RECALLS ARE DIFFERENT IN DIFFERENT STATES. *JB
SEAT BELTS PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2024-11-24
- Components: SEAT BELTS
- Summary: AUTOMATIC DRIVER'S SEAT BELT IS INOPERATIVE. THE SHOULDER STRAP IS JAMMED IN THE RAIL BEHIND THE SHOULDER OF THE DRIVER. RECALL 96V172001 WAS ISSUED ON MAKE,/MODEL AND YEAR, BUT THIS VEHICLE WAS NOT INCLUDED IN THE RECALL DUE TO VIN.*AK *LA
TIRES PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2003-04-24
- Components: TIRES
- Summary: THE CONSUMER HEARD A NOISE FROM THE VEHICLE, AND HE SOON DISCOVERED THE RIGHT REAR TIRE HAD EXPERIENCED TREAD SEPARATION. *JB
SEAT BELTS PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2003-03-03
- Components: SEAT BELTS
- Summary: SEAT BELT BROKE. IN 1996 THERE WAS A RECALL ON THE DRIVERS SIDE SEAT BELT TRACK, AT THAT TIME THE CONSUMER SEAT BELT WAS ALREADY BROKE, BUT WAS NOT INCLUDED IN THE RECALL. THE CONSUMER WROTE A LETTER TO FORD ABOUT THE SEAT BELT AND EVENTUALLY IT WAS FIXED UNDER THE RECALL. THE PASSENGER SIDE SEAT BELT WAS CHECKED AND THE MECHANIC STATED IT WAS FINE. IN 2000 THE DRIVERS SIDE SEAT BELT BROKE AGAIN, BUT THIS TIME THE CONSUMER HAD TO PAY FOR THE REPAIRS. NOW THE PASSENGER SEAT BELT IS BROKE, THE CONSUMER CALLED FORD TO INQUIRE ABOUT A RECALL FOR THE PASSENGER SEAT BELT BUT WAS TOLD THERE WAS NO RECALL. *JB
SEAT BELTS PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2002-09-15
- VIN: FULLFILL
- Components: SEAT BELTS
- Summary: THE SEAT BELT WAS EXTREMELY TIGHT.*JB
SEAT BELTS PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2024-11-24
- VIN: 1ZVPT20C8N5
- Components: SEAT BELTS
- Summary: BOTH DRIVERS SIDE AND PASSENGER SIDE SHOULDER BELTS LOCK UP CONTINUOUSLY. THERE WAS A RECALL ON FEBRUARY 2, 1997 ON BOTH OF THEM. THE PREVIOUS OWNER HAS HAD THEM REPLACED. BOTH SIDES STILL LOCK UP ALL THE TIME PREVENTING MOVEMENT OF ANY KIND.*AK
SEAT BELTS PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2024-11-24
- VIN: PLEASE PROV
- Components: SEAT BELTS
- Summary: AUTOMATIC RETRACTOR DOES NOT RETRACT, VEHICLE HAS BEEN REPAIRED UNDER RECALL 96 V 172 000. DEALER WAS NOTIFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.*AK
SEAT BELTS PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2001-11-01
- VIN: NOT AVAILAB
- Components: SEAT BELTS
- Summary: NHTSA RECALL ID# 96-V-172-002/ MANUFACTURER'S RECALL 96S99, AUTOMATIC SEAT BELT RETRACTOR ON PASSENGER'S SIDE IS STUCK IN ONE POSITION. AUTOMATIC SEAT BELT IS SUPPOSE TO RETRACT BACK AND FORWARD ACROSS CONSUMER WHEN DOOR IS OPENED AND CLOSED. PASSENGER'S SIDE SEAT BELT IS BEING REPLACED FOR SECOND TIME. DEALER WAS NOTIFIED, AN DRECALL REPAIRS WERE PERFORMED ONCE. PLEASE PROVIDE THE VEHICLE ID NUMBER AND MILEAGE.*AK
SEAT BELTS PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2024-11-24
- VIN: 1ZVPT21U4N5
- Components: SEAT BELTS
- Summary: DRIVER SIDE SEAT BELT FAILED, PRIOR TO RECALL AND PASSENGER SIDE SEAT BELT FAILED 18 MONTHS AFTER BEING FIXED AS PER RECALL NOTICE. *YH
EXTERIOR LIGHTING PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2024-11-24
- VIN: 1ZVPT21U4N5
- Components: EXTERIOR LIGHTING
- Summary: DRIVER'S SIDE HEADLAMP SWITCH FAILED. *YH
EXTERIOR LIGHTING PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2024-11-24
- VIN: 1ZVPT21U4N5
- Components: EXTERIOR LIGHTING
- Summary: DRIVER'S SIDE HEADLAMP SWITCH FAILED. *YH
EQUIPMENT PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2024-11-24
- VIN: 1ZVPT21U4N5
- Components: EQUIPMENT
- Summary: ANTENNA FAILED TO RETRACT, IT WAS REPLACED AND FAILED AGAIN ONE YEAR LATER. *YH
