Mercury Mystique problems
The Ford Mondeo I (first generation) is a mid-size car that was produced by Ford, beginning on 23 November 1992, with sales beginning on 22 March 1993. It is also known as the Mk I Mondeo; the 1996 facelift versions are usually designated Mk II. Available as a four-door saloon, a five-door hatchback, and a five-door estate, all models for the European market were produced at Ford's plant in the Belgian city of Genk. In December 1992, Autocar published a section on the Mondeo, and how it would conquer rivals.
Intended as a world car, it replaced the Ford Sierra in Europe, the Ford Telstar in a large portion of Asia and other markets, while the Ford Contour and Mercury Mystique replaced the Ford Tempo and Mercury Topaz in North America. Despite being billed as a world car, the only external items the Mondeo shared initially with the Contour were the windscreen, front windows, front mirrors and door handles. Thus, the CDW27 project turned out not to be a true world car in the sense that the original Ford Focus and newer Fords developed under the "One Ford" policy turned out to be. The first generation Mondeo was replaced in 2000, by the larger second generation; in the United States and Canada, the Contour/Mystique were replaced initially by the Focus and later the Fusion.
Design and development
Mk I
Instigated in 1986 (just before its Sierra predecessor received a major facelift), the design of the car cost Ford US$6 billion. It was one of the most expensive new-car programmes ever. The Mondeo was significant as its design and marketing were shared between Ford USA in Dearborn and Ford of Europe. Its codename while under development reflected thus: CDW27 signified that it straddled the C and D size classes and was a "world car". The head of the Mondeo project was John Oldfield, headquartered at Ford Dunton in Essex.
A large proportion of the high development cost was due to the Mondeo being a completely new design, sharing very little, if anything, with the Ford Sierra. Unlike the Sierra, the Mondeo is front-wheel drive in its most common form, with a rarer four-wheel drive version available on the Mk I car only. Over-optimistically, the floor pan was designed to accept virtually any conceivable drivetrain, from a transverse inline-four engine to a longitudinal V-8. This resulted in a hugely intrusive and mostly disused bellhousing cover and transmission tunnel. Resultingly the front interior, especially the footwells, feels more cramped than would be expected from a vehicle of this size. The Mondeo featured new manual and automatic transmissions and sophisticated suspension design, which give it class-leading handling and ride qualities, and subframes front and rear to give it executive car refinement. The automatic transmission featured electronic control with sport and economy modes plus switchable overdrive. The program manager from 1988, and throughout its early development, was David Price.
By 1989, Ford had confirmed that it would be launching an all-new front-wheel drive car to replace the Sierra within the next four years, although it had not yet decided whether the Sierra name would continue or be replaced, with some subsequent reports even hinting that the Cortina name could make a comeback, having been axed in 1982 when replaced by the Sierra. Several prototypes were tested that year, but the launch of the Nissan Primera in 1990 prompted Ford to make a number of major alterations to the final product, as it saw the new competitor from Nissan to be the benchmark car in this sector, having previously identified the Honda Accord as the class leader.
The car was launched in the midst of turbulent times at Ford of Europe, when the division was haemorrhaging hundreds of millions of dollars, and had gained a reputation in the motoring press for selling products which had been designed by accountants rather than engineers. The fifth-generation Escort and third-generation Orion of 1990 was the zenith of this cost-cutting/high-price philosophy, which was by then beginning to backfire on Ford, with the cars being slated for their substandard ride and handling, though a facelift in 1992 had seen things improve a little. The Sierra had sold well, but not as well as the all-conquering Cortina before it, and in Britain, it had been overtaken in the sales charts by the newer Vauxhall Cavalier. Previously loyal customers were already turning to rival European and Japanese products, and by the time of the Mondeo's launch, the future of Europe as a Ford manufacturing base was hanging in the balance. The new car had to be good, and it had to sell. It was unveiled to the public on 23 November 1992, although sales would not begin for another four months. At this stage, Ford confirmed that the new car would feature a completely new name and would be called the Mondeo.
Safety was a high priority in the Mondeo design, with a driver's side airbag (it was the first-ever car sold from the beginning with a driver's airbag in all of its versions, which helped it achieve the European Car of the Year title for 1994), side-impact bars, seat belt pretensioners, and antilock braking systems (higher models) as standard features. Other features for its year included adaptive damping, self-leveling suspension (top estate models), traction control (V6 and 4WD versions), and heated front windscreen, branded Quickclear.
The interiors were usually well-appointed, featuring velour trim, an arm rest with CD and tape storage, central locking (frequently remote), power windows (all round on higher models), power mirrors, illuminated entry, flat-folding rear seats, etc. Higher-specification models had leather seats, trip computers, electric sunroof, CD changer, and alloy wheels.
