1995 Gmc C15 problems

gmc logo

The Chevrolet C/K is a series of trucks that was manufactured by General Motors from the 1960 to 2002 model years. Marketed by both the Chevrolet and GMC divisions, the C/K series encompassed a wide range of vehicles. While most commonly associated with pickup trucks, the model line also included chassis-cab trucks and medium-duty trucks and served as the basis for GM full-size SUVs. Through its entire production, the model line competed directly against the Ford F-Series and the Dodge D series (later the Dodge Ram pickup).

Used for both the model branding and the internal model code, "C" denoted two-wheel drive, while "K" denoted four-wheel drive. Four generations of the C/K series were produced, including the GM monikered second-generation "Action Line" and third-generation "Rounded Line" vehicles (colloquially aka Square-Body trucks). For the fourth-generation (colloquially also known as OBS trucks), Chevrolet kept using the C/K designation while GMC revised its branding, changing to a singular GMC Sierra nameplate (C/K remained as an internal model code).

For South America, the model line was manufactured by General Motors de Argentina from 1960 to 1978, Sevel Argentina from 1986 to 1991, and General Motors Brazil, who produced versions of the model line for Brazil, Argentina, and Chile from 1964 to 2001.

As GM entered the 1990s, the company revised its truck ranges, replacing the medium-duty C/K trucks with the Chevrolet Kodiak/GMC TopKick for 1990. For 1999, GM replaced the fourth-generation C/K pickup trucks with an all-new model line; in line with GMC, Chevrolet dropped the C/K nameplate (in favor of a singular Chevrolet Silverado nameplate). Initially marketed with its successor, the final C/K pickup trucks were produced for the 2000 model year. From 2001 to 2002, the final vehicles of the C/K model line were medium-duty chassis cab trucks.

1995 Gmc C15

Social links

Common 1995 Gmc C15 problems

The 1995 GMC C1500 is a popular pickup truck and, like any vehicle, it has its share of common problems and complaints from owners. Here are some of the most frequently reported issues:

  • Vehicle Speed Sensor (VSS) Buffer Signal Loss: The 1995 GMC C1500 may also experience a signal loss from the Vehicle Speed Sensor (VSS) buffer. This can be caused by a faulty VSS or wiring and connectors associated with the VSS. To diagnose this problem, you can check the VSS and the wiring and connectors for any damage or faults. If the VSS is faulty, it may need to be replaced.
  • Throttle Position Sensor (TPS) Circuit Issues: The 1995 GMC C1500 may also experience issues with the TPS circuit. If the TPS circuit detects a signal voltage that is too high, it may set a trouble code. This can be caused by a faulty TPS or wiring and connectors associated with the TPS. To diagnose this problem, you can check the TPS and the wiring and connectors for any damage or faults. If the TPS is faulty, it may need to be replaced.
  • Transmission Oil Cooler Line Recall: In 2014, GM announced a recall on the 2015 Suburban and Yukon XL due to a transmission oil cooler line that was not securely attached, which could result in the engine malfunctioning and catching fire. This issue was isolated to the 2015 models and was not related to previous generation models or GM's restructuring in 2010. If you own a 2015 Suburban or Yukon XL, it is important to have this issue addressed by a GM dealer as soon as possible.

These are just a few of the common problems reported by owners of the 1995 GMC C1500. If you are experiencing any issues with your vehicle, it is important to have it diagnosed and repaired by a qualified mechanic.

1995 Gmc C15 engine

1995 Gmc C15 car problems categorized by type of issue

After analyzing all complaints sent to the NHTSA and researching popular Gmc C15 problems, we found that the most common problems with these 2023 model year vehicles are:

  • Service brakes problems
  • Hydraulic problems
  • Vehicle speed control problems
  • Air bags problems
  • Seat belts problems

The graph below shows statistics for all 1995 Gmc C15 vehicle components and the number of complaints received.

1995 Gmc C15 complaints

The NHTSA has received 11 complaints about various vehicle components related to the 1995 Gmc C15.

