2001 Chevrolet Tracker problems
The Chevrolet Tracker, formerly the Geo Tracker, is a mini SUV produced for Chevrolet and Geo by CAMI Automotive in Ingersoll, Ontario. Although appearing as a compact SUV, the Tracker was actually certified as a light truck due to its off-road capabilities and body on frame construction. The Tracker was produced under many brands in several different editions and in many countries.
First generation
The Geo Tracker was a mini SUV introduced in late 1988 as a 1989 model. It was developed by CAMI which was a joint venture between General Motors of Canada and Suzuki. North American models were to be built in CAMI's Ingersoll, Ontario, Canada plant alongside its almost identical twin, the domestic-built Suzuki Sidekick (Escudo). Nearly all 1989 and some 1990 Trackers were built in Japan and imported to the US because of delays at the CAMI factory in Canada. In late 1989, production began in Ingersoll with about 6,100 Geo Trackers finished, with annual production projected to be around 200,000 units. In the beginning, all Canadian-made Trackers were sent to the United States to circumvent the 25 percent Chicken Tax; the Canadian market was supplied entirely from Japan. Suzuki Sidekicks were added to the production line during 1990.
The Tracker was originally powered by Suzuki's 1.6L SOHC four-cylinder engine producing 80 hp (60 kW). The trim levels in 1989 were base convertible, base two-door hardtop, two-door XL bed, and LSi hardtop. LSi equipment included air conditioner, chrome rally wheels, intermittent wipers, rear window wiper/washer, spare tire cover, three-speed GM Turbo-Hydramatic 180 automatic transmission, tinted glass, and special red/black front and rear bucket seats. In 1990 the LSi trim was made available on the convertible models also. All Trackers were four-wheel drive until a base two-wheel drive convertible was introduced in 1992. The two-door hardtop models were available until 1995 when they were discontinued to make way for the four-door hardtop wagon that was to be introduced the following year. The two-door XL bed was a North America only edition which came with four more inches in the rear and a sealed two door cab. Although Suzuki started importing four-door Sidekicks in 1991, CAMI did not start producing them until the 1996 model year, when America got a four-door Geo Tracker, now powered by Suzuki's G16B 16-valve 1.6L boasting 96 hp (72 kW). In 1997, the Geo nameplate was merged back into Chevrolet and all Geo models, including the Tracker, Tracker XL, and all subsequent editions were rebadged as Chevrolet in 1998.
The Tracker was different from most other light SUVs on the market in that it is based on a rugged light-truck chassis and certified as a light truck. Although it appeared to be a comfortable passenger SUV, it was bolstered by a sturdy off-road four-wheel-drive system with a conventional light truck engine and transmission coupled to a hi-lo, 2-4 transfer case. The Tracker had a strong front suspension with a rugged recirculating ball steering box. The conventional front differential was rigidly mounted ahead of the engine, with CV axles connecting the coil-spring front hubs to the differential case. The rear axle was a conventional light truck unit on coil springs. As a result of the truck-like underpinnings, the Tracker had a fairly truck-like ride, but the benefit was its notable durability in harsh conditions.
The production of the first-generation model of the Tracker (and Sidekick) came to an end in Ontario after 1998 in order to make way for the second generation of Tracker/Vitara. However, the first generation Sidekick continued in production in other countries until 2004.
Social links
Common 2001 Chevrolet Tracker problems
The 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is known to have several common problems based on complaints from its owners. Here are some of the most frequently reported issues:
- Hissing noise and shifting problems: Some Tracker owners have reported a hissing noise when starting the car and issues with shifting gears smoothly. This can be caused by a variety of issues, including problems with the throttle body fuel injection system or the transmission.
- Headlights and heater fan turning on with no key: Some Tracker owners have reported that their headlights and heater fan turn on by themselves, even with no key in the ignition. This can be a sign of an electrical issue or a problem with the ignition switch.
- Gearbox problems: Many Tracker owners have reported issues with the gearbox, including problems with shifting gears smoothly and a loud noise coming from the gearbox. Some have reported needing to replace the entire gearbox due to these issues.
- Error code 89: Some Tracker owners have reported seeing error code 89 on their dashboard, accompanied by an audible alarm. The cause of this issue is not yet known, and no solution has been found.
- Engine stuck: Some Tracker owners have reported that their engine becomes stuck and will not respond when trying to start the car. This can be caused by a variety of issues, including problems with the ignition system or the fuel system.
It is important to note that these issues are based on complaints from Tracker owners and may not be representative of all 2001 Chevrolet Trackers. If you are experiencing any of these issues with your Tracker, it is recommended that you take it to a qualified mechanic for further diagnosis and repair.
Is Chevrolet Tracker a good car?
Recent Reviews
Good looking and very practical car for everday driving. It does not have that lot of features compared to others but it gives you the amenity you need - comfort, safety, fuel economy, speed and power and you look handsome while you're driving the car. Tracker is the most macho crossover in the road.
What kind of engine does a 2001 Chevy Tracker have?
Retail Price
| Engine | 2.0L I-4, 2.5L V-6 |
|---|---|
| Transmission | 4-spd auto w/OD, 5-spd man w/OD |
| Power | 127 - 155 hp |
| Drivetrain | four-wheel, rear-wheel |
| Curb Weight | 2,690 - 2,987 lbs |
What happened to Chevy Tracker?
On January 27, 2004, production of the Chevrolet Tracker was discontinued at the CAMI plant in Ingersoll, Ontario, and replaced with the Chevrolet Equinox.
