2000 Mercury Mystique problems
The Ford Mondeo I (first generation) is a mid-size car that was produced by Ford, beginning on 23 November 1992, with sales beginning on 22 March 1993. It is also known as the Mk I Mondeo; the 1996 facelift versions are usually designated Mk II. Available as a four-door saloon, a five-door hatchback, and a five-door estate, all models for the European market were produced at Ford's plant in the Belgian city of Genk. In December 1992, Autocar published a section on the Mondeo, and how it would conquer rivals.
Intended as a world car, it replaced the Ford Sierra in Europe, the Ford Telstar in a large portion of Asia and other markets, while the Ford Contour and Mercury Mystique replaced the Ford Tempo and Mercury Topaz in North America. Despite being billed as a world car, the only external items the Mondeo shared initially with the Contour were the windscreen, front windows, front mirrors and door handles. Thus, the CDW27 project turned out not to be a true world car in the sense that the original Ford Focus and newer Fords developed under the "One Ford" policy turned out to be. The first generation Mondeo was replaced in 2000, by the larger second generation; in the United States and Canada, the Contour/Mystique were replaced initially by the Focus and later the Fusion.
Design and development
Mk I
Instigated in 1986 (just before its Sierra predecessor received a major facelift), the design of the car cost Ford US$6 billion. It was one of the most expensive new-car programmes ever. The Mondeo was significant as its design and marketing were shared between Ford USA in Dearborn and Ford of Europe. Its codename while under development reflected thus: CDW27 signified that it straddled the C and D size classes and was a "world car". The head of the Mondeo project was John Oldfield, headquartered at Ford Dunton in Essex.
A large proportion of the high development cost was due to the Mondeo being a completely new design, sharing very little, if anything, with the Ford Sierra. Unlike the Sierra, the Mondeo is front-wheel drive in its most common form, with a rarer four-wheel drive version available on the Mk I car only. Over-optimistically, the floor pan was designed to accept virtually any conceivable drivetrain, from a transverse inline-four engine to a longitudinal V-8. This resulted in a hugely intrusive and mostly disused bellhousing cover and transmission tunnel. Resultingly the front interior, especially the footwells, feels more cramped than would be expected from a vehicle of this size. The Mondeo featured new manual and automatic transmissions and sophisticated suspension design, which give it class-leading handling and ride qualities, and subframes front and rear to give it executive car refinement. The automatic transmission featured electronic control with sport and economy modes plus switchable overdrive. The program manager from 1988, and throughout its early development, was David Price.
By 1989, Ford had confirmed that it would be launching an all-new front-wheel drive car to replace the Sierra within the next four years, although it had not yet decided whether the Sierra name would continue or be replaced, with some subsequent reports even hinting that the Cortina name could make a comeback, having been axed in 1982 when replaced by the Sierra. Several prototypes were tested that year, but the launch of the Nissan Primera in 1990 prompted Ford to make a number of major alterations to the final product, as it saw the new competitor from Nissan to be the benchmark car in this sector, having previously identified the Honda Accord as the class leader.
The car was launched in the midst of turbulent times at Ford of Europe, when the division was haemorrhaging hundreds of millions of dollars, and had gained a reputation in the motoring press for selling products which had been designed by accountants rather than engineers. The fifth-generation Escort and third-generation Orion of 1990 was the zenith of this cost-cutting/high-price philosophy, which was by then beginning to backfire on Ford, with the cars being slated for their substandard ride and handling, though a facelift in 1992 had seen things improve a little. The Sierra had sold well, but not as well as the all-conquering Cortina before it, and in Britain, it had been overtaken in the sales charts by the newer Vauxhall Cavalier. Previously loyal customers were already turning to rival European and Japanese products, and by the time of the Mondeo's launch, the future of Europe as a Ford manufacturing base was hanging in the balance. The new car had to be good, and it had to sell. It was unveiled to the public on 23 November 1992, although sales would not begin for another four months. At this stage, Ford confirmed that the new car would feature a completely new name and would be called the Mondeo.
Safety was a high priority in the Mondeo design, with a driver's side airbag (it was the first-ever car sold from the beginning with a driver's airbag in all of its versions, which helped it achieve the European Car of the Year title for 1994), side-impact bars, seat belt pretensioners, and antilock braking systems (higher models) as standard features. Other features for its year included adaptive damping, self-leveling suspension (top estate models), traction control (V6 and 4WD versions), and heated front windscreen, branded Quickclear.
The interiors were usually well-appointed, featuring velour trim, an arm rest with CD and tape storage, central locking (frequently remote), power windows (all round on higher models), power mirrors, illuminated entry, flat-folding rear seats, etc. Higher-specification models had leather seats, trip computers, electric sunroof, CD changer, and alloy wheels.
During its development, Ford used the 1986 Honda Accord and in the later stages the 1990 Nissan Primera as the class benchmarks that the CDW27 had to beat.
