1999 Mercury Mystique problems
The Ford Mondeo I (first generation) is a mid-size car that was produced by Ford, beginning on 23 November 1992, with sales beginning on 22 March 1993. It is also known as the Mk I Mondeo; the 1996 facelift versions are usually designated Mk II. Available as a four-door saloon, a five-door hatchback, and a five-door estate, all models for the European market were produced at Ford's plant in the Belgian city of Genk. In December 1992, Autocar published a section on the Mondeo, and how it would conquer rivals.
Intended as a world car, it replaced the Ford Sierra in Europe, the Ford Telstar in a large portion of Asia and other markets, while the Ford Contour and Mercury Mystique replaced the Ford Tempo and Mercury Topaz in North America. Despite being billed as a world car, the only external items the Mondeo shared initially with the Contour were the windscreen, front windows, front mirrors and door handles. Thus, the CDW27 project turned out not to be a true world car in the sense that the original Ford Focus and newer Fords developed under the "One Ford" policy turned out to be. The first generation Mondeo was replaced in 2000, by the larger second generation; in the United States and Canada, the Contour/Mystique were replaced initially by the Focus and later the Fusion.
Design and development
Mk I
Instigated in 1986 (just before its Sierra predecessor received a major facelift), the design of the car cost Ford US$6 billion. It was one of the most expensive new-car programmes ever. The Mondeo was significant as its design and marketing were shared between Ford USA in Dearborn and Ford of Europe. Its codename while under development reflected thus: CDW27 signified that it straddled the C and D size classes and was a "world car". The head of the Mondeo project was John Oldfield, headquartered at Ford Dunton in Essex.
A large proportion of the high development cost was due to the Mondeo being a completely new design, sharing very little, if anything, with the Ford Sierra. Unlike the Sierra, the Mondeo is front-wheel drive in its most common form, with a rarer four-wheel drive version available on the Mk I car only. Over-optimistically, the floor pan was designed to accept virtually any conceivable drivetrain, from a transverse inline-four engine to a longitudinal V-8. This resulted in a hugely intrusive and mostly disused bellhousing cover and transmission tunnel. Resultingly the front interior, especially the footwells, feels more cramped than would be expected from a vehicle of this size. The Mondeo featured new manual and automatic transmissions and sophisticated suspension design, which give it class-leading handling and ride qualities, and subframes front and rear to give it executive car refinement. The automatic transmission featured electronic control with sport and economy modes plus switchable overdrive. The program manager from 1988, and throughout its early development, was David Price.
By 1989, Ford had confirmed that it would be launching an all-new front-wheel drive car to replace the Sierra within the next four years, although it had not yet decided whether the Sierra name would continue or be replaced, with some subsequent reports even hinting that the Cortina name could make a comeback, having been axed in 1982 when replaced by the Sierra. Several prototypes were tested that year, but the launch of the Nissan Primera in 1990 prompted Ford to make a number of major alterations to the final product, as it saw the new competitor from Nissan to be the benchmark car in this sector, having previously identified the Honda Accord as the class leader.
The car was launched in the midst of turbulent times at Ford of Europe, when the division was haemorrhaging hundreds of millions of dollars, and had gained a reputation in the motoring press for selling products which had been designed by accountants rather than engineers. The fifth-generation Escort and third-generation Orion of 1990 was the zenith of this cost-cutting/high-price philosophy, which was by then beginning to backfire on Ford, with the cars being slated for their substandard ride and handling, though a facelift in 1992 had seen things improve a little. The Sierra had sold well, but not as well as the all-conquering Cortina before it, and in Britain, it had been overtaken in the sales charts by the newer Vauxhall Cavalier. Previously loyal customers were already turning to rival European and Japanese products, and by the time of the Mondeo's launch, the future of Europe as a Ford manufacturing base was hanging in the balance. The new car had to be good, and it had to sell. It was unveiled to the public on 23 November 1992, although sales would not begin for another four months. At this stage, Ford confirmed that the new car would feature a completely new name and would be called the Mondeo.
Safety was a high priority in the Mondeo design, with a driver's side airbag (it was the first-ever car sold from the beginning with a driver's airbag in all of its versions, which helped it achieve the European Car of the Year title for 1994), side-impact bars, seat belt pretensioners, and antilock braking systems (higher models) as standard features. Other features for its year included adaptive damping, self-leveling suspension (top estate models), traction control (V6 and 4WD versions), and heated front windscreen, branded Quickclear.
The interiors were usually well-appointed, featuring velour trim, an arm rest with CD and tape storage, central locking (frequently remote), power windows (all round on higher models), power mirrors, illuminated entry, flat-folding rear seats, etc. Higher-specification models had leather seats, trip computers, electric sunroof, CD changer, and alloy wheels.
During its development, Ford used the 1986 Honda Accord and in the later stages the 1990 Nissan Primera as the class benchmarks that the CDW27 had to beat.
Social links
Common 1999 Mercury Mystique problems
The Mercury Mystique 1999 is a compact sedan that was popular in its time, but like any vehicle, it has its share of common problems. Here are some of the most frequently reported issues with the 1999 Mercury Mystique:
- Transmission Failure: Many owners of the 1999 Mercury Mystique have reported transmission failure, which can be a significant issue. The problem is often caused by a faulty torque converter or a damaged solenoid. When the transmission fails, the car may not move at all, or it may shift roughly between gears. In some cases, the transmission may need to be replaced entirely, which can be a costly repair.
