1992 Toyota Celica problems
The Toyota Celica (/ˈsɛlɪkə/ or /sɛˈliːkə/) (Japanese: トヨタ・セリカ, Hepburn: Toyota Serika) is an automobile produced by Toyota from 1970 until 2006. The Celica name derives from the Latin word coelica meaning heavenly or celestial. In Japan, the Celica was exclusive to the Toyota Corolla Store dealer chain. Produced across seven generations, the Celica was powered by various four-cylinder engines, and bodystyles included convertibles, liftbacks, coupés and notchback coupés.
In 1973, Toyota coined the term liftback to describe the Celica fastback hatchback, and used the name Liftback GT for the North American market. Like the Ford Mustang, the Celica concept was to attach a coupe body to the chassis and mechanicals from a high volume sedan, in this case the Toyota Carina. Some journalists thought it was based on the Corona due to some shared mechanical parts.
The first three generations of North American market Celicas were powered by variants of Toyota's R series engine. In August 1985, the car's drive layout was changed from rear-wheel drive to front-wheel drive, and all-wheel drive turbocharged models were offered from 1986 to 1999. Variable valve timing came in certain Japanese models starting from December 1997 and became standard in all models from the 2000 model year. In 1986, the six-cylinder Celica Supra variant was spun off as a separate model, becoming simply the Supra. Lightly altered versions of the Celica were also sold through as the Corona Coupé through the Toyopet dealer network in the 1980s and as the Toyota Curren through the Vista network in the 1990s.
The Toyota Celica Liftback GT won Motor Trend Car of the Year (Imported Vehicle) in 1976.
Social links
Common 1992 Toyota Celica problems
Based on the complaints from owners of the 1992 Toyota Celica, here are some common problems associated with this car:
- Maintenance and Repairs: Some owners have highlighted the need for regular maintenance and repairs due to the age of the vehicle. Issues such as cracked or disconnected vacuum lines, improper wiring, and missing components like the MAP sensor can lead to drivability issues and the need for extensive repairs to restore the car to optimal condition.
- Electrical Problems: Complaints have included issues with electrical components like the stereo amp's power cable being fused with a washer, indicating poor electrical workmanship. These electrical issues can impact the functionality of various systems within the car, leading to performance issues and the need for troubleshooting and repairs.
- High Mileage Concerns: With some owners reporting high mileage on their 1992 Celicas, concerns about the longevity and reliability of the vehicle have been raised. While some owners have praised the durability of the Celica, others have noted the need for regular maintenance and potential repairs as the car ages and accumulates mileage.
- General Wear and Tear: Over time, general wear and tear on components like the trunk hinge area, which can weaken and damage quickly, has been mentioned by owners. This wear and tear can affect the overall condition and functionality of the vehicle, requiring attention and potential repairs to maintain the car's performance and appearance.
These common problems reported by owners of the 1992 Toyota Celica highlight the importance of thorough inspections, regular maintenance, and addressing issues promptly to ensure the longevity and optimal performance of this classic vehicle.
What is the most common problem with the Toyota Celica?
The belt problem is common, especially when it rains, for Celica. If you still under the warranty, just go change a new one for free from your dealer.
Is the Toyota Celica a reliable car?
Yes, Toyota Celicas are generally reliable cars. They are well-regarded for their durability, sporty performance, and long lifespan. In fact, many owners of Toyota Celicas report that with regular maintenance and care, these cars can easily exceed 200,000 miles.
How long do Toyota Celica engines last?
Hilux's are known to run well past 300,000 miles, and the AE86's are known to run perfectly beyond 250,000 as well. Well maintained, a Celica or other Toyota could probably do about 250,000 miles.
Is the 7th gen Celica bad?
What's Wrong with the 7th Generation (2000–2005) Celica? Celica owners have made 48 complaints about the 2000–2005 model years. Using our PainRank™ system we've ranked it 41st out of 81 Toyota generations in overall reliability , with some engine and transmission concerns.
Is a 92 Celica a good car?
I have owned a 1992 Celica GT-S for the last 5 years and still love it to this day. I haven't had any major problems with mine, and it's now an eighteen year old car! I live in Michigan, one of the worst road states in the country, and have still avoided major problems.
What is the most common problem with the Toyota Celica?
Rough Idling and Misfires (All 1.8-ltr Engines)
The car is driving roughly, misfires and backfires occasionally, and the check engine light is lit. The car may also stall often and lose power.