Social links
Common 2000 Mercury Mystique problems
The Mercury Mystique, introduced in 1995, was a compact car produced by the Ford Motor Company under the Mercury brand. The 2000 model year Mystique, based on the Ford Contour, had its fair share of common problems reported by owners. Here are some of the most frequently mentioned issues:
- Automatic Transmission Shifting Issues: Many owners of the 2000 Mercury Mystique have reported issues with the automatic transmission, including harsh shifting, slipping, and delayed engagement. These problems can be caused by various factors, such as worn-out clutches, solenoids, or internal transmission components. Transmission issues can lead to decreased performance, reduced fuel efficiency, and even complete transmission failure if left unaddressed.
- Power Steering System Leaks: The power steering system in the 2000 Mercury Mystique is prone to leaks, which can result in a loss of power steering assist, making the vehicle difficult to maneuver, especially at low speeds. The power steering system uses hydraulic fluid, which can leak from seals, hoses, or the power steering pump. Regular inspection and maintenance of the power steering system can help prevent leaks and prolong the life of the components.
- Air Conditioning System Failure: Several owners have reported issues with the air conditioning system in the 2000 Mercury Mystique, including compressor failure, refrigerant leaks, and electrical problems. These issues can lead to reduced cooling efficiency or complete air conditioning system failure. Regular maintenance and inspection of the air conditioning system can help identify and address these problems early on.
- Fuel System Issues: The 2000 Mercury Mystique has been known to have issues with the fuel system, including fuel pump failures, leaking fuel injectors, and clogged fuel filters. These problems can lead to decreased performance, reduced fuel efficiency, and even complete engine failure if left unaddressed. Regular inspection and maintenance of the fuel system can help prevent these issues and ensure optimal engine performance.
- Suspension and Steering Components Wear: The suspension and steering components in the 2000 Mercury Mystique can wear out prematurely, leading to issues such as uneven tire wear, poor handling, and vibrations while driving. Components such as bushings, struts, and tie rods can wear out over time, requiring replacement to maintain proper vehicle handling and performance.
- Interior Accessory Failures: Several owners have reported issues with interior accessories, such as power window motors, power seat motors, and door lock actuators, failing or malfunctioning. These issues can be caused by worn-out components, electrical problems, or lack of maintenance. Regular inspection and maintenance of interior accessories can help prevent these issues and ensure proper functionality.
In summary, the 2000 Mercury Mystique has several common problems reported by owners, including automatic transmission shifting issues, power steering system leaks, air conditioning system failure, fuel system issues, suspension and steering components wear, and interior accessory failures. Regular inspection and maintenance can help prevent these issues and ensure optimal vehicle performance and longevity.
Is the Mercury Mystique the same as the Ford?
Since its introduction in 1995, the Mystique has been Mercury's counterpart to the Ford Contour. Based on the same platform, the Mercury has differentiated itself by having different styling and trim packages. But for all intents and purposes, the Contour and Mystique were the same car.
How much does a 2000 Mercury Mystique weigh?
2,805 pounds
2000 Mercury Mystique Specs, Features & Options
| 1 of 2 Mystique GS Sedan 4D | 2 of 2 Mystique LS Sedan 4D |
|---|---|
| See Pricing See Cars in Stock | See Pricing See Cars in Stock |
| 36.5 feet | 37.3 feet |
| Curb Weight | |
| 2,805 pounds | 2,824 pounds |
What year was the Mercury Mystique made?
The Contour and Mystique, sold from 1995-2000, were, in the U.S., offered only in a four-door sedan version.
How much does a 1999 Mercury Mystique weigh?
1999 Mercury Mystique Specs, Features & Options
| Curb Weight | |
|---|---|
| 2805 pounds | 2805 pounds |
| EPA Total Interior | |
| 104.1 cubic feet | 104.1 cubic feet |
| Fuel Capacity |
What year was the Mercury Mystique made?
The Contour and Mystique, sold from 1995-2000, were, in the U.S., offered only in a four-door sedan version.
What Ford version is the Mercury Mystique?
The Ford Contour and its rebadged Mercury variant, the Mercury Mystique, are North American versions of the first-generation Ford Mondeo, marketed for model years 1995-2000 as a four-door sedan, replacing the Ford Tempo and Mercury Topaz.
What year was the last Mercury made?
2011
Production of Mercury vehicles ceased in all markets during the fourth quarter of 2010, with the final Mercury automobile, a Grand Marquis, rolling off the assembly line on January 4, 2011.
Is the Mercury Mystique the same as the Ford?
Since its introduction in 1995, the Mystique has been Mercury's counterpart to the Ford Contour. Based on the same platform, the Mercury has differentiated itself by having different styling and trim packages. But for all intents and purposes, the Contour and Mystique were the same car.
