1985 Pontiac Fiero problems
The Pontiac Fiero is a rear mid-engine, light sports car manufactured and marketed by Pontiac for model years 1984–1988.
Styled by George Milidrag and Hulki Aldikacti as an economical commuter car with modest performance aspirations, it was Pontiac's first two-seater since their 1926 to 1938 coupes, and the first rear mid-engine mass-produced car by any American manufacturer.
In addition to using 4- and 6-cylinder engines to help Pontiac meet America's 'CAFE' average fuel economy requirements, the Fiero's chassis and structure technology used non-load-bearing, composite body-panels, contributing to the car's light-weight and unique selling proposition. Pontiac engineers modified the design over its life to enhance its performance and reposition the two-seater closer to the implications of its sporty configuration.
The Fiero 2M4 (two-seat, mid-engine, four-cylinder) was on Car and Driver magazine's Ten Best list for 1984, and was the Official Pace Car of the Indianapolis 500 for 1984.
A total of 370,168 Fieros were manufactured over five years' production. After suffering criticisms related to its mild performance as well as reliability and safety issues, the Fiero was discontinued after annual sales fell steadily.
Social links
Common 1985 Pontiac Fiero problems
The Pontiac Fiero, introduced in 1983, was a mid-engined sports car that gained popularity due to its handling and affordable price. However, it quickly gained a reputation for unreliability, with several common problems affecting its performance and longevity.
- Engine Fires: Early Fiero models, including the 1985 model, were notorious for engine fires, with 135 cars reported to have had engine fires according to the NHTSA. This issue was primarily due to the placement of the fuel tank and fuel lines near the engine, making them susceptible to damage and leaks.
- Suspension Issues: The Fiero's independent suspension system was complex and required frequent maintenance due to the use of multiple suspension pivot and attachment points. This made the car expensive to maintain, especially for owners who were not mechanically inclined.
- Cooling System Issues: The Fiero's cooling system was prone to air bubbles due to its long pipes connecting the front-mounted radiator and the engine. This made the engine more susceptible to overheating, which could lead to engine damage if not addressed promptly.
- Engine Selection: Pontiac initially intended to equip the base model with a high-revving 1.8-liter engine, but due to cost considerations, they opted for the 2.5-liter Iron Duke engine instead. This engine was heavy, noisy, slow-revving, and underpowered, which made the car less enjoyable to drive.
- Body Structure: The Fiero's innovative body structure with space frame and plastic panels was expected to keep the weight under 2,000 pounds, but the complete structure ended up weighing more than 2,500 lbs. This made the car slow and less agile than its competitors.
- Vacuum Leaks: Vacuum leaks were a common problem in the Fiero, which could cause issues with the fuel injectors and engine performance. This issue was often caused by worn or damaged vacuum lines, which required replacement to resolve.
- Head Gasket Problems: The Fiero was prone to head gasket issues, which could lead to engine problems and coolant leaks. This issue was often caused by excessive heat and pressure in the cooling system, which could damage the head gasket and cause coolant leaks.
- Catalytic Converter Failure: The Fiero's catalytic converter was prone to failure, which could cause the engine to run poorly and produce excessive emissions. This issue was often caused by a rich fuel mixture or engine misfire, which could damage the catalytic converter and reduce its effectiveness.
- Overheating Engine: The Fiero's engine was prone to overheating, which could lead to engine damage if not addressed promptly. This issue was often caused by a malfunctioning cooling system or a lack of coolant, which could cause the engine to overheat and potentially fail.
In summary, the Pontiac Fiero was a mid-engined sports car that suffered from several common problems, including engine fires, suspension issues, cooling system problems, engine selection, body structure, vacuum leaks, head gasket problems, catalytic converter failure, and overheating engine. These issues made the car expensive to maintain and less reliable than its competitors, contributing to its reputation as an unreliable car.
Is the 1985 Pontiac Fiero a good car?
Comfortable to drive, responsive steering. Very stable in the corners. It makes commuting to work somuch fun you'll want to live further away from work. Biggest complaint is the short life of the upholstery.
Are Pontiac Fieros hard to work on?
