Mercury Sable 1992 problems
The Mercury Sable is a range of automobiles manufactured and marketed by the Mercury brand of Ford Motor Company. Introduced on December 26, 1985, as the replacement for the Mercury Marquis, the Sable marked the transition of the mid-size Mercury product range to front-wheel drive.
Over its production span, the Sable was Mercury's badge-engineered counterpart to the Ford Taurus, below the Grand Marquis in the Mercury range. From the 1986 to 2005 model years, it was produced as a mid-size four-door sedan and five-door station wagon. For 2006, the Sable was replaced by the full-size Montego and mid-size Milan. It was reintroduced for 2008 as a full-size car, offered as a four-door sedan.
Because of declining sales, the Sable was discontinued after the 2009 model year, leaving no Mercury counterpart for the sixth-generation Taurus. The final Sable was produced on May 21, 2009; in total, 2,112,374 Sables were produced during its 1985–2005 production.
Social links
Common Mercury Sable 1992 problems
The Mercury Sable, produced from 1986 to 2005, is known for several common problems that owners have reported over the years. These issues span across various components of the vehicle, including the transmission, engine, interior, electrical system, and HVAC system.
Transmission Failure
The transmission is one of the most common problem areas in the Mercury Sable, with a significant number of complaints filed against it. Transmission problems can manifest in several ways, such as difficulty shifting gears, slipping, or complete failure. Transmission issues can be costly to repair and may require a complete replacement in severe cases.
Engine Failure
The 1992 Mercury Sable also has a history of engine problems, with 43 complaints filed against it. Engine problems can be challenging to diagnose and repair, often requiring the expertise of a professional mechanic.
Interior Issues
Interior problems are also common in the Mercury Sable, with 20 complaints filed against this category.
Electrical System Failure
Electrical issues are another common problem area in the Mercury Sable, with 20 complaints filed against it. These issues can range from minor inconveniences, such as malfunctioning interior lights, to more significant problems, such as electrical system failure, which can affect various components of the vehicle.
HVAC System Failure
The HVAC system is another area where the Mercury Sable has reported issues, with 18 complaints filed against it.
In summary, the Mercury Sable has a history of common problems affecting various components of the vehicle, including the transmission, engine, interior, electrical system, and HVAC system. These issues can be costly to repair and may require the expertise of a professional mechanic. Potential buyers should be aware of these issues and consider the costs of potential repairs before purchasing a Mercury Sable.
What years of Mercury Sable to avoid?
Years to Avoid
- 2003. ...
- 2000. ...
- 2002. ...
- 2005. ...
- 2001.
- 2004.
Are Mercury Sables good cars?
Overall Mercury Sable is a great vehicle. Very comfortable, powerful, and drives smoothly. Relatively, fuel efficient.
What kind of engine does a Mercury Sable have?
For the Sable G and GS, the standard engine was the 3.0L Vulcan V6, producing 145 hp. For the Sable LS, the standard engine was a 3.0L DOHC Duratec V6, producing 200 hp; optional in the Sable GS, the Duratec engine was an enlarged version of the engine from the Mercury Mystique.
How much horsepower does a 1988 Mercury Sable have?
MMP Rating
| Engine Specifications | |
|---|---|
| Horsepower Range: | 140 hp @ 4800 rpm (3.0L), 140 hp @ 3800 rpm (3.8L) |
| Torque: | 160 lb-ft @ 3000 rpm (3.0L), 215 lb-ft @ 2400 rpm (3.8L) |
| Compression Ratio: | 8.9:1 (3.0L), 9.0:1 (3.8L) |
| Ignition System: | Electronic |
What years of Mercury Sable to avoid?
Years to Avoid
- 2003. ...
- 2000. ...
- 2002. ...
- 2005. ...
- 2001.
- 2004.
Is Mercury Sable a good car?
Overall Mercury Sable is a great vehicle. Very comfortable, powerful, and drives smoothly. Relatively, fuel efficient.
What kind of engine does a Mercury Sable have?
For the Sable G and GS, the standard engine was the 3.0L Vulcan V6, producing 145 hp. For the Sable LS, the standard engine was a 3.0L DOHC Duratec V6, producing 200 hp; optional in the Sable GS, the Duratec engine was an enlarged version of the engine from the Mercury Mystique.