- Engine Overheating: Another common problem with the 1999 Mercury Mystique is engine overheating. This issue is often caused by a faulty thermostat or a leaking cooling system. When the engine overheats, it can cause significant damage to the engine block, cylinder heads, and other critical components. If left unaddressed, engine overheating can lead to a complete engine failure, which is a costly repair.
- Power Steering Failure: The power steering system in the 1999 Mercury Mystique is also prone to failure. The problem is often caused by a leak in the power steering system or a faulty power steering pump. When the power steering system fails, it can make the car difficult to steer, especially at low speeds.
- Fuel Pump Failure: The fuel pump in the 1999 Mercury Mystique is also prone to failure. The problem is often caused by a faulty fuel pump relay or a clogged fuel filter. When the fuel pump fails, the car may not start at all, or it may stall while driving.
- Air Conditioning Failure: The air conditioning system in the 1999 Mercury Mystique is also prone to failure. The problem is often caused by a leak in the air conditioning system or a faulty compressor. When the air conditioning system fails, it can make the car uncomfortable to drive, especially in hot weather.
- Electrical Issues: The 1999 Mercury Mystique is also prone to electrical issues, such as blown fuses, faulty wiring, and malfunctioning sensors. These issues can cause various problems, such as the car not starting, the dashboard lights not working, or the car not shifting into gear.
- Excessive Oil Consumption: Some owners of the 1999 Mercury Mystique have reported excessive oil consumption. The problem is often caused by worn piston rings or a damaged cylinder wall. When the car consumes too much oil, it can lead to engine damage and reduced performance.
In conclusion, while the 1999 Mercury Mystique is a reliable car, it has its share of common problems. If you own a Mercury Mystique 1999, it's essential to be aware of these issues and address them promptly to avoid more significant problems down the road. Regular maintenance and inspections can help identify these issues early on and prevent costly repairs.
Is the Mercury Mystique the same as the Ford?
Since its introduction in 1995, the Mystique has been Mercury's counterpart to the Ford Contour. Based on the same platform, the Mercury has differentiated itself by having different styling and trim packages. But for all intents and purposes, the Contour and Mystique were the same car.
What year was the Mercury Mystique made?
The Contour and Mystique, sold from 1995-2000, were, in the U.S., offered only in a four-door sedan version.
Was Mercury nicer than Ford?
What is the difference between a Ford and a Mercury? Most Mercury models were higher trim, than Ford models, but lower trim, than Lincoln. Mercury had more standard features, than Ford and was priced higher than Ford, but less than Lincoln.
Why did Ford stop Mercury?
Ford completely phased out the Mercury brand in 2011, as the company refocused its marketing and engineering efforts solely on the Ford and Lincoln brands. “Mercury has been a tremendous line for Ford Motor Company because it filled the niche between our Ford and Lincoln lineups,” said Kreipke.
Is the Mercury Mystique the same as the Ford?
Since its introduction in 1995, the Mystique has been Mercury's counterpart to the Ford Contour. Based on the same platform, the Mercury has differentiated itself by having different styling and trim packages. But for all intents and purposes, the Contour and Mystique were the same car.
When was the Mercury Mystique made?
The Contour and Mystique, sold from 1995-2000, were, in the U.S., offered only in a four-door sedan version.
Was Mercury nicer than Ford?
What is the difference between a Ford and a Mercury? Most Mercury models were higher trim, than Ford models, but lower trim, than Lincoln. Mercury had more standard features, than Ford and was priced higher than Ford, but less than Lincoln.
Why did Ford stop Mercury?
Ford completely phased out the Mercury brand in 2011, as the company refocused its marketing and engineering efforts solely on the Ford and Lincoln brands. “Mercury has been a tremendous line for Ford Motor Company because it filled the niche between our Ford and Lincoln lineups,” said Kreipke.
1999 Mercury Mystique car problems categorized by type of issue
After analyzing all complaints sent to the NHTSA and researching popular Mercury Mystique problems, we found that the most common problems with these 2023 model year vehicles are:
- Structure problems
- Service brakes problems
- Hydraulic problems
- Unknown or other problems
- Visibility problems
The graph below shows statistics for all 1999 Mercury Mystique vehicle components and the number of complaints received.
Latest 25 complaints 1999 Mercury Mystique
The NHTSA has received 140 complaints about various vehicle components related to the 1999 Mercury Mystique. Below are the 25 most recent complaints reported for 1999 Mercury Mystique vehicles.
STRUCTURE,ENGINE PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2012-10-02
- Components: STRUCTURE,ENGINE
- Summary: I WAS DRIVING ALONG WHEN I COULD SMELL MY CAR GETTING HOT, SO I PULLED OVER AND SURE ENOUGH IT WAS OVERHEATING, BUT DID NOT SHOW INSIDE ON THE DASHBOARD, SO I HAD IT CHECKED AND THE PLASTIC HOUSING AROUND THE THERMOSTAT WAS CRACKED IN 3 PLACES, SO I SAY FIX IT ,THEY SAID IT WOULD BE 450.00, OK NO PROBLEM, THEN THEY CALLED BACK AND SAID THAT THE HOUSING WAS WELDED TO THE MANIFOLD AND THAT I WOULD HAVE TO REPLACE ALL FOR 1200.00 AND THAT THE HOUSING WASN'T MADE OF PLASTIC ANYMORE BECAUSE OF THIS PROBLEM. I THINK THIS SHOULD BE A RECALL AND FIXED FOR FREE. *TR
EQUIPMENT PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2011-03-01
- Components: EQUIPMENT
- Summary: S10 APPROPRIATE HANDLING- LETTER TO THE SECRETARY FROM REQUESTING THE RECALL AND REPLACEMENT OF FACULTY FLOOR MATS DUE TO SAFETY REASONS ON HIS 1999 MERCURY MYSTIQUE. *TGW THE CONSUMER STATED THE CLIPS THAT HELD THE FLOOR MATS IN PLACE BROKE DUE TO NORMAL WEAR.