1996-07-15

VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL PROBLEM

  • Date Of Incident: 1996-06-17
  • VIN: 1GETC14Z7SZ
  • Components: VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL
  • Summary: THE DEALERSHIP WILL NOT MAKE AN APPOINTMENT WITH HIM DEALING WITH RECALL 96V051000. *AK
1996-07-10

SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC PROBLEM

  • Date Of Incident: 1996-06-14
  • Components: SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC
  • Summary: WHEN APPLYING THE BRAKES, PEDAL GOES TO THE FLOOR AND THE STOPPING DISTANCE HAS INCREASED.THE VEHICLE HAS ABS.PLEASE DESCRIBE. *AK
1996-06-19

VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL PROBLEM

  • Date Of Incident: 1996-04-15
  • VIN: 1GCEC14KXSZ
  • Components: VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL
  • Summary: WENT TO DEALERSHIP THEY SAID THEY DON'T HVE ANYTHING ON THE RECALL AND WOULD NOT REMEDY IT. PLEASE DESCRIBE. *AK
1996-03-25

SEAT BELTS PROBLEM

  • Date Of Incident: 1996-03-19
  • VIN: 2GBEC19K4F1
  • Components: SEAT BELTS
  • Summary: THE RECALL LETTER STATES THAT THE WORK BE DONE IN 5DAYS. THEY PICKED UP THE TRUC 7 DAYS LATER AND THE RECALL PART WAS NOT FIXED. PLEASE DESCRIBE. *AK
1995-12-13

SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC PROBLEM

  • Date Of Incident: 1995-10-25
  • Crash: 1
  • Components: SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC
  • Summary: ABS: WHILE TOWING A TRAILER IN STOP/GO TRAFFIC, DRY SURFACE; ABS WOULD NOT ALLOW WHEEL LOCK UP; RAN INTO ANOTHER TRUCK; SOLELY BECAUSE OF ABS FAILURE. TT
1995-11-27

SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC PROBLEM

  • Date Of Incident: 2024-11-24
  • Crash: 1
  • Components: SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC
  • Summary: ABS BRAKES FAILED WHILE PULLING IN DRIVEWAY-HIT ANOTHER AUTO BUT NO INJURIES. TT
1995-09-14

AIR BAGS PROBLEM

  • Date Of Incident: 2024-11-24
  • Number Of Injuries: 1
  • Crash: 1
  • VIN: 2GTEK19KXS1
  • Components: AIR BAGS
  • Summary: HAD ACCIDENT AND DRIVERS AIR BAG DID NOT DEPLOY- INJURIED BACK. TT
1995-09-14

AIR BAGS PROBLEM

  • Date Of Incident: 2024-11-24
  • Number Of Injuries: 1
  • Crash: 1
  • VIN: 2GTEK19KXS1
  • Components: AIR BAGS
  • Summary: HAD ACCIDENT AND PASSENGERS AIR BAG DID NOT DEPLOY- INJURIED BACK. TT
1995-07-18

SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC PROBLEM

  • Date Of Incident: 1995-07-04
  • VIN: 2GTEC19K6S1
  • Components: SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC
  • Summary: BRAKE SYSTEM FAILURE, LOSS OF BRAKING SYSTEM. TT
1995-07-13

STEERING PROBLEM

  • Date Of Incident: 1995-06-29
  • VIN: 1GTEC14H8S2
  • Components: STEERING
  • Summary: WHILE DRIVING, STEERING WHEEL BECAME INOPERATIVE DUE TO BOLT MISSING OF FALLEN OUT. PLEASE DESCRIBE DETAILS. *AK
1995-05-09

POWER TRAIN PROBLEM

  • Date Of Incident: 1995-04-01
  • VIN: 1GTEC14H9SZ
  • Components: POWER TRAIN
  • Summary: MANUAL TRANSMISSION 5 SPEED , CLUTCH JUMPS CAUSING THE VEHICLE TO STALL WHILE DRIVING. TT

1995 Gmc C15 recalls

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has issued 7 recalls for different components of the 1995 Gmc C15.

