1984 Mercury Topaz problems

mercury logo
1984 Mercury Topaz

Social links

Common 1984 Mercury Topaz problems

The Mercury Topaz, introduced in 1984, was a compact car that was intended to be a premium offering from the brand. However, it faced several common problems that affected its reputation and reliability.

One of the most significant issues with the Mercury Topaz was its engine. Owners reported engine problems, with 7 complaints made across all model years, making it the most common issue with the car. Specifically, the 1991 Topaz had 3 complaints related to the engine dying, while the 1992 Topaz had 2 complaints related to engine heads cracking. These issues suggest that the Topaz's engine was prone to failure and could not withstand the stress of regular use.

Another common problem with the Mercury Topaz was its transmission. There were 2 complaints made related to transmission issues, with the 1987 Topaz having 2 complaints related to high idle and hard shifting. These issues suggest that the Topaz's transmission was not reliable and could cause problems with the car's performance.

The drivetrain was another area where the Mercury Topaz struggled. There were 2 complaints made related to drivetrain issues, with the 1992 Topaz having 2 complaints related to CV joints failing prematurely. This issue suggests that the Topaz's drivetrain was not durable and could not withstand the stress of regular use.

The brakes were another problem area for the Mercury Topaz, with 1 complaint made related to brake issues. This issue suggests that the Topaz's brakes were not reliable and could cause safety concerns for drivers.

The HVAC system was also a problem for the Mercury Topaz, with 1 complaint made related to air conditioning system constantly breaking. This issue suggests that the Topaz's HVAC system was not reliable and could cause discomfort for drivers and passengers.

In summary, the Mercury Topaz faced several common problems that affected its reliability and reputation. Engine issues were the most significant problem, with 7 complaints made across all model years. Transmission, drivetrain, brakes, and HVAC system issues were also reported, suggesting that the Topaz was not a reliable car. These problems may have contributed to the decline of the Mercury brand and its eventual discontinuation.

1984 Mercury Topaz engine

1984 Mercury Topaz car problems categorized by type of issue

After analyzing all complaints sent to the NHTSA and researching popular Mercury Topaz problems, we found that the most common problems with these 2023 model year vehicles are:

  • Electrical system problems
  • Engine and engine cooling problems
  • Exterior lighting problems
  • Visibility problems

The graph below shows statistics for all 1984 Mercury Topaz vehicle components and the number of complaints received.

1984 Mercury Topaz complaints

The NHTSA has received 11 complaints about various vehicle components related to the 1984 Mercury Topaz.

2001-04-30

ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING PROBLEM

  • Date Of Incident: 2024-11-24
  • VIN: 1MEBP75RXEK
  • Components: ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING
  • Summary: WHEN VEHICLE GETS HOT IT WILL STALL, SOMETIMES VEHICLE WILL NOT START.*AK
2000-10-25

ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING PROBLEM

  • Date Of Incident: 2000-10-20
  • VIN: 2MEBP75R6EB
  • Components: ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING
  • Summary: TFI MODULE STOPPED FUNCTIONING, CAUSING CAR TO STALL. BUT NOW IT WON'T START. CONSUMER HAS REPLACED 3 OF THESE MODULES WITHIN THE LAST THREE YEARS. CONSUMER WAS VERY UPSET BECAUSE THERE COULD BE AN ACCIDENT.*AK
1999-10-29

ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING,ELECTRICAL SYSTEM PROBLEM

  • Date Of Incident: 1999-07-01
  • VIN: 1MBPM36X1RK
  • Components: ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING,ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
  • Summary: WHEN DRIVING AT 18 MPH THE VEHICLE IS STALLING AND CUTTING OFF. CONSUMER HAD THE COMPUTER CHIP REPLACED, AND THE DEALER CAN'T DETERMINE THE CAUS EOF STALLING. *AK
1999-05-31

ELECTRICAL SYSTEM PROBLEM

  • Date Of Incident: 1998-07-12
  • VIN: 1MEBP75R7EK
  • Components: ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
  • Summary: NO SUMMARY LISTE DFOR THIS VEHICLE. *AK
1998-03-23