2000 Mercury Mystique car problems categorized by type of issue
After analyzing all complaints sent to the NHTSA and researching popular Mercury Mystique problems, we found that the most common problems with these 2023 model year vehicles are:
- Structure problems
- Visibility problems
- Engine and engine cooling problems
- Air bags problems
- Electrical system problems
The graph below shows statistics for all 2000 Mercury Mystique vehicle components and the number of complaints received.
Latest 25 complaints 2000 Mercury Mystique
The NHTSA has received 65 complaints about various vehicle components related to the 2000 Mercury Mystique. Below are the 25 most recent complaints reported for 2000 Mercury Mystique vehicles.
FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2008-06-02
- VIN: 3MEFM6530YM
- Components: FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE
- Summary: TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 2000 MERCURY MYSTIQUE. THE CONTACT EXPERIENCED ENGINE HESITATION, LOSS OF POWER, AND SURGING IN HER VEHICLE. SHE WOULD LOSE ALL POWER AND HAVE TO WAIT A COUPLE OF MINUTES BEFORE THE VEHICLE WOULD RESTART. THE CONTACT COULD ONLY DRIVE FIVE MILES BEFORE THE FAILURE RECURRED. THE FAILURE OCCURRED WHEN THE ENGINE WAS WARM OR HOT. SHE TOOK THE VEHICLE TO A LOCAL GARAGE AND THEY STATED THAT THE FUEL PUMP WAS DEFECTIVE. THE CURRENT MILEAGE WAS APPROXIMATELY 56,000 AND FAILURE MILEAGE WAS APPROXIMATELY 55,600.
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2003-02-01
- Components: ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
- Summary: INSTRUMENT DASH PANEL COVER IS , AND HAS CONTINUED TO PEEL BACK AT THE DEFROST VENTS AT THE WINDSHIELD SINCE 2003. IT APPEARS THE GLUE HAD BEGUN TO FAIL. EACH TIME I BROUGHT MY CAR IN FOR SERVICE MY CONCERNS AND COMPLAINT OF THE DASH BOARD WERE LARGELY IGNORED. SIMPLY BLOWN OFF TO SAY IT WAS NOT COVERED UNDER THE WARRANTY. WHEN ASKED IF THERE HAD BEEN ANY RECALL OR WIDESPREAD COMPLAINTS I WAS TOLD NO TO BOTH QUESTIONS. IT WAS ONLY RECENTLY I DISCOVERED ON A GOVERNMENT RECALL SITE THERE HAD ACTUALLY BEEN A CUSTOMER SERVICE ACTION OFFERED TO ADDRESS THIS PROBLEM. I DID NOT RECEIVE THIS NOTIFICATION. I AM VERY DISSATISFIED TO LEARN THAT NOT ONLY WASN'T I NOTIFIED OF THIS OFFER, MY DIRECT QUESTIONS TOWARDS THIS CONCERN PRODUCED ANSWERS THAT WERE INACCURATE. THIS SITUATION TROUBLES ME DEEPLY AS I PREPARE FOR THE PURCHASE OF MY NEXT NEW CAR. I THINK. IS THIS THE HONESTY ( OR SHOULD I SAY LACK OF HONESTY FROM A CAR MANUFACTURER ) AS I DECIDE WHAT MANUFACTURERS VEHICLE AND SERVICE WILL BEST SATISFY MY EXPECTATIONS AS A NEW CAR CONSUMER. MY FAMILIES ARE LOYAL CUSTOMERS AND CURRENT OWNERS OF FORD, LINCOLN, MERCURY PRODUCTS. THESE INCLUDE LINCOLN CONTINENTAL, FORD EXPLORER, MERCURY MYSTIQUE , AND FORD TAURUS. I WAS LEANING TOWARDS THE PURCHASE OF THE 2009 MERCURY MARINER. IN LIGHT OF MY CURRENT FINDINGS I'M NOT SO SURE I WILL STILL CHOOSE ONE OF YOUR VEHICLES. HAVING RELATIVES WHO ARE CURRENTLY LONG TIME EMPLOYEES OF F,L,M, AS WELL AS RETIRED FAMILY MEMBERS FROM F,L,MERC. I KNOW THAT THEY TOO ARE CONSIDERING PURCHASE OF NEW VEHICLES ALSO IN THE NEAR FUTURE. I REALLY EXPECT A RESPONSE FROM SOMEONE IN HELPING ME RESOLVE THE ISSUE I'M HAVING. DISSATISFIED CONSUMER. CYNTHIA JOHNSON-JERMAN *TR
VISIBILITY,STRUCTURE PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2005-04-20
- Components: VISIBILITY,STRUCTURE
- Summary: DASH HAS PEELED BACK BY WINDSHIELD, DEFROSTER SECTION POPPED OUT, AS TIME PROGRESSES THE DASH KEEPS PEELING BACK/RAISING UP...EVENTUALLY, IT WILL BE TOO HIGH TO SEE OVER. (I AM SHORT STATURE). *TR
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2006-06-17
- Components: ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