STRUCTURE PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2001-07-21
- VIN: 1MEFM66L2XK
- Components: STRUCTURE
- Summary: TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 1999 MERCURY MYSTIQUE. THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF THE INSTRUMENT CONTROL PANELS SURFACE BEGAN DEVELOPED CRACKS AND WARPS. A PLASTIC PIECE FROM THE PANEL, THAT WAS 5 INCHES IN HEIGHT BLOCKS THE WINDSHIELD. THE VEHICLE HAS NOT BEEN REPAIRED FOR THE MALFUNCTION. THE CONTACT COMMENTED THE FAILURE WAS RELATED TO THE FORD CONTOUR DASHBOARD DEFECT. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 80,000. THE CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 112,000.
FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2008-01-07
- VIN: 1MEFM66L3XK
- Components: FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE
- Summary: 1999 MERCURY MYSTIQUE, SECOND OWNER, PURCHASED IS 2005. THE GAS LINE FREEZES WHEN THE TEMPERATURE REACHES BELOW 20 DEGREES. THE TANK IS HALF FULL, TREATED FOR WINTER WEATHER AND IT STILL FREEZES. THIS IS NOT NORMAL: I'VE OWNED 2 OTHER VEHICLES (FORD TEMPO/DODGE STRATUS) NEVER HAPPENED. I'VE MISSED WORK DUE TO THIS GAS LINE FREEZE AND AM THE ONLY RESIDENT IN MY NEIGHBORHOOD THAT IS HAVING THIS PROBLEM. IT HAS TO BE A MANUFACTURE DEFECT OR THE GAS TANK IS NOT PROTECTED. THIS IS THE SECOND WINTER SEASON THIS HAS HAPPENED. *TR
ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING,ELECTRICAL SYSTEM PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2008-12-28
- Fire: 1
- VIN: 1MEFM6539XK
- Components: ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING,ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
- Summary: MY HUSBAND AND I WAS DRIVING IN TRAFFIC FROM AN APPOINTMENT AND ALL OF A SUDDEN THE CAR STARTS SMOKING WITHIN A QUICK SECOND THE FRONT LEFT SIDE BURST INTO FLAMES, ELECTRICAL WINDOWS WOULDN'T WORK AND THE BRAKES FAILED, THE WE HAD TO RIDE TRAFFIC UNTIL WE COULD MOVE OVER TO THE CURVE AT THIS TIME THE EMERGENCY BRAKE HAD TO BE USED IN ORDER TO STOP THE CAR AND I HAD TO MOVE MYSELF OUT ON THE DRIVERS SIDE. *TR
SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2008-07-11
- VIN: 1MEFM6536XK
- Components: SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC
- Summary: TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 1999 MERCURY MYSTIQUE. THE BRAKE PEDAL EXTENDED TO THE FLOOR WHEN IT WAS DEPRESSED. THE CONTACT ATTEMPTED TO EXIT THE DRIVEWAY AT 2 MPH, BUT THE VEHICLE FAILED TO STOP. SHE HAD TO CONTINUOUSLY APPLY PRESSURE TO THE BRAKE PEDAL IN ORDER FOR THE VEHICLE TO STOP. SHE INSPECTED THE VEHICLE AND NOTICED BRAKE FLUID LEAKING FROM UNDERNEATH. SHE ALSO NOTICED THAT THE BRAKE LINE AND CHASSIS WERE EXCESSIVELY RUSTED. THE DEALER STATED THAT BECAUSE THERE WAS NO RECALL, THEY WOULD NOT ASSUME ANY FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE REPAIR. THE VEHICLE HAS NOT BEEN REPAIRED. THE FAILURE AND CURRENT MILEAGES WERE 206,000. UPDATED 09/10/08. *LJ UPDATED 09/12/08. *JB
STRUCTURE,UNKNOWN OR OTHER PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 1901-01-01
- VIN: 3MEFM653XXM
- Components: STRUCTURE,UNKNOWN OR OTHER
- Summary: 1999 MERCURY MYSTIQUE DASHBOARD IS CURLING UP. CONSUMER STATES THAT FORD'S RECALL TO REPAIR THIS PROBLEM HAS EXPIRED AND THERE'S NOTHING THEY CAN DO. *NJ
ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING,EXTERIOR LIGHTING,SEAT BELTS PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2007-06-10
- VIN: 1MEFM6535XK
- Components: ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING,EXTERIOR LIGHTING,SEAT BELTS