1998-08-10
  • Manufacturer: GENERAL MOTORS CORP.
  • Components: FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE:STORAGE:TANK ASSEMBLY
  • Summary: VEHICLE DESCRIPTION: CREW CAB PICKUP TRUCKS. THE FRONT, INNER CORNER OF THE FUEL TANK CAN CONTACT THE BODY SILL EITHER INTERMITTENTLY OR CONSTANTLY. THIS MOVEMENT CAN CAUSE A DISCERNIBLE NOISE AND, OVER TIME, CAN WEAR A HOLE IN OR CRACK THE FUEL TANK AT POINT OF CONTACT.
  • Consequence: THIS CONDITION CAN RESULT IN FUEL LEAKAGE AND A DISTINCT FUEL ODOR IF THE TANK WERE FILLED ABOVE THE LEVEL OF THE HOLE OR CRACK. IN THE PRESENCE OF AN IGNITION SOURCE, A FIRE COULD RESULT.
  • Remedy: DEALERS WILL INSPECT THE FUEL TANK FOR WEAR AND, EITHER INSTALL A SPACER BETWEEN THE FUEL TANK AND THE FRONT CROSSMEMBER, OR IF NECESSARY, REPLACE THE FUEL TANK.
1997-03-07
  • Manufacturer: GENERAL MOTORS CORP.
  • Components: SEATS
  • Summary: VEHICLE DESCRIPTION: EXTENDED CAB AND 2-DOOR UTILITY VEHICLES EQUIPPED WITH RECLINING SEATS AND THE EASY-ENTRY FEATURE. THESE VEHICLES EXHIBIT A CONDITION IN WHICH A PINCH POINT EXISTS IN THE RECLINER MECHANISM THAT CAN TRAP AND PINCH A PERSON'S HAND OR FINGER(S) WHEN THE EASY-ENTRY FEATURE IS ACTIVATED.
  • Consequence: THIS PINCHING CAN CUT THE HAND OR POSSIBLY SEVER THE FINGER(S) WITHOUT PRIOR WARNING.
  • Remedy: DEALERS WILL INSTALL A PROTECTOR COVER OVER THE RECLINER MECHANISM.
1996-04-04
  • Manufacturer: GENERAL MOTORS CORP.
  • Components: VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL
  • Summary: THESE VEHICLES WERE ASSEMBLED WITH THE THROTTLE CABLE CONTACTING THE DASH MAT WHICH COULD BIND THE THROTTLE. THIS DOES NOT MEET WITH THE MAXIMUM RETURN TIMES REQUIRED BY FEDERAL MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY STANDARD NO. 124, "ACCELERATOR CONTROL SYSTEMS."
  • Consequence: CONSEQUENCE OF NON-COMPLIANCE: THE ENGINE SPEED MAY NOT RETURN TO IDLE INCREASING THE POTENTIAL FOR A VEHICLE ACCIDENT.
  • Remedy: DEALERS WILL INSPECT FOR ADEQUATE THROTTLE CABLE TO DASH MAT CLEARANCE, AND IF THERE IS INSUFFICIENT CLEARANCE, CUT OUT A PORTION OF THE DASH MAT TO PROVIDE PROPER CLEARANCE.
1996-03-25
  • Manufacturer: VEHICLE SAFETY SYSTEMS
  • Components: SEATS
  • Summary: THE SEAT RECLINER TO SEAT FRAME ATTACHING BOLTS ON THESE VEHICLES COULD LOOSEN, FATIGUE AND FRACTURE, ALLOWING THE SEAT BACK TO SUDDENLY RECLINE.
  • Consequence: IF THIS WERE TO OCCUR TO THE DRIVER'S SEAT, THIS COULD RESULT IN A SUDDEN LOSS OF VEHICLE CONTROL INCREASING THE RISK OF A VEHICLE ACCIDENT.