What year did they stop making Chevy trackers?
Production of the Chevrolet Tracker ended after the 2004. 11 years after the last Tracker was sold, Chevrolet re-entered the compact utility vehicle market with the Trax crossover.
Is Chevrolet Tracker a good car?
Recent Reviews
Good looking and very practical car for everday driving. It does not have that lot of features compared to others but it gives you the amenity you need - comfort, safety, fuel economy, speed and power and you look handsome while you're driving the car. Tracker is the most macho crossover in the road.
What happened to Chevy Tracker?
On January 27, 2004, production of the Chevrolet Tracker was discontinued at the CAMI plant in Ingersoll, Ontario, and replaced with the Chevrolet Equinox.
Why won't my Chevy Tracker start?
The most common reasons a Chevrolet Tracker won't start are a dead battery, an alternator problem, or failed starter.
What kind of motor is in a Chevy Tracker?
CHEVROLET Tracker 1.8L AWD 6AT (140 HP)
| ENGINE SPECS - 1.8L AWD 6AT (140 HP) | |
|---|---|
| Cylinders: | 4 |
| Displacement: | 1796 cm3 |
| Power: | 103 KW @ 6300 RPM 140 HP @ 6300 RPM 138 BHP @ 6300 RPM |
| Torque: | 131 lb-ft @ 3800 RPM 178 Nm @ 3800 RPM |
2001 Chevrolet Tracker car problems categorized by type of issue
After analyzing all complaints sent to the NHTSA and researching popular Chevrolet Tracker problems, we found that the most common problems with these 2023 model year vehicles are:
- Structure problems
- Engine and engine cooling problems
- Steering problems
- Suspension problems
- Air bags problems
The graph below shows statistics for all 2001 Chevrolet Tracker vehicle components and the number of complaints received.
Latest 25 complaints 2001 Chevrolet Tracker
The NHTSA has received 88 complaints about various vehicle components related to the 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. Below are the 25 most recent complaints reported for 2001 Chevrolet Tracker vehicles.
CHILD SEAT PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2024-06-21
- Components: CHILD SEAT
- Summary: The contact owns a Graco Safety Seat, Model Number: 2203450, Model Type: N/A manufactured 04/11/2024. The contact stated that the safety seat was being used in a 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. The contact stated that while attempting to remove her [XXX]granddaughter from the safety seat, the chest clip was stuck and failed to release from the chest buckle, causing the contact to maneuver and to slide her granddaughter out of the safety seat. The manufacturer was not notified of the failure. The safety seat was not replaced. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)
STEERING PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2019-11-01
- VIN: 2CNBE13C416
- Components: STEERING
- Summary: INSIDE TIE ROD END DO NOT LINE UP PROPERLY WITH OUTSIDE TIE ROD ENDS ARE FINE AND IN A SHARP TURN IT CAUSE THE FRONT TO SHAKE VERY BAD I CAN LIFT 300 LB AND IT TOOK EVERYTHING I HAD TO CONTROL IT FROM ROLLING OVER. MECHANIC SAID I MUSCLED THE METAL IN TO PLACE AND DAMAGE BOTH INSIDE TIE RODS ENDS ONLY. I HAVE NO REPLACED THEM YET NOT SURE WHAT TO DO. I IF I HAD NOT BEEN STRONG ENOUGH TO BEND THE MEDAL THERE WOULD HAVE BEEN A WRECK. I BEEN KNOW BREAK AND BEND PARTS LIKE THIS BEFORE.
SUSPENSION PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2017-03-28
- VIN: 2CNBJ734516
- Components: SUSPENSION
- Summary: PASSENGER FRONT LOWER CONTROL ARM MOUNTING BRACKET HAS DETACHED FROM THE FRONT CROSSMEMBER. HAPPENED TODAY MARCH 28TH 2017. VEHICLE WAS ORIGINALLY SOLD AND DRIVEN IN NORTH MISSOURI. DOES HAVE CONSIDERABLE RUST, BUT DIDN'T KNOW THE SUSPENSION MOUNTING POINT WOULD BREAK FREE? I WAS A FEW BLOCKS FROM MY RESIDENCE WHEN IT HAPPENED AND NO INJURIES OCCURRED. IT HAPPENED ON NORTH SIDE DR. IN FORT WORTH,TX. OVERCAST, DRY PAVEMENT ON TRAFFIC. I HIT BUMPS ON RAILROAD CROSSING AND QUITE A FEW POTHOLES.
ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2015-04-15
- Fire: 1
- VIN: 2CNBJ634616
- Components: ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING
- Summary: TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2001 CHEVROLET TRACKER. WHILE DRIVING AT APPROXIMATELY 35 MPH, OIL LEAKED FROM THE VEHICLE. THE CONTACT ALSO NOTICED WHITE SMOKE COMING FROM THE ENGINE AND SMELLED A STRONG OIL ODOR. THE FAILURE RECURRED NUMEROUS TIMES. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT DIAGNOSED OR REPAIRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOT NOTIFIED OF THE FAILURE. THE APPROXIMATE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 94,000. UPDATED 02/12/16*LJ THE CONSUMER STATED THE VALVE COVERS LEAKED OIL ONTO THE EXHAUST AND CAUSED SMOKE TO EMIT FROM THE ENGINE. UPDATED 03/07/16.*JB
SUSPENSION PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2015-04-15
- VIN: 2CNBJ734616
- Components: SUSPENSION
- Summary: MY MECHANIC ADVISED ME THAT THE FRONT SUSPENSION CROSS MEMBER IS RUSTED TO THE POINT THE IT WILL SNAP OFF. WHEN I MAKE A RIGHT HAND TURN OR GO OVER BUMPS I CAN HEAR CRACKING NOISES. CONTACTED CHEVY (GM) WAS ADVISED THAT I AM 4 YEARS TOO LATE IN CONTACTING THEM. ASKED ABOUT THE RECALL, THEY TOLD ME IT WAS A SILENT RECALL. AND BECAUSE I LIVE IN A STATE THAT HAS SNOW AND ICE THIS CONTRIBUTED TO THE PROBLEM. I ADVISED THAT IS THIS IS THE CASE THEN EVERY CAR IN THIS STATE WOULD HAVE THE SAME PROBLEM. FOLLOWING IS FROM GM'S WEBSITE: " FRONT SUSPENSION CROSS MEMBER DID NOT RECEIVE ADEQUATE CORROSION PROTECTION. THE RESULT OF THIS CONDITION MAY BE MOST NOTICEABLE ON VEHICLES DRIVEN IN AREAS WHERE RUST IS MOST COMMON, SUCH AS AREAS WHERE SALT IS USED TO CONTROL SNOW AND ICE. THE CORROSION MAY ADVANCE AND CAUSE RUST-THROUGH PERFORATION OF THE CROSS MEMBER IN THE AREA OF THE LEFT OR RIGHT FRONT LOWER CONTROL ARM ATTACHMENT BRACKETS. AS THE CORROSION PROGRESSES THE CROSS MEMBER WILL BECOME THINNER AND THE ATTACHMENT BRACKETS AND THE PERFORATIONS WILL GROW IN SIZE. IF THERE ARE SUBSTANTIAL AMOUNT OF PERFORATIONS, THE LEFT AND RIGHT FRONT LOWER CONTROL ARM ATTACHMENT BRACKETS WILL BECOME WEAKENED AND BEGIN TO FLEX. IF THIS OCCURS, THE CUSTOMER MAY NOTICE FRONT TIRE WOBBLE, STEERING LOOSENESS, VEHICLE PULL TO ONE SIDE, FRONT END NOISES (CLUNK, BANG, RATTLE, ETC) VEHICLE SHAKING, OR STEERING WHEEL ROTATION WHEN SHIFTING FROM REVERSE TO DRIVE AND DRIVE TO REVERSE.
SUSPENSION PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2011-06-10
- VIN: 2CNBJ18C116
- Components: SUSPENSION
- Summary: IN JUNE 2011, CAR WAS ALMOST 10 YRS. OLD AND HAD 99,919 MILES ON IT. BROUGHT IT TO DEALER FOR 100,000 MILE TUNE-UP AND OTHER WORK. ASKED THEM TO CHECK OUT ENTIRE CAR, AND SAW BANNERS FOR 24 POINT INSPECTION IF I ADDED TIRE ROTATION...SO I DID. IN SEPT. 2014 (CARS 13 YEARS OLD AND HAS 113, 000 MILES ON IT) I'M TOLD THAT FRONT SUSPENSION CROSSMEMBER WILL NEED TO BE REPLACED (SOON). WHEN I WENT ONLINE TO FIND THE PART, FIRST SITE I SEE TELLS ME ABOUT GM'S "SPECIAL WARRANTY" ON THAT PART. I CHECK MY DEALER RECEIPT AND REALIZE THE RUSTED PART SHOULD'VE BEEN REPLACED, FOR FREE, BACK IN 2011. NOW, IT'S ACTUALLY BUSTED THROUGH AND CAN NOT BE DRIVEN SAFELY. CONTACTED GM/DEALER, CAR WAS TOWED TO DEALER AND BACK HOME. GM/DEALER WILL NOT PAY FOR REPLACEMENT BECAUSE ALL THAT RUST HAPPENED IN THE LAST 3 (ISH) YEARS, NOT IN THE CLOSE TO 10 YEARS IT WAS DRIVEN FOR CLOSE TO 100,000 MILES ON CHICAGO AREA STREETS WHICH ARE HEAVILY SALTED. THE STREETS UP HERE ARE SANDED AND IN THE LAST 3 (ISH) YEARS I'VE ONLY PUT ANOTHER 13,000 MILES ON THE CAR. NEVER SEEN THE INSIDE OF A GARAGE SO 'PARKED' CONDITIONS ARE THE SAME IN BOTH AREAS. I HAVE FILED A COMPLAINT W/THE BBB SO WE'LL SEE HOW FAR THAT GETS ME. FILING THIS COMPLAINT BECAUSE GM'S ANSWER TO MY QUESTION OF WHY IT WASN'T REPLACED IN 2011 WAS THAT "DEALERS ARE NOT REQUIRED TO TELL CUSTOMERS ABOUT SPECIAL WARRANTY PARTS". SERIOUSLY??? *TR