EXTERIOR LIGHTING,VISIBILITY PROBLEM

  • Date Of Incident: 1998-01-20
  • VIN: 2MEPM36X3NB
  • Components: EXTERIOR LIGHTING,VISIBILITY
  • Summary: TOOK VEHICLE TO DEALER FOR HEATER HOSE REPAIR. WHILE THERE, WAS INFORMED BY MECHANIC THAT HEADLIGHT WOULD FLUTTER/FLICKER OFF AND ON. COULD NOT FIND CAUSE OF PROBLEM. *AK
1996-11-12

ELECTRICAL SYSTEM PROBLEM

  • Date Of Incident: 1996-09-12
  • Fire: 1
  • VIN: 2MEBP73R8EB
  • Components: ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
  • Summary: ELECTRICAL SHORT IN THE IGNITION SWITCH, WHEN THE VEHICLE IS IN THE OFF POSITION THE STARTER WILL START RUNNING UNTIL THE VEHICLE CAUGHT FIRE IN THE STEERING COLUMN. *AK
1996-06-17

ELECTRICAL SYSTEM PROBLEM

  • Date Of Incident: 1996-04-18
  • Fire: 1
  • VIN: 1MEBP73R5EK
  • Components: ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
  • Summary: IGNITION SWITCH FIRE. *SD
1996-05-22

ELECTRICAL SYSTEM PROBLEM

  • Date Of Incident: 1995-08-15
  • Fire: 1
  • Components: ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
  • Summary: WHILE DRIVING, FLAMES STARTED SHOOTING OUT FROM UNDERHOOD; DRIVER GOT OUT, STARTED RUNNING, TURNED AROUND, VEHICLE BLEW UP; VEHICLE HAD OIL LEAK. *AK
1996-04-19

ELECTRICAL SYSTEM PROBLEM

  • Date Of Incident: 1996-04-17
  • Fire: 1
  • VIN: 2MEBP72R5EB
  • Components: ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
  • Summary: ENGINE COMPARTMENT FIRE CAUSED BY THE ELECTRICAL SYSTEM WIRING. *AK
1996-04-18

ELECTRICAL SYSTEM PROBLEM

  • Date Of Incident: 1989-08-12
  • Fire: 1
  • Components: ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
  • Summary: ELECTRICAL SHORT OR SHOCK IN THE IGNITION SWITCH, CAUSING THE VEHICLE TO CATCH FIRE. (THE VEHICLE WAS IN MOTION). *AK
1996-04-18

ELECTRICAL SYSTEM PROBLEM

  • Date Of Incident: 1989-08-12
  • Fire: 1
  • Components: ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
  • Summary: ELECTRICAL SHORT OR SHOCK IN THE IGNITION SWITCH, CAUSING THE VEHICLE TO CATCH FIRE. (THE VEHICLE WAS IN MOTION). *AK

1984 Mercury Topaz recalls

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has issued 6 recalls for different components of the 1984 Mercury Topaz.