Working on a Fiero is not worse than any other FWD car and better in some cases. I just ran into some guy who claimed to be a Fiero owner that told me you have to drop the cradle to change the plugs/ I know he had the cars as he had photo's of 4. But he either had no skills or never worked on a Fiero before.
What was the best year for the Pontiac Fiero?
1988 GT
The best-performing Fieros in the market are 1988 GT coupe models. That final production year saw in improved suspension to make that model the best of the breed, and prices reflect it, with #2-condition values at $13,400.
What year Fiero caught fire?
However, it was almost exclusively the 2.5-liter and the 1984 model which caught fire. By mid-1987, the 1984 Fieros were catching fire at a rate of about 20 per month.
Is the 1985 Pontiac Fiero a good car?
Comfortable to drive, responsive steering. Very stable in the corners. It makes commuting to work somuch fun you'll want to live further away from work. Biggest complaint is the short life of the upholstery.
Is a Pontiac Fiero safe?
The unique plastic body-on-spaceframe design, helped the Fiero to achieve a NHTSA NCAP frontal crash test rating of five stars, the highest rating available.
What is special about the Pontiac Fiero?
Some of the amazing features of the Pontiac Fiero include: Mid-engine layout: This gave the Fiero a better weight distribution and handling than front-engine cars. Composite body panels: These panels were lightweight and helped to improve the Fiero's fuel economy.
Are Pontiac Fieros hard to work on?
Working on a Fiero is not worse than any other FWD car and better in some cases. I just ran into some guy who claimed to be a Fiero owner that told me you have to drop the cradle to change the plugs/ I know he had the cars as he had photo's of 4. But he either had no skills or never worked on a Fiero before.
1985 Pontiac Fiero car problems categorized by type of issue
After analyzing all complaints sent to the NHTSA and researching popular Pontiac Fiero problems, we found that the most common problems with these 2023 model year vehicles are:
- Engine and engine cooling problems
- Power train problems
- Parking brake problems
- Service brakes problems
- Hydraulic problems
The graph below shows statistics for all 1985 Pontiac Fiero vehicle components and the number of complaints received.
Latest 25 complaints 1985 Pontiac Fiero
The NHTSA has received 36 complaints about various vehicle components related to the 1985 Pontiac Fiero. Below are the 25 most recent complaints reported for 1985 Pontiac Fiero vehicles.
PARKING BRAKE,ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2008-07-16
- VIN: 1G2PF37R3FP
- Components: PARKING BRAKE,ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING
- Summary: GM WON'T ACKNOWLEDGE THE RECALLS ON MY CAR. I HAVE CALLED GM CUSTOMER CARE AT LEAST 4 TIMES AND THEY WON'T HELP ME. IT HAS NOT BEEN THROUGH ANY OF THE 2 IMPORTANT SAFETY RECALLS APPLICABLE TO IT. *TR
ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2008-02-18
- VIN: 1G2PG3793FP
- Components: ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING
- Summary: VEHICLE HAS EXHAUST LEAK. PER VIN # RECALL 88C24 APPLIES TO VEHICLE, I'VE READ THE RECALL INFO, AND THERE ARE NO UPDATED PARTS INSTALLED. IVE CONTACTED MY LOCAL DEALER AND THEY CAN NOT CHECK FOR RECALLS DUE TO THE AGE OF THE VEHICLE. I'VE CONTACTED PONTIAC THEY SAY THERE IS NO OPEN RECALLS ON THE VEHICLE. YET PER THE INFO IT DOES APPLIY AND WAS NOT DONE, PONTIAC COULD NOT TELL ME IF IT WAS DONE PER THERE RECORDS. I'VE GOT A FILE # AT PONTIAC 71-611369143
ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 1997-01-01
- VIN: 1G2PF3799FP
- Components: ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING
- Summary: I BELIEVE MY VEHICLE IS SUBJECT TO PONTIAC'S PRODUCT SAFETY CAMPAIGN #88-C-24 WHICH I CURRENTLY HAVE A COPY OF SAME. THE RECALL ADDRESSES COOLANT LEAKS, OIL LEAKS, AND IMPROPER SEALING OF THE ENGINE COMPARTMENT LID ALLOWING FOR PREMATURE FAILURE OF THE FRONT (LEFT) EXHAUST MANIFOLD. MY MANIFOLD IS CRACKED DUE TO SUCH DECK LID FAILURE. IN CONTACTING PONTIAC(GM), THEY ALSO STATE THAT EITHER MY VEHICLE HAS ALREADY BEEN THROUGH THE RECALL(NO RECALL CAMPAIGN STICKER ARE ATTACHED TO MY CAR), OR THAT THE DOCUMENT I POSSESS IS FRAUDULENT. PONTIAC WILL NOT ANSWER MY LETTERS IN WRITTEN FORMAT, ALTHOUGH THEY HAVE BEEN REQUESTED TO DO SO. THEY ALSO STATE THAT THE CAMPAIGN NUMBER(88-C-24) DOES NOT EXIST IN THEIR FILES. I NEED HELP IN RESOLVING THIS ISSUE. *TS ***DIMSII IVOQ ENTRY POSTED AFTER 12-12-02 CUT OVER TO ARTEMIS***761457
ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2001-09-13
- Fire: 1
- VIN: 1G2PM37R3FP
- Components: ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING
- Summary: RECALLS 89 V 232 000/ENGINE AND 90 V 104 000/ENGINE: VEHICLE HAD AN ENGINE COMPARTMENT FIRE WHILE TRAVELING 15-20 MPH. MANUFACTURER WAS NOTIFIED. FEEL FREE TO PROVIDE ANY FURTHER INFORMATION ON THIS MATTER.*AK
PARKING BRAKE PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2001-07-05
- VIN: 1G2PF3796FP
- Components: PARKING BRAKE
- Summary: PONTIAC REFUSES TO PERFORM NHTSA CAMPAIGN ID NUMBER 91V055000. THEIR POSITION IS THE RECALL HAS ALREADY BEEN PERFORMED. I HAVE OWNED THE VEHICLE SINCE 1990, WELL BEFORE THE RECALL DATE, AND THE RECALL HAS NOT BEEN PERFORMED. SMAIL AUTOMOTIVE REFUSES TO INSPECT THE CAR TO VERIFY THAT REPLACEMENT PARTS HAVE BEEN INSTALLED. THEY ARE RELYING ON INACCURATE INFORMATION FROM THEIR COMPUTER SYSTEM. I WOULD LIKE PONTIAC TO PROVIDE PROOF THAT THE RECALL HAS BEEN PERFORMED. MY CAR HAS NOT BEEN TO A GENERAL MOTORS SERVICE DEPARTMENT SINCE I'VE OWNED IT. THANK YOU FOR ANY HELP YOU CAN PROVIDE ME. *AK
ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2000-10-01
- VIN: 1G2PG3791FP
- Components: ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING
- Summary: CONSUMER STARTED CAR AND IT SOUNDED LIKE A CAR WITHOUT A MUFFLER. TOOK VEHICLE TO DEALER AND THEY REFUSED TO REPAIR BECAUSE RECALL CAMPAIN HAD EXPIRED. *AK
SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC,PARKING BRAKE PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 1993-07-23
- VIN: 1G2PG3794FP
- Components: SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC,PARKING BRAKE
- Summary: THE EMERGENCY BRAKE ADJUSTER FAILS TO OPERATE. THE PADS WERE WORN OUT. IT WOULD FAIL TO HOLD WHEN ENGAGED. CAN ROLL IN ON INCLINE. 91V055000
ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 1999-05-15
- VIN: 1G2PF3793FP