Is the Toyota Celica a reliable car?
Yes, Toyota Celicas are generally reliable cars. They are well-regarded for their durability, sporty performance, and long lifespan. In fact, many owners of Toyota Celicas report that with regular maintenance and care, these cars can easily exceed 200,000 miles.
How long do Toyota Celica engines last?
Hilux's are known to run well past 300,000 miles, and the AE86's are known to run perfectly beyond 250,000 as well. Well maintained, a Celica or other Toyota could probably do about 250,000 miles.
1992 Toyota Celica car problems categorized by type of issue
After analyzing all complaints sent to the NHTSA and researching popular Toyota Celica problems, we found that the most common problems with these 2023 model year vehicles are:
- Air bags problems
- Seat belts problems
- Tires problems
- Vehicle speed control problems
- Electrical system problems
The graph below shows statistics for all 1992 Toyota Celica vehicle components and the number of complaints received.
Latest 25 complaints 1992 Toyota Celica
The NHTSA has received 27 complaints about various vehicle components related to the 1992 Toyota Celica. Below are the 25 most recent complaints reported for 1992 Toyota Celica vehicles.
ENGINE PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2018-10-25
- VIN: JT5VN94TM00
- Components: ENGINE
- Summary: TOYOTA MOTOR SALES STARTED A SPECIAL SERVICE CAMPAIGN (V06) FOR 1990 - EARLY 1995 TRUCKS, 4 RUNNERS & T100S WITH 3VZ-E V6 ENGINES. THIS CAMPAIGN WAS TO REPLACE THE 3VZ-E HEAD GASKET ON CERTAIN IDENTIFIED VIN NUMBERS THAT TOYOTA IDENTIFIED AS HAVING DEFECTS FROM THE FACTORY. THIS SPECIAL SERVICE CAMPAIGN CAN BE VIEWED AT HTTPS://TECHINFO.TOYOTA.COM AND IS PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE. ON PAGE TWO, TOYOTA'S SPECIAL SERVICE CAMPAIGN (V06) FOR 1990-EARLY 1995 TRUCKS, 4RUNNERS, & T100 WITH 3VZ-E V6 ENGINES STATES: "UNDER THE SPECIAL SERVICE CAMPAIGN PROGRAM, THE HEAD GASKETS WILL BE REPLACED ON ALL THE AFFECTED VEHICLES REGARDLESS OF LEAKAGE OR NOT, AND THERE WILL NOT BE ANY AGE, MILEAGE OR TIME RESTRICTIONS UNDER THE SPECIAL SERVICE CAMPAIGN." MY VEHICLE VIN HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED BY TOYOTA AS FALLING UNDER THIS SPECIAL SERVICE CAMPAIGN. TOYOTA HAS AS OF SEPTEMBER 24, 2018, STATED THAT THIS SPECIAL SERVICE CAMPAIGN HAS EXPIRED AND REFUSES TO HONOR THEIR HEAD GASKET REPAIR UNDER THIS SPECIAL SERVICE CAMPAIGN. BECAUSE TOYOTA'S DESCRIPTION OF THE SPECIAL SERVICE CAMPAIGN INCLUDES THE STATEMENT "THERE WILL NOT BE ANY AGE, MILEAGE OR TIME RESTRICTIONS UNDER THE SPECIAL SERVICE CAMPAIGN", EXPIRING THIS CAMPAIGN ON A RANDOM DATE IS NOT LEGAL. TOYOTA HAS REFUSED TO REPLACE MY HEAD GASKET AS PART OF THIS RECALL. THIS SHOULD BE ADDRESSED AND TOYOTA HELD TO THEIR LEGAL OBLIGATION.
TIRES PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2009-07-12
- Crash: 1
- Components: TIRES
- Summary: 1992 TOYOTA CELICA HAD A FRONT TIRE BLOW OUT. *BF THE VEHICLE WENT OFF THE ROADWAY INTO A DITCH. OHIO TRAFFIC CRASH REPORT # 10-0551-89 UPDATED 04/14/10 *BF
VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 1995-03-24
- Components: VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL
- Summary: TL*THE CONTACT PREVIOUSLY OWNED A 1992 TOYOTA CELICA. THE CONTACT WAS DRIVING APPROXIMATELY BETWEEN 50-55 MPH ON NORMAL ROAD CONDITIONS. UNEXPECTEDLY, THE VEHICLE INCREASED ACCELERATION AT THE SPEED RATE BETWEEN 75-80 MPH. THE DRIVER WAS ABLE TO STOP THE VEHICLE AND GAIN CONTROL AFTER A PERIOD OF TWO MINUTES. THE VEHICLE RESUMED NORMAL OPERATION. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO AN AUTHORIZED DEALER AND TRADED IN FOR A NEW VEHICLE DUE TO THE POTENTIAL SAFETY HAZARD. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 35,000. THE VIN WAS UNKNOWN. THE CONTACT NO LONGER OWNS THE VEHICLE.