- Summary: INSTRUMENT PANEL COVER IS WARPED. *TR
ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING,ELECTRICAL SYSTEM PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2008-04-08
- VIN: 1MEFM66L2YK
- Components: ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING,ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
- Summary: 2000 MYSTIQUE LS, ENGINE STALL 7 TIMES OVER THE LAST 10 MONTHS. AFTER MULTIPLE REPAIRS, THE MERCURY DEALER COULD NOT FIND THE PROBLEM. PROBLEM STILL EXISTS. *TR
SUSPENSION PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2007-03-13
- VIN: 1MEFM6536YK
- Components: SUSPENSION
- Summary: FRONT LEFT COIL SPRING BROKE AND PUNCTURED TIRE WHILE BACKING FROM DRIVEWAY. NO INJURIES OR DAMAGE TO VEHICLE. BOTH FRONT COIL SPRINGS REPLACED BY FORD DEALER AT A COST OF ABOUT $300. TIRE DEALER REPLACED TIRE UNDER ROAD HAZARD WARRANTY. *JB
VISIBILITY PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2005-01-01
- VIN: 1MEFM66L4YK
- Components: VISIBILITY
- Summary: I HAVE THE SAME EXACT DEFECT AS - CAMPAIGN NUMBER: DP06004 STRUCTURE VISIBILITY:DEFROSTER/DEFOGGER SYSTEM:WINDSHIELD:BLOWER
VISIBILITY PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2007-02-27
- Components: VISIBILITY
- Summary: TL* - THE CONTACT OWNS A 2000 MERCURY MARQUIS. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THERE WAS A SAFETY RECALL, BUT IN ACTUALITY IT WAS A SAFETY BULLETIN ON THE WINDSHIELD WIPER MODULE. THE DEALER AND MANUFACTURER STATED THAT THERE WAS NO SAFETY RECALL ON THE WINDSHIELD WIPER MODULE. AS SOON AS REACHING 70 MPH THE WINDSHIELD WIPERS STARTED RUMBLING AS IF SOMETHING WAS LOOSE. IF THE WEATHER WAS POOR THE VISIBILITY WAS DIMINISHED. THE CONTACT STATED THAT HAD DONE THIS SINCE THE PURCHASE DATE. THE CONTACT HAD REPLACED THE WINDSHIELD WIPER BLADES THREE TIMES WITH EXPENSIVE WIPER BLADES, BUT IT DID NOT REMEDY THE FAILURE. THAE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 50,000 AND THE CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 83,360.*AK
FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2006-10-09
- VIN: 1MEFM6536YK
- Components: FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE
- Summary: PASSANGER SIDE FUEL TANK RETAINER STRAP CORRODED THROUGH AND YIELDED. DRIVER SIDE STRAP IS ALSO CORRODED AND NEEDS TO BE REPLACED BUT DID NOT YIELD. *NM
UNKNOWN OR OTHER PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2006-08-20
- VIN: 1MEFM66LXYK
- Components: UNKNOWN OR OTHER
- Summary: INSTRUMENT PANEL WARPAGE CAUSES LOSS OF DEFROSTER FUNCTION. *JB
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2005-10-15
- VIN: 1MEFM6536YK
- Components: ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
- Summary: DT*: THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE VEHICLE'S DASH WARPED ON 10/15/06 CAUSING THE WINDSHIELD DEFROSTER VENT COVER TO POP OUT OF PLACE. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE DEALER SHORTLY AFTER AND DETERMINED THAT A TECHNICAL SERVICE BULLETIN 0346 WITH NHTSA ITEM #10001899 HAD EXPIRED. THE VEHICLE'S DASHBOARD WAS REPLACED ON 04/17/06. *AK
STRUCTURE PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2006-06-22
- VIN: 1MEFM66L8YK
- Components: STRUCTURE
- Summary: DASHBOARD OF 2000 MERCURY MYSTIQUE HAS WARPED AND PRESENTS SAFETY HAZARD AS VISUAL DISTRACTION/OBSTRUCTION TO SAFE DRIVING. *NM
UNKNOWN OR OTHER PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2005-12-12
- VIN: 1MEFM66L8YK
- Components: UNKNOWN OR OTHER
- Summary: I AM THE OWNER OF A 2000 MERCURY MYSTIQUE LS AND THE DASHBOARD PAD IS DELAMINATING AND CURLING UP ON THE PASSENGER'S SIDE OF THE VEHICLE. I PREVIOUSLY HAD THE RECALL FIX THAT WAS ISSUED FOR IT DONE AND THIS WAS ONLY SOMEWHAT SUCCESSFUL AS IT DID ADDRESS THE DASH WARPAGE AROUND THE DEFROST VENT BUT NOW THE DASH HAS NOW BEGUN TO CURL UP AT THE BASTE OF THE WINDSHIELD. EVENTUALLY IT WILL CONTINUE TO CURL AND BEGIN TO OBSTRUCT MY VIEW OUT OF THE PASSENGER SIDE OF THE WINDSHIELD. *JB
