1991 Ford Probe problems
The Ford Probe is a liftback coupé produced by Ford, introduced in 1988 and produced until 1997. The Probe was the result of Ford's collaboration with its longtime Japanese partner Mazda, and both generations of Probe were derived from the front-wheel drive Mazda G platform that underpinned the Mazda Capella.
The Probe succeeded the Ford EXP, and the instrument cluster of the first-generation Probe and pop-up headlight mechanisms were borrowed from the FC Series RX-7.
Based on the Mazda MX-6 as a sport compact coupe, the Probe was intended to fill the market niche formerly occupied by the Capri in Europe, and it was originally intended to be the fourth generation Ford Mustang in the North American market as a direct competitor with the Acura Integra, Isuzu Piazza, Nissan 200SX, and the Toyota Celica. During that time, Ford's marketing team had deemed that a front-wheel drive platform (borrowed Mazda GD and GE platforms) would have lower costs for production, and also because the platform had been gaining popularity with consumers.
Mustang fans objected to the front-wheel drive configuration, Japanese engineering, and lack of a V8, so Ford began work on a new design for the Mustang instead. On March 17, 1997, Ford announced the discontinuation of the Probe.
Social links
Common 1991 Ford Probe problems
The Ford Probe, produced from 1989 to 1997, is known for its sporty design and handling. However, like any vehicle, it has developed a number of common issues over the years. Here are some of the most common problems with the Ford Probe, based on complaints from owners:
- Power Windows and Door Locks Malfunction: One common issue with the first-generation Ford Probe is the tendency for the power windows and door locks to malfunction. In some cases, the windows and locks would stop working altogether, while in other cases, they would operate sporadically. This was often caused by faulty wiring or a malfunctioning power window regulator. Replacing the regulator or repairing the wiring can often fix this issue.
- Engine Oil Leaks: Another problem that was common with the first-generation Ford Probe was engine oil leaks. These leaks were typically caused by worn gaskets or seals, and could lead to a loss of engine oil and potential engine damage if left unchecked. Regularly checking the engine oil level and addressing any leaks promptly can prevent this issue from becoming a major problem.
- Manual Transmission Problems: Some first-generation Ford Probe models experienced problems with their manual transmissions. The transmissions would often grind or fail to shift properly, especially when shifting into third gear. This issue was often caused by worn synchronizers or damaged shift forks, and could require transmission repair or replacement to fully resolve.
- Dashboard and Instrument Cluster Problems: Some first-generation Ford Probe models had problems with the dashboard and instrument cluster. The dashboard lights would often fail to illuminate properly or stop working altogether, making it difficult to monitor the vehicle's speed and other important metrics. Replacing the faulty bulbs or fuses can often fix this issue.
- Cooling System Problems: Some 1993 Ford Probe models were prone to overheating due to a malfunctioning thermostat. This issue could lead to engine damage if not addressed promptly. Replacing the thermostat and performing a cooling system flush can often fix this issue.
- Engine Oil Pressure Gauge Malfunction: Some 1994 and 1995 Ford Probe models had issues with the engine oil pressure gauge. The gauge would often malfunction or read incorrectly, leading to confusion about the actual oil pressure in the engine. Replacing the faulty gauge or sensor can often fix this issue.
- Automatic Transmission Problems: Some second-generation Ford Probe models had issues with the automatic transmission, including slipping or failing altogether. This issue was often caused by worn or damaged transmission bands or clutches, and could require transmission repair or replacement to fully resolve.
- Electrical System Problems: Some 1996 and 1997 Ford Probe models experienced problems with the electrical system, including issues with the alternator and battery. These issues would often cause the battery to drain quickly, leading to starting problems and other electrical malfunctions. Replacing the faulty alternator or battery can often fix this issue.
While these issues can be frustrating for Ford Probe owners, regular maintenance and prompt repairs can help keep these problems from becoming major issues. It's important to stay on top of regular maintenance tasks, such as checking the engine oil level and addressing any leaks promptly, to ensure that the vehicle continues to perform at its best.