How much horsepower does a 1988 Mercury Sable have?
MMP Rating
| Engine Specifications | |
|---|---|
| Horsepower Range: | 140 hp @ 4800 rpm (3.0L), 140 hp @ 3800 rpm (3.8L) |
| Torque: | 160 lb-ft @ 3000 rpm (3.0L), 215 lb-ft @ 2400 rpm (3.8L) |
| Compression Ratio: | 8.9:1 (3.0L), 9.0:1 (3.8L) |
| Ignition System: | Electronic |
Mercury Sable 1992 car problems categorized by type of issue
After analyzing all complaints sent to the NHTSA and researching popular Mercury Sable problems, we found that the most common problems with these 2023 model year vehicles are:
- Engine and engine cooling problems
- Power train problems
- Service brakes problems
- Hydraulic problems
- Steering problems
The graph below shows statistics for all Mercury Sable 1992 vehicle components and the number of complaints received.
Latest 25 complaints Mercury Sable 1992
The NHTSA has received 483 complaints about various vehicle components related to the Mercury Sable 1992. Below are the 25 most recent complaints reported for Mercury Sable 1992 vehicles.
TIRES PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2010-06-15
- VIN: 1MELM5044NG
- Components: TIRES
- Summary: THE TIRE VALVE ON MY RIGHT REAR TIRE FAILED WHILE THE CAR WAS GARAGED. THIS WAS THE SECOND VALVE FAILURE IN A PAIR OF TIRES INSTALLED ON 04/27/2007. THE FIRST VALVE FAILED (ON THE OTHER TIRE IN THE PAIR) ON 04/26/2009 WHILE THE CAR WAS ALSO PARKED, BUT ABOUT 30 MILES FROM HOME (SEE ODI NUMBER 10279930). *TR
TIRES PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2009-04-26
- VIN: 1MELM5044NG
- Components: TIRES
- Summary: WHILE AT A DESTINATION ABOUT 30 MILES FROM HOME, MY LEFT-FRONT TIRE VALVE FAILED JUST AS I WAS ABOUT TO ENTER THE PARKED CAR TO HEAD HOME. THE AIR WHOOSHED LOUDLY OUT OF THE TIRE AS I WATCHED IT DEFLATE BEFORE MY EYES. I CALLED AAA FOR ASSISTANCE IN CHANGING THE TIRE AND TOOK THE FLAT TIRE TO MY DEALER THE FOLLOWING DAY FOR REPLACEMENT OF THE DEFECTIVE TIRE VALVE. THE VALVE WAS INSTALLED AS PART OF A NEW-TIRE INSTALLATION ON 04/24/2007 BY MY FORD DEALER. *TR
STEERING,SUSPENSION,STRUCTURE PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 1992-09-04
- VIN: 1MELM5841NA
- Components: STEERING,SUSPENSION,STRUCTURE
- Summary: TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 1992 MERCURY SABLE. WHEN THE CONTACT TOOK HIS VEHICLE TO A LOCAL MECHANIC, CORROSION WAS DISCOVERED IN THE STEERING COLUMN. HE ALSO DISCOVERED THAT HE WAS EXPERIENCING THE SAME FAILURE LISTED IN NHTSA CAMPAIGN ID NUMBER 98V323000 (STRUCTURE:FRAME AND MEMBERS). THE MANUFACTURER WAS UNABLE TO PROVIDE ASSISTANCE; HOWEVER, THEY STATED THAT BECAUSE IT HAD EXCEEDED TEN YEARS, THE PARTS WERE UNAVAILABLE. THE VEHICLE HAS NOT BEEN REPAIRED. THE FAILURE AND CURRENT MILEAGES WERE 85,591. UPDATED 10/16/08. *LJ THE VEHICLE WOULD PULL TO THE SIDE. UPDATED 10/17/08. *JB