During its development, Ford used the 1986 Honda Accord and in the later stages the 1990 Nissan Primera as the class benchmarks that the CDW27 had to beat.
Social links
Mercury Mystique model years
Common Mercury Mystique problems
The Mercury Mystique, a compact car produced between 1995 and 2000, was known for its European-inspired handling and stylish interior. However, it also had several common problems that affected its overall appeal and longevity.
- Limited Rear-Seat Room: One of the most frequently cited issues with the Mercury Mystique is its lack of rear-seat space, particularly for a family sedan. This drawback was addressed in later models by redesigning the front seatbacks and lowering and moving back the rear-seat cushions, but the overall space remained a concern for many owners.
- Automatic Transmission Issues: The Mercury Mystique's automatic transmission was often criticized for its poor performance and reliability. Many owners reported harsh shifts, slipping, and difficulty with downshifts, which could lead to premature wear and expensive repairs.
- Interior Quality: Although the Mystique's interior was praised for its design and appearance, many owners reported issues with the build quality and durability of the interior components. Common complaints included rattles, vibrations, and the disintegration of plastic parts, particularly in cold climates. Additionally, the interior's susceptibility to breaking and electrical problems was a frequent source of frustration for Mystique owners.
- Suspension and Steering: Some owners reported issues with the Mystique's suspension and steering, including excessive vibration, noise, and a harsh ride. While the car was known for its handling capabilities, these issues could detract from the overall driving experience and lead to premature wear of suspension components.
- Electrical Problems: The Mercury Mystique was plagued by a variety of electrical issues, ranging from intermittent interior lighting and gauge failures to malfunctioning alarms and window motors. These problems could be difficult to diagnose and often required expensive repairs, contributing to the car's reputation for unreliability.
- Early Wear of Parts: Some owners reported that parts of the Mystique, such as the brakes, suspension components, and exhaust system, wore out earlier than expected. This could lead to frequent repairs and higher maintenance costs over time.
In summary, the Mercury Mystique was a compact car with a number of common problems that affected its appeal and longevity. These issues included limited rear-seat room, automatic transmission problems, interior quality concerns, suspension and steering issues, electrical problems, and early wear of parts. While the Mystique had its strengths, such as its European-inspired handling and stylish interior, these issues contributed to the car's overall reputation for unreliability and high maintenance costs.
What are common problems with mercury?
Depending on the type and amount, exposures to mercury can damage the nervous system, kidneys, liver and immune system. Breathing mercury vapors can harm the nervous system, lungs and kidneys. Mercury vapors can pass easily from the lungs to the bloodstream.
What year was the Mercury Mystique made?
The Mercury Mystique, Mercury's all-new front-wheel-drive, 5-passenger, midsize 4-door sedan, debuted in late 1994 for the 1995 model year. Occupying the slot in the Mercury line once held by the now-defunct Topaz, the Mystique was a much more sophisticated car than the Topaz ever was.
Are mercury cars reliable?
The Mercury Mariner received mixed reviews from owners and good scores from users, with a reliability rating of 3.7 out of 5.0 on RepairPal.
Is mercury a reliable car brand?
Mercury Ratings Overview
The average rating is a 3.9 out of 5 stars.
Percentage distribution of complaints by Mercury Mystique years
We have researched Mercury problems and analysed all the complaints filed against Mercury Mystique cars and compiled the top 5 most problematic Mercury Mystique model years:
- Mercury Mystique 1995
- Mercury Mystique 1998
- Mercury Mystique 1996
- Mercury Mystique 1999
- Mercury Mystique 1997
Below you can see the percentage distribution of known problems by Mercury Mystique model years.
Distribution of the number of complaints by Mercury Mystique years
We've also compiled a chart for you with the number of complaints about Volkswagen Jetta cars of certain model years:
Mercury Mystique car problems categorized by type of issue
After analysing all complaints related to Mercury Mystique , it was concluded that the most common issues with these cars are:
- Engine and engine cooling problems
- Electrical system problems
- Power train problems
- Suspension problems
- Service brakes problems
The graph below shows statistics for all Mercury Mystique vehicle components and the number of complaints received.
Distribution of the number of complaints where the accident occurred by Mystique model years
A total of 62 complaints were registered in which the accident occurred. In the graph you can see the distribution of the number of complaints by model year.
Distribution of the number of complaints with fire by Mystique model years
There were a total of 40 complaints that resulted in a fire. In the graph you can see the distribution of the number of complaints by model year.
Distribution of the number of complaints with injuries by Mystique model years
There were a total of 62 complaints that resulted in a injuries. In the graph you can see the distribution of the number of complaints by model year.