- Summary: TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 1999 MERCURY MYSTIQUE. THE CONTACT NOTICED MOISTURE IN THE DRIVER'S SIDE HEADLIGHT. IN ADDITION, THE DRIVER'S SIDE TAIL LIGHT DRIPPED WATER INTO THE TRUNK WHEN IT WAS OPENED. SHE NOTICED THAT THE MOISTURE WAS ALWAYS PRESENT, ESPECIALLY AFTER IT RAINED. THE VEHICLE HAS NOT BEEN DIAGNOSED. THE CURRENT MILEAGE IS 51,504 AND FAILURE MILEAGE WAS APPROXIMATELY 48,246. UPDATED 07/07/08. *LJ THE PASSENGER SIDE SEAT BELT WAS INOPERABLE, THE TIMING BELT WAS REPLACED. UPDATED
UNKNOWN OR OTHER PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2005-05-20
- VIN: 3MEFM66L8XM
- Components: UNKNOWN OR OTHER
- Summary: DASH STARTED PEELING FROM RIGHT CORNER AND NOW HAS PEELED AWAY FROM FRONT OF DASH AREA ALL THE WAY ACROSS. *CN
SEAT BELTS PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2008-01-09
- VIN: 1MEFM53S0XG
- Components: SEAT BELTS
- Summary: THE FRONT PASSENGER SEAT BELT WILL NOT EXTRACT FROM THE RETRACTOR MAKING IT IMPOSSIBLE TO BE WORN BY ANYONE SITTING IN THE PASSENGER SEAT. THERE IS A RECALL FOR THIS ISSUE ON MY MODEL YEAR BUT FORD MOTOR CLAIMS THAT MY VEHICLE IS NOT AFFECTED AND IS UNWILLING TO DO ANYTHING AT THIS TIME. *TR
VISIBILITY,STRUCTURE PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2007-07-27
- Components: VISIBILITY,STRUCTURE
- Summary: MY 1999 MERCURY MYSTIQUES DASH BOARD HAS COMPLETELY WARPED. IT HAS RENDERED THE DEFROSTER USELESS. I WAS NOT INFORMED OF ANY RECALL FOR THE DEFECT. I NOW UNDERSTAND THAT THE LINCOLN/MERCURY COMPANY DID ACKNOWLEDGE A DEFECT IN THE DASHBOARDS. WHAT REMEDY CAN I EXPECT ? *TR
SUSPENSION,ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2007-03-29
- VIN: 1MEFM66L2XK
- Components: SUSPENSION,ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING
- Summary: TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 1999 MERCURY MYSTIQUE. THE CONTACT HEARD A LOUD GRINDING NOISE COMING FROM THE FRONT END OF THE VEHICLE AND FELT A VIBRATION WHILE IDLING. THE MECHANIC STATED THAT THE ENGINE MOUNTS NEEDED TO BE CHANGED. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE VEHICLE WOULD JERK TO THE RIGHT WHEN STOPPING AND JERKED TO THE LEFT WHEN HE ACCELERATED. AS OF JULY 27, 2007, THE VEHICLE HAS NOT BEEN REPAIRED. THE CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 57,000 AND FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 50,000. UPDATED 02-01-08. *KB THE CONSUMER HAS SINCE TRADED IN THE VEHICLE. UPDATED
AIR BAGS PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2007-06-23
- Number Of Injuries: 2
- Crash: 1
- VIN: 4M2XV11T3XD
- Components: AIR BAGS
- Summary: A MINI VAN BROADSIDED A 4 DOOR SEDAN AND THE AIRBAGS DID NOT DEPLOY UNTILL AFTER THE VAN CAME TO A STOP, AND THE DRIVER TRIED TO OPEN DRIVER'S SIDE DOOR TO GET OUT. *AK
FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2007-04-22
- VIN: 1MEFM6532XK
- Components: FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE
- Summary: I HAD A STRAP THAT HAD RUSTED UNDERNEATH MY CAR. A 1999 MERCURY MYSTIQUE 2.0, SO I TOOK IT TO THE MECHANIC. HE INDICATED THAT MY GAS TANK STRAP RUSTED THROUGH AND THAT THE OTHER ONE WAS ABOUT TO FAIL AS WELL. HE TOLD ME THAT THIS IS A DEFINITE HAZARD AND COULD HAVE PROVED TO BE DANGEROUS IF I DID NOT TAKE CARE OF IT. HE ALSO SAID THAT THERE SHOULD HAVE BEEN A RECALL REGARDING THIS PROBLEM. *TR
AIR BAGS PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2006-06-12
- Number Of Injuries: 1
- Crash: 1
- Components: AIR BAGS
- Summary: I WAS HIT ON THE DRIVER'S SIDE BETWEEN THE DOOR AND THE FRONT OF THE CAR. THE AIR BAG DID NOT DEPLOY. THE DOCTOR, POLICE OFFICER, AND BODY SHOP SAID IT SHOULD HAVE. I SUFFERED HEAD , BACK AND NECK INJURIES. THE CAR WAS TOTALED. *AK
AIR BAGS,STRUCTURE PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2003-07-02
- VIN: 1FAFP66L2XK
- Components: AIR BAGS,STRUCTURE