AIR BAGS PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2005-10-22
- Number Of Injuries: 1
- Crash: 1
- VIN: 1MEFM66L1YK
- Components: AIR BAGS
- Summary: RAINY DAY, SUV VEHICLE IN FRONT OF ME COMPLETELY STOPPED IN THE MIDDLE OF STREET TO MAKE A LEFT HAND TURN, HE MUST HAVE JUST STOPPED, BECAUSE WHEN I SLOWED DOWN TO BRAKE MY CAR SLID AND HIT HIM IN THE REAR, MY WHOLE FRONT OF CAR WAS SMASHED WITH THE RADIATOR PARTIALLY UP IN THE AIR, THE CAR TOTALLED, I WOULD SAY, YET THE AIR BAGS DID NOT DEPLOY, AND IT HAD DUAL AIR BAGS. I HAD A CUT ON MY NOSE, NOT BAD, BUT WITH BLEEDING INSIDE NOSE, AND LOWER BACK PAINS, MY HEAD HITTING STEERING WHEEL. ALSO MY BROTHER HAS PAINS IN HIS RIB WHICH WE ARE GOING TO THE DOCTOR FORTO HAVE XRAYS. I BELIEVE THESE AIR BAGS SHOULD HAVE DEPLOYED AT TIME OF IMPACT, I AM LUCKY TO BE ALIVE. PLEASE INVESTIGATE THIS . THANK YOU. *NM
SUSPENSION PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2005-07-19
- VIN: 1MEFM55S3YA
- Components: SUSPENSION
- Summary: DT REAR DRIVERS SIDE COIL SPRING I BROKE, BUT CONTAINED IT HASN'T COME OUT OF HOLDER. NOTICED THIS WHEN ROTATING THE TIRES. THERE IWAS A RECALL FOR THE FRONT COIL SPRINGS BUT NOT THE REAR. CONNTACTED F FORD, THEY DID NOT OFFER ANY ASSISTANTS. THE VEHICLE WAS DRIVEABLE,*AK BUT CONCERNED THAT THEY'LL BE A BLOW OUT.NOTICED THIS MORNING ON JULY 19, 2005. *AK
FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE,POWER TRAIN,ELECTRICAL SYSTEM PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2004-07-12
- Components: FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE,POWER TRAIN,ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
- Summary: TRANSMISSION REBUILT AT 45,000 MILES BY DEALER WHEN WE GOT IT BACK IT DIED AT A 1/4 OF A TANK OF GAS, SO WE CAN NEVER LET IT GO BELOW EVEN A HALF A TANK NOW. OVER DRIVE LIGHT FLASHES ON AND OFF PERIODICALLY THEN GOES OFF. AT 69,000 MILES CAR IS NOW CUTTING OUT LIKE IT DID WHEN IT FIRST HAD TRANSMISSION PROBLEMS.
SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC,ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING,POWER TRAIN PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2005-03-04
- VIN: 1MEFM6539YK
- Components: SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC,ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING,POWER TRAIN
- Summary: THE REAR WHEELS ARE LOCKING WHEN THE DRIVER IS SLOWING DOWN TO STOP. THIS OCCURS WHEN THE WEATHER IS COLD. THE OWNER WAS INFORMED BY A MECHANIC THAT THE REAR BRAKE ASSEMBLY WAS COMPLETELY RUSTED. THE OWNER CONTACTED THE MANUFACTURER, BUT RECEIVED NO ASSISTANCE. *AK THERE WAS A BAD NOISE WHEN THE VEHICLE WAS STARTED AND THE VEHICLE WOULD HESITATE WHEN TRYING TO INCREASE IN SPEED ALONG WITH HARD SHIFTING. RECALL CAMPAIGN # 00V075000. *SC
ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2005-01-31
- VIN: 1MEFM653XYK
- Components: ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING
- Summary: TURNING ONTO THE HIGHWAY VEHICLE SHUT DOWN, CAUSING THE VEHICLE TO CONTINUE ONTO THE HIGHWAY WITH NO POWER. VEHICLE WAS TOWED, AND THE ENGINE WAS FOUND TO BE DEFECTIVE.*AK
VISIBILITY PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2004-08-09
- VIN: 1MEFM653XYK
- Components: VISIBILITY
- Summary: THE DEFROSTER DOES NOT OPERATE ,MAKING THE ABILITY TO SEE THE ROAD DIFFICULT DURING INCLEMENT WEATHER. MANUFACTURER WILL BE CONTACTED BY OWNER.*AK
AIR BAGS PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2005-01-05
- Number Of Injuries: 1
- Crash: 1
- VIN: 1MEFM66L1YK