Distribution of the number of complaints with deaths by Mystique model years
There were a total of 1 complaints that resulted in a death. In the graph you can see the distribution of the number of complaints by model year.
The NHTSA has received 1184 complaints about various vehicle components related to the Mercury Mystique . Below are the 25 most recent complaints reported for Mercury Mystique vehicles.
Latest 25 complaints
Mercury Mystique 1998
- Date Of Incident: 2016-01-01
- Date Complaint: 2016-01-06
- VIN: 1MEFM66L7WK
- Components: EXTERIOR LIGHTING
- Summary: HEADLIGHTS ARE MALFUNCTIONING. MY 17YO DAUGHTER GOT PULLED OVER BECAUSE ONLY HER HIGH BEAMS WERE WORKING. THE REGULAR HEADLIGHTS ARE DIM. VERY DANGEROUS. THIS HAPPENS AT ALL TIMES AND UNEXPECTEDLY.
Mercury Mystique 1998
- Date Of Incident: 2015-10-14
- Date Complaint: 2015-10-15
- VIN: 1MEFM66L1WK
- Components: VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL
- Summary: WHEN YOU HAVE TRAVELED 30MINS/15 TO 18 MILES THE CAR BEGAN TO SLOW DOWN/THE SPEEDOMETER BEGAN TO DROP EVEN THOUGH YOU ARE PUSHING THE GAS PEDDLE AND THE RPM GAUGE IS WAVING BACK AND FOURTH. IT HAPPENED ON 09/25/15, 10/08,13,14/2015. I WAS TRAVELING 60MPH AND 45MPH.
Mercury Mystique 2001
- Date Of Incident: 2015-01-04
- Date Complaint: 2015-01-04
- Components: TIRES
- Summary: TIRE WOULD DEFLATE ON AND OFF. WENT IN TO THE SHOP TODAY TO GET IT REPAIRED. THERE WAS A RIP IN SIDEWALL. REPAIRMEN STATED IT WAS A DEFECTIVE TIRE, NOT ANYTHING I DID. HAD TO BUY A NEW TIRE. *TR
Mercury Mystique 1998
- Date Of Incident: 2014-07-01
- Date Complaint: 2014-09-25
- VIN: 3MELM66L9WM
- Components: STEERING,SUSPENSION,ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING,POWER TRAIN,ELECTRICAL SYSTEM,VISIBILITY,EQUIPMENT
- Summary: 1998 MERCURY MYSTIQUE. ELECTRICAL SUB-HARNESS CONNECTOR PROBLEMS. *SMD THE CONSUMER STATED HE TOOK THE VEHICLE TO HIS MECHANIC, BECAUSE THE AC WASN'T COOLING PROPERLY AND THE VEHICLE WOULD OVER HEAT, WHILE IT WAS ON. THE VEHICLE HAS TWO FANS IN THE FRONT AND THEY FOUND THE COOLING FAN MELTED AND THE SUB-HARNESS CONNECTOR BURNED UP. IN ADDITION, THEY SHOWED THE CONSUMER THE PART OF THE SUB-HARNESS WITH THE INSULATION JUST FALLING OFF THE WIRE. THEY HAD TO REPLACED THE FAN MOTOR UNIT AND HAD TO SPLICE IN A FAN CONNECTOR AND WIRE INTO THE REST OF THE SUB-HARNESS, BECAUSE FOR SAID THE SUB-HARNESS WAS OBSOLETE AND NOT AVAILABLE. WHILE IT FUNCTIONS, THE CHECK ENGINE LIGHT HAS SINCE ILLUMINATED FOR A CAM SHAFT POSITION SENSOR, WHICH THE CONSUMER WAS INFORMED IT WAS RELATED TO THE SUB-HARNESS. ALSO, THE LOWER CONTROL ARMS, BALL JOINTS, FRONT STRUTS, REAR STRUTS AND REAR MOUNTS, NUMEROUS O2 SENSORS, RADIO ANTENNA, RACK AND PINION, DRIVERS SIDE POWER WINDOW AND SWITCH CONTROLLER WERE ALL REPLACED. THE ENGINE AND TRANSMISSION MOUNTS ALSO HAD TO BE REPLACED. *JB
Mercury Mystique 1999
- Date Of Incident: 2012-10-02
- Date Complaint: 2012-10-08
- Components: STRUCTURE,ENGINE