SUSPENSION PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2007-09-24
- VIN: 1MECM50U2NG
- Components: SUSPENSION
- Summary: TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 1992 MERCURY SABLE. WHILE DRIVING APPROXIMATELY 30 MPH, THE CONTACT HEARD A LOUD THUMPING NOISE. APPROXIMATELY THIRTY SECONDS LATER, THE VEHICLE SHUT OFF. HE PUSHED THE VEHICLE TO THE SIDE OF THE ROAD AND NOTICED THAT THE FRONT FRAME FAILED. TWO DAYS LATER, THE VEHICLE WAS TOWED TO AAA. A LOCAL MECHANIC ARRIVED A WEEK LATER AND STATED THAT THERE WAS WEAR AND TEAR ON THE FRONT FRAME BUSHING SWAY BAR, WHICH CAUSED THE FRONT FRAME TO FAIL. HE NOTIFIED THE MANUFACTURER AND THEY STATED THAT THERE WAS A RECALL FOR THE REAR FRAME, BUT NOT THE FRONT. THE MANUFACTURER WOULD NOT PROVIDE ANY FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE WITH THE REPAIRS AND STATED THAT THE VEHICLE WAS NOT WORTH REPAIRING. THE VEHICLE HAS NOT BEEN REPAIRED. THE VIN WAS UNKNOWN. THE CURRENT AND FAILURE MILEAGES WERE 100,000. UPDATED 11/06/07 *TR
ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2005-11-10
- VIN: 1MELM554XNG
- Components: ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING
- Summary: DT*: THE CONTACT STATED WHILE DRIVING AT LOW SPEEDS DOWN A HILL AND TRYING TO STOP THE VEHICLE STALLED. ALL THE LIGHTS ON THE DASHBOARD ILLUMINATED PRIOR TO THE VEHICLE STALLING. THE BRAKES DID NOT WORK WHEN THIS OCCURRED. THE PARKING BRAKE MUST BE USED TO STOP THE VEHICLE. AN INDEPENDENT REPAIR SHOP HAS BEEN UNABLE TO DUPLICATE THE PROBLEM.*AK UPDATED 1/25/2006 - THE MANUFACTURER INDICATED THERE WERE NOT RECALLS RELATED TO THE FAILURE. *NM
TIRES PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2005-11-01
- Components: TIRES
- Summary: THE CONSUMER'S GENERAL TIRES DEVELOPED SEPARATION BETWEEN THE TREAD AND THE CORE. *TS *SC
SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2005-11-09
- Crash: 1
- VIN: 1MECM53U8NG
- Components: SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC
- Summary: DT: THE CONTACT STATED WHILE DRIVING AT NIGHT THE CONSUMER STRUCK A DEER AND EXPERIENCED DIFFICULTY STOPPING WITH THE BRAKES. THERE WAS DAMAGE TO THE FRONT HOOD AND HEADLIGHTS. NO POLICE REPORT WAS TAKEN. HE DROVE THE VEHICLE HOME. UPON INSPECTION THERE WAS CORROSION ON BRAKE LINES. HE SUSPECTED THIS WAS DUE TO DISSIMILAR METAL CORROSION AND ROAD SALTS. THE VEHICLE HAS NOT BEEN REPAIRED AT THIS TIME. *AK UPDATED 12/27/05. *JB THE BRAKE LINE BURST.
STEERING PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2004-09-02
- VIN: 1MECM50U7NG
- Components: STEERING
- Summary: MERCURY SABLE 1992 POWER STEERING LEAKED. *BF THE LEAK WAS COMING FROM THE RACK AND PINION. *NM
AIR BAGS PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2004-11-17
- Crash: 1
- VIN: PLEASE FILL
- Components: AIR BAGS