2007-08-27
  • Manufacturer: FEDERAL-MOGUL CORPORATION
  • Components: FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE:DELIVERY:FUEL PUMP
  • Summary: CERTAIN FEDERAL-MOGUL AFTERMARKET FUEL PUMPS SOLD UNDER THE BRAND NAMES OF CARTER, ACCUFLOW, NAPA, TRUFLOW, PARTS DEPO, AND PARTS MASTER, SHIPPED BETWEEN AUGUST 2006 AND JULY 2007 FOR USE ON THE VEHICLES LISTED ABOVE. THE FUEL PUMP DIAPHRAGM IN CERTAIN PRODUCTION RUNS MAY HAVE BEEN IMPROPERLY INSTALLED OR INADEQUATELY TESTED WHICH MAY CAUSE THE FUEL PUMP TO LEAK.
  • Consequence: A LEAKING FUEL PUMP COULD CREATE A VEHICLE FIRE HAZARD.
  • Remedy: FEDERAL-MOGUL WILL NOTIFY OWNERS AND REPLACE THE DEFECTIVE FUEL PUMPS FREE OF CHARGE. THE RECALL BEGAN ON OCTOBER 15, 2007. OWNERS CAN CONTACT FEDERAL-MOGUL AT 248-354-7700.
1986-06-24
  • Manufacturer: FORD MOTOR COMPANY
  • Components: SEATS
  • Summary: THE FORWARD BOLT THAT PROVIDES PART OF THE ATTACHMENT BETWEEN THE DRIVER'S SEAT BACK ASSEMBLY AND THE SEAT CUSHION FRAME MAY BE SUBJECT TO FATIGUE FRACTURE. CONSEQUENCE OF DEFECT: IF THIS BOLT BREAKS, THE DRIVER AND SEAT BACK WILL FALL BACK, WHICH COULD RESULT IN THE DRIVER LOSING CONTROL OF THE CAR AND POSSIBLY LEAD TO AN ACCIDENT.
  • Remedy: REPLACE SCREWS THAT ATTACH DRIVER'S SEAT BACK ASSEMBLY TO THE SEAT CUSHION FRAME.
1985-11-05
  • Manufacturer: FORD MOTOR COMPANY
  • Components: SUSPENSION:REAR
  • Summary: REAR SUPENSION CONTROL ARM-TO-SPINDLE ATTACHMENT BOLTS MAY BE SUBJECT TO FRACTURE CAUSING THE REAR SPINDLE TO SEPARATE DURING USE OF CAR. CONSEQUENCE OF DEFECT: IF BOLTS FRACTURE AND REAR SPINDLE DISENGAGES FROM CONTROL ARM, LOSS OF CONTROL WILL BE EXPERIENCE WHICH MAY RESULT IN AN ACCIDENT.
  • Remedy: REPLACE REAR SUSPENSION BOLTS AS NECESSARY.
1985-07-03
  • Manufacturer: FORD MOTOR COMPANY
  • Components: SUSPENSION:REAR
  • Summary: REAR SUSPENSION CONTROL ARM-TO-SPINDLE ATTACHMENT BOLTS MAY BE SUBJECT TO FRACTURE DURING USE OF CAR. CONSEQUENCE OF DEFECT: IF BOLTS FRACTURE, REAR SPINDLE COULD DISENGAGE FROM CONTROL ARM AND POSSIBLY RESULT IN LOSS OF CONTROL.
  • Remedy: REPLACE REAR SUSPENSION BOLTS AS NECESSARY.
1983-12-20
  • Manufacturer: FORD MOTOR COMPANY
  • Components: SEAT BELTS:FRONT:ANCHORAGE
  • Summary: THE BOLTS THAT ATTACH THE D-SHAPED RING FOR THE SHOULDER BELT ARE INADEQUATELY SUPPORTED BY THE MATERIAL IN WHICH THEY ARE MOUNTED. THE ATTACHMENT DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF FEDERAL MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY STANDARD NO. 210, "SEAT BELT ASSEMBLY ANCHORAGES".
  • Remedy: DEALERS WILL INSTALL NEW ATTACHING HARDWARE TO IMPROVE THE STRENGTH OF THE MOUNTING.
1983-05-16
  • Manufacturer: FORD MOTOR COMPANY
  • Components: INTERIOR LIGHTING
  • Summary: IN THE EVENT OF A SHORT CIRCUIT IN THE INSTRUMENT PANEL, THE HEADLAMP AND INTERIOR ILLUMINATION CONTROL SWITCHES COULD OVERHEAT.
  • Remedy: THE HEADLAMP SWITCH WILL BE REPLACED AND FUSE AND FUSE PANEL WILL BE INSPECTED FOR SAFE OPERATION.
Leave your review of 1984 Mercury Topaz

Other years of Mercury Topaz

mercury topaz 1985 photo
Topaz 1985
Mercury

5

4

0

  • 5
  • 4
  • 3
  • 2
  • 1
mercury topaz 1986 photo
Topaz 1986
Mercury

13

1

0

  • 5
  • 4
  • 3
  • 2
  • 1
mercury topaz 1987 photo
Topaz 1987
Mercury

17

1

0

  • 5
  • 4
  • 3
  • 2
  • 1
mercury topaz 1988 photo
Topaz 1988
Mercury

25

2

0

  • 5
  • 4
  • 3
  • 2
  • 1
mercury topaz 1989 photo
Topaz 1989
Mercury

52

1

0

  • 5
  • 4
  • 3
  • 2
  • 1
mercury topaz 1990 photo
Topaz 1990
Mercury

65

2

0

  • 5
  • 4
  • 3
  • 2
  • 1

Are you having problems with your 1984 Mercury Topaz?

Add car complaint
1984 Mercury Topaz photo