- Summary: I WAS DRIVING ALONG WHEN I COULD SMELL MY CAR GETTING HOT, SO I PULLED OVER AND SURE ENOUGH IT WAS OVERHEATING, BUT DID NOT SHOW INSIDE ON THE DASHBOARD, SO I HAD IT CHECKED AND THE PLASTIC HOUSING AROUND THE THERMOSTAT WAS CRACKED IN 3 PLACES, SO I SAY FIX IT ,THEY SAID IT WOULD BE 450.00, OK NO PROBLEM, THEN THEY CALLED BACK AND SAID THAT THE HOUSING WAS WELDED TO THE MANIFOLD AND THAT I WOULD HAVE TO REPLACE ALL FOR 1200.00 AND THAT THE HOUSING WASN'T MADE OF PLASTIC ANYMORE BECAUSE OF THIS PROBLEM. I THINK THIS SHOULD BE A RECALL AND FIXED FOR FREE. *TR
Mercury Mystique 1997
- Date Of Incident: 2012-01-13
- Date Complaint: 2012-07-20
- VIN: 1MELM6538VK
- Components: SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC
- Summary: TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 1997 MERCURY MYSTIQUE. THE CONTACT STATED THAT HE NOTICED A LEAK UNDER THE VEHICLE. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE DEALER FOR DIAGNOSIS WHERE HE WAS INFORMED THAT THE PRESSURE CONSCIOUS REGULATING VALVE ON THE REAR DRIVER SIDE WOULD NEED TO BE REPLACED. THE VEHICLE WAS REPAIRED. THE CONTACT REFERENCED NHTSA CAMPAIGN ID NUMBER: 00V075000 (SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC:FOUNDATION COMPONENTS) AND CONTACTED THE MANUFACTURER WHO STATED THAT THE VEHICLE WAS NOT INCLUDED IN THE RECALL. THE FAILURE AND CURRENT MILEAGES WERE 93,000. UPDATED 8/23/12 *CN
Mercury Mystique 1997
- Date Of Incident: 2012-06-01
- Date Complaint: 2012-06-28
- VIN: 1MELM6538VK
- Components: SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC,SERVICE BRAKES
- Summary: MY 97 MERCURY MYSTIQUE HAS A BAD BRAKE FLUID LEAK FROM A PART ON THE BRAKE LINE (PRESSURE CONSCIOUS RELEASE VALVE) THAT WAS RECALLED #06E022000. FLUID MUST BE ADDED EVERY FEW DAYS WHEN THE BRAKE LIGHT COMES ON. FORD TELLS ME THERE IS NO RECALL INFO FOR MY CAR AND WON'T DO ANYTHING. THEY COULD NOT SAY IF ANY RECALL WORK HAD BEEN DONE ON MY CAR. BOTTOM LINE, THIS IS NOT PREVENTATIVE, MY CAR IS DANGEROUSLY LEAKING BRAKE FLUID FROM A RECALLED PART. *TR
Mercury Mystique 1995
- Date Of Incident: 2011-07-25
- Date Complaint: 2011-09-09
- VIN: 1MELM66L0SK
- Components: VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL
- Summary: I BOUGHT THIS CAR ON JUNE 22,2011. ON THAT DAY I TOLD THE DEALER THAT THE SPEEDOMETER WAS ACTING ERRATIC,JUMPING UP AND DOWN. AT THE TIME, IT WASN'T AFFECTING THE SPEED. THEY SAID THEY KNOW AND JUST WAIT AND SEE WHAT HAPPENS. ABOUT A MONTH OR SO LATER,THE SPEEDOMETER STOPPED WORKING, CAUSING THE CAR TO HESITATE A LITTLE. I BROUGHT IT BACK AND THEY GOT A CABLE FROM A USED CONTOUR AND RIGGED IT SO IT WOULD WORK. SO THEY CLAIM.I WAS ALSO TOLD THEY JUST REPAIRED THE CABLE DIFFERENTLY. REGARDLESS,THEY SAID THEY REPAIRED IT. IT WORKED AND I DROVE IT FOR AT LEAST ANOTHER 2 MONTHS OR SO NOW AND IT FAILED AGAIN. I DROVE BACK TO THE SHOP AND THEY SAY ITS A DEALER PART OR THEY DON'T EVEN MAKE THEM ANYMORE? I DON'T KNOW HOW FAST IM GOING,WHICH IS DANGEROUS AND AS OF TODAY,THE 9TH OF SEPT2011, IT DOESN'T WORK. *TR
Mercury Mystique 1999
- Date Of Incident: 2011-03-01
- Date Complaint: 2011-03-17
- Components: EQUIPMENT
- Summary: S10 APPROPRIATE HANDLING- LETTER TO THE SECRETARY FROM REQUESTING THE RECALL AND REPLACEMENT OF FACULTY FLOOR MATS DUE TO SAFETY REASONS ON HIS 1999 MERCURY MYSTIQUE. *TGW THE CONSUMER STATED THE CLIPS THAT HELD THE FLOOR MATS IN PLACE BROKE DUE TO NORMAL WEAR.