- Summary: THE VEHICLE HAD BEEN IN A FRONTAL CRASH AT 35-40 MPH AND NONE OF THE AIR BAGS DEPLOYED. NO INJURIES WERE REPORTED AND THE DEALER WAS NOTIFIED. *JB
VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL,EQUIPMENT PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2004-07-31
- VIN: 1MELM55U4NG
- Components: VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL,EQUIPMENT
- Summary: I WAS ON THE HIGHWAY SO I PUT ON THE CRUISE CONTROL, WHEN I HIT THE BRAKES THE CAR SLOWED DOWN, THEN WHEN I REASLED THE BRAKES THE CAR RADILY SPEED UP, AND IT IS HARD TO SHUT IT OFF.*AK
STRUCTURE PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2004-10-27
- VIN: 1MECM5043NA
- Components: STRUCTURE
- Summary: WHILE DRIVING 30 MPH REAR SUB FRAME MOUNT BUSHING SEPARATED FROM THE VEHICLE. RECALL 98V323000 FOR THE SUB FRAME MOUNT BOLTS WAS ISSUED. DEALER REFUSED TO REPAIR THE VEHICLE BECAUSE IT WAS NOT INCLUDED IN THE RECALL DUE TO VIN. *AK
POWER TRAIN PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2004-09-01
- VIN: 1MECM5047NA
- Components: POWER TRAIN
- Summary: WHILE DRIVING TRANSMISSION MADE A LOUD NOISE. THEN IT COMPLETELY FAILED. *AK
STRUCTURE PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2003-02-15
- VIN: 1MECM5049NA
- Components: STRUCTURE
- Summary: SUB FRAME RUSTED DUE TO THE PROBLEM AS DESCRIBED IN THE SUB FRAME CORROSION RECALL 98V323000. HOWEVER, THIS VEHICLE WAS NOT INVOLVED IN THE RECALL DUE TO VIN. *AK
STRUCTURE PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2004-03-05
- VIN: 1MECM55U1NA
- Components: STRUCTURE
- Summary: CORROSION OF PASSENGER SIDE REAR SUB FRAME, ALOWING ENGINE TO DROP DOWN, CAUSING A POSSIBLE FATAL DRIVING CONDITION. SUB FRAME BOLTS REPLACED IN A RECALL. ENTIRE SUB FRAME WAS REPLACED WITH A NEW ORIGINAL PART FROM FORD, AT A $1,100 COST TO MYSELF. *AK
ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2004-01-01
- Number Of Deaths: 4
- VIN: 1MELM504XPG
- Components: ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING
- Summary: MY HEAD GASKETS KEEP BLOWING .. I REALIZE THIS IS A OLDER MODEL CAR HOWEVER JUST B/C IM A SINGLE FEMALE WHO DIDNT EVEN KNOW WHAT A RECALL WAS/IS DOESNT MEAN THAT I SHOULDNT BE ENTITLED TO PERHAPS A REEMBURSMENT OR TO HAVE MY CAR FIXED PROPERLY I HAVE BEEN OUT SO MUCH MONEY ON THIS CAR AND THE MOTOR AND I ALWAYS ALWAYS DO AS DIRECTED WITH OIL CHANGES AND WATER CHECKINGS I JUST DONT UNDERSTAND WHY I WASNT EVER NOTIFIED OF THE DANGERS OF MY COOLING SYSTEMS AND MY MOTOR. I AM A WIDOW WITH 3 CHILDREN AND I CANT AFFORD TO KEEP HAVING MY HEADS DONE OR MY MOTOR WORKED ON PLEASE GUIDE ME IN THE DIRECTION OF SOMEONE THAT COULD PERHAPS FIX THIS PROBLEM ONCE AND FOR ALL. *AK
UNKNOWN OR OTHER PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 1997-06-15
- VIN: 1MECM5348NG
- Components: UNKNOWN OR OTHER
- Summary: SEVERE PAINT EROSION/FLAKING/DISCOLORATION....HAS BEEN NOTICEABLE AND PROGRESSING WORSE SINCE ABOUT 1997.
ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2003-02-15
- VIN: 1MELM5040NG
- Components: ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING
- Summary: 1ST ONE REMOVE & REPLACE TIMING COVER/PUMP, HOUSING, REPLACE STUDS, WATER PUMP, RENEW COOLANT. COST $1,079.60 2ND R&R HEADGASKETS/ $1,304.10. I WOULD LIKE FOR SOMEONE TO LET ME KNOW IF I COULD GET SOME OF MY MONEY BACK BECAUSE THIS WAS A RECALL A BAD PART WHICH I HAD NO KNOWLEDGE OF. UNTIL I HAD TO HAVE IT REPAIRED. FORD SAID THAT I WAS 9 MONTHS TO LATE UNDER WARRANTY. I AM THE SECOND OWNER OF THIS CAR HOW WOULD I HAVE KNOWN THAT FORD HAD A PROBLM WITH THIS KIND OF CAR. ANY TYPE OF HELP WOULD BE APPRECIATED. I'M A SINGLE MOM AND I CAN'T AFFORD TO HAVE THIS KIND OF CAR REPAIR. I HAD TO USE MY RENT MONEY INORDER TO GET MY CAR OUT OF THE SHOP. I JUST WANT SOMEKIND OF REPAYMENT A HEAD GASKET IS SUPPOSE TO LAST THE LIFE OF THE CAR. IT WILL BE JUST THREE YEARS THIS OCTOBER FOR ME THAT I HAVE HAD THE CAR. IT'S NOT MY PROBLEM THAT THEY PUT IN BAD PARTS AND KNEW THAT THEY NEEDED TO BE TAKEN CARE OF. BUT NO ONE WANTED TO PAY THE COST SO A LOT OF CUSTOMERS DIDN'T GET RECALL LETTERS INORDER TO TAKE CARE OF THE PROBLEM. I'M SURE THAT IF ANYONE THAT OWNED THIS CAR WOULD HAVE HAD THE REPAIRS DONE AT THE COST OF THE COMPANY. WHY WOULD THERE BE A TIME LIMIT SET ON MAJOR PART LIKE THAT. SO PEOPLE DON'T EXPERIENCE THE PROBLEM UNTIL YEARS AND THAT'S WHAT HAPPENED TO ME. I JUST WANT SOME KIND OF RESPONSE TOWARD THIS PROBLEM. THANK YOU MS. PATRICIA REESE P.O. BOX 59 SHIRLEY, NY 11967-0059
ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2003-07-15
- VIN: 1MECM5345NG
- Components: ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING
- Summary: THE CAR IS A 1992 MERCURY SABLE 3.8L V-6 ENGINE WITH 93,000 MILES. THE HEAD GASKETS NEED TO BE REPLACED. I HAVE BEEN QUOTED AN ESTIMATE OF $1,000 TO FIX THE PROBLEM. I AM THE SECOND OWNER OF THE AUTOMOBILE AND IT HAS BEEN WELL MAINTAINED. THE CAR BROKE DOWN ON JUNE 25, 2003 AND IS CURRENTLY PARKED AT THE MECHANIC'S SHOP.
SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2003-10-21
- VIN: 1MELM50U9NG
- Components: SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC
- Summary: WHEN BRAKING HARD, THE PEDAL WENT TO THE FLOOR RESULTING IN LOSS OF BRAKES. I HAD TO USE THE E-BRAKE AND PUMP THE REGULAR PEDAL TO STOP. BRAKE FLUID WAS LEAKING FROM LINE LOCATED IN ENGINE COMPARTMENT NEXT TO DRIVER SIDE FRONT WHEEL WELL. *LA
STRUCTURE PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2024-11-24
- VIN: 1MECM5046NG
- Components: STRUCTURE
- Summary: WHILE DRIVING UNDER NORMAL CONDITIONS STEERING WHEEL SUDDENLY LOCKED UP WITHOUT WARNING. CONSUMER STOPPED VEHICLE, TURNED ON HAZARDS, AND NOTICED TRANSMISSION AND MOTOR HAD DROPPED. IT WAS LATER DETERMINED THAT THE SUBFRAME RUSTED AROUND BOTH REAR BUSHINGS. *AK *NLM
POWER TRAIN PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2003-06-05
- Components: POWER TRAIN
- Summary: THE TRANSMISSION FAILED TO GO INTO GEAR. *JB
EXTERIOR LIGHTING PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2003-01-29
- VIN: 1MECM5042NG
- Components: EXTERIOR LIGHTING
- Summary: HEADLIGHTS BLINKING ON AND OFF WHEN HE TURNS THEM ON. TOOK THE AUTO TO HIS PRIVATE MECHANIC AND HAD THIS REPAIRED. THIS PARTICULAR PROBLEM IS LISTED AS A RECALL # 8105 98V 00 9000 FOR THE 93 MERCURY SABLE. PH
ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2001-12-17
- Components: ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING
- Summary: WHILE DRIVING, VEHICLE STARTED RUNNING HOT, OVERHEATING. CONSUMER HAD VEHICLE TOWED TO DEALERSHIP, WHO INDICATED THAT THE CAUSE OF THE PROBLEM WAS THE WATER PUMP. DEALERSHIP REPLACED THE PUMP, BUT THE PROBLEM RECURRED 3 TIMES WITHIN A SMALL PERIOD OF TIME. PLEASE PROVIDE MORE DETAILS. TS
SUSPENSION PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2002-10-22
- Components: SUSPENSION
- Summary: BOTH COIL SPRINGS FAILED DUE TO CORROSION. PIECES OF SPRING ALMOST FELL OUT AND CONTACTED TIRE. COULD HAVE RESULTED IN PUNCTURE AT HIGH SPEED. DT
ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING PROBLEM
- Date Of Incident: 2024-11-24
- VIN: PLEASE PROV
- Components: ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING
- Summary: THE MOTOR MOUNTS WERE REPLACED IN 1999 WHICH HAS FAILED AGAIN. WHILE DRIVING 45 MPH THE OWNER HEARD SOMETHING DROP/BREAK. *MR
Mercury Sable 1992 recalls
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has issued 5 recalls for different components of the Mercury Sable 1992.