STRUCTURE PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2014-10-19
- VIN: 2CNBJ13C216
- Components: STRUCTURE
- Summary: MY FRONT SUSPENSION CROSSMEMBER COMPLETELY CORRODED AND CRACKED IN HALF MAKING MY CAR NOT DRIVABLE. I LOCATED THE SPECIAL COVERAGE PROGRAM ONLINE AS THIS APPEARED TO BE A COMMON OCCURRENCE. I AM THE 2ND OWNER. I PURCHASED THIS CAR FROM A WOMAN WHO RESIDES IN ASSISTED LIVING AND HAD BEEN IN ASSISTED LIVING SINCE THE SPECIAL COVERAGE NOTICE. AS SHE DID NOT HAVE A DRIVER'S LICENSE, THIS VEHICLE SAT IN HER GARAGE WITHOUT THE NEEDED REPAIR COVERED BY GM UNTIL HER FAMILY SOLD IT TO ME IN JUNE. AFTER A 90MIN CALL WITH A GM REP 10/20/14, I SPOKE WITH GM SUPVR [XXX] WHO ASSURED ME GM WOULD COVER COST TO TOW TO THE CLOSEST DEALERSHIP AS WELL AS COVER THE REPAIR. HE LEFT A VMAIL FOR THE DEALER BUT DID NOT SPECIFY THIS OFFER. I LEFT 5 UNRETURNED VMAILS FOR [XXX] UNTIL I SPOKE WITH SUPVR [XXX] 10/22/14. [XXX] ADV SHE WOULD HAVE HER DIRECT REPORT MAY PLACE A REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION STATING THIS WOULD NEED TO BE APPROVED AND [XXX] SHOULD NOT HAVE PROMISED TO COVER THIS REPAIR. 10/27/14 [XXX] 866-760-5700 [XXX] CALLED AND VERY CURTLY ADVISED THIS WILL NOT BE COVERED AND SARCASTICALLY REMINDED ME OF THE EXPIRATION OF SAID "SPECIAL COVERAGE." I REQUESTED [XXX] SUPERVISOR AND [XXX] ADVISED "LET ME TELL YOU WHAT HE WILL SAY..HE WILL SAY 'NO'.." I ASKED FOR [XXX] SUPERVISOR AGAIN AND WAS TOLD SHE WOULD HAVE THAT PERSON CALL ME. 10/30/14 AS I HAVE NOT RECEIVED A CALL BACK I CALLED GM AND AFTER 21MIN I WAS DIRECTED TO ANOTHER REP. [XXX]. 16MIN LATER I WAS TOLD BY [XXX] SHE WOULD HAVE [XXX] SUPVR [XXX] CALL ME WITHIN THE NEXT 48HRS. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6). *TR
SUSPENSION PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2014-10-19
- VIN: 2CNBJ13C216
- Components: SUSPENSION
- Summary: WHILE BACKING UP OUT OF MY DRIVEWAY, I HEARD AN ODD SOUND AND THE VEHICLE PULLED TO THE LEFT. I STOPPED THE CAR AND WAS TOLD BY MY SON TO NOT DRIVE IT UNTIL HE LOOKED AT IT. I AM 77YR AND HE WAS WORRIED ABOUT HIS MOTHER GETTING INTO AN ACCIDENT. MY SON SAID THE FRONT SUSPENSION CROSSMEMBER RUSTED IN HALF AND THE CAR WAS NOT DRIVABLE. I HAVE CONTACTED GM AT 800-222-1020 BASED ON THE NHTSA ACTION NUMBER : EA06018. THE REPRESENTATIVE TOLD ME THERE WAS NO RECALL FOR THIS PART, HOWEVER YOUR WEBSITE CONTRADICTS THAT STATEMENT. YOU HAVE MY PERMISSION TO SPEAK WITH [XXX] REGARDING THIS MATTER. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6). *TR
AIR BAGS PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2007-04-23
- Number Of Injuries: 2
- Crash: 1
- Components: AIR BAGS
- Summary: I WAS T BONED, A LADY RAN A STOP SIGN HITTING MY CAR I WAS PASSENGER, BUT IT WAS MY VEHICLE. I NEED UP ON THE DASH BOARD WHEN THE FIREMEN AND EMT GO ON THE SCENE THEY TOLD US TO LEAN THE SEATS ALL THE WAY BACK INCASE THE AIR BAGS LATER DEPLOYED AND THEY NEVER DID! I ENDED UP GETTING 2 BACK SURGERIES DUE TO THAT ACCIDENT ON4/23/07 IN MY 2001 CHEVY TRACKER WHICH THE AIRBAGS NEVER WENT ACTIVE AND IT WAS A BAD IMPACT! THERE WAS A POLICE REPORT MADE OF THE ACCIDENT AS WELL. *TR
ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING,SEAT BELTS,STRUCTURE,SERVICE BRAKES PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2014-05-09
- VIN: 2CNBJ18C516
- Components: ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING,SEAT BELTS,STRUCTURE,SERVICE BRAKES