Why did the Ford Probe fail?
By 1997, the Probe's final year, Ford sold less than 20,000 units compared to 108,000 Mustangs. Ford did such a poor job of positioning and marketing the Probe it was almost destined to fail. A third-generation Probe was planned, but that design became the early-2000s Mercury Cougar, also an unsuccessful car.
How long did the Ford Probe last?
The Ford Probe is a liftback coupé produced by Ford, introduced in 1988 and produced until 1997.
Is the Ford Probe fast?
The Probe hit 60 mph in 7.0 seconds, 0.2 quicker than the MX-6. Its quarter-mile clocking of 15.5 seconds at 89 mph also edges out the MX-6's 15.6-second/88-mph performance.
How much do Ford probes go for?
More about the Ford Probe
There are 1 used Ford Probe vehicles for sale near you, with an average cost of $16,995. Prices for a used Ford Probe range from a high of $16,995 to a low of $16,995. Remember that mileage and condition can affect price.
Why did the Ford Probe fail?
By 1997, the Probe's final year, Ford sold less than 20,000 units compared to 108,000 Mustangs. Ford did such a poor job of positioning and marketing the Probe it was almost destined to fail. A third-generation Probe was planned, but that design became the early-2000s Mercury Cougar, also an unsuccessful car.
Did the Ford Probe have a Mazda engine?
As before, the Probe was to share its under-structure with Mazda's MX-6 and 626. Mazda engineered the engine, transmission, and chassis, while Ford engineered the body and interior. Technically, the second generation Probe is 60% Mazda and 40% Ford.
What happened to all the Ford probes?
Why Was the Ford Probe Taken Off the Market? By 1997, Probe sales had dropped to less than 20,000 as buyer interest was lured away from the coupe and towards the Mustang it was meant to replace. It also lost sales to the Thunderbird and Mazda's Miata, all of which had rear-wheel drive.
Is the Ford Probe fast?
The Probe hit 60 mph in 7.0 seconds, 0.2 quicker than the MX-6. Its quarter-mile clocking of 15.5 seconds at 89 mph also edges out the MX-6's 15.6-second/88-mph performance.
1991 Ford Probe car problems categorized by type of issue
After analyzing all complaints sent to the NHTSA and researching popular Ford Probe problems, we found that the most common problems with these 2023 model year vehicles are:
- Seat belts problems
- Visibility problems
- Engine and engine cooling problems
- Electrical system problems
- Power train problems
The graph below shows statistics for all 1991 Ford Probe vehicle components and the number of complaints received.
Latest 25 complaints 1991 Ford Probe
The NHTSA has received 190 complaints about various vehicle components related to the 1991 Ford Probe. Below are the 25 most recent complaints reported for 1991 Ford Probe vehicles.
SEAT BELTS PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2000-01-01
- VIN: 1ZVPT21U2M5
- Components: SEAT BELTS
- Summary: THE DRIVER SIDE SEAT BELT IS STUCK ON THE TRACK TOWARDS THE BACK OF IT'S TRACK AND NO LONGER MOVES OR ENGAGES.
VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 1991-05-16
- VIN: 1ZVPT2123M5
- Components: VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL
- Summary: TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 1991 FORD PROBE. WHENEVER THE CONTACT DROVE THE VEHICLE AT VARIOUS SPEEDS TO INCLUDE APPROXIMATELY 60 MPH, USING THE CRUISE CONTROL THE VEHICLE SPEED INCREASED. THE VEHICLE HAS NOT BEEN DIAGNOSED BY THE DEALER. THE CURRENT AND FAILURE MILEAGES WERE 113000.
