1994 Gmc C15 problems

gmc logo

The Chevrolet C/K is a series of trucks that was manufactured by General Motors from the 1960 to 2002 model years. Marketed by both the Chevrolet and GMC divisions, the C/K series encompassed a wide range of vehicles. While most commonly associated with pickup trucks, the model line also included chassis-cab trucks and medium-duty trucks and served as the basis for GM full-size SUVs. Through its entire production, the model line competed directly against the Ford F-Series and the Dodge D series (later the Dodge Ram pickup).

Used for both the model branding and the internal model code, "C" denoted two-wheel drive, while "K" denoted four-wheel drive. Four generations of the C/K series were produced, including the GM monikered second-generation "Action Line" and third-generation "Rounded Line" vehicles (colloquially aka Square-Body trucks). For the fourth-generation (colloquially also known as OBS trucks), Chevrolet kept using the C/K designation while GMC revised its branding, changing to a singular GMC Sierra nameplate (C/K remained as an internal model code).

For South America, the model line was manufactured by General Motors de Argentina from 1960 to 1978, Sevel Argentina from 1986 to 1991, and General Motors Brazil, who produced versions of the model line for Brazil, Argentina, and Chile from 1964 to 2001.

As GM entered the 1990s, the company revised its truck ranges, replacing the medium-duty C/K trucks with the Chevrolet Kodiak/GMC TopKick for 1990. For 1999, GM replaced the fourth-generation C/K pickup trucks with an all-new model line; in line with GMC, Chevrolet dropped the C/K nameplate (in favor of a singular Chevrolet Silverado nameplate). Initially marketed with its successor, the final C/K pickup trucks were produced for the 2000 model year. From 2001 to 2002, the final vehicles of the C/K model line were medium-duty chassis cab trucks.

1994 Gmc C15

Social links

Common 1994 Gmc C15 problems

Based on the information provided in the sources, here are some common problems with the GMC C15 1994 based on complaints from owners:

  1. Alternator Failure: In older Sierras and Silverados, the alternator may eventually fail, leading to the battery dying and possibly causing abnormal noises. This issue typically occurs around 125,000 miles and may require a replacement costing around $300 to $400.
  2. Internal Distributor Faults: Some drivers have reported internal faults in the distributor, leading to issues like squealing noises, rough engine running, or stalling. This problem may not be as common but can still occur, especially around 130,000 miles. Overhauling or replacing the internal distributor is necessary to resolve this issue.
  3. Steering Wheel Position Sensor Failure: Owners may experience a service stability message due to a failed steering wheel position sensor. This issue can occur intermittently or regularly, typically around 90,000 miles. Replacing the sensor, costing about $200 to $300, should address this problem.
  4. Windshield Wiper Motor Component Failure: Models made between 1990 and 1999 may face intermittent issues with the windshield wipers due to a defective wiper motor. Recalls have been issued for some models, and if the wipers stop working, fail to turn on, or run continuously, replacing the wiper motor control board is necessary.
  5. Coolant Leaks or Oil Leaks From Intake Manifold Gaskets: Owners may encounter coolant or oil leaks from the intake manifold gaskets. This issue can lead to engine overheating or oil consumption problems. Addressing this requires inspecting and replacing the faulty gaskets to prevent further leaks.

These common problems with the GMC C15 1994 can impact the vehicle's performance and reliability, highlighting the importance of regular maintenance and prompt repairs to ensure the smooth operation of the truck.

1994 Gmc C15 engine

1994 Gmc C15 car problems categorized by type of issue

After analyzing all complaints sent to the NHTSA and researching popular Gmc C15 problems, we found that the most common problems with these 2023 model year vehicles are:

  • Seats problems
  • Visibility problems
  • Steering problems

The graph below shows statistics for all 1994 Gmc C15 vehicle components and the number of complaints received.

1994 Gmc C15 complaints

The NHTSA has received 7 complaints about various vehicle components related to the 1994 Gmc C15.