- Components: ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING
- Summary: DEALER REFUSED TO HONOR MFR. RECALL 88C-28, EXHAUST MANIFOLD, AND NHTSA RECALL # 90V-104000, ENGINE. DEALER INFORMED CONSUMER THAT THEY WERE NOT GOING TO HONOR RECALL BECAUSE IT WAS TOO LONG AGO. CAN NHTSA HELP IN THIS MATTER. *AK
POWER TRAIN PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2024-11-24
- VIN: 1G2PE37R3FP
- Components: POWER TRAIN
- Summary: CLUTCH AND SLAVE CYLINDER FAILED DUE TO SPRINGS CATCHING THE FINGERS IN THE PRESSURE PLATE STRIPPING THE RELEASE BEARING. YUH
ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 1998-12-31
- Fire: 1
- VIN: 1G2PF3792FP
- Components: ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING
- Summary: MY CAR STARTED TO DEVELOP WHAT I THOUGHT WAS AN EXHAUST LEAK FROM NORMAL WEAR & TEAR. I TOOK THE VEHICLE TO SEVERAL EXHAUST SPECIALTY SHOPS (I.E. COLE MUFFLER, MIDAS, ETC.) TO HAVE THE PROBLEM CORRECTED AT MY EXPENSE WHEN I WAS TOLD THAT IT HAD DEVELOPED A CRACK IN THE EXHAUST MANIFOLD. MUCH TO MY SURPRISE ONE OF THE GARAGES HAD TOLD ME THAT THIS HAS BEEN A CONTINUAL PROBLEM (MANUFACTURER DEFECT) ON THIS PARTICULAR MAKE & MODEL & THAT THERE WAS A RECALL AT ONE TIME OR ANOTHER. WHEN I CONTACTED MY LOCAL PONTIAC DEALER THEY HELPED ME VERY LITTLE & INSISTED THAT I MAKE 700.00 WORTH OF REPAIRS MYSELF TO CORRECT IT. DISCOURAGED & UPSET I TRIED TO CONTACT GENERAL MOTORS MYSELF DIRECT. GENERAL MOTORS WILL NOT EVEN ADMIT THAT THERE HAS EVER BEEN ANY KIND OF RECALL ON THIS VEHICLE & HAS DONE ABSOLUTLY NOTHING TO HELP ME OR RECTIFY THE PROBLEM. (MY COMPLAINT / CASE NUMBER WITH GM IS #99027524) ON 12/31/98 WHILE TRAVELING OUT OF TOWN TO VISIT RELATIVES THE PASSENGER COMPARTMENT OF THE CAR FILLED WITH SMOKE & EXHAUST FUMES & AT THAT POINT I THOUGHT THE ENGINE WAS ON FIRE. AFTER PULLING OVER & MAKING AN EMERGENCY STOP I WAS TOLD THAT IT JUST MAY HAVE BURNED THROUGH & WAS NOT ON FIRE. ALL I WANT IS SOME HELP FROM THE MANUFACTURER TO RECTIFY THIS PROBLEM. TO DATE MY COMPLAINTS GO UN-ANSWERED. I AM NOW DEALING WITH CONSTANT EXHAUST FUMES ENTERING THE PASSENGER COMPARTMENT & MAKING MYSELF & PASSENGERS SICK TO OUR STOMACHES WITH THE CONSTANT CARBON MONOXIDE SMELL & YET FACE THE RISK OF A POSSIBLE FIRE. I WOULD APPRECIATE ANY HELP THAT YOU PEOPLE MAY BE ABLE TO GIVE ME IN GETTING THIS SITUATION SETTLED WITH THE MANUFACTURER. I ALSO SEE AFTER SEARCHING OVER YOUR DATABASE FOR RECALL INFORMATION THAT THERE WAS ALSO A RECALL FOR THE PARKING BRAKE ALSO AN ITEM THAT HASN'T WORKED ON MY CAR FOR YEARS!!! AGAIN GENERAL MOTORS, PONTIC, & THEIR RELATED DEALERS HAVE NO RECORD OF THIS BEING AN ACTUAL COMPLAINT AND/OR RECALL AT ANY TIME! IT JUST SEEMS IRONIC THAT THEY WILL NOT HELP IN ANY WAY
ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2024-11-24
- Fire: 1
- Components: ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING
- Summary: TOOK TO DEALER TO BE REPAIRED AND THE DEALER BROKE PARTS OF THE ENGINE AND IS CHARGING CONSUMER FOR FIXING VEHICLE UNDER A RECALL THAT WAS NOT CORRECTED THE FIRST TIME. *AK
ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 1996-03-26
- VIN: 1G2PF37R3FP
- Components: ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING
- Summary: ENGINE OVERHEATS, MELTING WIRES.
ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 1996-03-25
- VIN: 1G2PF37R3FP
- Components: ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING
- Summary: ENGINE LEAKS.
POWER TRAIN PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 1996-03-25
- VIN: 1G2PF37R3FP
- Components: POWER TRAIN
- Summary: TRANSMISSION LEAKS.
VISIBILITY PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 1996-03-25
- VIN: 1G2PF37R3FP
- Components: VISIBILITY
- Summary: SUNROOF LEAK.
EQUIPMENT PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 1996-03-25
- VIN: 1G2PF37R3FP
- Components: EQUIPMENT
- Summary: AIR CONDITIONER INOPERATIVE.
UNKNOWN OR OTHER PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 1996-03-25
- VIN: 1G2PF37R3FP
- Components: UNKNOWN OR OTHER
- Summary: DASHBOARD LIGHTS INOPERATIVE.
SUSPENSION PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 1996-03-25
- VIN: 1G2PF37R3FP
- Components: SUSPENSION
- Summary: SUSPENSION FAILURE.
SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 1996-03-25
- VIN: 1G2PF37R3FP
- Components: SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC
- Summary: BRAKES FAILED.
POWER TRAIN PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 1996-03-25
- VIN: 1G2PF37R3FP
- Components: POWER TRAIN
- Summary: BEARINGS FAILED.
POWER TRAIN PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 1996-03-25
- VIN: 1G2PF37R3FP
- Components: POWER TRAIN
- Summary: AXLE FAILED.
POWER TRAIN PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 1996-03-25
- VIN: 1G2PF37R3FP
- Components: POWER TRAIN
- Summary: CV JOINTS FAILED.
VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 1996-03-25
- VIN: 1G2PF37R3FP
- Components: VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL
- Summary: CRUISE CONTROL INOPERATIVE.
PARKING BRAKE PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 1996-07-26
- VIN: 1G2PN37R2FP
- Components: PARKING BRAKE
- Summary: THE DEALERSHIP WILL NOT FIX EVERYTHING STATED IN HIS RECALL LETTER. *AK CONSUMER STATES RECALL LETTER STATES THAT THE BRAKE PADS NEED TO BE REPLACED WHENT THE CABLES, ETC ARE REPLACED, HOWEVER DEALER DID NOT PERFORM THIS, SERVICE MANAGER REFUSED TO REPLACE, CONSUMER REFUSES TO DRIVE VEHICLE, RECALL 86-C-16, REGARDING EMERGENCY BRAKE. *SLC
ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 1996-05-01
- Components: ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING
- Summary: RECALL RELATED 89V232000, VEHICLE IN RECALL, CAN'T PEFORM THE RECALL DUE THE SEAL, ALSO THE EXHAUST SYSTEM CAUSING OVERHEATING OF WIRING. *AK
1985 Pontiac Fiero recalls
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has issued 4 recalls for different components of the 1985 Pontiac Fiero.
- Manufacturer: HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC.
- Components: FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE
- Summary: CERTAIN REPLACEMENT FUEL FILTERS, FRAM BRAND NAME P/N G3727, WITH DATE CODES X52911 THROUGH X60801 SEQUENTIALLY OR X600141 AND A MEXICO COUNTRY OR ORIGIN MARKING ON THE FUEL FILTER HOUSING MANUFACTURED FROM OCTOBER 18, 2005, THROUGH MARCH 21, 2006, SOLD FOR USE ON THE VEHICLES LISTED ABOVE AND ON CERTAIN SCHOOL BUSES. (TO SEE THE SCHOOL BUS ENGINE SIZES, CLICK ON "DOCUMENT SEARCH" AND THEN "BUS APPLICATIONS"). THE CONNECTOR ON THE FUEL FILTER WAS NOT MANUFACTURED TO HONEYWELL'S SPECIFICATION. AS A RESULT, THE O-RING MAY NOT SEAT CORRECTLY ON THE FUEL LINE.