SEAT BELTS PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 1996-01-06
- Components: SEAT BELTS
- Summary: TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 1991 FORD PROBE. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE CABLE WHICH RETRACTS THE BUCKLE ASSEMBLY JAMMED AND CAUSED THE SEAT BELT TO FAIL. THE DEALER STATED THAT THIS VEHICLE WAS EXCLUDED FROM RECALL # 96V172001 DUE TO THE VIN. THE CURRENT AND FAILURE MILEAGE WERE 100,000.*AK
SEAT BELTS PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2006-10-18
- VIN: 1ZVPT20C4M5
- Components: SEAT BELTS
- Summary: DT*: THE CONTACT STATED IMMEDIATELY AFTER PURCHASING A VEHICLE, IT WAS NOTICED THE SEAT BELT DID NOT RETRACT AND WAS JAMMED IN THE RAIL RENDERING THE BELT INOPERATIVE. THE CONTACT CHECKED FOR RECALLS ON THE NHTSA WEBSITE AND FOUND THE NHTSA RECALL CAMPAIGN # 96V172001 COVERED THE DEFECT. THE MANUFACTURER WAS CONTACTED WHO INFORMED THE VEHICLE WAS NOT INCLUDED IN THE RECALL DUE TO THE VIN. THE CONTACT WAS VERY CONCERNED BECAUSE THE DESCRIPTION IN THE RECALL MATCHED EXACTLY THE PROBLEMS, THE VEHICLE'S SEAT BELT HAD.
SEAT BELTS PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2006-08-01
- VIN: 1ZVPT20C0M5
- Components: SEAT BELTS
- Summary: I OWN A 1991 FORD PROBE. THE DRIVERS SIDE AUTO-RETRACT SEAT-BELT ASSEMBLY IS JAMMED. SEARCHING ON THE INTERNET, (AUTOZONE RECALLS AND THIS WEB-SITE FOR TWO), I FIND INTERESTING INFORMATION REGARDING THIS ISSUE. PARTICULARLY NHTSA ID # 96V172001 / FORD RECALL 96S48 THAT DESCRIBES THIS. ALSO THE LINK ON YOUR SITE TO THIS PDF (RC-96V172-NN.PDF), IS ALSO OF INTEREST. MY ISSUE / COMPLAINT IS THAT I TOLD MY LOCAL FORD DEALER AS WELL AS HAD FORD MOTOR CO. RUN MY VIN AND THEY STATED MY VIN WAS NOT PART OF THE RECALL CAMPAIGN. I DO NOTICE THAT IN THE ABOVE PDF A STATEMENT THAT ALL PROBES STARTING AS EARLY AS 1990 WITH THIS RESTRAINT SYSTEM ARE TO BE COVERED UNDER THE RECALL. THIS SYSTEM ON THIS CAR IS FAULTY. IN IOWA THERE IS A SEAT BELT LAW. ALTHOUGH I AM NOT THE ORIGINAL OWNER, I KNOW 2 OF THE 3 OTHER OWNERS OF THIS. IT HAS ONLY 88,000 MILES. REGARDLESS OF AGE OR CONDITION, I UNDERSTAND THIS SHOULD BE COVERED UNDER THE FORD RECALL CAMPAIGN AND I SHOULD BE FREE OF ANY FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY TO REPAIR THE PROBLEM. ANY INPUT? *JB
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2004-08-04
- VIN: 1ZVPT22L9M5
- Components: ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