Mercury Mystique 1998
- Date Of Incident: 2010-08-11
- Date Complaint: 2010-09-22
- VIN: 1MEFM6536WK
- Components: FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE
- Summary: RECALL ON A FUEL FILLER NECK VALVE FOR A 98 MERCURY MYSTIQUE, GAS BEING UNABLE TO FLOW FREELY INTO GAS TANK,SPITS GAS BACK OUT ON YOU. AUGUST IS THE FIRST TIME I KNEW THERE WAS A RECALL. FORD SAYS MY VIN # WASN'T ON RECALL , BUT THE PART IS DEFECTIVE ANYWAY.( DANGEROUS ) OCCURS EVERYTIME YOU TRY AND PUT GAS INTO CAR. THEY PUT A CANISTER VENT VALVE ON WHICH WAS NOT THE PROBLEM. THEY KEPT THE OLD PART THAT WAS GOOD. PROBLEM IS FUEL FILLER NECK VALVE. *TR
Mercury Mystique 1995
- Date Of Incident: 2010-04-30
- Date Complaint: 2010-05-05
- VIN: 3MELM6533SM
- Components: ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING
- Summary: I HAVE HAD MY CAR IN THE SHOP FOR MY VEHICLE RUNNING ON THE VERY WARM SIDE AND NOT COOLING ITSELF DOWN. MANY THINGS REPAIRED AND NOW IT IS DOING IT AGAIN AND IT IS NOT EVEN THE DEAD OF SUMMER YET! *TR
Mercury Mystique 1999
- Date Of Incident: 2001-07-21
- Date Complaint: 2009-10-29
- VIN: 1MEFM66L2XK
- Components: STRUCTURE
- Summary: TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 1999 MERCURY MYSTIQUE. THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF THE INSTRUMENT CONTROL PANELS SURFACE BEGAN DEVELOPED CRACKS AND WARPS. A PLASTIC PIECE FROM THE PANEL, THAT WAS 5 INCHES IN HEIGHT BLOCKS THE WINDSHIELD. THE VEHICLE HAS NOT BEEN REPAIRED FOR THE MALFUNCTION. THE CONTACT COMMENTED THE FAILURE WAS RELATED TO THE FORD CONTOUR DASHBOARD DEFECT. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 80,000. THE CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 112,000.
Mercury Mystique 1996
- Date Of Incident: 2009-09-23
- Date Complaint: 2009-10-13
- Number Of Injuries: 3
- Crash: 1
- VIN: 1MELM6539TK
- Components: AIR BAGS
- Summary: 1996 MERCURY MYS AIR BAGS FAILURE IN CAR ACCIDENT. *TR
Mercury Mystique 1998
- Date Of Incident: 2009-01-21
- Date Complaint: 2009-03-27
- VIN: 1MELM66L1WK
- Components: ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING
- Summary: FAULTY CATALYTIC CONVERTERS. *TR
Mercury Mystique 1998
- Date Of Incident: 2008-12-31
- Date Complaint: 2009-02-11
- VIN: 1MEFM66LXWK
- Components: ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
- Summary: I AM THE 2ND OWNER OF MY 1998 MERCURY MYSTIQUE. I PURCHASED THE VEHICLE IN 2004. IT HAS A COMPUTER DEFECT THAT GIVES A FALSE READING FOR THE CHECK ENGINE LIGHT. THIS CAR QUALIFIED FOR THE NJ LEMON LAW BECAUSE OF THIS PROBLEM WITH ITS 1ST OWNER. HOWEVER, THAT OWNER WAS TOO KIND TO DO ANYTHING ABOUT IT. THE PREVIOUS OWNER GAVE ME A FILE FILLED WITH SERVICE INFORMATION FROM THE DATE HE PURCHASED THE VEHICLE, BRAND NEW IN DECEMBER 1997. SHORTLY AFTER HIS PURCHASE HE HAD THE VEHICLE BACK TO THE DEALER FOR THE CHECK ENGINE LIGHT. HE HAD IT BACK A COUPLE MORE TIMES FOR THE SAME THING AND THEY ALWAYS FIXED IT. OBVIOUSLY, THEY PUT A BAND-AID ON A MAJOR DEFECT. I NOTICED THE LIGHT WAS ON WHEN I FIRST PURCHASED THE VEHICLE. THE FORMER OWNER SAID HE HAD IT CHECKED AND WAS TOLD NOT TO PAY ATTENTION TO IT. WELL, SINCE