- Summary: THE ENTIRE UNDERCARRIAGE HAS ROTTED, INCLUDING THE BRAKE LINES, OIL LINES AND ANTIFREEZE COOLANT LINES. I DO NOT BELIEVE THIS IS NORMAL FOR ANY CAR, EVEN THOUGH THE CAR IS 12 YEARS OLD. IT WAS HAPPENING TO THE PREVIOUS OWNER BUT HE WAS RELUCTANT TO REPORT IT...I AM NOT. I HAVE OWNED THE CAR ONLY FOR ABOUT 4 MONTHS NOW. I HAVE HAD TO REPLACE SOME OF THE COOLANT LINES AND SOME OF THE BRAKE LINES. NOW THE OIL LINES ARE LEAKING HEAVILY AND I AM GOING TO HAVE TO HAVE THEM REPLACED AS WELL. ALSO, THE PREVIOUS OWNER SAID THAT WHEN A PASSENGER TRIED TO USE THE SEAT BELT IT COMPLETELY LOCKED UP ON THE FRONT PASSENGER SIDE. I HAVE NOT BEEN ABLE TO HAVE A PASSENGER IN THE FRONT SEAT BECAUSE IT IS ILLEGAL TO HAVE A PASSENGER RIDE WITHOUT A SEAT BELT. I FEEL THAT THE CAR SHOULD B E REPAIRED BY GENERAL MOTORS SINCE I FEEL THE STEEL USED IN BUILDING THIS CAR WAS NOT PROPERLY COATED, THEREBY CAUSING THIS SEVERE DETERIORATION OF THE UNDERCARRIAGE. I HAD TO BE TOWED WHEN THE BRAKES FAILED GOING DOWN RT. 739 IN PENNSYLVANIA, JUST BEFORE A HUGE HILL/DOWNGRADE IN THE ROADWAY. NOW THE COOLANT LINES ARE LEAKING DUE TO RUST AND SO ARE THE OIL LINES. *TR
SEAT BELTS PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2013-02-21
- VIN: 2CNBJ13C316
- Components: SEAT BELTS
- Summary: TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2001 CHEVROLET TRACKER. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE WEBBING FOR BOTH FRONT SEAT BELTS FAILED TO EXTEND ENOUGH TO SECURE OVER THE OCCUPANTS BODY. IN 2003, THE VEHICLE WAS REPAIRED UNDER NHTSA CAMPAIGN ID NUMBER 01V124000 (SEAT BELTS). THE FAILURE RECURRED AND THE VEHICLE WAS NOT FURTHER REPAIRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOTIFIED OF THE PROBLEM. THE APPROXIMATE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 111,000. *TR
STEERING,SUSPENSION,STRUCTURE PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2013-11-12
- VIN: 2CNBJ18C016
- Components: STEERING,SUSPENSION,STRUCTURE
- Summary: 2001 CHEVY TRACKER WITH RUSTED FRONT CROSS MEMBER. THE CROSS MEMBER RUSTED AND BROKE LEAVING THE LOWER A ARM DISCONNECT FROM THE FRAME ON ONE END. THIS CAUSES AN UNCONTROLLABLE SHAKE AND TOTALLY OUT OF CONTROL. THIS IS EXTREMELY DANGEROUS, ESPECIALLY AT HIGHWAY SPEEDS. I CONTACTED A CHEVY DEALER AND ALSO GENERAL MOTORS AND WAS TOLD THAT THERE IS NOTHING THAT CAN BE DONE BECAUSE THE SPECIAL COVERAGE OFFER HAD EXPIRED. THE SPECIAL COVERAGE WAS FOR 10 YEARS OR 150,000 MILES. MY TRACKER HAS 59,450 MILES BUT WAS REJECTED BECAUSE OF A TIME LIMIT. I WAS NEVER SENT A NOTICE BECAUSE I WAS NOT THE ORIGINAL OWNER AND DIDN'T BUY IT FROM A GM DEALER. GM COULD HAVE QUERIED EACH STATE'S REGISTRATION DATABASES FOR OWNERSHIP. I WAS TOLD BY GM THAT I COULD HAVE BROUGHT IT IN AND HAD IT INSPECTED. HOW WOULD I HAVE KNOWN TO BRING IT IN FOR INSPECTION IF I AM UNAWARE THAT A POTENTIAL STRUCTURAL PROBLEM EXIST. THIS IS A STRUCTURAL ITEM THAT SHOULD OUTLAST THE DRIVE LINE AND BODY ... TO LIMIT IT BY TIME OR MILEAGE IS ABSURD AND SHRUGGING RESPONSIBILITY. THE VERY LAST THING THAT SHOULD FAIL IS THE STRUCTURE. I ARGUED THAT IT IS A FACTORY DEFECT AND SHOULD HAVE NO TIME LIMIT BECAUSE IT IS A STRUCTURAL ITEM WHICH WHEN FAILED COULD CAUSE AN ACCIDENT AND POSSIBLE DEATH AND PROPERTY DAMAGE. AND I FEEL THAT THE FACTORY SHOULD BE LIABLE FOR THE ENTIRE LIFE OF THE VEHICLE. IF IT IS OTHERWISE ROAD WORTHY AND MEETS STATE INSPECTION THEN THE SPECIAL COVERAGE SHOULD APPLY. IT IS THE FACTORY'S RESPONSIBILITY TO PROVIDE SAFE VEHICLES. WITH A COMPUTER MODEL, KNOWING THE GRADE OF STEEL, THE THICKNESS OF THE STEEL ONE CAN CALCULATE THE APPROXIMATE TIME IT WOULD TAKE TO RUST THROUGH. THIS IS WHY THERE SHOULD BE NO TIME LIMIT FOR RESPONSIBILITY. *TR
STRUCTURE PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2013-02-02
- VIN: 2CNBJ13C216
- Components: STRUCTURE