- Summary: TL*- THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE 1999 FORD MYSTIQUE'S DASHBOARD WAS FALLING FROM THE FRAME OF THE VEHICLE. SHE WAS AFRAID THAT THE AIR BAGS MAY DEPLOY WHILE DRIVING THE VEHICLE, OR THE DASHBOARD WILL FALL INTO HER LAP WHILE DRIVING. SHE HAS CONTACTED THE DEALERSHIP, AND THEY INFORMED HER THAT WERE NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR REPAIRING THE DASHBOARD UNDER WARRANTY BECAUSE THE VEHICLE WAS OUT OF WARRANTY. THE CONTACT FEARED DRIVING THE VEHICLE, AND SHE THOUGHT THAT FORD WOULD HONOR THE WARRANTY. SHE DID SPEAK WITH SOMEONE AT A CHRYSLER DEALERSHIP, AND THEY QUOTED HER A PRICE OF $2000, THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE VEHICLE CURRENTLY HAD 29,000 MILES. *AK
SEAT BELTS,VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2001-09-03
- Number Of Injuries: 2
- Crash: 1
- VIN: 1ZWFT61LXX5
- Components: SEAT BELTS,VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL
- Summary: TL*- THE CONTACT STATED THAT WHILE DRIVING THE 1999 MERCURY COUGAR WITH 44000 FAILURE MILEAGE AT 40 MPH AND ENTERING THE HIGHWAY WITH THE FOOT ON THE GAS PEDAL THE CONTACT LIFTED THE FOOT OFF THE GAS PEDAL TO MANEUVER AROUND A VEHICLE AND THE VEHICLE WOULD NOT SLOW DOWN, IT KEPT ACCELERATING. THE CONTACT PRESSED ON THE GAS PEDAL TO TRY TO GET THE PEDAL UNSTUCK, BUT NOTHING HAPPENED. THE VEHICLE REACHED A SPEED OF 120 MPH. THE CONTACT TOOK THE NEAREST EXIT RAMP AND PRESSED ON THE FOOT BRAKE, BUT NOTHING HAPPENED. THE CONTACT PRESSED ON THE FOOT BRAKE A SECOND TIME, THEN ONLY ONE FRONT BRAKE GRABBED AND THE VEHICLE FLIPPED SEVERAL TIMES. THE PASSENGER FRONT SEAT BELT UNLATCHED FROM THE BUCKLE ASSEMBLE. THE AIRBAGS DID NOT DEPLOY. BOTH THE PASSENGER AND THE DRIVER SUSTAINED MINOR INJURIES. THE VEHICLE HAD THREE MERCURY RECALLS 00S03, 01S03, 01S02. THE CONTACT TURNED THE VEHICLE OFF AND TOOK THE KEY OUT OF THE IGNITION BUT, THE ENGINE WAS STILL RACING, THE ENGINE DID NOT SHUT DOWN. THE VEHICLE SUSTAINED MAJOR DAMAGE AND WAS NOT DRIVABLE. *AK
VISIBILITY PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2007-03-12
- VIN: 1MEFM66L7XK
- Components: VISIBILITY
- Summary: I OWN A 1999 MERCURY MYSTIQUE. THE DASHBOARD HAS COME LOOSE AND WARPED SIGNIFICANTLY NEAR THE WINDSHIELD. THE PLASTIC PIECE THAT SURROUNDS THE DEFROST VENT HAS BROKEN. THE DEFROSTER NO LONGER WORKS SUFFICIENTLY DUE TO THE WARPED DASHBOARD BEING IN THE WAY. THE LOCAL DEALER TOLD ME THEY COULD FIX IT AT WHAT TO ME IS A SIGNIFICANT COST. I CANNOT AFFORD THIS AND IT IS OBVIOUSLY A DEFECT IN THE VEHICLE. *JB
VISIBILITY PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2007-02-02
- VIN: 1MEFM66L4XK
- Components: VISIBILITY
- Summary: SEE NHTSA ACTION NUMBER : DP06004. COMPLAINANT VEHICLE (MERCURY MYSTIQUE 1999) EXHIBITS THE IDENTICAL CONDITIONS. COMPLAINANT ATTEMPTED TO RECEIVE REPAIRS FROM AN AUTHORIZED MERCURY DEALER IN 2002, WAS (A) NOT TOLD OF ANY EXISTING FORD CAMPAIGN INVOLVING THE SUBJECT MATTER; AND (B) WAS TOLD THAT NOTHING COULD BE DONE FOR LESS THAN MULTIPLE THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS. SINCE THAT TIME, THE WARPAGE HAS WORSENED TO THE POINT WHERE THE GRILL FOR THE DEFROSTER WILL NO LONGER STAY IN PLACE, AND DEFROSTER PERFORMANCE TO THE DRIVER'S SIDE IS SEVERELY UNDERMINED DUE TO UNCONTROLLED AIRFLOW THROUGH THE OPENING TO THE DEFROSTER BLOWER. *NM
STRUCTURE PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2006-12-20
- VIN: 1MEFM6530XK
- Components: STRUCTURE
- Summary: I BELIEVE IT'S A SHAME THAT MANUFACTURERS CAN SELL CARS WITH GLUED DASHBOARDS THAT REQUIRE THE REMOVAL OF THE WINDSHIELD TO REPAIR THE DASHBOARD. THIS IS A 1999 MERCURY MYSTIQUE, THE DASHBOARD MATERIAL CAME LOOSE AND SQUEEZED THE DEFROST DIVERTER PLASTIC UP AND OFF THE DASHBOARD, THEREFORE MAKING IT DIFFICULT TO USE THE DEFROSTER. *NM