2004-03-12

VISIBILITY PROBLEM

  • Date Of Incident: 2004-02-05
  • VIN: 1GCDC14H7RZ
  • Components: VISIBILITY
  • Summary: WHILE DRIVING DURING RAINY WEATHER FRONT WINDSHIELD WIPERS FAILED. *AK
1999-11-10

SEATS PROBLEM

  • Date Of Incident: 1999-06-06
  • VIN: 2GCEK19H0R1
  • Components: SEATS
  • Summary: THE SEATBACK ON PASSENGER'S SIDE HAS BROKEN AGAIN. SEATBACK WAS CORRECTED ONCE UNDER RECALL 96E010000 IN 1997. THIS IS THE SECOND TIME THE SEATBACK HAS BROKEN. THE DRIVER'S SIDE HAS BROKEN ONCE. MANUFACTURER WAS NOTIFIED ABOUT THE PROBLEM. PROBLEM HAS NOT BEEN CORRECTED. *AK
1996-07-08

SEATS PROBLEM

  • Date Of Incident: 1996-06-24
  • Number Of Injuries: 1
  • Crash: 1
  • Components: SEATS
  • Summary: HIT FROM BEHIND AND BOTH BUCKET SEATS BROKE. *AK
1996-03-29

STEERING PROBLEM

  • Date Of Incident: 1996-03-24
  • Components: STEERING
  • Summary: WHEN TURNING THE STEERING WHEEL LOCKS AND CAUSES THE VEHICLE TO KEEP TURNING. PLEASE DESCRIBE. *AK
1996-03-07

SEATS PROBLEM

  • Date Of Incident: 1996-03-02
  • Components: SEATS
  • Summary: DRIVERS SIDE SEAT BROKE WHILE DRIVING. *AK
1995-12-06

SEATS PROBLEM

  • Date Of Incident: 1995-12-06
  • VIN: 2GTEC19K8R1
  • Components: SEATS
  • Summary: SEAT FRAME BROKE WHILE DRIVING, CAUSING THE SEAT BACK TO COLLAPSE. TT
1995-01-23

SEATS PROBLEM

  • Date Of Incident: 1995-01-04
  • VIN: 1G1EC19K2RE
  • Components: SEATS
  • Summary: DRIVER SEAT FRAME BROKE AWAY FROM THE FLOOR. TT

1994 Gmc C15 recalls

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has issued 10 recalls for different components of the 1994 Gmc C15.

