Mitsubishi Van problems
The Mitsubishi Delica (Japanese: 三菱・デリカ, Hepburn: Mitsubishi Derika) is a range of vans and pickup trucks designed and built by the Japanese automaker Mitsubishi Motors since 1968. It was originally based on a cabover van and pickup truck introduced the previous year, also called the Delica, its name a contraction of the English language phrase Delivery car. This pickup truck, and a commercial van derived from it has received many names in export markets, being sold as the L300 (later L400) in Europe, Jamaica (discontinued after the third generation) and New Zealand, Express and Starwagon in Australia, and plain Mitsubishi Van and Wagon in the United States. The passenger car versions were known as Delica Star Wagon from 1979 until the 1994 introduction of the Delica Space Gear, which became simply Space Gear in Europe at least. The most recent version (not available as a commercial vehicle) is called the Delica D:5. With the exception of the first, versions of all generations are still being sold in various international markets.
In Japan, the Delica Cargo and Delica D:3 nameplates were used on rebadged Mazda Bongo Brawny (between 1999 and 2010) and Nissan NV200 (between 2011 and 2019) respectively. Since 2011, the Delica D:2 nameplate has been applied to the rebadged Suzuki Solio. Starting 2023, the Delica Mini nameplate is also used as a kei car model based on the eK X Space.
First generation (1968)
The production of the Delica light commercial cab-over pickup began in July 1968. It received the chassis code T100, in line with the recently (January 1968) introduced "T90" Canter. Using a KE44 1,088 cc engine producing 58 PS (43 kW), its maximum payload was 600 kg (1,323 lb) and had a top end speed of 115 km/h (71 mph). A year later, in line with consumer needs, a cargo van and a passenger van were added to the line-up. The passenger van, discontinued in 1976, was called the 'Delica Coach' and could seat nine people in three rows of seats. The engine was upgraded to 62 PS (46 kW) in 1969.
In March 1971, a slightly facelifted version, called the Delica 75, arrived. This (the T120) received a small grille rather than the naked metal front of the earliest Delicas, and a new 1.4-litre Neptune (4G41) engine rated at 86 PS (63 kW) was added to the line-up. The smaller 1.1-litre engine may have remained available in a 600 kilograms (1,300 lb) version of the truck but if so, it soon vanished entirely.
After a fall 1974 facelift, the Delica received a new nose with much plastic cladding and double headlights, now mounted beneath the swage line. It was now known only as the "Delica 1400", as this was the only engine with which it was available (mention of a Delica 1200 is most likely apocryphal, perhaps an issue of confusion arising from the "120" chassis code). A longer wheelbase (T121) one-ton truck was added in 1976.
In export markets, this car was usually called the Colt T100/T120/1400. It became a massive success in Indonesia, where "Colt" became synonymous with minibus. Mitsubishi dominated the market and the T120 remained in production until 1982. The nametag was revived in February 1991 with a rebadged version of the Suzuki Carry Futura. Record, a Greek manufacturer of agricultural vehicles, plagiarized the Delica T120 design (even using the same windshield) for their fibreglass-bodied "GS2000" truck.
Social links
Mitsubishi Van model years
Common Mitsubishi Van problems
Based on the complaints from owners of Mitsubishi Express vans, several common problems have been highlighted:
- Engine Overheating: Some users have mentioned that the engine of the Mitsubishi Express can generate excessive heat, especially under the front seats, affecting the comfort inside the van. This issue can be more pronounced during summer months, requiring extra time for the engine to cool down before use.
- High Engine Oil Consumption: Another common problem noted by owners is high engine oil consumption. Some vans have been reported to consume significant amounts of engine oil without producing black smoke, indicating a potential issue with oil leakage or burning within the engine.
- Safety Concerns: The Mitsubishi Express has been criticized for its poor safety features, including the lack of airbags, ABS, and a crumple zone. Owners have expressed safety concerns related to poor handling in wet conditions and the absence of essential safety components, leading to accidents and near misses.
- Difficulty in Finding Parts: Owners have faced challenges in finding essential parts for Mitsubishi Express vans, such as a Charcoal Canister or a thermostat housing cover. This difficulty in sourcing parts has led to prolonged periods off the road while waiting for replacements, impacting the usability of the vehicle.
- Fuel Consumption: Some users have raised concerns about the fuel consumption of the Mitsubishi Express, indicating that the van feels thirsty on fuel. Improving fuel efficiency, such as by changing the differential ratio, has been a consideration for owners looking to enhance the van's performance in this aspect.