- Summary: (1) PURCHASED THE VEHICLE (2) LEARNED THE HORN DID NOT WORK (3) PURCHASED A REPLACEMENT HORN, AND REQUESTED INFORMATION FROM FORD AND 3 DEALERS WHERE IT WOULD BE LOCATED. ALL, EXCEPT 1 DEALER, REFUSED TO GIVE US ANY INFORMATION. THE LAST DEALER WAS NOT CERTAIN. FORD'S COMMENT WAS THIS WAS "PRIVATE COMPANY INFORMATION" OR "WE DON'T HAVE THAT INFORMATION". SUGGESTED WE CONTACT THEIR PRINTING COMPANY WHO WOULD SELL US SCHEMATICS. PRINTING COMPANY HAD NO IDEA WHICH SET OF SCHEMATICS WE WOULD NEED. VEHICLES ARE REQUIRED TO HAVE WORKING HORNS FOR SAFETY REASONS. FORD WANTED TO SELL US $100 WORTH OF SERVICE TO INSTALL A $15 PART.*AK
STEERING,SUSPENSION,ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING,SEAT BELTS,STRUCTURE,WHEELS,UNKNOWN OR OTHER PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 1993-01-15
- VIN: 1ZVPT20C5M5
- Components: STEERING,SUSPENSION,ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING,SEAT BELTS,STRUCTURE,WHEELS,UNKNOWN OR OTHER
- Summary: I READ YOUR COMPLAINT PAGE, HAVE HAD THE CAR SINCE 91 AND I HAVE ALL THE SAME PROBS, 1 PERSON SAID HE HAD 2 INCHES OF WATER IN THE CAR, TRY 6. THE PAINT WASNT RIGHT FROM DAY 1. THE CV JOINTS/AXELS WENT BAD AFTER 2 YEARS AND IVE GOT BY TILL NOW BUT THE RATTLE IS ANNOYING. THE EXHAUST SYS ALSO RATTLES. FRONT TIRES GO YEARLY. AIR CONDITIONER NEVER HAS BLOWN COLD. AND THE DOOR ON THE GLOVE COMPARTMENT IS TO HEAVY FOR THE LATCH, I RIDE 6 MNTHS OF EVERY YEAR WITH AN OPEN GLOVE COMPARTMENT.THE HATCHBACK LEAKS, AND THE PAINT WELL, WHO KNOWS WHERE THEY GOT THAT BLEND. THE CAR ALWAYS RUNS COLD WHICH CAUSES THE ROUGH IDLE AND START AND 14 INCH WHEELS WERENT SUFFICIENT FOR A CAR THAT BIG. I WILL SAY THAT FORD BENT OVER BACKWARDS TO GET THE ITEMS FIXED I JUST CANT LEAVE IT THERE BI-WEEKLY.THEY DID REPAINT IT TWICE AND HONORED THE SEATBELT RECALL THIS YEAR, 2003.THE CAR NOW HAS 200,000 MILES AND HAS NEVER FAILED SMOG OR SPENT ONE DAY ON A TOW TRUCK OR IN A SHOP BECAUSE IT WOULDNT START. ITS BEEN A LONG NOISY AND EXTREMELY HOT RIDE, AND I HOPE THEY LEARNED AFTER THOSE BAD YEARS. BUT JUST RECENTLY I ASKED A MECHANIC ON HIS OPINION IF I SHOULD BUY A TAURUS. HE POINTED TO A CAR IN THE BACK OF HIS SHOP AND SAID THAT CAR IS PAYING FOR HIS SONS COLLEGE. 6TH TIME THIS YEAR HES HAD IT AND HE STRONGLY ADVISED ME TO NEVER PURCHASE A FORD CAR. ALL THE PROBS WITH THE PROBE ARE SAME WITH THE TAURUS. I MIGHT GET 50000 MORE MILES BUT DOUBT IT. BUT I DONT THINK THEY TRIED TO CHEAT ME, FORD WORKED WITH ME FROM THE DAY I SAT IN THE DEALERSHIP AND THEY STILL ARE.