1999-02-05
  • Manufacturer: GENERAL MOTORS CORP.
  • Components: EXTERIOR LIGHTING:BRAKE LIGHTS:SWITCH
  • Summary: VEHICLE DESCRIPTION: PICKUP TRUCKS, CREW CABS, UTILITY TRUCKS AND SPORT UTILITY VEHICLES. THESE VEHICLES WERE BUILT WITH THE POLARITY OF THE WIRING FOR THE ZERO ADJUST BRAKE SWITCH REVERSED FROM WHAT WAS SPECIFIED ON THE SWITCH DRAWING. WITH THE REVERSED POLARITY, THE CONTACTS IN THE BRAKE SWITCH CAN WEAR OUT PREMATURELY. THE BRAKE SWITCH WILL PERFORM NORMALLY UNTIL THE BRAKE SWITCH CONTACTS WEAR OUT, RESULTING IN LOSS OF THE BRAKE LAMPS WITHOUT ANY WARNING TO THE DRIVER.
  • Consequence: THIS WOULD FAIL TO WARN A FOLLOWING DRIVER THAT THE VEHICLE IS BRAKING AND COULD LEAD TO A CRASH.
  • Remedy: DEALERS WILL REPLACE THE BRAKE SWITCH AND REVERSE THE WIRING.
1996-03-25
  • Manufacturer: VEHICLE SAFETY SYSTEMS
  • Components: SEATS
  • Summary: THE SEAT RECLINER TO SEAT FRAME ATTACHING BOLTS ON THESE VEHICLES COULD LOOSEN, FATIGUE AND FRACTURE, ALLOWING THE SEAT BACK TO SUDDENLY RECLINE.
  • Consequence: IF THIS WERE TO OCCUR TO THE DRIVER'S SEAT, THIS COULD RESULT IN A SUDDEN LOSS OF VEHICLE CONTROL INCREASING THE RISK OF A VEHICLE ACCIDENT.
  • Remedy: DEALERS WILL REMOVE ALL FOAM AND/OR FABRIC SANDWICHED BETWEEN THE RECLINER ASSEMBLY AND THE SEAT FRAME, INSTALL WASHERS BETWEEN THE SEAT RECLINER AND THE SEAT FRAME AT EACH ATTACHMENT POINT, AND INSTALL NEW ATTACHING BOLTS TORQUED TO A HIGHER SPECIFICATION. THESE CORRECTIONS WILL BE MADE TO BOTH THE DRIVER'S AND PASSENGER'S SEATS.
1995-12-21
  • Manufacturer: GENERAL MOTORS CORP.
  • Components: SEATS
  • Summary: THE SEAT RECLINER TO SEAT FRAME ATTACHING BOLTS ON THESE VEHICLE COULD LOOSEN, FATIGUE AND FRACTURE, ALLOWING THE SEAT BACK TO SUDDENLY RECLINE.
  • Consequence: IF THIS WERE TO OCCUR TO THE DRIVER'S SEAT, THIS COULD RESULT IN A SUDDEN LOSS OF VEHICLE CONTROL INCREASING THE RISK OF A VEHICLE ACCIDENT.
  • Remedy: DEALERS WILL REMOVE ALL FOAM AND/OR FABRIC SANDWICHED BETWEEN THE RECLINER ASSEMBLY AND THE SEAT FRAME, INSTALL WASHERS BETWEEN THE SEAT RECLINER AND THE SEAT FRAME AT EACH ATTACHMENT POINT, AND INSTALL NEW ATTACHING BOLTS TORQUED TO A HIGHER SPECIFICATION. THESE CORRECTIONS WILL BE MADE TO BOTH THE DRIVER'S AND PASSENGER'S SEATS.
1995-12-13
  • Manufacturer: GENERAL MOTORS CORP.
  • Components: SEAT BELTS:FRONT
  • Summary: IF BOTH THE LAP-BELT AND SHOULDER-BELT ENERGY MANAGEMENT LOOPS ON THE FRONT SEAT BELT ASSEMBLIES RELEASE AT OR NEAR THE SAME TIME, ACCELERATION FORCES CAN CAUSE THE BUCKLE RELEASE MECHANISM TO ACTIVATE AND ALLOW THE BUCKLE TO SEPARATE FROM THE LATCH.
  • Consequence: IF THE BUCKLE RELEASED, THE SYSTEM WOULD FAIL TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE OCCUPANT RESTRAINT PROTECTION.
  • Remedy: DEALERS WILL REMOVE THE STITCHING THAT CREATES THE ENERGY MANAGEMENT LOOP IN THE SHOULDER BELT(S).
1995-12-13
  • Manufacturer: GENERAL MOTORS CORP.
  • Components: SEAT BELTS:FRONT
  • Summary: THESE VEHICLES WERE BUILT WITH FRONT SEAT BELT SYSTEMS WITH NO ENERGY MANAGEMENT LOOPS AND MAY NOT MEET THE HEAD INJURY CRITERIA REQUIREMENTS OF FMVSS NO. 208, "OCCUPANT CRASH PROTECTION."
  • Consequence: IN THE EVENT OF A VEHICLE CRASH, THE OCCUPANTS OF THESE SEATS MAY NOT BE PROPERLY RESTRAINED.
  • Remedy: DEALERS WILL REPLACE THE RETRACTOR PORTION OF THE SEAT BELT ASSEMBLY(S) WITH ONE HAVING THE NEWLY DESIGNED ENERGY-MANAGEMENT TWIN-LOOP SYSTEM.
1994-12-13
  • Manufacturer: GENERAL MOTORS CORP.
  • Components: ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING:ENGINE:DIESEL
