1992 Land rover Classic problems

General information about Land rover-Classic
Overview of popular issues
Analysis of common problems
Сomplaints list

The Range Rover is a 4x4, mid-size off-road vehicle series produced from 1970 to 1996 – initially by the Rover (later Land Rover) division of British Leyland, and latterly by the Rover Group.

The first generation of vehicles produced under the Range Rover name, it was built as a two-door model for its first 11 years, until a four-door also became available in 1981. The Range Rover then successfully moved upmarket during the 1980s, and remarkably debuted in the U.S. as a 17-year old model at the 1987 Los Angeles Auto Show.

Availability of the two-door version was restricted from 1984, but it remained in production for some markets until 1994, when the second generation was launched. From that moment, Land Rover rebranded the original model under the term Range Rover Classic, to distinguish it from its new P38A successor, when the two were briefly built alongside, and applied the name retrospectively to all first-generation Range Rovers.

Although formally superseded by the second generation Range Rover, starting in 1994 – both the successor and the more affordable first and second series of the Land Rover Discovery were heavily based on the original Range Rover's chassis, drive-train and body-structure, which in essence lived on until the third generation Discovery arrived, and its mechanical blood-line ended with the replacement of the Mark 2 Discovery after 2004.

In early 2020, the 26-year production run of the original Range Rover was counted as the twenty-seventh most long-lived single generation car in history by Autocar magazine."

Social links

Common 1992 Land rover Classic problems

Based on the information provided in the sources, here is a detailed list of common problems with the Land Rover Classic 1992 based on complaints from owners:

Lack of Comfort:
- The Land Rover Defender 90 is criticized for its lack of comfort, especially at high speeds or on poorly maintained roads, where passengers feel every bump and imperfection in the surface below. This issue ranks the Defender 90 lower compared to other Land Rovers in terms of comfort and ride quality.
Uneconomical Engine:
- The Land Rover Defender 110 is known for having an uneconomical engine that consumes fuel at a high rate. This can lead to increased fuel costs, especially considering the rising fuel prices over the years. The inefficient fuel consumption of the Defender 110 can be a significant drawback for owners.
Need for Regular Maintenance:
- Land Rover Defenders, including the 90 and 110 models, often require frequent adjustments, repairs, or part replacements. Owners may find themselves needing to invest time, effort, and money into maintaining these vehicles to keep them running smoothly. This continuous need for maintenance can be a significant concern for owners.
Unreliability:
- Both the Land Rover Defender 90 and 110 are reported to be unreliable, with inconsistent performance levels from start to finish. Owners have complained about issues such as a lack of power, difficulty in acceleration and deceleration, and a general lack of reliability in day-to-day use. This unreliability can be a major frustration for owners relying on their vehicles for regular transportation.
Corrosion and Bodywork Problems:
- Land Rover Defenders, including the 110 model, are prone to corrosion of the bodywork, particularly on the underside of the car. Common complaints include issues with power-assisted steering leaks, timing belt failures, and corrosion in critical areas like the bulkhead and scuttle. These bodywork problems can lead to structural issues and safety concerns for owners.
Fuel Mixups:
- One common issue reported by owners is the accidental use of the wrong fuel type in Land Rover Defenders. Putting petrol into a diesel-based vehicle, for example, can lead to catastrophic engine damage. This mistake can occur due to human error and lack of understanding, highlighting the importance of using the correct fuel type for these vehicles to avoid costly repairs.

These common problems with the Land Rover Classic 1992, as reported by owners, encompass a range of issues related to comfort, engine efficiency, maintenance requirements, reliability, bodywork integrity, and fuel management. Addressing these issues proactively can help owners maintain and enjoy their Land Rover Defenders more effectively.

1992 Land rover Classic car problems categorized by type of issue

After analyzing all complaints sent to the NHTSA and researching popular Land rover Classic problems, we found that the most common problems with these 2023 model year vehicles are:

Fuel system problems
Gasoline problems
Equipment problems

The graph below shows statistics for all 1992 Land rover Classic vehicle components and the number of complaints received.

1992 Land rover Classic complaints

The NHTSA has received 1 complaints about various vehicle components related to the 1992 Land rover Classic.

2005-01-31

FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE,EQUIPMENT PROBLEM

Date Of Incident: 2005-01-10
VIN: SALHV1249NA
Components: FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE,EQUIPMENT
Summary: I OWN A RANGE ROVER, COUNTY MODEL VIN: [XXX], PURCHASED IN 1992. I HAVE REPLACED 2 FUEL TANKS DUE TO WHAT 2 DIFFERENT MECHANICS HAVE TOLD ME IS LEAKING FUEL DUE TO FAULTY SEAMS ON THE PLASTIC FUEL TANKS. I HAVE BEEN UNABLE TO LOCATE A NEW FUEL TANK BECAUSE I AM TOLD BY LAND ROVER THAT THE TANK IS NO LONGER IN PRODUCTION BECAUSE ROVER IS UNABLE TO SECURE A FUEL TANK MANUFACTURER. AFTER MARKET COMPANIES HAVE TOLD ME THE SAME. I HAVE CONTACTED LAND ROVER AND THEY HAVE TOLD ME THAT NO RECALL HAS HAPPENED AT THIS POINT IN TIME. I AM ABLE TO SMELL FUEL AROUND MY VEHICLE ESPECIALLY AFTER FILLING THE TANK. IT WOULD MAKE SENSE TO BELIEVE THAT FUEL TANKS SHOULD LAST THE LIFE OF THE VEHICLE WITHOUT EVER LEAKING, ESPECIALLY 2 FUEL TANKS. THE REPLACEMENT FUEL TANKS SHOULD ALSO BE AVAILABLE FOR PURCHASE EVEN IF THERE IS NOT A RECALL. I AM CONCERNED THAT THIS PRESENTS A FIRE HAZARD AND THE VEHICLE SHOULD BE RECALLED. I BELIEVE THAT THIS MATTER NEEDS THE IMMEDIATE ATTENTION OF THE NHTSA. I AM TOLD BY ROVER MECHANICS THAT OTHER OWNERS ARE EXPERIENCING THE SAME PROBLEM, AND THAT ROVER'S DISCONTINUANCE OF PRODUCTION IS THE RESULT OF THE "PROBLEMS THEY ARE HAVING WITH TANK FAILURE". WHAT ARE WE TO DO? THEY WON'T RECALL A KNOWN PROBLEM AND EVERY DAY WE DRIVE OUR FAMILY AROUND WITH A STRONG ODOR OF GAS FUMES COMING FROM THE REAR OF THE VEHICLE. THIS IS AN EXTREMELY COSTLY REPAIR INVOLVING WHAT COULD BE A LIFE THREATENING PROBLEM. PLEASE REPLY.*AK UPDATED 07/24/2012 *JS INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)

Add Complaint