UNKNOWN OR OTHER PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2004-06-16
- VIN: 1MEFM66L4XK
- Components: UNKNOWN OR OTHER
- Summary: AFTER THE CAR WAS ABOUT 5 YEARS OLD THE DASHBOARD WARPED. IT CAME UP ABOUT 3 INCHES AND COVERS ABOUT 10% OF THE WINDSHIELD. IT ALSO WILL NOT HOLD THE DEFROSTER DEFLECTOR TRIM SO IT HAD TO BE REMOVED. I HAVE NOT HEARD FROM FORD (MERCURY)ABOUT THIS PROBLEM AND FEEL IT IS THEIR PROBLEM TO REPAIR AND NOT AN EXPENSE I SHOULD HAVE TO PAY. *JB
STRUCTURE PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2006-11-23
- VIN: 3MEFM66L9XM
- Components: STRUCTURE
- Summary: 1. DASH WARP CAUSES VISIBILITY PROBLEMS, DEFROSTER MALFUNCTION, LOOSE TRIM. I DROVE OVER A SEAM IN THE ROADWAY AT AN OVERPASS (SMALL BUMP) & THE VENT TRIM POPPED LOOSE. THIS IS SIMPLY AN AGING ISSUE AS THERE WAS NO UNUSUAL EVENT. MY CAR IS A 1999 MERCURY MYSTIQUE, BUT THIS ISSUE IS ALSO PREVALENT ON THE FORD 1999 & 2000 CONTOUR, AND SOME 1998 MODELS WITH THE NEWER STYLE DASH. 2. THE TRIM POPPED LOOSE FROM THE DASH WHILE COMMUTING ON I-95 TO WORK. THE VENT TRIM CAME TO REST IN FRONT OF THE AIR BAG & ON MY ARMS AS I DROVE, BUT FORTUNATELY DID NOT CAUSE AN ACCIDENT. 3. THE VENT TRIM WAS PLACED LOOSELY ONTO THE DASH SO THE DEFROSTER WOULD STILL BE USABLE, BUT THE WARPED DASH PREVENTS IT FROM BEING PROPERLY SECURED. A NEW VENT TRIM WILL NOT FIX THIS PROBLEM. THERE WAS AN OLD RECALL WHICH INCLUDED A 'REPAIR KIT', BUT IT HAS EXPIRED. I WOULD LIKE TO SEE THE RECALL RE-INSTATED. *NM
SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2006-11-03
- Crash: 1
- VIN: 1MEFM6535XK
- Components: SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC
- Summary: THE SENSOR RING FOR ABS (BRAKES) ON RIGHT AND LEFT AXELS ON THE FRONT OF MY 99 MERCURY MYSTIQUE ARE BOTH CRACKED CAUSING ABS TO NOT FUNCTION,ALSO I JUST RETURNED FROM GETTING RESISTERS REPLACED FOR MY BLOWER MOTOR WHICH I JUST FOUND OUT HAD A RECALL THAT WAS CLOSED PLEASE LET ME KNOW OF ANYTHING I CAN DO . I DID HAVE AN ACCIDENT I THOUGHT THE BRAKES DIDNT WORK PROPERLY BUT DONT KNOW IF IT IS RELATED
SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2006-11-03
- Crash: 1
- VIN: 1MEFM6535XK
- Components: SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC
- Summary: THE SENSOR RING FOR ABS (BRAKES) ON RIGHT AND LEFT AXELS ON THE FRONT OF MY 99 MERCURY MYSTIQUE ARE BOTH CRACKED CAUSING ABS TO NOT FUNCTION,ALSO I JUST RETURNED FROM GETTING RESISTERS REPLACED FOR MY BLOWER MOTOR WHICH I JUST FOUND OUT HAD A RECALL THAT WAS CLOSED PLEASE LET ME KNOW OF ANYTHING I CAN DO . I DID HAVE AN ACCIDENT I THOUGHT THE BRAKES DIDNT WORK PROPERLY BUT DONT KNOW IF IT IS RELATED
UNKNOWN OR OTHER PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2003-05-15
- VIN: 1MEFM66L7XK
- Components: UNKNOWN OR OTHER
- Summary: THE DASHBOARD IS BADLY WARPED BLOCKING MY VISION AND INHIBITING THE FUNCTION OF MY DEFROSTER. *JB
1999 Mercury Mystique recalls
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has issued 4 recalls for different components of the 1999 Mercury Mystique.
- Manufacturer: FEDERAL-MOGUL CHASSIS PRODUCTS
- Components: SUSPENSION
- Summary: FEDERAL MOGUL IS RECALLING 6,903 AFTERMARKET BALL JOINT ASSEMBLIES SHIPPED BETWEEN NOVEMBER 9, 2007 AND MARCH 26, 2008, WHICH MAY HAVE BEEN PACKAGED WITH INCORRECT NUTS. THE PART NUMBERS PACKAGED WITH INCORRECT NUTS ARE: K7147, K7329, K8683, AND 104353. THESE PARTS WERE MADE FOR USE ON THE VARIOUS VEHICLES LISTED ABOVE.
- Consequence: THE NUTS INCLUDED IN THE PACKAGING FOR THESE BALL JOINT ASSEMBLIES ARE MISSING THE INTENDED PREVAILING TORQUE (SELF-LOCKING) FEATURE. IF THE INCORRECT NUT WAS TO BECOME LOOSE, THE JOINING MEMBERS MAY LOOSEN LEADING TO A SEPARATION OF THE BALL JOINT. THIS MAY RESULT IN LOSS OF VEHICLE CONTROL, POSSIBLY RESULTING IN A VEHICLE CRASH.