SEAT BELTS PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2003-08-20
- VIN: 1ZVPT20CXM5
- Components: SEAT BELTS
- Summary: THE CONSUMER WAS REFERRED TO THE DEALER BY AN AUTO REPAIR SHOP FOR RECALLS ON THE SEAT BELTS. THE DEALER STATED THE VEHICLE WAS IN THE REMEDY SCOPE, BUT THE RECALL HAD EXPIRED. THE DRIVER AND PASSENGER SIDE SEAT BELTS DID NOT RETRACT PROPERLY. RECALL# 96V172001 AND 96V172002 SUBJECT: AUTOMATIC SHOULDER BELT.*AK *JB
SEAT BELTS PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2003-02-18
- VIN: 1ZVPT20C3M5
- Components: SEAT BELTS
- Summary: THE DRIVER SIDE SEAT BELT BUCKLE ASSEMBLY BECAME JAMMED IN THE FORWARD POSITION AND WILL NOT RETRACT.*AK
SEAT BELTS PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2001-05-06
- VIN: 1ZVPT21U2M5
- Components: SEAT BELTS
- Summary: I HAVE A SEAT BELT THAT DOES NOT WORK IT IS STUCK IN PLACE AND THEY WONT HELP ME AT ALL. *AK
POWER TRAIN PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 1999-01-25
- VIN: 1ZVPT21U8M5
- Components: POWER TRAIN
- Summary: HAS ANYONE ELSE HAD PROBLEMS WITH THE TRANSMISSIONS IN THEIR FORD PROBES. THIS ONE HAS BLOWN APART TWICE, LEAVING LARGE HOLES IN THE CASING. WHY ISN'T FORD STANDING BEHIND THEIR PRODUCT? BOTH TIMES THE ENTIRE TRANSMISSION HAD TO BE REPLACED. *AK
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2024-11-24
- Components: ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
- Summary: CONSUMER IS HAVING PROBLEMS WITH A DEFECTIVE IGNITION SWITCH THAT IS POSSIBLY CAUSING VEHICLE TO STALL. *TT
TIRES PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2001-03-31
- VIN: 1ZVPT20C0M5
- Components: TIRES
- Summary: WHILE DRIVING 65 MPH CONSUMER HEARD A POPPING SOUND THEN DRIVER'S REAR TIRE CAME OFF. THERE WAS A RECALL 93VE035000 IN 1993, BUT THIS VEHICLE WAS NOT AFFECTED DUE TO VIN. *AK
STEERING,VISIBILITY PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2024-11-24
- VIN: 1ZVPT21U9M5
- Components: STEERING,VISIBILITY
- Summary: WINDSHIELD WIPERS WORK BUT WHEN THEY ARE TURNED OFF, THEY STOP IN A VERTICAL POSITIONS IN THE DRIVER'S VIEWING AREA. THE POWER STEERING HOSE COST ME OVER $200 TO BE REPLACED BECAUSE IT IS BUILT INTO THE FIREWALL. THE CAR HAD TO BE TAKEN APART IN ORDER TO GET TO THE HOSE.*AK
ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2000-11-01
- VIN: 1ZVPT21U8M5
- Components: ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING
- Summary: THE FINS ON THE WATER PUMP HAVE CORRODED BEYOND USE. POOR MANUFACTURING OF WATER PUMP TO ALLOW A NON-ALUMINUM METAL TO BE IN CONSTANT CONTACT WITH A CORROSIVE ENGINE COOLANT. *AK
SEAT BELTS PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2000-11-01
- VIN: 1ZVPT21U6M5
- Components: SEAT BELTS
- Summary: RECALL 96S48/96S99 "PASSIVE SEAT BELT ASSEMBLY" REPAIRED AT DEALER SYSTEM FAILED NEEDS REPAIR DEALER AND MANUFACTURER REFUSED TO COMPLY. *AK
SEAT BELTS PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2000-10-25
- VIN: 1CVPT20C5M5
- Components: SEAT BELTS