THEN I HAVE BEEN TOLD AT INSPECTION THAT IT HAS TO BE FIXED EVERY TIME. SO IT GOES TO MY MECHANIC WHO WILLS REPAIR/REPLACE THE NECESSARY PARTS PER THAT DAY'S COMPUTER READING. WITHIN A FEW WEEKS (OCCASIONALLY MONTHS) THE LIGHT GOES ON AGAIN. PREVIOUS TO THIS YEARS INSPECTION (DECEMBER 31ST) I HAD MY FRIEND LOOK IT OVER AND HE REPLACED THE VALVE/SENSOR THAT WAS DEFECTED (PER THAT DAYS COMPUTER READING). WELL, RIGHT BEFORE INSPECTION THE CHECK ENGINE LIGHT WENT BACK ON. AND OF COURSE, SINCE IT WAS ON, IT FAILED AGAIN. I MENTIONED TO THE INSPECTOR THAT IT HAD A HISTORY OF THIS PROBLEM. I ASKED IF THERE WAS ANY RECOURSE AND HE TOLD ME TO LOOK INTO THE NJ WAIVER PROGRAM. I CALLED THE MOTOR VEHICLE COMMISSION TO LEARN ABOUT THE WAIVER PROGRAM. I UNDERSTAND TO BE CONSIDERED, THE REPAIR COST HAS TO BE ABOUT $400 OR MORE. SOME TIME AGO THE REPAIR COSTS LIMIT WAS ABOUT $250 OR MORE. WELL, FOR THE REPAIR I HAD DONE BEFORE THIS LAST INSPECTION, IT COST ME ABOUT $250 AGAIN. I BELIEVE THAT FOR THESE REASONS I SHOULD QUALIFY FOR A VEHICLE WAIVER FOR THE EMISSIONS INSPECTION OF MY VEHICLE. *TR
Latest 5 recalls Mercury Mystique
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has issued 49 recalls for different components of the Mercury Mystique.You can explore the year of the Volkswagen Jetta you are interested in by selecting it from the list.
- Model: Mercury Mystique 1998
- Report Received Date: 2008-04-14
- Manufacturer: FEDERAL-MOGUL CHASSIS PRODUCTS
- Components: SUSPENSION
- Summary: FEDERAL MOGUL IS RECALLING 6,903 AFTERMARKET BALL JOINT ASSEMBLIES SHIPPED BETWEEN NOVEMBER 9, 2007 AND MARCH 26, 2008, WHICH MAY HAVE BEEN PACKAGED WITH INCORRECT NUTS. THE PART NUMBERS PACKAGED WITH INCORRECT NUTS ARE: K7147, K7329, K8683, AND 104353. THESE PARTS WERE MADE FOR USE ON THE VARIOUS VEHICLES LISTED ABOVE.
- Consequence: THE NUTS INCLUDED IN THE PACKAGING FOR THESE BALL JOINT ASSEMBLIES ARE MISSING THE INTENDED PREVAILING TORQUE (SELF-LOCKING) FEATURE. IF THE INCORRECT NUT WAS TO BECOME LOOSE, THE JOINING MEMBERS MAY LOOSEN LEADING TO A SEPARATION OF THE BALL JOINT. THIS MAY RESULT IN LOSS OF VEHICLE CONTROL, POSSIBLY RESULTING IN A VEHICLE CRASH.
- Remedy: FEDERAL MOGUL WILL NOTIFY OWNERS AND REPLACE THE PARTS FREE OF CHARGE. THE RECALL BEGAN ON MAY 22, 2008. OWNERS CAN CONTACT FEDERAL MOGUL AT 877-489-6659.
- Model: Mercury Mystique 2000
- Report Received Date: 2008-04-14
- Manufacturer: FEDERAL-MOGUL CHASSIS PRODUCTS
- Components: SUSPENSION
- Summary: FEDERAL MOGUL IS RECALLING 6,903 AFTERMARKET BALL JOINT ASSEMBLIES SHIPPED BETWEEN NOVEMBER 9, 2007 AND MARCH 26, 2008, WHICH MAY HAVE BEEN PACKAGED WITH INCORRECT NUTS. THE PART NUMBERS PACKAGED WITH INCORRECT NUTS ARE: K7147, K7329, K8683, AND 104353. THESE PARTS WERE MADE FOR USE ON THE VARIOUS VEHICLES LISTED ABOVE.
- Consequence: THE NUTS INCLUDED IN THE PACKAGING FOR THESE BALL JOINT ASSEMBLIES ARE MISSING THE INTENDED PREVAILING TORQUE (SELF-LOCKING) FEATURE. IF THE INCORRECT NUT WAS TO BECOME LOOSE, THE JOINING MEMBERS MAY LOOSEN LEADING TO A SEPARATION OF THE BALL JOINT. THIS MAY RESULT IN LOSS OF VEHICLE CONTROL, POSSIBLY RESULTING IN A VEHICLE CRASH.