- Remedy: FEDERAL MOGUL WILL NOTIFY OWNERS AND REPLACE THE PARTS FREE OF CHARGE. THE RECALL BEGAN ON MAY 22, 2008. OWNERS CAN CONTACT FEDERAL MOGUL AT 877-489-6659.
- Manufacturer: BRAKE PARTS, INC.
- Components: SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC
- Summary: CERTAIN AFTERMARKET BRAKE HYDRAULIC MASTER CYLINDERS SOLD AS REPLACEMENT BRAKE CYLINDERS FOR CERTAIN FORD, DAIMLERCHRYSLER, AND JEEP PASSENGER VEHICLES. THESE BRAKE CYLINDERS WERE SOLD UNDER THE BRAND NAMES OF NAPA, RAYBESTOS, AIMCO, AC DELCO, CARQUEST, BENDIX, AND WAGNER. ONLY PRODUCTS THAT WERE MANUFACTURED FROM JULY 27, 2005 THROUGH JANUARY 17, 2006 (DATE CODES 0529 THROUGH 0602) ARE SUBJECT TO THIS RECALL. WHEN SUBJECT TO VERY COLD TEMPERATURES, AN INTERNAL SEAL IN THE MASTER CYLINDER COULD LOSE FLEXIBILITY AND MAY CAUSE BRAKE FLUID TO LEAK.
- Consequence: LOSS OF BRAKE FLUID CAN LEAD TO A DECREASE IN BRAKE LINE PRESSURE AND AN INCREASE IN STOPPING DISTANCE, WHICH CAN RESULT IN A VEHICLE CRASH.
- Remedy: AFFINIA (BRAKE PARTS, INC.) WILL REPLACE THE SUBJECT BRAKE HYDRAULIC MASTER CYLINDERS FREE OF CHARGE. THE RECALL BEGAN ON MARCH 20, 2006. OWNERS CAN CONTACT AFFINA GROUP CUSTOMER SERVICE AT 1-800-323-0354.
- Manufacturer: FORD MOTOR COMPANY
- Components: SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC:FOUNDATION COMPONENTS
- Summary: VEHICLE DESCRIPTION: PASSENGER VEHICLES NOT EQUIPPED WITH THE ANTI-LOCK BRAKING SYSTEM (ABS). A PRESSURE CONSCIOUS REDUCING VALVE (PCRV) IN THE REAR BRAKES MAY BE SUBJECT TO CORROSION AND RESULT IN MALFUNCTION, WHEN OPERATED IN AREAS THAT USE SALT COMPOUNDS ON THE ROADWAY FOR DE-ICING OR DUST CONTROL.
- Consequence: IF BOTH PCRV'S MALFUNCTION, VEHICLE HANDLING COULD BE ADVERSELY AFFECTED DURING BRAKING AS A RESULT OF THE REAR WHEELS LOCKING, INCREASING THE RISK OF A CRASH.
- Remedy: DEALERS WILL INSTALL IMPROVED PCRV'S IN THE REAR BRAKE SYSTEM. THIS RECALL WAS EXPANDED IN SEPTEMBER 2000 TO INCLUDE 1999 AND 2000 FORD CONTOUR, MERCURY MYSTIQUE AND COUGAR VEHICLES.
- Manufacturer: FORD MOTOR COMPANY
- Components: ELECTRICAL SYSTEM:IGNITION:SWITCH
- Summary: VEHICLE DESCRIPTION: PASSENGER VEHICLES BUILT WITH AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSIONS WHICH UTILIZE A PARK/LOCK SOLENOID. IT IS POSSIBLE TO ROTATE THE IGNITION KEY TO THE LOCK POSITION AND REMOVE THE KEY WITHOUT THE SHIFT LEVER AND TRANSMISSION BEING IN PARK. THESE VEHICLES DO NOT COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF FMVSS NO. 114, "THEFT PROTECTION."
- Consequence: THIS COULD RESULT IN A CRASH AND POSSIBLE PERSONAL INJURY.
- Remedy: DEALERS WILL INSPECT THESE VEHICLES. VEHICLES THAT HAVE UNITS WITH IGNITION KEYS REMOVABLE IN GEAR POSITIONS OTHER THAN PARK, WILL HAVE THE STEERING COLUMN REPLACED.
Negative 1999 Mercury Mystique car reviews
Positive 1999 Mercury Mystique car reviews
-
Hello! Thank you for considering our car. We purchased it new and have driven it for 112,000 miles. We did have to replace the timing belt at around 100,000 miles, but this is a common maintenance issue for cars with timing belts. We recommend replacing it at 95,000 miles as a precaution to avoid any potential issues. Overall, it's a great car that's fun to drive and gets excellent gas mileage, with 28 to 33 mpg in the city or on the highway. While there are a couple of cosmetic issues, such as peeling paint on the grille, it's still in good condition. We live in a snowy area and it handles well, unless we get an unusual amount of snow. My husband drives it to work every day, which is a 7-mile rural commute. We hope it lasts as long as our old '91 Tracer, which had an impressive 315,000 miles when we sold it! Please let us know if you have any questions or would like to take it for a test drive.
-
I have a 99 mystique and it's been an amazing car for me. With 130k miles on it, I bought it in 2009 with 80k miles for only $2,250. It's now 2013 and it's still running strong! Of course, like any car, it's had a few issues - my alternator went out and was difficult to replace, and my battery, starter, and O2 sensor are starting to go bad. But these are all expected issues that come with owning a car. The only things that I'm not too happy about are that my front windows and sunroof don't work, and my brake light and blinkers are out. Overall, I've had this car for about 4 years and have spent around $500 a year plus about $1k on repairs, but I'm still very happy with it and will probably get another one.