SEAT BELTS PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2004-01-01
- Components: SEAT BELTS
- Summary: SEAT BELT RETRACTOR DOES NOT WORK, DRIVER AND PASSENGER SIDES. *LA
AIR BAGS PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2024-11-24
- VIN: FILL IN
- Components: AIR BAGS
- Summary: WHEN THE CONSUMER PRESSED THE BRAKE PEDAL WITH FORCE THE FRONTAL AIR BAG DEPLOYED. PLEASE PROVIDE ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. *NM
ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2003-05-15
- VIN: JT3VN39W4N0
- Components: ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING
- Summary: ON 3/29/03 I HAD MY CAR SERVICED AT WORLDTOYOTA ON PEACHTREE INDUSTRIAL BLVD. I HAD AN OIL & FILTER CHANGE, 19 PT. INSPECTION, SPRING SERVICE AND BRAKES FOR A WHOPPING $488. I HAVE HAD A DIAGNOSTICS TEST DONE ON MY VEHICLE WITHIN THE PAST 6 MONTHS AT WORLDTOYOTA. IN THE PAST YEAR I HAVE ALSO REPLACED MY TRANSMISSION, MAIN SEAL, TRANSMISSION SEAL AND CV AXLE, TIMING BELT, TUNE-UP AND REGULAR OIL CHANGES. ON 4-28-03 I THREW A ROD IN MY ENGINE. I IMMEDIATELY CHECKED THE OIL AND THERE WAS NO OIL IN THE ENGINE (MARKED ABOUT A 1/4" FROM TIP OF DIP STICK). AS CONFIRMED BY WORLDTOYOTA I HAVE NO OIL LEAKS AND I HAVE NOT EXPERIENCED ANY SMOKE OR FUME EMMITTING FROM MY EXHAUSE. LAST EMISSION INSPECTION 1/03. IF SOMEONE (NAMELY WORLDTOYOTA) CAN GIVE ME A FEASIBLE EXPLANATION AS TO WHAT HAPPEN TO THE 5 QUARTS OF OIL THAT WAS SUPPOSEDLY REPLACED DURING THE OIL CHANGE I CAN MAYBE GET SOME UNDERSTANDING. BUT OIL DOES NOT JUST EVAPORATE OUT OF THE ENGINE. MY NEXT SCHEDULE OIL CHANGE WAS 138,019 MILES OR 5/29/03. I AM A SINGLE MOM AND THIS IS MY SOLE MEANS OF TRANSPORTAION. I CONSISTENTLY TAKE NECESSARY STEPS TO MAINTAIN MY VEHICLE.