- Remedy: FEDERAL MOGUL WILL NOTIFY OWNERS AND REPLACE THE PARTS FREE OF CHARGE. THE RECALL BEGAN ON MAY 22, 2008. OWNERS CAN CONTACT FEDERAL MOGUL AT 877-489-6659.
- Model: Mercury Mystique 1996
- Report Received Date: 2008-04-14
- Manufacturer: FEDERAL-MOGUL CHASSIS PRODUCTS
- Components: SUSPENSION
- Summary: FEDERAL MOGUL IS RECALLING 6,903 AFTERMARKET BALL JOINT ASSEMBLIES SHIPPED BETWEEN NOVEMBER 9, 2007 AND MARCH 26, 2008, WHICH MAY HAVE BEEN PACKAGED WITH INCORRECT NUTS. THE PART NUMBERS PACKAGED WITH INCORRECT NUTS ARE: K7147, K7329, K8683, AND 104353. THESE PARTS WERE MADE FOR USE ON THE VARIOUS VEHICLES LISTED ABOVE.
- Consequence: THE NUTS INCLUDED IN THE PACKAGING FOR THESE BALL JOINT ASSEMBLIES ARE MISSING THE INTENDED PREVAILING TORQUE (SELF-LOCKING) FEATURE. IF THE INCORRECT NUT WAS TO BECOME LOOSE, THE JOINING MEMBERS MAY LOOSEN LEADING TO A SEPARATION OF THE BALL JOINT. THIS MAY RESULT IN LOSS OF VEHICLE CONTROL, POSSIBLY RESULTING IN A VEHICLE CRASH.
- Remedy: FEDERAL MOGUL WILL NOTIFY OWNERS AND REPLACE THE PARTS FREE OF CHARGE. THE RECALL BEGAN ON MAY 22, 2008. OWNERS CAN CONTACT FEDERAL MOGUL AT 877-489-6659.
- Model: Mercury Mystique 1995
- Report Received Date: 2008-04-14
- Manufacturer: FEDERAL-MOGUL CHASSIS PRODUCTS
- Components: SUSPENSION
- Summary: FEDERAL MOGUL IS RECALLING 6,903 AFTERMARKET BALL JOINT ASSEMBLIES SHIPPED BETWEEN NOVEMBER 9, 2007 AND MARCH 26, 2008, WHICH MAY HAVE BEEN PACKAGED WITH INCORRECT NUTS. THE PART NUMBERS PACKAGED WITH INCORRECT NUTS ARE: K7147, K7329, K8683, AND 104353. THESE PARTS WERE MADE FOR USE ON THE VARIOUS VEHICLES LISTED ABOVE.
- Consequence: THE NUTS INCLUDED IN THE PACKAGING FOR THESE BALL JOINT ASSEMBLIES ARE MISSING THE INTENDED PREVAILING TORQUE (SELF-LOCKING) FEATURE. IF THE INCORRECT NUT WAS TO BECOME LOOSE, THE JOINING MEMBERS MAY LOOSEN LEADING TO A SEPARATION OF THE BALL JOINT. THIS MAY RESULT IN LOSS OF VEHICLE CONTROL, POSSIBLY RESULTING IN A VEHICLE CRASH.
- Remedy: FEDERAL MOGUL WILL NOTIFY OWNERS AND REPLACE THE PARTS FREE OF CHARGE. THE RECALL BEGAN ON MAY 22, 2008. OWNERS CAN CONTACT FEDERAL MOGUL AT 877-489-6659.
- Model: Mercury Mystique 1997
- Report Received Date: 2008-04-14
- Manufacturer: FEDERAL-MOGUL CHASSIS PRODUCTS
- Components: SUSPENSION
- Summary: FEDERAL MOGUL IS RECALLING 6,903 AFTERMARKET BALL JOINT ASSEMBLIES SHIPPED BETWEEN NOVEMBER 9, 2007 AND MARCH 26, 2008, WHICH MAY HAVE BEEN PACKAGED WITH INCORRECT NUTS. THE PART NUMBERS PACKAGED WITH INCORRECT NUTS ARE: K7147, K7329, K8683, AND 104353. THESE PARTS WERE MADE FOR USE ON THE VARIOUS VEHICLES LISTED ABOVE.
- Consequence: THE NUTS INCLUDED IN THE PACKAGING FOR THESE BALL JOINT ASSEMBLIES ARE MISSING THE INTENDED PREVAILING TORQUE (SELF-LOCKING) FEATURE. IF THE INCORRECT NUT WAS TO BECOME LOOSE, THE JOINING MEMBERS MAY LOOSEN LEADING TO A SEPARATION OF THE BALL JOINT. THIS MAY RESULT IN LOSS OF VEHICLE CONTROL, POSSIBLY RESULTING IN A VEHICLE CRASH.