- Manufacturer: FORD MOTOR COMPANY
- Components: STRUCTURE:FRAME AND MEMBERS
- Summary: VEHICLE DESCRIPTION: PASSENGER VEHICLES ORIGINALLY SOLD OR CURRENTLY REGISTERED IN CONNECTICUT, DELAWARE, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, ILLINOIS, INDIANA, IOWA, KANSAS, KENTUCKY, MAINE, MARYLAND, MASSACHUSETTS, MICHIGAN, MINNESOTA, MISSOURI, NEBRASKA, NEW HAMPSHIRE, NEW JERSEY, NEW YORK, OHIO, PENNSYLVANIA, RHODE ISLAND, VERMONT, VIRGINIA, WEST VIRGNIA, AND WISCONSIN. THE REAR LOWER SUBFRAME MOUNT PLATE NUT CAN EXPERIENCE STRESS CORROSION CRACKING IF SUBJECTED TO LONG TERM EXPOSURE TO ROAD SALTS. THIS CAN RESULT IN FRACTURE AND LOSS OF THE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF THE SUBFRAME MOUNT ATTACHMENT. DETACHMENT OF THE BODY MOUNTS AT THE REAR CORNERS OF THE SUBFRAME, WHICH SUPPORTS THE ENGINE AND TRANSMISSION, ALLOWS THE REAR CORNERS OF THE SUBFRAME TO DROP.
- Consequence: IF BOTH REAR CORNERS DROP, STEERING WOULD BECOME SUDDENLY VERY DIFFICULT, AFFECTING VEHICLE CONTROL AND INCREASING THE RISK OF A CRASH.
- Remedy: DEALERS WILL INSTALL SUBFRAME REAR MOUNT BOLTS, REINFORCEMENT PLATES, AND PLATE NUTS.
- Manufacturer: FORD MOTOR COMPANY
- Components: VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL
- Summary: VEHICLE DESCRIPTION: VEHICLES EQUIPPED WITH 3.8L ENGINES AND ORIGINALLY SOLD OR CURRENTLY REGISTERED IN THE FOLLOWING STATES: ALASKA, COLORADO, IOWA, IDAHO, ILLINOIS, INDIANA, KANSAS, MASSACHUSETTS, MAINE, MICHIGAN, MINNESOTA, MISSOURI, MONTANA, NORTH DAKOTA, NEBRASKA, NEW HAMPSHIRE, NEW YORK, OHIO, PENNSYLVANIA, SOUTH DAKOTA, VERMONT, WISCONSIN, AND WYOMING. WATER CAN ACCUMULATE WITHIN THE SPEED CONTROL CABLE CONDUIT. IF ENOUGH WATER ACCUMULATES, IT COULD FREEZE WITHIN A LOW AREA OF THE CABLE ROUTING WHEN EXPOSED TO A LONG TERM COLD SOAK AT TEMPERATURES AT LEAST SEVERAL DEGREES BELOW FREEZING.
- Consequence: DRIVER CONTROL OF VEHICLE SPEED USING THE SPEED CONTROL SYSTEM OR THE ACCELERATOR CONTROL SYSTEM WOULD BE DIMINISHED INCREASING THE RISK OF A VEHICLE CRASH.
- Remedy: DEALERS WILL ADD A BOOT TO THE SPEED CONTROL CABLE.