- Components: AIR BAGS
- Summary: CONSUMER'S VEHICLE WAS INVOLVED IN A HEAD ON COLLISION WHILE DRIVING 25 MPH . UPON IMPACT, AIR BAG DID NOT DEPLOY. *AK
ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2004-11-03
- VIN: 1MEFM6539YK
- Components: ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING
- Summary: THE DEALERSHIP INFORMED THE CONSUMER THAT THE INTAKE MANIFOLD WAS LEAKING GAS. THE DEALERSHIP REPAIRED THE INTAKE MANIFOLD. PLEASE PROVIDE MORE INFORMATION. *JB
ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2004-08-10
- Components: ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING
- Summary: CHECK ENGINE LIGHT STAYED ON. CONSUMER STATED NO ONE WAS ABLE TO DETERMINE THE CAUSE. NO CONTACT WITH THE MANUFACTURER. *AK
STRUCTURE PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2004-10-10
- VIN: 1MEFM6532YK
- Components: STRUCTURE
- Summary: THE DASHBOARD WAS WARPED AND SEPARATED FROM THE FRONT WINDSHIELD. DEALERSHIP WAS NOTIFIED, BUT DID NOT RESOLVE THE PROBLEM. *AK
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2004-09-27
- VIN: 1MEFM66L1YK
- Components: ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
- Summary: DEALER FOUND BATTERY CABLE OVER HEATED AND MELTED THE INSULATION. EVERYTHING IN THE CAR IS ORIGINAL WITH NO ADD-ON OR ALTERATION. SINCE WARRANTY EXPIRED IN MAY 2003, IT WILL COST 300 DOLLARS TO FIX IT.*AK
VISIBILITY PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2004-08-11
- VIN: 1MEFM6536YK
- Components: VISIBILITY
- Summary: WELL OVER THE PERIOD OF THREE YEARS MY DASH BOARD HAS BEEN WORKING FINE UNTIL THIS SUMMER WHEN IT BEGAN TO MALFUCTION AND WARP. SOON AFTER MY GRILL FOR MY DEFROSTER POPPED OUT OF THE DASHBOARD AND AND BEGAN TO IMPROPERY DEFROST MY WINDSHIELD MAKING IT VERY DIFFICULT TO DRIVE. I RECIVED A NOTIFICATION JUST AFTER I PRUCHASED MY CAR ABOUT A DEFECT IN THE UNIT BUT NO RECALL WAS ISSUED SO THE TIME OF REPLACEMENT HAD EXPIRED AND NOTHING IS GOING TO BE DONE BECAUSE FORD REFUSES TO PAY FOR THE PARTS. *AK
2000 Mercury Mystique recalls
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has issued 5 recalls for different components of the 2000 Mercury Mystique.
- Manufacturer: FEDERAL-MOGUL CHASSIS PRODUCTS
- Components: SUSPENSION
- Summary: FEDERAL MOGUL IS RECALLING 6,903 AFTERMARKET BALL JOINT ASSEMBLIES SHIPPED BETWEEN NOVEMBER 9, 2007 AND MARCH 26, 2008, WHICH MAY HAVE BEEN PACKAGED WITH INCORRECT NUTS. THE PART NUMBERS PACKAGED WITH INCORRECT NUTS ARE: K7147, K7329, K8683, AND 104353. THESE PARTS WERE MADE FOR USE ON THE VARIOUS VEHICLES LISTED ABOVE.
- Consequence: THE NUTS INCLUDED IN THE PACKAGING FOR THESE BALL JOINT ASSEMBLIES ARE MISSING THE INTENDED PREVAILING TORQUE (SELF-LOCKING) FEATURE. IF THE INCORRECT NUT WAS TO BECOME LOOSE, THE JOINING MEMBERS MAY LOOSEN LEADING TO A SEPARATION OF THE BALL JOINT. THIS MAY RESULT IN LOSS OF VEHICLE CONTROL, POSSIBLY RESULTING IN A VEHICLE CRASH.
- Remedy: FEDERAL MOGUL WILL NOTIFY OWNERS AND REPLACE THE PARTS FREE OF CHARGE. THE RECALL BEGAN ON MAY 22, 2008. OWNERS CAN CONTACT FEDERAL MOGUL AT 877-489-6659.
- Manufacturer: BRAKE PARTS, INC.
- Components: SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC
- Summary: CERTAIN AFTERMARKET BRAKE HYDRAULIC MASTER CYLINDERS SOLD AS REPLACEMENT BRAKE CYLINDERS FOR CERTAIN FORD, DAIMLERCHRYSLER, AND JEEP PASSENGER VEHICLES. THESE BRAKE CYLINDERS WERE SOLD UNDER THE BRAND NAMES OF NAPA, RAYBESTOS, AIMCO, AC DELCO, CARQUEST, BENDIX, AND WAGNER. ONLY PRODUCTS THAT WERE MANUFACTURED FROM JULY 27, 2005 THROUGH JANUARY 17, 2006 (DATE CODES 0529 THROUGH 0602) ARE SUBJECT TO THIS RECALL. WHEN SUBJECT TO VERY COLD TEMPERATURES, AN INTERNAL SEAL IN THE MASTER CYLINDER COULD LOSE FLEXIBILITY AND MAY CAUSE BRAKE FLUID TO LEAK.