- Summary: KEEP WRITING FRAME UNDER PARTS BUT IT KEEPS DISSAPPEARING. THE LAST ACT IS THE MOTOR MOUNT RUSTING THROUGH DROPING THE ENGINE AND PUTTING A HOLE IN THE OIL PAN. THE WHOLE UNDERSIDE OF THE VEHICLE HAS RUSTED. THE CROSSMEMBER DID AND WAS REPLACED.BUT THE REST OF THE FRAME HAS ALSO RUSTED. THE MIDDLE SUPPORT FOR THE CAR IS ALMOST COMPLETELY GONE. THE OIL PAN WAS REPLACED WHEN IT RUSTED THOUGH. ALL BRAKE AND TRANNY LINES ARE FAILING. REAR END COVER ALMOST IS RUSTED THROUGH AND IS LEAKING. OTHER SUPPORTS AND JOINTS ARE FAILING ALONG WITH THE BACK BUMPER. BOTH ROCKER PANELS UNDER THE FRONT DOORS ARE RUSTED THROUGH. IT WOULD BE EASIER WRITING WHAT IS NOT RUSTED. HAVE BEEN A CHEVY OWNER ALL THE TIME DRIVING, THEY SOLD IT EVEN THOUGH SOMEONE ELSE MADE IT STAND BY IT. *TR
SUSPENSION PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2012-01-02
- VIN: 2CNBJ13C816
- Components: SUSPENSION
- Summary: TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2001 CHEVROLET TRACKER. THE CONTACT STATED THAT WHILE DRIVING 45 MPH, THE VEHICLE STARTED TO SHAKE AND WOBBLE FROM SIDE TO SIDE WITHOUT WARNING. THE BRAKES WERE APPLIED AND THE CONTACT WAS ABLE TO PULL OVER. THE VEHICLE WAS THEN TAKEN TO AN AUTOMOTIVE SHOP WHERE IT WAS DIAGNOSED THAT THE SUSPENSION CROSS MEMBER WAS RUSTED COMPLETELY. THE DEALER WAS CONTACTED AND THEY DID NOT ACKNOWLEDGE THE FAILURE DUE TO THE AGE AND MILEAGE OF THE VEHICLE. THE VEHICLE WAS REPAIRED WITH A NEW SUSPENSION CROSS MEMBER AND CONTROL BUSHING. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 113,000 AND THE CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 113,925.
STRUCTURE PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2011-03-31
- VIN: 2CNBJ634216
- Components: STRUCTURE
- Summary: TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 2001 CHEVROLET TRACKER. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE FRONT END OF THE FRAME EXHIBITED SIGNIFICANT RUST AND CORROSION. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO AN INDEPENDENT MECHANIC WHERE THEY WELDED THE DAMAGED FRAME FOR A TEMPORARY REPAIR AND ADVISED THAT THE VEHICLE WAS NOT SAFE TO DRIVE. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS APPROXIMATELY 100,000. UPDATED 07/08/11
SUSPENSION,POWER TRAIN PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2001-10-10
- VIN: 2CNBJ634516
- Components: SUSPENSION,POWER TRAIN
- Summary: TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 2001 CHEVROLET TRACKER. THE CONTACT NOTICED THAT THE REAR AXLE WAS LEAKING. THE DEALER WAS NOTIFIED, BUT OFFERED NO ASSISTANCE. THE MANUFACTURER WAS CONTACTED AND ALSO OFFERED NO ASSISTANCE. THE VEHICLE WAS REPAIRED BY AN AUTHORIZED DEALER. THE CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 14,597. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 608. UPDATED 01/11/2011. *LJ UPDATED 2/17/11 *CN THE CONSUMER STATED THE RIGHT REAR AXLE SEAL HAS BEEN REPLACED THREE TIMES AND HAS FAILED AGAIN SINCE THE VEHICLE WAS NEW. UPDATED 08/31/11. *JB
STRUCTURE PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2010-05-30
- VIN: 2CNBJ634316
- Components: STRUCTURE
- Summary: I PURCHASED A 2001 CHEVROLET TRACKER LT USED WITH 109K MILES. THE VEHICLE WAS SOLD TO ME BY A DEALERSHIP WITHOUT SAFETY INSPECTION STICKERS. I TOOK THE VEHICLE TO MY MECHANIC TO HAVE IT INSPECTED AND WAS TOLD THE FRAME WAS ROTTED, INCLUDING THE FRONT FRAME, SUSPENSION AND SIDE ROCKER PANELS. THE DEALERSHIP DID NOT DISCLOSE THE DAMAGE TO ME AND REFUSES TO REFUND THE COST OF THE VEHICLE OR MAKE THE REPAIRS. I AM CURRENTLY TRYING TO HAVE THE ISSUE MEDIATED BY THE PA STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE. I AM ALSO AWARE THAT CHEVROLET HAS A SAFETY NOTICE ON THE FRONT SUSPENSION OF 2001-2003 CHEVY TRACKERS INDICATING THAT THE FRONT SUSPENSION MAY RUST AND SEPARATE FROM THE VEHICLE. THE INSPECTION PERIOD ON MY VEHICLE IS EXPIRED AND THE VEHICLE IS UNSAFE TO DRIVE.