- Summary: MOTOR SEAT BELT ON THE DRIVER'S SIDE SOMETIMES WILL NOT RETRACT, ALWAYS LEAVING BELT HALFWAY WHEN THE DOOR IS CLOSED. THIS HAD BEEN RAPAIRED BEFORE.*AK SHOULDER HARNESS/SEAT BELT(LAP) WAS REPLACED AS A RESULT OF A RECALL (96V-172) BUT IT STILL MALFUNCTIONS. *YH
SEAT BELTS PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2000-09-10
- VIN: 1ZVPT20C6M5
- Components: SEAT BELTS
- Summary: MOTOR SAFETY SEAT ON TRACK FAILED ON THE DRIVER'S SIDE, CONSUMER WAS NOT PROPERLY RESTRAINED.*AK
SEAT BELTS PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2000-08-21
- VIN: 1ZVPT20C5M5
- Components: SEAT BELTS
- Summary: DRIVER'S SIDE SEATBELT DOESN'T RETRACT AT ALL. SEATBELT IS STUCK IN THE MIDDLE. SEATBELT WAS REPLACED UNDR MANUFACTURER'S RECALL 96S48. FOUR YEARS AGO SEATBELT WAS FIXED. CURRENTLY, SAME PART OF THE SEATBELT WAS NOT OPERABLE. *AK
FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2024-11-24
- VIN: 1FAPP14J5MW
- Components: FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE
- Summary: ESCORT FUEL PUMP ASSEMBLY RESULTED IN HIGH PRESSURE MASSIVE GASOLINE LEAKS, FUEL PUMPS ARE UNDER THE BACK SEATS. WHEN THE FUEL PUMP LEAK THE PRESSURE IS LIKE A GARDEN HOSE SPEWING GASOLINE
SEAT BELTS PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2000-06-19
- VIN: PLEASE FILL
- Components: SEAT BELTS
- Summary: RECALL 96V172001/AUTOMATIC SHOULDER BELT: DRIVER SIDE AUTOMATIC BELT FAILED TO OPERATE AGAIN. MANUFACTURER NOTIFIED, AND INFORMED CONSUMER THAT THEY ARE NOT RESPONSIBLE TO REPAIR RECALL AGAIN. PLEASE PROVIDE FURTHER DETAILS. *AK
SEAT BELTS PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 1995-10-01
- VIN: 1ZVPT21U3M5
- Components: SEAT BELTS
- Summary: SEAT BELT HARNESS LOCKS UP AND CHOKES DRIVER & PASSENGER REPEATEDLY SINCE PURCHASE, DEALERSHIP REPEATEDLY SAYS NO PROBLEM FOUND. *AK
ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2000-01-02
- VIN: 1MEPM6042MA
- Components: ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING
- Summary: THE HEAD GASKET FAILED IN THE ENGINE. THE REPAIR BILL WAS $627.69. I TALKED TO FORD MOTOR COMPANY'S CUSTOMER SERVICE DEPT. THEY DECLINED TO PAY FOR REPAIR EVEN THOUGH THE FAILURE IS A KNOWN DESIGN DEFECT. *AK
SEAT BELTS PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 1998-12-12
- VIN: 1ZVPT20CXM5
- Components: SEAT BELTS
- Summary: SHOUDLER BELTS ON DRIVER'S SIDE AND PASSENGER'S SIDE DO NOT RETRACT. IN NOVEMBER OF 1996, SHOULDER BELTS WERE SERVICED UNDER RECALL # 96V172000. IN DECEMBER OF 1998, DRIVER'S SIDE BELT STOPPED RETRACTING, AND THE PASSENGER'S SIDE BELT STOPPED RETRACTIBNG 6 MONTHS LATER. PLEASE PROVIDE ANY FURTHER INFORMATION. *AK
SEAT BELTS PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2000-03-10
- VIN: 1ZVPT22L5M5
- Components: SEAT BELTS
- Summary: SEAT BELT WAS FIXED DUE TO A RECALL. CURRENTLY SEAT BELT NEEDS TO BE FIXED AGAIN DUE TO LOCKING UP WHEN VEHICLE MOVES. *AK
1991 Ford Probe recalls
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has issued 4 recalls for different components of the 1991 Ford Probe.