- Manufacturer: FORD MOTOR COMPANY
- Components: ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING:COOLING SYSTEM:FAN
- Summary: THESE VEHICLES ARE ORIGINALLY SOLD OR CURRENTLY REGISTERED IN THE FOLLOWING STATES: ALASKA, IOWA, MINNESOTA, NEBRASKA, NORTH DAKOTA, AND SOUTH DAKOTA. THE VEHICLES INVOLVED ARE 1992-1994 TEMPO/TOPAZ VEHICLES WITH 3.0L ENGINES; 1994 TEMPO/TOPAZ WITH 2.3L ENGINES; 1992-1995 TAURUS/SABLE WITH 3.8L ENGINES; 1994-1995 TAURUS/SABLE WITH 3.0L ENGINES AND 1992-1994 LINCOLN CONTINENTAL VEHICLES WITH 3.8L ENGINES. DURING HIGH WINDS, HEAVY, BLOWING AND DRIFTING SNOW, AND LOW TEMPERATURES, THE ENGINE COOLING FAN CAN BECOME BLOCKED OR FROZEN WITH SNOW. THE FAN MOTOR MAY NOT ROTATE AND COULD OVERHEAT.
- Consequence: THIS CONDITION CAN CAUSE SMOKE OR FLAMES FROM THE FAN AND/OR SHROUD, THE FAN ELECTRICAL WIRING, OR THE FAN MOTOR RESULTING IN A VEHICLE FIRE.
- Remedy: DEALERS WILL INSTALL AN ELECTRICAL JUMPER HARNESS CONTAINING AN AUTOMATIC RESETTING CIRCUIT BREAKER TO PROTECT THE FAN MOTOR LOW SPEED CIRCUITRY FROM OVERHEATING.
- Manufacturer: MONROE AUTO CORP.
- Components: SUSPENSION:FRONT:SHOCK ABSORBER
- Summary: THE ARC WELDS ON THE SWAY BAR BRACKET, WHERE IT ATTACHES TO THE STRUT RESERVE TUBE, DID NOT FUSE PROPERLY.
- Consequence: OVER TIME, A PORTION OF THE BRACKET CAN TEAR AWAY FROM THE STRUT, FALLING INTO AND PUNCTURING THE TIRE OR CAUSING DAMAGE TO THE WHEEL, WHICH COULD RESULT IN AN ACCIDENT.
- Remedy: MONROE DEALERS WILL REPLACE THE STRUT FREE OF CHARGE.
- Manufacturer: FORD MOTOR COMPANY
- Components: WHEELS
- Summary: CHILDREN CAN ACCIDENTALLY LOCK THEMSELVES IN THE FOOTWELL AREA OF THE REAR-FACING THIRD SEAT, OR IN THE STORAGE COMPARTMENT IN STATION WAGONS NOT EQUIPPED WITH AN OPTIONAL THIRD SEAT. ONCE THE COMPARTMENT IS CLOSED IT CANNOT BE OPENED FROM THE INSIDE.
- Consequence: THERE IS A DANGER OF AIR DEPRIVATION, HYPERTHERMIA,AND/OR PANIC RESPONSE TO A CHILD WHO HAS LOCKED HIMSELF OR HERSELF INTO THECOMPARTMENT, WITH THE POSSIBILITY OF ASPHYXIATION.
- Remedy: REPLACE THE SELF-LATCHING ASSEMBLY CURRENTLY USED IN THE REAR STORAGE COMPARTMENT WITH A LATCH ASSEMBLY THAT CAN ONLY BE CLOSED WITH A KEY.
Negative Mercury Sable 1992 car reviews
Positive Mercury Sable 1992 car reviews
-
Hello! I hope you're doing well. I wanted to share my experience with my '92 Sable GS. It has the 3.8 Liter engine and has been with me for 90,000 miles with the original head gasket. With proper maintenance, this car can last up to 200,000 miles! It was previously owned by an old lady and an old man who took great care of it for the last 15 years. Recently, I had to replace the hoses and brakes due to age issues, but other than that, it's been a reliable car. The trunk is huge and came in handy when I moved earlier this summer. I know this car has received some negative reviews, but I can't relate to them at all. I believe that if you take good care of this car, it will last you a long time. Thank you for reading!
-
I purchased my car brand new at the end of 1991. Unfortunately, I have had several repairs, both big and small, right from the very beginning, which has cost me a lot of money. Despite taking excellent care of the car and keeping it garaged, I have received very little cooperation from FORD and my complaints were disregarded. After speaking with other owners of the same 1992 model, I discovered that about 7 out of 10 had similar problems. Even the manager of the Ford dealership told me that his father has the same car and it is a LEMON. Recently, I accidentally broke the glass of the front mirror and was quoted $400.00 for a replacement. I am grateful to have found this site to vent my frustration. I have been driving for over 50 years, always using American cars, but I am considering a different brand for my next car.