STEERING PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2010-08-18
- VIN: 1G1YY32GX15
- Components: STEERING
- Summary: TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 2001 CHEVROLET CORVETTE. THE CONTACT STATED THAT HE TOOK THE VEHICLE IN FOR RECALL NHTSA CAMPAIGN ID NUMBER: 04V060000 COMPONENT: STEERING:COLUMN LOCKING:ANTI-THEFT DEVICE. THE VEHICLE WAS SERVICED FOR THIS RECALL IN 2008 AND NOW THE FAILURE HAS RECURRED. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THIS IS A SAFETY ISSUE DUE TO THE FACT THAT THE REMEDY FOR A SAFETY ISSUE FAILED CREATING THE SAME SAFETY CONDITION. THE FAILURE AND CURRENT MILEAGES WERE 27,000. UPDATED 12/22/10. *LJ
TIRES PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2008-02-01
- Number Of Injuries: 1
- Crash: 1
- VIN: 2CNBJ634316
- Components: TIRES
- Summary: 2001 CHEVROLET TRACKER, EXPERIENCED A TIRE FAILURE AND DROVE OFF THE ROADWAY AND STRUCK A FENCE BEFORE OVERTURNING INTO A FIELD. *BF ACCORDING TO THE POLICE REPORT, THE LEFT REAR TIRE LOST TREAD. THE TIRE WAS STILL INFLATED WITH THE INTACT CASING ON THE WHEEL. THE DRIVER SUFFERED MINOR INJURIES TO HER RIGHT HAND AND THE LEFT SIDE OF HER NECK. (OHIO TRAFFIC CRASH REPORT # 10-0344-90)*JB UPDATED 08/05/10 *BF UPDATED 9/13/10 *CN THE CONSUMER STATED SAME INCIDENT HAPPENED IN MAY 2010 WITH THE LEFT REAR TIRE. UPDATED 09/15/10
STRUCTURE PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2010-05-20
- VIN: 2CNBJ13C316
- Components: STRUCTURE
- Summary: WE HAVE A 2001 CHEVY TRACKER WITH THE RUSTED CROSSMEMBER/SUBFRAME THAT CHEVROLET WON'T REPAIR. I THINK THIS IS DEFINITELY A SAFETY ISSUE. I CALLED CHEVY REPS. AND ALL I GOT WAS " WERE SORRY" BUT THE CAR IS 1200 MILES OVER THE LIMIT FOR REPAIRS. WE TOOK OURS TO OUR LOCAL MECHANIC FOR REGULAR MAINTENANCE AND THEY FOUND THE RUSTED CROSSMEMBER AND ADVISED US TO NOT DRIVE THE VEHICLE, IT WAS NOT SAFE. SO NOW WE WITHOUT A VERY NEEDED CAR. *TR
ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING,VISIBILITY PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2010-01-26
- VIN: 2CNBJ13CX16
- Components: ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING,VISIBILITY
- Summary: WHILE DRIVING WITHIN THE CITY IN WINTER, THE WINDSHIELD SUDDENLY BECAME FOGGED OVER AND THE SMELL OF COOLANT WAS NOTICED INSIDE THE VEHICLE. I WAS UNABLE TO SEE OUT THE WINDSHIELD AND HAD TO PULL OVER. AFTER PARKING I NOTICED A SMALL DRIP OF COOLANT UNDER THE CENTER CONSOLE. A LOCAL INDEPENDENT GARAGE FOUND THE HEATER CORE TO BE RUPTURED. THE HEATER CORE WAS REPLACED. *TR
AIR BAGS PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2010-01-03
- Crash: 1
- Components: AIR BAGS
- Summary: AIRBAG DID NOT DEPLOY ON CHEVY TRACKER 2001 AFTER BEING REAR ENDED AT 100 MPH WHILE TRAVELING AT A SPEED OF 69 MPH AND HIT THE CENTER DIVIDER HEAD ON. *TR
SUSPENSION,AIR BAGS PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2009-10-29
- Number Of Injuries: 1
- Crash: 1
- VIN: 2CNBJ734316
- Components: SUSPENSION,AIR BAGS
- Summary: 10/29/2009, 2001 TRACKER ZR2 MODEL, VEHICLE TRAVELING 50 MPH WITH A SLIGHT RIGHT HAND TURN IN ROAD, WEST BOUND ON HWY 26 FAR LEFT HAND LANE. HEARD A LOUD BANG, VEHICLE BECAME UNCONTROLLABLE, WENT INTO RIGHT HAND SPIN, CROSSED THREE LANES OF TRAFFIC AND HIT CONCRETE BARRICADE ON FAR RIGHT HAND OF HWY. DRIVER WAS SLAMMED INTO WINDOW AND SUSTAINED MINOR INJURIES, AIR BAGS DID NOT DEPLOY. INSPECTION OF VEHICLE REVEALS DAMAGE TO LEFT REAR FENDER, DOOR AND BOTH WHEELS. LOWER CONTROL ARM CAME LOOSE, STEERING ROD BROKE IN HALF AND DESTROYED THE RACK HOUSING. COULD HAVE DIED IN THIS ACCIDENT, SO VERY LUCKY HERE. *TR
AIR BAGS PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2009-02-01
- Number Of Injuries: 1
- Crash: 1
- VIN: 2CNBE634516
- Components: AIR BAGS
- Summary: DRIVER OF VEHICLE WHILE TRAVELING 35 MPH HIT A FORD F150 THAT MADE A U-TURN FROM THE RIGHT SHOULDER OF THE ROAD. DRIVER DID NOT HAVE TIME TO HIT BRAKES. AIRBAG DID NOT DEPLOY. DRIVER WAS INJURED. *TR
STRUCTURE PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2008-11-06
- Components: STRUCTURE
- Summary: THE CAR WAS STEERING FUNNY AND PULLING TO THE LEFT ESPECIALLY WHEN BRAKING. I HEARD A METAL BANG NOISE AT ONE POINT AND MADE AN APPOINTMENT TO HAVE IT CHECKED WHERE THE MECHANIC WAS SHOCKED TO FIND THE CROSSMEMBER SUBFRAME FRACTURED WHICH WOULD HAVE CERTAINLY LEAD TO A SERIOUS ACCIDENT AND I WAS "LUCKY" TO HAVE MADE IT TO THE GARAGE. *TR
Negative 2001 Chevrolet Tracker car reviews
Positive 2001 Chevrolet Tracker car reviews
-
Congratulations on your first car, a 2001 Chevy Tracker! It's amazing how convenient it is that you never have to touch the light switch. The SUV is incredibly sturdy, as evidenced by your recent accident where you hit a guardrail at 50 mph and went into a ditch. Despite the impact, your car suffered only minor damage and you were able to drive it to work just 5 miles away. In comparison, an Expedition that was involved in a similar accident just 400 yards up the road was undrivable. It's possible that the accident was caused by less than ideal tread depth on non LT tires. Thank you for sharing your experience with us!