- Manufacturer: FORD MOTOR COMPANY
- Components: SEAT BELTS:FRONT:WEBBING
- Summary: NOTE: PASSENGER SIDE (RIGHT) SEAT BELT ASSEMBLY. THE RAIL OF THE AUTOMATIC SHOULDER BELT CAN WEAR SUFFICIENTLY SUCH THAT THE CABLE WHICH RETRACTS THE BUCKLE ASSEMBLY WILL BECOME JAMMED IN THE RAIL RENDERING THE SHOULDER BELT INOPERATIVE.
- Consequence: IN THE EVENT OF A VEHICLE CRASH, THE OCCUPANT WOULD NOT BE ADEQUATELY RESTRAINED INCREASING THE RISK OF PERSONAL INJURY.
- Remedy: DEALERS WILL REPLACE DRIVER SIDE AND INOPERATIVE PASSENGER SIDE SHOULDER BELT TRACK ASSEMBLIES.
- Manufacturer: FORD MOTOR COMPANY
- Components: SEAT BELTS:FRONT:WEBBING
- Summary: NOTE: DRIVER'S SIDE (LEFT) PASSIVE SEAT BELT ASSEMBLY. THE RAIL OF THE AUTOMATIC SHOULDER BELT CAN WEAR SUFFICIENTLY SUCH THAT THE CABLE WHICH RETRACTS THE BUCKLE ASSEMBLY WILL BECOME JAMMED IN THE RAIL RENDERING THE SHOULDER BELT INOPERATIVE.
- Consequence: IN THE EVENT OF A VEHICLE CRASH, THE OCCUPANT WOULD NOT BE ADEQUATELY RESTRAINED INCREASING THE RISK OF PERSONAL INJURY.
- Remedy: DEALERS WILL REPLACE DRIVER SIDE AND INOPERATIVE PASSENGER SIDE SHOULDER BELT TRACK ASSEMBLIES.
- Manufacturer: MIDAS INTERNATIONAL CORP.
- Components: SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC:FOUNDATION COMPONENTS:DRUM:DRUM
- Summary: THE GROOVE FOR THE REAR WHEEL BEARING RETAINER RING WAS INCORRECTLY MACHINED.
- Consequence: IF THE RETAINING RING DOES NOT SIT CORRECTLY IN THEGROOVE, THE AXLE LUG NUTS WILL BREAK, CAUSING THE BRAKE DRUM, WHEEL, AND TIREASSEMBLY TO SEPARATE FROM THE VEHICLE.
- Remedy: MIDAS SHOPS WILL REPLACE THE BRAKE DRUMS WITH OTHER BRAKE DRUMS FROM ANOTHER SUPPLIER.
- Manufacturer: FORD MOTOR COMPANY
- Components: SEAT BELTS:FRONT:ANCHORAGE
- Summary: BRACKETS MOUNTING AUTOMATIC SHOULDER BELT RETRACTOR ASSEMBLY MAY HAVE AN UNDERSTRENGTH SPOT WELD.
- Consequence: SHOULDER BELT COULD FAIL IN A COLLISION INCREASING THERISK OF INJURY TO THE OCCUPANT.
- Remedy: INSTALL TWO BOLTS IN THE BRACKETS TO PREVENT SHOULDER BELT FAILURE.
Negative 1991 Ford Probe car reviews
Positive 1991 Ford Probe car reviews
-
This is the third probe I've had and I loved them all, but this 3.0 has to be the best. It has just enough power and rides like a dream. I am a total Ford Probe fan and would definitely buy another.
-
After reading others' experiences, I went ahead and bought my 90 with 147K on it, and have added another 9K. I replaced the plugs, wires, distributor cap/rotor, and front brakes (which were cheap!). The timing belt blew, but I should have changed it; luckily, there was no valve damage. This car has been amazingly reliable and inexpensive. The previous owner and I both use Mobil 1 oil. It's definitely the best car buy I've ever made!