AIR BAGS PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2002-10-05
- Crash: 1
- Components: AIR BAGS
- Summary: WHILE DRIVING VEHICLE WAS INVOVLED IN A HEAD ON COLLISION AND AIRBAGS DID NOT DEPLOY. *AK
AIR BAGS PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2003-06-15
- Crash: 1
- Components: AIR BAGS
- Summary: CONSUMER STATES THAT THE VEHICLE WAS IN A HEAD ON ACCIDENT. CONSUMER STATES THAT THE DRIVERS SIDE AIRBAG DID NOT DEPLOY. DEALER NOTIFIED.*AK
AIR BAGS PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 1999-07-23
- Crash: 1
- VIN: JT2ST87F5N0
- Components: AIR BAGS
- Summary: WHILE SITTING AT A STOP LIGHT, ANOTHER VEHICLE REAR END THE CONSUMER VEHICLE. UPON IMPACT, DRIVER'S SIDE AIR BAG DIDN'T DEPLOY. *AK
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 1999-03-30
- Fire: 1
- VIN: JT5ST87K4N0
- Components: ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
- Summary: WHILE DRIVING, MY CAR IT STARTED FILLING UP WITH SMOKE. THE SMOKE WAS COMMING OUT OF THE AMPLIFIER, LOCATED UNDER THE PASSENGER SEAT OF MY VEHICLE. TURNING OFF THE VEHICLE DID NOT STOP THE ELECTRICAL CURRENT, THE CAR KEPT FILLING UP WITH SMOKE AND STRANGE NOISES WERE COMMING OUT OF THE SPEAKERS. ALSO, THE RADIO WOULD NOT TURN OFF. NO FUSES BLEW. DISCONNECTING THE BATTERY CABLE FINALLY STOPPED THE CURRENT AND EVERYTHING SHUT OFF . LUCKLY I WAS CLOSE TO HOME, AS THE VEHICLE DID NOT COME EQUIPPED WITH A WRENCH TO DISCONNECT THE BATTERY CABLE IN THE EVENT OF A ROGUE ELECTRICAL CURRENT. PART OF THE CIRCUT BOARD INSIDE THE AMP WAS MELTED. I WOULD LIKE TO WARN OTHERS, WITH THIS PART IN THEIR TOYOTA, OF WHAT TO DO IN THE EVENT THIS HAPPENS TO THEM. THE SITUATION COULD DEFINATELY HAVE TURNED OUT MORE DAMAGING. I WAS LUCKY. I HAVE CONTATCTED TOYOTA AND THEY HAVE LET ME KNOW THEY DO NOT HAVE A RECALL OR SPECIAL SERVICE CAMPAIGN FOR THE AMPLIFIER. THEY APOLOGIZED THAT THERE WAS NO FURTHER TECHNICAL EXPLANATION FOR MY CONCERN. A SERVICE REPRESENTATIVE AT A STEREO AND ELECTRONICS STORE ASKED ME IF THE AMPLIFIER HAD BEEN SERVICED BEFORE DUE TO THERE BEING A "JUMPER" ON IT. I DID ASK TOYOTA IF THE EVERY CIRCUT BOARD LOCATED IN THIS PART HAD A JUMPER MELDED ON IT, SINCE IT SEEMED TO HAVE BEEN ALTERED FROM ITS ORIGINAL STATE ON MINE. THEY DID NOT ANSWER MY QUESTION IN THEIR RESPONSE.
SEAT BELTS PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2024-11-24
- Components: SEAT BELTS
- Summary: SEAT BELT DOES NOT RETRACT FULLY, IF AT ALL AND NEVER HAS.
STRUCTURE PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 1997-06-04
- VIN: JT2AT86F3N0
- Components: STRUCTURE
- Summary: LIFTED UP TRUNK & TRUNK HINGE NEAR DRIVER SIDE SNAPPED OFF IN DRIVER'S HAND; LOOKED LIKE IT WAS RUSTY OR CORRODED. TOOK TO DEALER FOR ESTIMATE & INFORMED OTHER CELICAS EXPERIENCED SAME PROBLEM. *AK
AIR BAGS PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 1997-02-11
- Number Of Injuries: 1
- Crash: 1
- VIN: JT2ST87N4N0
- Components: AIR BAGS
- Summary: BLAZER IN FRONT HAD STOPPED; SUN OBSTRUCTED DRIVER'S VIEW (TOYOTA) & REARENDED THE BLAZER; THE DRIVER'S SIDE AIR BAG DID NOT DEPLOY. *AK
SEAT BELTS PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 1996-02-01
- Components: SEAT BELTS
- Summary: PASSENGER'S SEAT BELT RETRACTOR INOPERATIVE.
SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC,VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 1996-02-15
- Crash: 1
- VIN: JT2STH7F7N0
- Components: SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC,VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL
- Summary: IN STOP AND GO TRAFFIC, UPON BRAKING SUDDENLY, VEHICLE ACCELERATED OUT OF CONTROL, RESULTING FRONT END ACCIDENT, ALSO PREVIOUSLY WHEN WENT THROUGH A GARAGE.*AK
TIRES PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 1996-05-29
- Components: TIRES
- Summary: GOODYEAR VIVA TIRES HAVE POOR TRACTION. *SD
AIR BAGS PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 1996-01-10
- Number Of Injuries: 1
- Crash: 1
- VIN: JG2ST87F2N0
- Components: AIR BAGS
- Summary: AIR BAG; THE CONSUMER WAS INVOLVED IN A HEAD ON COLLISION AND THE DRIVER SIDE AIR BAG DID NOT DEPLOY. *AK
AIR BAGS PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 1996-02-19
- VIN: JT2ST87F7N0
- Components: AIR BAGS
- Summary: AIR BAG LIGHT CAME ON, TOOK IT TO THE DEALER, DEALER SAID THE SENSOR FAILED AND NEEDED THE BE REPLACED, NO ACCIDENT. TT
AIR BAGS PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 1996-02-19
- VIN: JT2ST87F7N0
- Components: AIR BAGS
- Summary: AIR BAG LIGHT CAME ON, TOOK IT TO THE DEALER, DEALER SAID THE SENSOR FAILED AND NEEDED THE BE REPLACED, NO ACCIDENT. TT
AIR BAGS PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 1995-10-01
- Number Of Injuries: 1
- Crash: 1
- VIN: JT2ST87F2N0
- Components: AIR BAGS
- Summary: LOST CONTROL OF VEHICLE, HIT WOODEN FENCE,PROCEEDED TO HIT CONCRETE WALL; AIRBAG DID NOT DEPLOY. TT
AIR BAGS PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 1995-10-01
- Number Of Injuries: 1
- Crash: 1
- VIN: JT2ST87F2N0
- Components: AIR BAGS
- Summary: LOST CONTROL OF VEHICLE, HIT WOODEN FENCE,PROCEEDED TO HIT CONCRETE WALL; AIRBAG DID NOT DEPLOY. TT
AIR BAGS PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 1995-07-02
- Number Of Injuries: 2
- Crash: 1
- VIN: JT2ATH6F6N0
- Components: AIR BAGS
- Summary: DRIVING VEHICLE AT SPEED OF 45 MPH HITTING AN ANIMAL ON HWY CAUSING A FRONTAL IMPACT 12:00, THE AIR BAG DID NOT DEPLOY. TT
AIR BAGS PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 1995-07-22
- Number Of Injuries: 1
- Crash: 1
- VIN: JT2AT86F9N0
- Components: AIR BAGS
- Summary: IN A HEAD ON COLLISION THE AIR BAG DID NOT DEPLOY. TT
VISIBILITY PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 1994-06-15
- Components: VISIBILITY
- Summary: REAR WINDSHIELD IS OXIDIZED; NO VISION IS POSSIBLE; DRIVER CANNOT SEE OUT OF REAR WINDOW; COULD CAUSE ACCIDENT. TT
AIR BAGS PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 1995-04-04
- Number Of Injuries: 1
- Crash: 1
- VIN: JT2ST87FXN0
- Components: AIR BAGS
- Summary: FRONTAL COLLISION IMPACT 12:00 POSITION SPEED 25 MPH, AIR BAG PARTIALLY DEPLOYED, CAUSING INJURIES. TT
1992 Toyota Celica recalls
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has issued 1 recalls for different components of the 1992 Toyota Celica.
- Manufacturer: RIDE CONTROL, LLC
- Components: SUSPENSION
- Summary: RIDE CONTROL IS RECALLING CERTAIN FRONT STRUT MOUNTS BRANDED AS GABRIEL RIDE CONTROL OR ARVINMERITOR, P/NOS. 142435, 142193, 142305, 142303, SOLD AS REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT FOR THE VEHICLES LISTED ABOVE. THE AFFECTED FRONT STRUT MOUNTS DID NOT CONTAIN A WELD JOINT BETWEEN THE BEARING HOUSING AND THE RATE PLATE.
- Consequence: THE ABSENCE OF THE WELD CAN ALLOW THE STRUT TO COME OUT OF ITS MOUNTING POSITION UNDER CERTAIN EXTREME DRIVING CONDITIONS WHICH COULD CAUSE DAMAGE TO SURROUNDING VEHICLE COMPONENTS INCREASING THE RISK OF A CRASH.
- Remedy: RIDE CONTROL WILL NOTIFY OWNERS OF RECORD AND REPLACE THE AFFECTED PARTS FREE OF CHARGE. THE SAFETY RECALL BEGAN ON MARCH 15, 2010. OWNERS MAY CONTACT RIDE CONTROL AT 1-248-458-1396.
Positive 1992 Toyota Celica car reviews
Additional sources
More sources of information about 1992 Toyota Celica problems:
Inform me of the problems the 92 has? | Toyota Celica Forum
May 24, 2013 ... I found a 1992 Toyota Celica GT Convertible ... Any common problems, any specific things wrong with this car? ... "Im selling a1992 Toyota Celica ...