SEAT BELTS PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2024-11-24
- VIN: 1ZVPT2U5N52
- Components: SEAT BELTS
- Summary: THE DRIVERS SIDE SEAT BELT FAILED TO COME BACK AFTER THE DOOR WAS OPENED AND CLOSED AND THE PASSENGER SIDE DID THE SAME THING. NLM
POWER TRAIN PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2024-11-24
- VIN: 1ZVPT2U5N52
- Components: POWER TRAIN
- Summary: THE TRANSMISSION FAILED WHILE DRIVING. NLM
POWER TRAIN PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2024-11-24
- VIN: 1ZVPT2U5N52
- Components: POWER TRAIN
- Summary: THE TRANSMISSION FAILED WHILE DRIVING. NLM
SEAT BELTS PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2000-08-01
- VIN: 1ZVPT20C0N5
- Components: SEAT BELTS
- Summary: PASSENGER'S AND DRIVER'S AUTOMATIC SEAT BELTS ARE FROZEN. CABLES ARE JAMMED. THERE IS A RECALL 96V172000/ MANUFACTURER'S RECALL 96S48. RECALL IS NO LONGER IN EFFECT, AND THERE WAS NOTHING THEY COULD DO. *AK AT TIME OF RECALL, CONSUMER HAD TAKEN VEHICLE TO DEALER WHO STATED THERE WERE NO PROBLEMS, THEREFORE NO CORRECTIONS NEEDED TO BE MADE. *SLC
SEAT BELTS PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2024-11-24
- Crash: 1
- VIN: 1ZVPT20V7N5
- Components: SEAT BELTS
- Summary: PASSENGER'S AUTOMATIC SET BELT CAME OUT OF T TRACK AFTER HITTING A DEER. SEAT BELT WAS IN USE AT TIME. PASSENGER WAS THROWN FORWARD WHEN BELT BROKE. HAD NO AIRBAGS. NO INJURIES. *AK
SEAT BELTS PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2001-01-02
- VIN: 1ZVPT20C8N5
- Components: SEAT BELTS
- Summary: REGARDING FORD RECALL # 96S48 AND 96S99 - SEAT BELT RECALL. DEALERSHIP CLAIMS THAT THEY PERFORMED REPLACEMENT OF SEATBELT TRACK AND MOTOR ASSEMBLY ON FEBRUARY 25, 1997. HOWEVER, THE REPAIR HAS FAILED JUST AS THE RECALL DESCRIBED THE ORIGINAL PROBLEM. FORD WILL NOT AGREE TO FIX THIS SAFETY ISSUE CLAIMING THAT THE WORK HAS ALREADY BEEN DONE. I CONTEND THAT I RECEIVED EITHER FAULTY PARTS AND / OR SHODDY WORKMANSHIP FROM THE DEALERSHIP. CAN YOU HELP ME RESOLVE THIS ISSUE WITH FORD? THANK YOU. MI. *AK
EQUIPMENT PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2024-11-24
- VIN: 2MEPM36X7NB
- Components: EQUIPMENT
- Summary: NO SUMMARY LISTED FOR ABOVE VEHICLE. *AK
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 1998-11-28
- VIN: 1ZVPT20CXN5
- Components: ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
- Summary: BATTERY FAILED. NLM
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2000-03-20
- VIN: 1ZVPT20CXN5
- Components: ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
- Summary: ALTERNATOR FAILED. NLM
1992 Ford Probe recalls
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has issued 3 recalls for different components of the 1992 Ford Probe.
- Manufacturer: FORD MOTOR COMPANY
- Components: SEAT BELTS:FRONT:WEBBING
- Summary: NOTE: PASSENGER SIDE (RIGHT) SEAT BELT ASSEMBLY. THE RAIL OF THE AUTOMATIC SHOULDER BELT CAN WEAR SUFFICIENTLY SUCH THAT THE CABLE WHICH RETRACTS THE BUCKLE ASSEMBLY WILL BECOME JAMMED IN THE RAIL RENDERING THE SHOULDER BELT INOPERATIVE.
- Consequence: IN THE EVENT OF A VEHICLE CRASH, THE OCCUPANT WOULD NOT BE ADEQUATELY RESTRAINED INCREASING THE RISK OF PERSONAL INJURY.
- Remedy: DEALERS WILL REPLACE DRIVER SIDE AND INOPERATIVE PASSENGER SIDE SHOULDER BELT TRACK ASSEMBLIES.
- Manufacturer: FORD MOTOR COMPANY
- Components: SEAT BELTS:FRONT:WEBBING
- Summary: NOTE: DRIVER'S SIDE (LEFT) PASSIVE SEAT BELT ASSEMBLY. THE RAIL OF THE AUTOMATIC SHOULDER BELT CAN WEAR SUFFICIENTLY SUCH THAT THE CABLE WHICH RETRACTS THE BUCKLE ASSEMBLY WILL BECOME JAMMED IN THE RAIL RENDERING THE SHOULDER BELT INOPERATIVE.