- Consequence: LOSS OF BRAKE FLUID CAN LEAD TO A DECREASE IN BRAKE LINE PRESSURE AND AN INCREASE IN STOPPING DISTANCE, WHICH CAN RESULT IN A VEHICLE CRASH.
- Remedy: AFFINIA (BRAKE PARTS, INC.) WILL REPLACE THE SUBJECT BRAKE HYDRAULIC MASTER CYLINDERS FREE OF CHARGE. THE RECALL BEGAN ON MARCH 20, 2006. OWNERS CAN CONTACT AFFINA GROUP CUSTOMER SERVICE AT 1-800-323-0354.
- Manufacturer: FORD MOTOR COMPANY
- Components: SEAT BELTS
- Summary: VEHICLE DESCRIPTION: PASSENGER VEHICLES, LIGHT DUTY TRUCKS, SPORT UTILITY VEHICLES, AND MINI VANS EQUIPPED WITH TRW SEAT BELT BUCKLE ASSEMBLIES. THE BUCKLE BASE OF THESE SEAT BELT ASSEMBLIES WERE NOT PROPERLY HEAT TREATED AND THEREFORE DO NOT PASS THE LOAD BEARING REQUIREMENT OF FEDERAL MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY STANDARD NO. 209, "SEAT BELT ASSEMBLIES."
- Consequence: IN THE EVENT OF A VEHICLE CRASH, THE OCCUPANT MAY NOT BE PROPERLY RESTRAINED.
- Remedy: DEALERS WILL INSPECT THE DATE CODE ON CERTAIN SEAT BELT BUCKLES OF YOUR VEHICLE AND REPLACE ALL SEAT BELT BUCKLES THAT FALL WITHIN THE SUSPECT DATE CODE RANGE. OWNER NOTIFICATION BEGAN OCTOBER 26, 2000. OWNERS WHO TAKE THEIR VEHICLES TO AN AUTHORIZED DEALER ON AN AGREED UPON SERVICE DATE AND DO NOT RECEIVE THE FREE REMEDY WITHIN A REASONABLE TIME SHOULD CONTACT FORD AT 1-800-392-3673.
- Manufacturer: FORD MOTOR COMPANY
- Components: SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC:FOUNDATION COMPONENTS
- Summary: VEHICLE DESCRIPTION: PASSENGER VEHICLES NOT EQUIPPED WITH THE ANTI-LOCK BRAKING SYSTEM (ABS). A PRESSURE CONSCIOUS REDUCING VALVE (PCRV) IN THE REAR BRAKES MAY BE SUBJECT TO CORROSION AND RESULT IN MALFUNCTION, WHEN OPERATED IN AREAS THAT USE SALT COMPOUNDS ON THE ROADWAY FOR DE-ICING OR DUST CONTROL.
- Consequence: IF BOTH PCRV'S MALFUNCTION, VEHICLE HANDLING COULD BE ADVERSELY AFFECTED DURING BRAKING AS A RESULT OF THE REAR WHEELS LOCKING, INCREASING THE RISK OF A CRASH.
- Remedy: DEALERS WILL INSTALL IMPROVED PCRV'S IN THE REAR BRAKE SYSTEM. THIS RECALL WAS EXPANDED IN SEPTEMBER 2000 TO INCLUDE 1999 AND 2000 FORD CONTOUR, MERCURY MYSTIQUE AND COUGAR VEHICLES.
- Manufacturer: FORD MOTOR COMPANY
- Components: EQUIPMENT:OTHER:LABELS
- Summary: VEHICLE DESCRIPTION: PASSENGER VEHICLES. AN INCORRECT LABEL WAS INSTALLED ON THE DRIVER SIDE REAR DOOR. THIS LABEL CONTAINS INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE ACTIVATION OF THE CHILDPROOF SAFETY LOCKS.
- Consequence: THE OPERATOR OF THE VEHICLE MAY BELIEVE THE CHILDPROOF SAFETY LOCK WAS ACTIVATED WHEN IT WAS NOT, POTENTIALLY ALLOWING THE DOOR TO BE OPENED FROM THE INSIDE.
- Remedy: OWNERS WILL BE PROVIDED WITH A REPLACEMENT LABEL AND INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS.
Negative 2000 Mercury Mystique car reviews
Positive 2000 Mercury Mystique car reviews
-
This car is often overlooked despite being the same size as a Volvo S40 or Passat. I have owned this car and have only needed to do regular maintenance. It is very enjoyable to drive with its V6 engine, manual transmission, and excellent handling. My only complaint is that the new Mondeo is not available in the US.
-
I've had this car for five years and nearly 80k miles now. It was the only American made sedan I could find with a manual transmission, ABS and a V-6 at the time. I opted for every available option; the power seat, sunroof, traction control and split folding leather seats have definitely come in handy. I always enjoy driving it, although it does have some limitations, particularly the drink holders and road noise at highway speeds. Fortunately, very little has gone wrong that wasn't fixed under warranty (knock on wood) so I've been quite pleased with that. Generally, it's a much sportier and more comfortable car than you'd expect for the price and I am very happy with it.