- Remedy: FEDERAL MOGUL WILL NOTIFY OWNERS AND REPLACE THE PARTS FREE OF CHARGE. THE RECALL BEGAN ON MAY 22, 2008. OWNERS CAN CONTACT FEDERAL MOGUL AT 877-489-6659.
Latest negative Mercury Mystique car reviews
Latest positive Mercury Mystique car reviews
-
Vehicle year: 1995
I really enjoyed this vehicle and found it to be one of the best Ford products. I recommend changing the fluids regularly and using the cheapest regular gasoline available. Although I had some issues with dealer service departments, the sedan itself was very competent. I have often recommended this car to friends and would definitely buy it again if I was in the market for a vehicle. Unfortunately, I was disappointed to learn that Mercury has discontinued it. I hope that Ford will continue to produce great cars that meet the needs of all customers.
-
Vehicle year: 1999
I have a 99 mystique and it's been an amazing car for me. With 130k miles on it, I bought it in 2009 with 80k miles for only $2,250. It's now 2013 and it's still running strong! Of course, like any car, it's had a few issues - my alternator went out and was difficult to replace, and my battery, starter, and O2 sensor are starting to go bad. But these are all expected issues that come with owning a car. The only things that I'm not too happy about are that my front windows and sunroof don't work, and my brake light and blinkers are out. Overall, I've had this car for about 4 years and have spent around $500 a year plus about $1k on repairs, but I'm still very happy with it and will probably get another one.
-
Vehicle year: 1998
You'll be pleased to know that this car does a great job on the expressways and performs well under various driving conditions. It gives you a sense of control.
-
Vehicle year: 2000
This car is often overlooked despite being the same size as a Volvo S40 or Passat. I have owned this car and have only needed to do regular maintenance. It is very enjoyable to drive with its V6 engine, manual transmission, and excellent handling. My only complaint is that the new Mondeo is not available in the US.
-
Vehicle year: 1997
I really appreciate this car. It has great gas mileage at 29/37 and is perfect for city driving. The trunk space is also a plus, and since it's just my wife and me, the rear seat isn't an issue. The exterior of the car looks fantastic, and I especially love the glove box next to the steering column. The only thing I wish it had was a sunroof. Although I did experience an issue with the electrical system after nine years, this is the first time I've encountered this problem on my car. Overall, this car is top-notch!
Are you having problems with your Mercury Mystique?
Ellsworth Lehner 2024-11-23
Vehicle year: 1999
At first, it seemed like a great deal - low mileage, good price, and the previous owner had kept up with all the scheduled maintenance. However, after six months, the timing belt blew out on the highway (yes, it actually blew out) with only 55,000 miles on the car. To make matters worse, the power steering fluid began leaking and even rotted out the sway bar bushings. Unfortunately, I've already spent nearly a third of what I originally paid for the car on repairs. Just a word of caution for anyone considering a similar purchase!
Jeffery Glover 2024-11-22
Vehicle year: 1996
I strongly advise against purchasing this car. It was a big money pit and required over $2000 worth of repairs just to get it running. It spent a total of a month in the shop. In fact, I believe I could sell my bike for more than this car is worth. Please avoid making the same mistake I did and do not buy one.
Marshall Schimmel 2024-10-29
Vehicle year: 1996
The car experienced several issues, including multiple factory recalls. Unfortunately, after reaching 80K miles, it began to experience significant problems. Despite having the timing belt replaced twice, there is still a noticeable noise. Additionally, the interior has suffered from several broken plastic panels. The front power window motors also failed around 75-80K miles. Overall, the car's reliability has been compromised, and it is difficult to trust it now.
Moises Jacobson 2024-10-16
Vehicle year: 1996
I purchased one of these cars when my second son was born. Unfortunately, I experienced frequent repairs costing between $300-500 before I had even paid it off. A coworker of mine referred to it as the 'Mercury Mistake' and I have to agree. Although it was a good-looking car, it was plagued with issues. One day, while driving to work, I had to pull over due to a large puff of smoke coming from under the hood. That was the end of the Merc! Since then, I have not purchased a Ford, but I have had great luck with two Chevy Impalas.
Gianni Goldner 2024-09-14
Vehicle year: 1995
I purchased one of these cars when my second son was born. Unfortunately, I experienced frequent repairs costing between $300-500 before I had even paid it off. A coworker of mine referred to it as the 'Mercury Mistake' and I have to agree. Although it was a good-looking car, it was plagued with issues. One day, while driving to work, I had to pull over due to a large puff of smoke coming from under the hood. That was the end of the Merc! Since then, I have not purchased a Ford, but I have had great luck with two Chevy Impalas.