-
I also have a 1997 Mystique LS. I agree that the 1999 version seems to track better than the 1997. The handling is very secure at all speeds and the 2.5 liter Duratec engine is both strong and smooth. I travel a lot at freeway speeds and average an impressive 27-29 mpg, which is pretty spectacular for an automatic V6 powered sedan. However, one caveat is that my car is not very quiet, with lots of wind and road noise. Interestingly, in 1999 Consumer Reports rated the car as well as the Accord and better than the Maxima. The only negative reported was under 'integrity' (seals, fit and finish). In this area, the 1997 made in Mexico is better. Still, if you enjoy driving, this is a pretty slick ride.
-
I've had this car for five years and nearly 80k miles now. It was the only American made sedan I could find with a manual transmission, ABS and a V-6 at the time. I opted for every available option; the power seat, sunroof, traction control and split folding leather seats have definitely come in handy. I always enjoy driving it, although it does have some limitations, particularly the drink holders and road noise at highway speeds. Fortunately, very little has gone wrong that wasn't fixed under warranty (knock on wood) so I've been quite pleased with that. Generally, it's a much sportier and more comfortable car than you'd expect for the price and I am very happy with it.
-
I hope you're doing well! I wanted to share my thoughts on my 1999 Mercury Mystique Ls. I absolutely love how comfortable the ride is, thanks to the soft yet supportive leather seats and great shocks. Additionally, I find all of the dash buttons to be easily accessible and straightforward to understand. The styling of both the interior and exterior is very nice and definitely doesn't look cheap like so many other cars. In fact, I think this car looks like it should cost more than it actually does!
Additional sources
More sources of information about 1999 Mercury Mystique problems:
1999 Mercury Mystique Problems and Complaints - 3 Issues
Problem with your 1999 Mercury Mystique? Our list of 3 known complaints reported by owners can help you fix your 1999 Mercury Mystique.
Q&A: Mercury Mystique Problems - 1999 Mercury Mystique with ...
Jul 3, 2009 ... I have 169000 miles on my 1999 Mercury Mystique. This is an automatic transmission. All of a sudden, my car started - Answered by a verified ...
Mercury Mystique Problems and Complaints - 4 Issues
Check Engine Light Due to Plugged EGR Passage · Problem With Idle Air Bypass Valve May Cause Engine Performance Problems · Transmission Failure Common Due to ...
Common Mercury Mystique Problems - 1999 Mercury Mystique GS ...
Apr 16, 2011 ... 1. Check power to the Fuel Pump Driver Module (FPDM) on the Blue (BL) wire from the inertia switch. This circuit should show battery voltage ...
1st Generation (1995-2000) Mystique Problems
Worst Issues · check engine light on in the 1998 Mystique · weak acceleration in the 1996 Mystique · hiccupping in cruise control in the 1998 Mystique · engine ...
Other years of Mercury Mystique
Are you having problems with your 1999 Mercury Mystique?
Allan Runte 2025-01-02
The car looks great! I wish I had researched this model before purchasing it. Unfortunately, it had 105,000 miles on it when I bought it. However, the car runs great, despite the check engine light coming on frequently. I have had to replace the thermostat, flush the cooling system, and change the hoses, but overall it has been a good experience. The Catalyst Converter needs to be changed, and the rear defogger grid lines burn out too quickly. It averages about 21 mpg and has some minor electrical issues. If you are interested in purchasing this model, I suggest looking for one with low miles. Lastly, the regulator on the driver's side window had to be replaced. In conclusion, I think this is a decent Ford product.
Ellsworth Lehner 2024-11-23
At first, it seemed like a great deal - low mileage, good price, and the previous owner had kept up with all the scheduled maintenance. However, after six months, the timing belt blew out on the highway (yes, it actually blew out) with only 55,000 miles on the car. To make matters worse, the power steering fluid began leaking and even rotted out the sway bar bushings. Unfortunately, I've already spent nearly a third of what I originally paid for the car on repairs. Just a word of caution for anyone considering a similar purchase!
Barrett Kuvalis 2024-07-29
Hey there! I have a 99 Mercury Mystique and I feel like I know more about the vehicle than an actual mechanic. Unfortunately, I've been having some issues with the car lately. The paint is peeling off and there's rust on the roof, and to top it off, the check engine light keeps coming on and costing me more money. I've had to replace the catalytic converter, oxygen sensors, spark plug wires, starter, and even the alternator. What else could possibly go wrong?
Josiah McDermott 2024-05-18
The car experienced some issues during the first week of use, such as the keyless trunk release being inoperative. However, these issues were promptly addressed and resolved. Although there were some subsequent issues with rattling windows and dashboards, these were also resolved through multiple visits to the repair shop. It is unfortunate that the dash has warped again after two years, but it is important to note that the warranty has expired. Despite this, the car remains a reliable and well-designed vehicle.
Jarvis Jacobi 2024-03-23
It sounds like you've had a great experience with your car overall! Although you did have a problem with the dash, it's great to hear that Ford was able to fix it even after the car was off warranty. The V6 engine sounds like it provides plenty of power, and it's even better that your car is loaded with all the options. Thanks for sharing your thoughts!