-
Smooth and crisp response, the Mercury Sable is the car for you. Like lemonade on a hot, sunny day, you'll enjoy the cool pleasure of running your fingers over the dash and feeling refreshed. If you're looking for a newer car, we have plenty of options available that might suit your needs. Let us know how we can help you find the perfect car!
-
In the 10 years you've had this Sable (3.0 L engine), it has been very reliable and needed very few repairs (just a new radiator and ignition switch, besides the normal brakes, oil changes, etc.). It runs very smoothly and is a pleasure to drive.
-
This has been a great car - very comfortable with good gas mileage and great control. I got the 3.8L which is a must-have. However, the only issue I've had with this car is overheating, which can be very frustrating!
Additional sources
More sources of information about Mercury Sable 1992 problems:
Taurus/Sable Transmission Problems - Page 3 — Car Forums at ...
Nov 6, 2006 ... It appears to be a common problem with Ford/Mercury autos for this period. The splines strip out on the torque converter cog so that the output ...
1992 Mercury Sable - Engine power cuts out randomly when driving ...
Dec 3, 2014 ... I had a long standing problem just like this in an older Volvo. Eluded mechanic forever. Turned out to be a soft failure in the fuel pump relay.
1992 Mercury Sable Reviews - Carsurvey.org
Aug 27, 2018 ... Well, few minor Do It Yourself parts have been replaced: Oil filter. Air Filter. Ignition Coil. Spark Plugs. Distributor Cap. Vaccume. Lines.
Mercury Sable Problems and Complaints - 11 Issues
Top Mercury Sable Problems · Problem With Idle Air Bypass Valve May Cause Engine Performance Problems · Engine Oil Pan Gasket May Leak · Camshaft Sensor Magnet may ...
Q&A: 1992 Mercury Sable - Expert Answers & Solutions
Jun 29, 2010 ... Unfortunately the problem you are describing is more likely much more serious than just a failing pump, but most like a failing transmission and ...
Other years of Mercury Sable
Are you having problems with your Mercury Sable 1992?
Don Paucek 2024-10-06
Please let me know the value of my car. Despite the transmission issue, it has been a reliable form of transportation and runs well.
Albert Howe 2024-08-07
This car has been a complete disappointment. Despite following the owner's manual for maintenance, the engine required replacement at 62,000 miles, followed by two more transmission replacements at 68,000 and 78,000 miles. The brakes wore out after only 20,000 miles, and the A/C stopped working at 70,000 miles. Unfortunately, the car spent a lot of time in the shop, resulting in low mileage.
Jadon Anderson 2024-07-27
The engine was replaced at 62k and again at 120k. At the same time, the transmission was also replaced. Currently, at 140k with a rebuilt engine, the transmission needs to be replaced. Unfortunately, Ford denied responsibility for these issues. Additionally, the AC went out at 50k. We understand your frustration and apologize for any inconvenience caused. Please let us know if there is anything we can do to assist you further.
Bernardo Weissnat 2024-07-17
The 3.8 L engine in this car unfortunately experienced a head gasket failure at 62000 miles. While Ford has acknowledged this issue in later models (1994 & 95), they have yet to do so for earlier models. Despite documented cases of head gasket failure, it is important to note that purchasing a used Ford product from the early to mid-nineties with this engine may come with some risks.
Shaun Armstrong 2024-07-04
Hi there! I just wanted to share my experience with my car. Back in 2003, I purchased it as a work car for my Marine Fiberglass job. I was looking for an alternative to a Chrysler Minivan and this car caught my eye. Although it doesn't have as much room as the minivan, it gets better mileage and doesn't look like a soccer car, which is a plus! When I bought it, the car had 85k on it and it still had ALL of its original parts, including the 3.0 litre engine. I'm happy to report that the engine has been very dependable, with only a water pump and the bearing on the A/C going bad. The only issues I've had are with the transmission (which now needs to be repaired) and the brakes (two sets of rear rotors and one set of new calipers). Overall, it's been a great car and I'm glad I made the purchase!