- Component Accessibility: Owners have highlighted difficulties in accessing and changing components within the engine of the Mitsubishi Express. The design of the van may require complex procedures, such as dropping the motor, to reach certain parts for maintenance or repairs.
These common problems reported by Mitsubishi Express van owners encompass a range of issues from engine performance and overheating to safety concerns and challenges in finding replacement parts. Addressing these issues promptly and ensuring regular maintenance can help mitigate potential problems and enhance the overall reliability and safety of the vehicle.
Percentage distribution of complaints by Mitsubishi Van years
We have researched Mitsubishi problems and analysed all the complaints filed against Mitsubishi Van cars and compiled the top 1 most problematic Mitsubishi Van model years:
Below you can see the percentage distribution of known problems by Mitsubishi Van model years.
Distribution of the number of complaints by Mitsubishi Van years
We've also compiled a chart for you with the number of complaints about Volkswagen Jetta cars of certain model years:
Mitsubishi Van car problems categorized by type of issue
After analysing all complaints related to Mitsubishi Van , it was concluded that the most common issues with these cars are:
- Electrical system problems
The graph below shows statistics for all Mitsubishi Van vehicle components and the number of complaints received.
Distribution of the number of complaints with fire by Van model years
There were a total of 2 complaints that resulted in a fire. In the graph you can see the distribution of the number of complaints by model year.
The NHTSA has received 2 complaints about various vehicle components related to the Mitsubishi Van . Below are the 25 most recent complaints reported for Mitsubishi Van vehicles.
List of Mitsubishi Van complaints
Mitsubishi Van 1988
- Date Of Incident: 1996-06-29
- Date Complaint: 1996-07-11
- Fire: 1
- Components: ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
- Summary: WHILE PARKED, VEHICLE CAUGHT FIRE UNDER PASSENGER'S SEAT, CAUSED BY FAULTY FUEL INJECTION WIRING HARNESS. *AK
Mitsubishi Van 1988
- Date Of Incident: 1996-06-29
- Date Complaint: 1996-07-11
- Fire: 1
- Components: ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
- Summary: WHILE PARKED, VEHICLE CAUGHT FIRE UNDER PASSENGER'S SEAT, CAUSED BY FAULTY FUEL INJECTION WIRING HARNESS. *AK
Recalls Mitsubishi Van
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has issued 1 recalls for different components of the Mitsubishi Van.You can explore the year of the Volkswagen Jetta you are interested in by selecting it from the list.
- Model: Mitsubishi Van 1988
- Report Received Date: 1995-05-24
- Manufacturer: MITSUBISHI AMERICA
- Components: SEAT BELTS:FRONT:BUCKLE ASSEMBLY
- Summary: THE FRONT SAFETY BELT BUCKLE RELEASE BUTTONS CAN BREAK. THESE RED PLASTIC RELEASE BUTTONS ARE MARKED "PRESS." IF A BUTTON BREAKS, PIECES CAN FALL INTO THE BUCKLE ASSEMBLY CAUSING THE BUCKLE TO OPERATE IMPROPERLY.
- Consequence: THE SAFETY BELTS WOULD NOT PROVIDE ADEQUATE PROTECTION TO AN OCCUPANT IN A VEHICLE CRASH.
- Remedy: OWNERS SHOULD PROMPTLY CHECK THE CONDITION AND OPERATION OF BOTH FRONT SAFETY BELT BUCKLES AND CAREFULLY INSPECT THE RED RELEASE BUTTON FOR ANY BREAKS OR CRACKS. THEY SHOULD ENSURE THAT BOTH BUCKLES ARE OPERATING PROPERLY BY INSERTING EACH LATCH PLATE INTO ITS BUCKLE, TUGGING ON THE BELT TO MAKE SURE THE LATCH IS SECURELY LOCKED, AND THEN PRESSING THE RELEASE BUTTON. THE LATCH PLATE SHOULD POP OUT OF THE BUCKLE WHEN THE BUTTON IS PRESSED. IF EITHER RELEASE BUTTON SHOWS A SIGN OF BREAKING OR CRACKING OR IF EITHER BUCKLE FAILS TO OPERATE PROPERLY, OWNERS SHOULD PROMPTLY CONTACT THEIR AUTHORIZED DEALER TO SCHEDULE AN APPOINTMENT TO HAVE THE BUCKLE REPLACED OR REPAIRED, FREE OF CHARGE. THE MANUFACTURER IS DEVELOPING A REMEDY DESIGNED TO PREVENT FAILURE OF THE BUTTONS THAT ARE NOT CURRENTLY BROKEN.