  • Summary: VEHICLE DESCRIPTION: LIGHT DUTY PICKUP TRUCKS, VANS AND MOTORHOMES EQUIPPED WITH ELECTRONICALLY FUEL INJECTED 6.5L DIESEL ENGINE. THIS IS NOT A SAFETY RECALL IN ACCORDANCE WITH FEDERAL REGULATION PART 573. HOWEVER, IT IS DEEMED A SAFETY IMPROVEMENT CAMPAIGN BY THE AGENCY. THE CAMPAIGN WILL IMPROVE THE OVERALL DRIVEABILITY OF THESE VEHICLES.
  • Consequence: CERTAIN VEHICLES CAN EXHIBIT SOME DRIVEABILITY CONCERNS SUCH AS POOR THROTTLE RESPONSE, STALLING, MISFIRE, POOR HOT OR COLD STARTING, EXTENDED CRANKING OF A HOT ENGINE, OR STALLING AFTER START. TRUCKS WITH MANUALTRANSMISSIONS CAN EXHIBIT POOR ACCELERATION FROM START OR COULD STALL DURING DECELERATION.
  • Remedy: DEALERS WILL INSTALL SOME RECENTLY DEVELOPED ENHANCEMENTS WHICH WILL IMPROVE THE OVERALL DRIVEABILITY OF THESE VEHICLES.
1994-10-26
  • Manufacturer: GENERAL MOTORS CORP.
  • Components: VISIBILITY:WINDSHIELD
  • Summary: THE WINDSHIELDS WERE INSTALLED WITH INCORRECT WINDSHIELD OPENING PINCH-WELD-FLANGE PRIMER. THIS PRIMER WILL NOT PROPERLY ETCH THE PAINTED SURFACE OF THE FLANGE, ALLOWING THE WINDSHIELD TO SEPARATE FROM THE VEHICLE DURING A COLLISION. THIS DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF FMVSS NO. 212, "WINDSHIELD MOUNTING."
  • Consequence: CONSEQUENCE OF NON-COMPLIANCE: THE SEPARATION OF THE WINDSHIELD FROM THE VEHICLE DURING COLLISION INCREASES THE RISK OF INJURY FOR ALL PERSONS INVOLVED.
  • Remedy: DEALERS WILL REMOVE THE WINDSHIELD AND REINSTALL IT USING THE CORRECT PRIMER.
1994-04-05
  • Manufacturer: GENERAL MOTORS CORP.
  • Components: SUSPENSION:FRONT:CONTROL ARM:LOWER ARM
  • Summary: TRUCKS WERE ASSEMBLED WITH THE LEFT-HAND LOWER CONTROL ARM TO FRAME REAR NUT TIGHTENED BELOW THE SPECIFIED TORQUE. LOW TORQUE ON THIS NUT MAY ALLOW THE ATTACHMENT BOLT TO LOOSED AND SUBSEQUENTLY FATIGUE AND BREAK. THE BOLT BREAKAGE CAN CAUSE THE LEFT HAND CONTROL ARM TO SEPARATE FROM THE FRAME.
  • Consequence: IF THIS OCCURS, A LOSS OF VEHICLE CONTROL AND A CRASH COULD RESULT.
  • Remedy: DEALERS WILL TIGHTEN THE LEFT-HAND LOWER CONTROL ARM TO FRAME REAR NUT TO THE PROPER TORQUE SPECIFICATION.
1993-12-14
  • Manufacturer: GENERAL MOTORS CORP.
  • Components: SEATS
  • Summary: THE SEATS HAVE BEEN ASSEMBLED WITHOUT BOLTS THAT CONNECT THE UPPER SLAVE HINGE TO THE SEAT BACK FRAME, OR WITHOUT BOLTS THAT CONNECT THE SEAT TO THE SEAT ADJUSTER. IN EITHER CASE, THE VEHICLES FAIL TO CONFORM TO FNVSS NO. 207, "SEATING SYSTEMS."
  • Consequence: THE MISSING BOLTS MAY CAUSE THE DRIVER'S SEAT TO BECOMELOOSE AND IN A SUDDEN STOP OR ACCIDENT MAY SUBJECT THE OCCUPANT TO INCREASEDRISK OF INJURY.
  • Remedy: DEALERS WILL INSPECT SEATS FOR MISSING BOLTS AND INSTALL BOLTS IF REQUIRED.
1993-09-15
  • Manufacturer: GENERAL MOTORS CORP.
  • Components: SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC:PEDALS AND LINKAGES
  • Summary: THE BRAKE PEDAL PUSH ROD RETAINER IS MISSING, MISPOSITIONED OR NOT PROPERLY SEATED.
  • Consequence: BRAKE PEDAL PUSH ROD PROBLEMS CAN CAUSE THE STOP LAMPSWITCH AND THE BRAKE BOOSTER PUSH ROD TO DISCONNECT FROM THE BRAKE PEDAL,RESULTING IN LOSS OF BRAKE OPERATION, AND A VEHICLE CRASH COULD OCCUR WITHOUTPRIOR WARNING.
  • Remedy: INSPECT VEHICLES TO ASSURE THE BRAKE PEDAL PUSH ROD RETAINER IS PRESENT AND FULLY SEATED IN ITS CORRECT POSITION.
Leave your review of 1994 Gmc C15

Other years of Gmc C15

gmc c15 1995 photo
C15 1995
Gmc

11

7

0

  • 5
  • 4
  • 3
  • 2
  • 1
gmc c15 1996 photo
C15 1996
Gmc

5

6

0

  • 5
  • 4
  • 3
  • 2
  • 1
gmc c15 1978 photo
C15 1978
Gmc

1

1

0

  • 5
  • 4
  • 3
  • 2
  • 1
gmc c15 1988 photo
C15 1988
Gmc

1

4

0

  • 5
  • 4
  • 3
  • 2
  • 1
gmc c15 1989 photo
C15 1989
Gmc

1

1

0

  • 5
  • 4
  • 3
  • 2
  • 1
gmc c15 1990 photo
C15 1990
Gmc

2

2

0

  • 5
  • 4
  • 3
  • 2
  • 1

Are you having problems with your 1994 Gmc C15?

Add car complaint
1994 Gmc C15 photo