-
I hope you're doing well! I wanted to share my thoughts on my 1999 Mercury Mystique Ls. I absolutely love how comfortable the ride is, thanks to the soft yet supportive leather seats and great shocks. Additionally, I find all of the dash buttons to be easily accessible and straightforward to understand. The styling of both the interior and exterior is very nice and definitely doesn't look cheap like so many other cars. In fact, I think this car looks like it should cost more than it actually does!
-
I bought this vehicle new, took it for all the regular check-ups, and changed the oil every 3,000 miles. Despite my diligent maintenance, the engine blew at 80,000+ miles. However, I confidently replaced the engine, knowing that I had taken excellent care of the car.
-
'99 LS...has a 5-speed manual transmission. The beefy tires add a whole new dimension to the driving experience. The car handles smoothly and there's no hesitation when shifting or accelerating. While the trunk has an odd opening, with some careful maneuvering, you can make the most of the space. The rear seat is best suited for small adults and kids. The leather seats are definitely a plus, providing both comfort and support. My car is equipped with ABS and a sunroof that allows fresh air in and sunshine to brighten up the interior. The gas mileage averages around 22MPG. I highly recommend this car to anyone who needs four doors and loves to have fun.
Additional sources
More sources of information about 2000 Mercury Mystique problems:
2000 Mercury Mystique Problems and Complaints - 3 Issues
Problem with your 2000 Mercury Mystique? Our list of 3 known complaints reported by owners can help you fix your 2000 Mercury Mystique.
Common Mercury Mystique Problems - 1999 Mercury Mystique GS ...
Apr 16, 2011 ... I have a 99 Mercury Mystique that has a fuel problem. When I turn on the ignition to start the engine, the fuel pump · My 2000 mercury ...
Mercury Mystique Problems and Complaints - 4 Issues
Top Mercury Mystique Problems · Check Engine Light Due to Plugged EGR Passage. 23 people have reported this · Problem With Idle Air Bypass Valve May Cause Engine ...
Q&A: 1999 Mercury Mystique Engine Problems - Causes & Solutions
Jun 24, 2009 ... ... engine componants are more like a 2000. There are no stored codes in the OBD. no chec engine light. Mercury Mechanic: Richard. Verified ...
1995 mercury mystique | Ford Contour Enthusiasts Group Forums
May 22, 2007 ... Another common problem is the idle air control valve, sometimes you can take them off and clean them, carbon builds up in them. Also if you ...
Other years of Mercury Mystique
Are you having problems with your 2000 Mercury Mystique?
Jamison Flatley 2024-09-02
The vehicle exhibits several issues that require attention. The engine produces excessive noise and vibrations at 70 mph. The brakes have been replaced twice within 60,000 miles and still perform below the expected standard. The acceleration is irregular, particularly when entering the expressway. The mechanic's report indicates cracks in the chassis that require repair. Additionally, there is knocking on extreme turns of the steering wheel. The interior molding below the windshield and rubber door trim are both curled up and deteriorating. Furthermore, there are shorts in the interior lighting of the dash, overhead, and gear shift. Rest assured, these issues can be resolved with the appropriate repairs and maintenance.
Jeffrey Cummings 2024-08-21
It sounds like you've had a great experience with your car overall! Although you did have a problem with the dash, it's great to hear that Ford was able to fix it even after the car was off warranty. The V6 engine sounds like it provides plenty of power, and it's even better that your car is loaded with all the options. Thanks for sharing your thoughts!
Derick Schmidt 2024-05-08
I've had quite a few major repairs over the years, and I've been told by multiple mechanics that these issues are common for this model. Some of the repairs that were specific to the Mystique include the timing belt going at 108,000 miles (supposed to last until 120,000), the transmission needing to be rebuilt at 5 years due to the way the drive shaft kit was made, and a complete brake system overhaul at 6 years. I also had some issues with the oxygen sensor, which cost me $600 to fix, and the dash has warped over time, making it difficult to see over and causing problems with the defroster. Despite these issues, the car still gets me where I need to go and has plenty of space. However, I have to admit that it hasn't lived up to my expectations in terms of safety, as I find myself stranded on the side of the road twice a year.
Earl Hodkiewicz 2024-01-05
Although I am happy with the performance of the vehicle, I am extremely concerned about the dashboard becoming unglued, unsightly and unsafe in a four-year-old car. Despite being informed by Lincoln Mercury that there is nothing they can do and that replacing it would cost me $1350 with no guarantees, I believe that a recall should be issued for this issue. According to the Linc/Merc representative, this is a common problem and a recall is necessary. If you are interested in joining me to write to Ford/Lincoln Mercury about this issue, please email me at [email protected].