- Consequence: THIS CONDITION MAY CAUSE AN INADEQUATE SEAL AT THE CONNECTION, POTENTIALLY LEADING TO A FUEL LEAK. IN THE PRESENCE OF AN IGNITION SOURCE, A FIRE COULD OCCUR.
- Remedy: HONEYWELL WILL NOTIFY OWNERS AND REPLACE THE FUEL FILTERS FREE OF CHARGE. THE RECALL BEGAN ON OCTOBER 18, 2006. OWNERS MAY CONTACT FRAM CUSTOMER SERVICE AT 1-800-890-2075 (OPTION 1).
- Manufacturer: GENERAL MOTORS CORP.
- Components: PARKING BRAKE:CONVENTIONAL
- Summary: PARKING BRAKE ADJUSTER FAILS TO OPERATE AND DO NOT WORK AFTER BRAKE PAD WEAR.
- Consequence: PARKING BRAKES WILL NOT COMPLETELY HOLD A PARKED VEHICLEWHEN PARKED ON A SLOPE, CAUSING UNINTENDED VEHICLE ROLLAWAY WHICH COULD RESULTIN A VEHICLE ACCIDENT.
- Remedy: REPLACE NONFUNCTIONING PARKING BRAKE ADJUSTERS.
- Manufacturer: GENERAL MOTORS CORP.
- Components: ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING:ENGINE:GASOLINE
- Summary: PCV GROMMET OIL LEAKS, TRANSMISSION OIL COOLER LEAKS, PISTON CONNECTING ROD FAILURES BREAKING THROUGH ENGINE WALL CAUSING OIL SPILLAGE, FUEL RAIL LEAKS, COOLANT LEAKS, ROCKER COVER OIL LEAKS, AND MAINTENANCE OR SERVICE RELATED FACTORS, COULD CAUSE ENGINE COMPARTMENT FIRES.
- Consequence: AN ENGINE COMPARTMENT FIRE CAN SPREAD TO THE PASSENGERCOMPARTMENT AND INJURE OCCUPANTS.
- Remedy: CORRECT OR INSTALL NEW COMPONENTS TO PREVENT UNREASONABLE FIRE RISK.
- Manufacturer: GENERAL MOTORS CORP.
- Components: ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING:ENGINE:GASOLINE
- Summary: DUE TO AN INTERACTION OF THE ENGINE COMPARTMENT ENVIRONMENT AND MAINTENANCE OR SERVICE RELATED FACTORS, THERE IS A RISK OF ENGINE COMPARTMENT FIRES.
- Consequence: AN ENGINE COMPARTMENT FIRE CAN SPREAD TO THE PASSENGERCOMPARTMENT AND INJURE OCCUPANTS.
- Remedy: CORRECT OR INSTALL NEW ENGINE COMPONENTS TO PREVENT UNREASONABLE FIRE RISK.
Additional sources
More sources of information about 1985 Pontiac Fiero problems:
What are the most common Fiero problems? - Pennock's Fiero Forum
Dec 31, 2000 ... The second biggest problem is that many of them were given to kids that did not care about them as "first cars." When I got my 1984 Fiero, the ...
Pontiac Fiero History and FAQ: GM's Most Famous Failure?
Feb 2, 2023 ... The biggest were the low-capacity oil pans that caused overheating, faulty connecting rods that failed at a rate of about 1 in 10, and an ...
common problems on used fieros? - Pennock's Fiero Forum
Aug 18, 2004 ... sardonyx247. 5032 posts. Member since Jun 2003. Fuel pumps seem to be common problems in the Fieros I have worked ...
Pontiac Fiero Questions - what should I look for when buying a 1987 ...
May 18, 2011 ... Most problems int he GT 2.8L V6) are ignition module, trunk corners (Rust. Look under carpet in sides of trunk) ...
Common problems? - Pennock's Fiero Forum
Oct 24, 2005 ... ” But the Fiero's inherent potential for performance was realized when Pontiac delivered the V-6-powered GT in 1985. The notchback-styled GT ...
Other years of Pontiac Fiero
Are you having problems with your 1985 Pontiac Fiero?
Leave your review of 1985 Pontiac Fiero