  • Remedy: DEALERS WILL REMOVE ALL FOAM AND/OR FABRIC SANDWICHED BETWEEN THE RECLINER ASSEMBLY AND THE SEAT FRAME, INSTALL WASHERS BETWEEN THE SEAT RECLINER AND THE SEAT FRAME AT EACH ATTACHMENT POINT, AND INSTALL NEW ATTACHING BOLTS TORQUED TO A HIGHER SPECIFICATION. THESE CORRECTIONS WILL BE MADE TO BOTH THE DRIVER'S AND PASSENGER'S SEATS.
1996-01-02
  • Manufacturer: GENERAL MOTORS CORP.
  • Components: STEERING: STEERING WHEEL/HANDLE BAR
  • Summary: THE STEERING COLUMN UPPER INTERMEDIATE-SHAFT NUT MAY NOT BE TORQUED TO PROPER SPECIFICATIONS. THE NUT COULD LOOSEN AND DETACH ALLOWING THE THROUGH-BOLT THAT SECURES THE UPPER INTERMEDIATE-SHAFT TO THE LOWER STEERING COLUMN SHAFT JOINT TO FALL OUT.
  • Consequence: THIS LOOSE ENGAGEMENT CAN PROVIDE NOTICEABLE NOISE AND ABNORMAL STEERING FEELING TO THE DRIVER AND, IF LEFT UNATTENDED, THE STEERING SHAFTS CAN SEPARATE RESULTING IN A LOSS OF STEERING CONTROL.
  • Remedy: DEALERS WILL TORQUE THE SUSPECT FASTENERS TO THE PROPER SPECIFICATIONS.
1995-12-13
  • Manufacturer: GENERAL MOTORS CORP.
  • Components: SEAT BELTS:FRONT
  • Summary: THESE VEHICLES WERE BUILT WITH FRONT SEAT BELT SYSTEMS WITH NO ENERGY MANAGEMENT LOOPS AND MAY NOT MEET THE HEAD INJURY CRITERIA REQUIREMENTS OF FMVSS NO. 208, "OCCUPANT CRASH PROTECTION."
  • Consequence: IN THE EVENT OF A VEHICLE CRASH, THE OCCUPANTS OF THESE SEATS MAY NOT BE PROPERLY RESTRAINED.
  • Remedy: DEALERS WILL REPLACE THE RETRACTOR PORTION OF THE SEAT BELT ASSEMBLY(S) WITH ONE HAVING THE NEWLY DESIGNED ENERGY-MANAGEMENT TWIN-LOOP SYSTEM.
1995-12-13
  • Manufacturer: GENERAL MOTORS CORP.
  • Components: SEAT BELTS:FRONT
  • Summary: IF BOTH THE LAP-BELT AND SHOULDER-BELT ENERGY MANAGEMENT LOOPS ON THE FRONT SEAT BELT ASSEMBLIES RELEASE AT OR NEAR THE SAME TIME, ACCELERATION FORCES CAN CAUSE THE BUCKLE RELEASE MECHANISM TO ACTIVATE AND ALLOW THE BUCKLE TO SEPARATE FROM THE LATCH.
  • Consequence: IF THE BUCKLE RELEASED, THE SYSTEM WOULD FAIL TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE OCCUPANT RESTRAINT PROTECTION.
  • Remedy: DEALERS WILL REMOVE THE STITCHING THAT CREATES THE ENERGY MANAGEMENT LOOP IN THE SHOULDER BELT(S).
Leave your review of 1995 Gmc C15

Other years of Gmc C15

gmc c15 1996 photo
C15 1996
Gmc

5

6

0

  • 5
  • 4
  • 3
  • 2
  • 1
gmc c15 1978 photo
C15 1978
Gmc

1

1

0

  • 5
  • 4
  • 3
  • 2
  • 1
gmc c15 1988 photo
C15 1988
Gmc

1

4

0

  • 5
  • 4
  • 3
  • 2
  • 1
gmc c15 1989 photo
C15 1989
Gmc

1

1

0

  • 5
  • 4
  • 3
  • 2
  • 1
gmc c15 1990 photo
C15 1990
Gmc

2

2

0

  • 5
  • 4
  • 3
  • 2
  • 1
gmc c15 1991 photo
C15 1991
Gmc

1

0

0

  • 5
  • 4
  • 3
  • 2
  • 1

Are you having problems with your 1995 Gmc C15?

Add car complaint
1995 Gmc C15 photo