- Consequence: IN THE EVENT OF A VEHICLE CRASH, THE OCCUPANT WOULD NOT BE ADEQUATELY RESTRAINED INCREASING THE RISK OF PERSONAL INJURY.
- Remedy: DEALERS WILL REPLACE DRIVER SIDE AND INOPERATIVE PASSENGER SIDE SHOULDER BELT TRACK ASSEMBLIES.
- Manufacturer: MIDAS INTERNATIONAL CORP.
- Components: SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC:FOUNDATION COMPONENTS:DRUM:DRUM
- Summary: THE GROOVE FOR THE REAR WHEEL BEARING RETAINER RING WAS INCORRECTLY MACHINED.
- Consequence: IF THE RETAINING RING DOES NOT SIT CORRECTLY IN THEGROOVE, THE AXLE LUG NUTS WILL BREAK, CAUSING THE BRAKE DRUM, WHEEL, AND TIREASSEMBLY TO SEPARATE FROM THE VEHICLE.
- Remedy: MIDAS SHOPS WILL REPLACE THE BRAKE DRUMS WITH OTHER BRAKE DRUMS FROM ANOTHER SUPPLIER.
Negative 1992 Ford Probe car reviews
Positive 1992 Ford Probe car reviews
-
I've had my car for 4.5 years now and it hasn't had any problems, which is a testament to its true performance. With its APC dual 4
-
I have driven this car from coast to coast in hard rain, snow and all kinds of weather and altitude. It has always performed well and has even served as a sleeper under the hatchback with the back seats down in a pinch. The all-around windows make air conditioning a necessity in hot weather driving, and the heater is just as important in high altitudes and cold weather. It's a wonder to drive. As I get older, I look forward to fewer trips across the US.
-
Great car with the Ford name, but mostly made by Mazda. For a car as old as it was, it ran well and smooth. Good stuff.
-
This is the third probe I've had and I loved them all, but this 3.0 has to be the best. It has just enough power and rides like a dream. I am a total Ford Probe fan and would definitely buy another.
-
This car has been incredibly reliable. It runs very well and is a joy to drive. Despite having 115,000 miles on it, it still feels like it's brand new. I am absolutely thrilled with this purchase!
Additional sources
More sources of information about 1992 Ford Probe problems:
Ford Probe Problems and Complaints - 7 Issues
Top Ford Probe Problems · Engine Runs Rough, Stalls, Hesitates on Acceleration, Hard Starting, Poor Performance · Ticking Noise from Engine, Stalling, Rough ...
Ford Probe Problems: Expert Q&A on 1996 SE Transmission & More
Sep 28, 2010 ... 1996 ford probe SE transmission problems or something else - Answered by a verified Ford Mechanic.
1997 Ford Probe Problems and Complaints - 4 Issues
Top 1997 Ford Probe Problems · Engine Runs Rough, Stalls, Hesitates on Acceleration, Hard Starting, Poor Performance · Head Lights may Open and Close on their own ...
1993 Ford Probe / Mazda 2.0 - No spark | Mazda MX-6 Forum
Dec 6, 2010 ... Now, I have a '92 MX-3 and a very frequent problem for no spark situations is the distributor, or rather the electronic goodies inside, go bad.
Ford Probe? Reliability? | The Ranger Station
My questions would be, do any of you guys know of any common problems with either of these cars, and what are you opinions of them? Also, if you ...
Other years of Ford Probe
Are you having problems with your 1992 Ford Probe?
Levi Schumm 2024-10-22
Although my 92 Probe has required several repairs and replacements, including front brakes, tie rods, struts, strut plates, air conditioning fan, $2 headlight relay (after $100 of diagnostics), e-brake cable, CV axles, and a transmission flush, I have been able to find the necessary parts either through special order or from a junkyard. While it is true that Ford no longer manufactures Probe parts and that older models may have similar issues, I have been able to maintain my car's reliability through proper maintenance and care. It is important to note that any car, regardless of make or model, may require repairs and replacements over time. With the right attention and care, the Probe can still be a reliable car.
Raul Prohaska 2024-06-25
Hi there! I noticed that you mentioned you've owned your car for two years and have spent $2500 on it, but are still experiencing a burning oil problem. That sounds frustrating! Have you considered taking it to a trusted mechanic for a second opinion?
Tate Roberts 2024-01-16
This car has been with me for over two years now, ever since my grandma gave it to me for my 16th birthday. It has been a pretty good car overall, but I did have to replace the muffler and brake pads twice. Although I wish it had a V6 engine for better acceleration on the highway, it's still a nice little sporty car to have. The right front blinker has gone out randomly a few times, which can be annoying, but I know it's not the bulb, it's something in the wiring. The sound system could be better, but other than that, it's been pretty reliable. All in all, I'm grateful for this car and the memories it has helped me create.