-
I had a bit of a rough patch back in 2014 when I totaled my Pontiac and was without a car for 8 months. However, I was fortunate enough to land a teaching job an hour away and was able to purchase a Saturn to get me through until I could afford something better. In January 2015, I finally got my Tracker, and it was during a snowstorm in Wisconsin! I have to say, I absolutely love this car. It's reliable, great on gas, and the optional 4WD is a lifesaver in the winter (which is why I had to say goodbye to my Grand Am). It's also spacious and perfect for my 6'1
-
I bought this car used in '03 and have loved it ever since. Despite a few costly problems, it runs great and is a blast to drive. It's also easy to park and fun off-road. At around 30,000 miles, the master switch for the power windows broke, which cost almost $300 to replace. However, I managed to find one on Ebay for just $10! Recently, I had to replace the rear brakes, which set me back $700. Despite these issues, I plan to keep it for at least another 5 years.
-
I've had this little ZR2 for three years now and I still love it! I usually drive a manual, but after test driving three manuals and not finding the right fit, I opted for an automatic. I drive to and from Northern WI a lot and it handles the journey great. There have been a few minor issues, such as the master switch for power windows and locks breaking (which cost over $250 to replace), but I was able to find a replacement on Ebay for just $10! There was also a strange rattle noise coming from the engine compartment, but the dealership was able to replace it under warranty after a week. I plan on keeping it until it dies.
-
I bought my 2001 Tracker 4x4 convertible used with 18,000 miles on it. It has all the power features I didn't care about, too. Since I had a 1993 Tracker prior, I specifically looked for the 2.0L 4cyl w/5spd manual combo. I cannot speak for the stock performance because within a matter of hours of owning it, I had the Calmini suspension lift and Interco 29
Additional sources
More sources of information about 2001 Chevrolet Tracker problems:
Attempting to buy a Tracker. Issues to look for? : r/geotracker
Aug 25, 2020 ... Common 1st-gen problems: Rust. Timing chain ... Engine / Mechanical problems: People can ... My buddy has a 2.5 ZR-2 package 2003 Chevy Tracker ...
2001 Chevrolet Tracker Problems and Complaints - 7 Issues
Problem with your 2001 Chevrolet Tracker? Our list of 7 known complaints reported by owners can help you fix your 2001 Chevrolet Tracker.
Q&A: 2001 Chevy Tracker Overheating - Common Problems ...
Feb 19, 2011 ... Overheating issues with 2001 chevy tracker 2.0L Auto 4wd. · 1-i want you to remove the radiator/reservoir cap · 2-start the engine and let it ...
2001 Chevrolet Tracker Reviews - Carsurvey.org
Sep 29, 2008 ... At approximately 67,000 miles, the oxygen sensor had to be replaced. Around 69,000 miles, a plastic piece in the ignition broke and I had to get ...
Q&A: 2001 Chevy Tracker - Common Issues, Maintenance Tips ...
Jun 13, 2007 ... The valve becomes gummed with carbon from age, the carbon loosens as the engine heats up, than when you shut it off...the carbon solidifies to ...
Other years of Chevrolet Tracker
Are you having problems with your 2001 Chevrolet Tracker?
Owen Metz 2024-10-25
My tracker has already clocked up 112,000 miles. Unfortunately, it is currently in the shop for its second rebuilt alternator. Since I bought it, I have put about $3,000 into repairs. The brakes have been done four times, including the rotors. Additionally, both rear brake springs broke and had to be replaced. The belts have also broken and been replaced, and I had to bypass the A/C when it broke due to the astronomical price to replace it. Just last week, the power steering belt broke and had to be replaced. Although it is still limping along, I don't see much trade-in value left.
Dejon Considine 2024-10-04
The car's performance on wet roads is not great, as it tends to slide when attempting to stop. This can be a concern for safety, especially when driving with family. Due to this, I have decided to trade it in. It is unfortunate that the car has depreciated by 50% in less than 2 years.
Darius Swaniawski 2024-07-15
I think you'll really enjoy this dependable, fun-to-drive, and inexpensive SUV. While it may not be world-class, it's definitely a great buy within its price and size range.
Rodrigo Prohaska 2024-04-08
This car has been very reliable. However, it is very compact and doesn't offer much leg space or room for cargo. The interior is made with economical plastic, which may not be the most comfortable for long journeys. It may not be the best option for family travel, but it ran fairly well.
Chesley Huels 2024-03-29
I drove 50 miles from home in a 2001 4 Cyc 2.0L 4 door that I purchased less than 2 months ago. Unfortunately, the engine fell apart from the inside, clogging the oil pump and causing the motor to be totaled.