-
Your 91 Probe is now 16 years old and has close to 300,000 miles on it, but it still has the original motor and transmission (auto) and runs great without any smoke. You also purchased a 97 Probe GT a few years ago because you love this car so much. It's so much fun to drive, has great styling, and is very dependable. It's still your daily driver, and you drive 150 miles each day. This car is fantastic and handles like a sports car, still turning heads. Next week, you will travel to Minnesota to pick up your new 1991 Probe LX V-6, which has only had one owner and has 26,000 miles on it with original tires. It looks like it just came off the showroom floor. You can't wait to bring her home to Colorado. Merry Christmas 2006 to you! Trust me, this is one great car to own and drive.
-
When I bought this car, it had 111,000 miles on it. Eight years later, it's still going strong with over 205,000 miles and no major repairs other than a timing belt and water pump. I would definitely buy it again!
-
Hi there! I recently purchased a 1990 Ford Probe from a family member, but unfortunately, they didn't mention that the car had a few glitches. As time went on, I had to replace the radiator and fix the A/C, but now it's working perfectly and giving off cold air and heat. I also added some nice window tinting and new tires. After fixing most of the major problems, the car has been running smoothly ever since. I'm currently in the process of selling it, but I can confidently say that it has been a reliable car that has never left me stranded. Of course, a car like this needs to be well taken care of. Thanks for reading!
Additional sources
More sources of information about 1991 Ford Probe problems:
Q&A: 1997 Ford Probe GT - Common Problems, Interior, Fuel Pump ...
Jun 9, 2007 ... I have a 1997 Ford Probe GT 6 cyl. There is a problem in the fuel pump circuit. The fuse is good, and when I jump spots - Answered by a ...
Ford Probe Problems and Complaints - 7 Issues
Top Ford Probe Problems · Engine Runs Rough, Stalls, Hesitates on Acceleration, Hard Starting, Poor Performance · Ticking Noise from Engine, Stalling, Rough ...
1991 Ford Probe GT 2.2 Turbo weird problems. : r/MechanicAdvice
Sep 22, 2021 ... Also 4 cracked lines. A leaky or broke line or solenoid for the waste gate can cause over boost shutoff. .. And things would also get hot. Lots ...
Advice buying Ford Probe? Any problems? — Car Forums at ...
Aug 7, 2002 ... Tires wear out. Brakes wear out. O2 sensors wear out. Water pumps wear out. Timing belts wear out. Refrigerant seals wear out. Most of these ...
How trustworthy is a Ford Probe? : r/Ford
Sep 27, 2023 ... The v6 manual probes are reliable and tons of fun. The probe is the “it's more fun to drive a slow car fast, than a fast car slow”. That engine ...
Other years of Ford Probe
Are you having problems with your 1991 Ford Probe?
Linwood Kuhic 2024-09-14
I purchased my 2.2l auto-trans car in 1994 with 47k miles. I took great care of it, performing full tune-ups every 12k miles and changing the oil every 3k miles, including the timing belt and other necessary maintenance. Despite my best efforts, the Probe gave me some trouble. I had to replace both front axles twice, the transmission went out at 75k, and the a/c stopped working at 85k. Every mechanic I went to quoted me $800 or more for the repairs. When the car reached 110k miles, the engine started to wear out and the mileage decreased to 22mpg on the highway. Finally, the clearcoat began to fade and chip. In 2001, I decided to trade it in for a Dodge.
Cloyd Berge 2024-04-21
Hey there! I just wanted to share with you how much I adore my Probe L. It's my little gem and I absolutely love it! This car is super fun to drive and I plan on keeping it until the end of time. It's such a unique car too, you don't see LX models on the streets anymore. How cool is that?
Marcelino Wiegand 2024-02-09
It sounds like you've had a good run with your car, but it's time to move on. With 110000 miles on the clock, it's probably a wise decision to trade it in before it starts to give you any trouble. It's great to hear that you enjoyed it at first, but it's understandable that it's lost its appeal over time. Overall, it seems like it's been a reliable car for you.