1992 Toyota Celica Problems and Complaints - 35 Issues
Problem with your 1992 Toyota Celica? Our list of 35 known complaints reported by owners can help you fix your 1992 Toyota Celica.
Common Problems with 5th gen Celica | Toyota Celica Forum
Jan 8, 2013 ... Toyota also knew about compact discs (CDs) in 1992 but they were too cheap to include them in the Celicas. I guess casettes were still ...
Toyota Celica Runs Very Poor | Vaccum Leak and Map & O2 Issues
This 1992 Toyota Celica was one of them. This ... common problems. This manual is focused on advanced ... I have a 1992 Celica GT, with 2.2L 5SFE engine.
All my crazy Lexus issues SOLVED!! (ECU-leaking capacitor ...
Sep 20, 2012 ... This issue affects all Lexus & Toyota models with the following engines: ... ○ Toyota Celica GT - 1985 -1998 ○ Toyota ... ○ Toyota Soarer - 1992- ...
Other years of Toyota Celica
Are you having problems with your 1992 Toyota Celica?
Lourdes Ortiz 2025-01-05
I bought this car used from the original owner. It has now clocked 195k miles and has required repairs that are normal for a Toyota. In fact, it has required far less repair than other cars I have owned. The biggest cost was painting, which I consider an investment. I opted for a Factory Original Standard job, which will last 16 years, just like the original paint. It's true what they say, you get what you pay for, and it looks like new. The interior is holding up great, and I use Armor All regularly for cleaning and protection. I also use Michelin Pilot all-season radials, which are very important. The car was sold new for $17,500, but I paid $9,500 for it with 73k miles in 1997. I have replaced the clutch and slave, radiator, water pump, A/C converted to new standard, bearings, and a few bulbs. I must warn you that this car has a high compression engine and direct front-wheel drive, which can be a dangerous combination in slippery conditions. To stay on the road and avoid a wreck, you cannot take your foot off the accelerator unless you are in neutral gear. Then, tap or pump the brakes to slow down. Failure to do so will result in a 360 spin. This fact about this car may be the reason I have never seen another one like it on the road in over 20 years. I believe most of these cars have been crashed because of bad slippery weather conditions. Other than this flaw, the car is very safe. Now I know why many sports cars have rear-wheel drive. Overall, rear-wheel drive is safer, though not as good in snow and ice. Front-wheel drive is still better for snow and ice, and the new automatics with computer control on the throttle help to reduce the chance of 360's in bad weather. The bottom line is to know your car. Only sports cars with high compression engines have this problem. So, know your car and test it in a parking lot in bad weather before you get caught driving in bad weather. Then, you will be okay. By the way, the car gets a maximum of 40.2 MPG with premium gas and 29.5 MPG in the city (in mountains). It's great on fuel economy, especially if you use cruise control.(now 200036 miles, running like new)
Curtis Mann 2024-11-19
What a great find! This car has had only two previous female owners and was purchased with just 9000 miles in '93. It has been driven daily for 9 years and has proven to be extremely reliable. The A/C was even replaced on Toyota's nickel at about 60,000 miles. With only a few minor replacements such as 2 batteries, 8 tires, fluids, 3 lights, and 2 power antennas, this car has held up incredibly well. I had never owned a manual before, but this car reads my mind when shifting! Kudos to the engineers who designed it and the people who built it. It is super solid and I am confident it will last for another 90 to 120 thousand miles.
Denis Haley 2024-10-29
I was gifted this car by my parents when I graduated, and although I was hesitant at first, it has grown on me so much that I fear I will never be able to part with it. It is an absolute joy to drive, with its solid construction and sturdy metal parts (which contribute to its weight). After 13 years, there are still no squeaks or rattles, and it remains sporty, fun, and safe. In fact, I have only had to replace the alternator and light bulbs since I became its owner.
Tremaine Buckridge 2024-10-26
This car has been very reliable, with only an unexpected alternator failure at about 75k. Although there have been some quirky problems, such as a piston that operates the roof springing a leak, they have mostly been minor or middle-level routine maintenance, such as replacing wheel bearings and mufflers. I have driven this car for 196k and will continue to do so until it dies. I have found that if you take care of the car, it will take care of you. One annoying problem is the vinyl roof, which loses clarity and shape, creating real blind spots. Additionally, the radio lights have failed, but it is too expensive to figure out why.
Paolo Bogisich 2024-10-11
This car has been great! I can't think of anything negative to say about it.